This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 8/7/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

August 7, 2007

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People -

 

Editorial:

Daniel Weintraub: Republicans tangle with old foe on global warming -

Sacramento Bee

 

Malibu Pier poised to recapture its past

Restaurants and other beach services are in the works after years of rebuilding delays. -

Los Angeles Times

 

Alameda County takes the lead in a grass-roots green initiative

New group takes on a hot topic by asking counties nationwide to cut warming emissions 80 percent by 2050 -

Contra Costa Times

 

Editorial:

Our View: Much hot air on melting glaciers

Boxer’s calls for economy-killing laws against greenhouse gases aren’t backed by latest research -

Marysville Appeal Democrat

 

***************************************************************

 

Editorial:

Daniel Weintraub: Republicans tangle with old foe on global warming

Sacramento Bee – 8/7/07

 

Jerry Brown, who has been confounding California Republicans for more than 30 years, is at it again.

 

The Democratic attorney general -- who served as governor in the 1970s and 1980s, led the California Democratic Party, ran for president and then served as mayor of Oakland -- is now in the middle of a dispute that has been blamed for blocking passage of the state budget more than six weeks after it is due.

 

Brown has made global warming one of his top areas of concern, and he is using his office to pressure local governments to account for the potential increase in greenhouse gas emissions when they consider new development. He has sued San Bernardino County to block its adoption of a 25-year master plan meant to guide growth in that booming region.

 

Brown's campaign has put the state's business leaders on edge, and their complaints found a receptive audience among Republicans in the state Senate. As part of the price for their votes on the state budget, those lawmakers are demanding a provision that would stop Brown -- or anyone else -- from filing any more such lawsuits until 2012.

 

Sen. Dick Ackerman of Irvine, the Senate Republican leader, said Brown's attempt to use global warming to slow development harkens back to his time as governor, when he proclaimed an "era of limits" and "basically stopped all freeway construction and development" for his eight years as chief executive.

 

Ackerman fears that Brown also will try to use global warming to restrict the use of public works bonds voters approved last fall.

 

"When the people of California overwhelmingly approved $40 billion worth of bonds, they wanted to put something in the ground, not have it all spent on litigation and challenges," Ackerman said. "His 'MO' has been to try to stop development and use this issue as a crutch. He'll do the same thing when people try to build a road or repair a levee."

 

In an interview, Brown told me that all he is doing is enforcing the California Environmental Quality Act, which requires local agencies to consider the potential environmental impacts of new development and take reasonable actions to reduce those effects.

 

Assembly Bill 32, the state's historic bill to fight global warming, requires California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by about 25 percent by 2020. But it will be years before that law takes full effect.

 

First, the Air Resources Board must write the regulations. Then, Brown suspects, business groups will sue to try to block many of those new rules.

 

In the meantime, Brown said, state and local officials should be doing everything they can to avoid making the problem worse, and he believes they were required to do so even before the passage of the new law.

 

"With AB 32 it becomes obvious that this is the state's goal," he said. "This is where we are going. Why keep adding if we can find feasible measures to reduce, if we are serious, if we believe global warming is as serious as 95 percent of the scientists say it is?"

 

Brown said he believes his office will soon reach a settlement with San Bernardino County. He also has sent letters challenging housing developments in San Jose and in Yuba County. He is monitoring transportation plans in Sacramento, Fresno, San Diego and Kern counties. And he is reviewing plans by Chevron and Conoco-Phillips to expand their oil refineries in Richmond.

 

Brown was a champion for growth in Oakland when he was mayor, and he says his goal is not to stop development. He just expects local governments at minimum to identify greenhouse gas emissions that can be attributed to the actions they are about to take and then consider ways in which they can reduce those emissions. He said his model is Marin County, which voluntarily adopted a greenhouse gas reduction plan last October.

 

The dispute has also put Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in a political bind.

 

As a proud advocate of AB 32, the governor has traveled around the country and around the world promoting California's leadership in the fight to limit greenhouse gas emissions. He says he thinks Brown has probably gone too far, too fast, in pressing their mutual cause, but he does not believe his fellow Republicans should be using the issue to further delay an already tardy budget.

 

Behind the scenes, Schwarzenegger's staff has been trying to broker a compromise that would limit lawsuits over land-use planning until the state establishes standards for local governments to use in measuring the potential greenhouse gases from development. A provision restricting the use of AB 32 in such lawsuits might satisfy Senate Republicans, even though Brown says he believes the state's other environmental laws give him wide leeway to intervene.

 

A perpetual minority, Republicans in the Legislature have leverage only when a bill requires a two-thirds majority to pass, as is the case with the budget. That's the only time their votes matter, and that's the only time anyone listens to them. At the moment, on this issue, they're making it clear that they want to be heard.#

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/311807.html

 

Malibu Pier poised to recapture its past

Restaurants and other beach services are in the works after years of rebuilding delays.

Los Angeles Times – 8/7/07

By Martha Groves, staff writer

 

It's one of the leading coastal landmarks of Southern California, but the Malibu Pier has often struggled to get the respect its colorful past would suggest it deserves.

Over the years, the pier has been lashed by a series of winter storms that destroyed pilings and forced costly repairs. It has endured construction delays caused by financially overextended contractors. Its revival has spawned legal or verbal tiffs between contractors, between the state and its concessionaire and between concession partners.

Since 1995, the pier has stood forlornly at the southern end of Malibu Lagoon State Beach as the state Department of Parks and Recreation prodded the pier's concessionaire to install the eateries and other amenities needed to resurrect the once vibrant venue and get revenue flowing again.

A sign in the window of what was once Alice's Restaurant (named for the song, according to the state parks agency) proclaims with unwarranted optimism: "Opening in early spring 2007 . . . a sit-down family-oriented restaurant in the style of a classic 1940s seafood house."

That target, like many others, was not met, but things are finally looking up. A sportfishing operation offers two departures a day. Dozens of people visit the pier regularly to stroll or fish. Concessionaire Malibu Pier Partners has opened the pier to special events, such as surf contests and free outdoor film screenings.

In perhaps the most important development, state parks officials announced in June that Malibu Pier Partners had struck a deal with Ruby Restaurant Group, based in Newport Beach, to open two eateries and a bar. At the start of the pier, in a white, wood-sided building with royal blue trim, will be the Beachcomber bar and restaurant, featuring seafood dishes and a mid-1940s atmosphere. At the seaward end, a building will house Ruby's Shake Shack, offering shakes, burgers and fries to go with the million-dollar view.

The company has for years operated restaurants at piers in Balboa, Seal Beach, Oceanside and Huntington Beach. Assuming the necessary approvals come through for the Malibu project, chairman and chief executive Doug Cavanaugh said he expects the "whole thing would happen probably no later than November."

There are also plans for coastal boat tours, a surf museum, a gift shop, a bait and tackle shop and beach equipment rentals.

Jefferson Wagner, owner of the nearby Zuma Jay surf shop, will handle the rentals of kayaks and boogie boards. But it's a far diminished role from what Wagner, a local surfer who decades ago was a boat-cleaning hand on the pier, had in mind when the state chose him as the pier's concessionaire in 2003. In need of funds, he subsequently agreed to become a partner with Alexander Leff, a San Francisco attorney. Wagner said Leff has kept him in the dark and held up progress on the pier. Leff declined to discuss the disagreement.

Until recently, parks officials have been none too pleased with Leff. In December, the agency notified him that Malibu Pier Partners was in breach of contract for, among other things, failing to pay rent on time or submit timely construction documents and for allowing a shirtless man to collect parking fees from the back of a pickup truck without offering receipts.

But the prospect of relaunching the time-consuming bidding process prompted the state to work out its differences with Leff.

"Yes, it's true this took much longer than we wanted," said Roy Stearns, a state parks spokesman. "If ever there was a project where every pitfall possible emerged, it was this project. We are ecstatic that we will have the pier fully open this year."

Leff said he believed that "the wait will have been worth it and that both the local Malibu community and visitors will be very pleased at the final result." Meanwhile, he continues to defend himself in court in pier-related suits filed by a restaurant company and a consultant.

It's hard to imagine why this classic pier on busy Pacific Coast Highway, in a place that many have likened to the Riviera, has suffered such hard times.

The structure was commissioned in the early 1900s by businessman Frederick Rindge and his wife, May, as a shipping wharf for hides and grains from their 17,000-acre Malibu Rancho. It also served as a dock for unloading materials for building the Rindge family's private 20-mile railroad, which ran from Las Flores Canyon to the Ventura County line.

During the 1920s and '30s, film studios shot sea epics at the pier. In 1929, the Rindges' daughter, Rhoda Rindge Adamson, erected a tower-like home for her son at the highway end of the pier, within view of her tile-bedecked Adamson House. (In 1972, the tower became part of the newly opened Alice's Restaurant.) Protecting the tower was a rubble-studded concrete-block wall.

In 1934, the pier opened to the public, with Cesar Romero and Buster Crabbe among the many Hollywood dignitaries who strode through the rough-hewn gates and fished for halibut and barracuda from a barge anchored offshore.

After the Rindges' land development company, Marblehead Land Co., went bankrupt in 1936, the pier was taken over by bondholders who had helped finance Malibu development. It was extended to its current 780-foot length.

During World War II, the Coast Guard used the pier as a lookout post. After a storm demolished much of the structure in the winter of 1943-44, businessman William Huber bought it for $50,000 and rebuilt it. After the war, Huber constructed the familiar twin buildings at the seaward end for a bait and tackle shop and restaurant. In 1980, the state purchased the somewhat battered property.

A 1983 El Niño storm destroyed many of the pilings, and parks officials closed the pier for 18 months. Soon after it reopened, the state named it a historic point of interest. But big storms in 1993 and 1994 again trashed much of the structure, and it was closed in 1995. The pier has been in limited use for the last few years.

One of those looking forward to having the pier back in action is Jose Amato, 48, a Hollywood Hills resident who was fishing there one recent dazzlingly sunny afternoon.

"It's a beautiful place, but we don't have any facilities," he said. "I've always wondered why all the locations are empty. They can open some restaurants for the tourists walking the pier. It's going to be a very nice place that people can go and enjoy."#

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-malibupier7aug07,1,2955047.story?coll=la-headlines-california&ctrack=1&cset=true

 

Alameda County takes the lead in a grass-roots green initiative

New group takes on a hot topic by asking counties nationwide to cut warming emissions 80 percent by 2050

Contra Costa Times – 8/7/07

By Chris Metinko, staff writer

 

 

Environmental consciousness is nothing new to the East Bay -- think the ban in Berkeley and Oakland on polystyrene foam -- but now Alameda County officials want the whole county to go green, and soon the whole nation.

 

In July, Alameda County became one of 12 charter members launching the Cool Counties initiative in conjunction with the Sierra Club. It is a program designed to combat global warming by asking counties nationwide to reduce warming emissions 80 percent by 2050.

 

Counties also will try to apply pressure to urge the federal government to adopt legislation requiring an 80 percent emissions reduction by 2050 and raising fuel economy standards to 35 miles per gallon within a decade.

 

"The federal government is doing nothing right now on this issue," said Scott Haggerty, president of the Alameda County Board of Supervisors. "That's why we need a grass-roots effort like this. We need counties and cities to come together and get the federal government to do something."

 

The 12 founding counties in the new green initiative are among the largest in the country -- with more than 17 million people across 10 states living in those counties -- including King County in Washington, Fairfax and Arlington counties in Virginia, Nassau in New York, Montgomery and Queen Anne in Maryland, Miami-Dade in Florida, Cook in Illinois, Shelby in Tennessee, Hennepin in Minnesota and Dane in Wisconsin.

 

That Alameda County was asked to join the initial list was no accident.

 

The county already has a handful of projects under way to cut its carbon footprint: County facilities are conserving $6 million of energy a year and generating on-site power through 3.1 megawatts of solar installations and a 1-megawatt fuel cell at Santa Rita Jail in Dublin.

 

The county also has two different types of hybrid cars in its fleet and one car powered by vegetable oil. In addition, it has started the Alameda County Climate Protection Project, a campaign the county's cities can join in an effort to cut emissions.

 

"Alameda County has been one of the true leaders in this movement," said Jim Lopez, deputy chief of staff in King County, Wash., which is credited with helping jump-start the Cool Counties program.

 

Haggerty said counties and local governments have to set an example, especially considering it is those bodies that set rules for others.

 

"If we're going to make businesses follow certain regulations, government also has to watch what it's doing," Haggerty said. "That's only fair."

 

Haggerty added that despite slower revenue growth and rising costs for county programs, initiatives such as the Cool Counties program are too important to delay.

"It's not always about the money," said Haggerty, pointing to the $6.1 million fuel cell project. "This board (of supervisors) has always been extremely supportive of issues such as this. It's up to us, local government and even the state to show we are willing to put our money where our mouth is."

 

Alameda County officials would like to see their counterparts in other counties do the same. On Tuesday, the board voted unanimously to adopt the Cool Counties Climate Stabilization Declaration and urged all other counties in the state to join the new initiative to combat rising world temperatures. Haggerty said he already has been in contact with other counties.

 

Laura Garcia Darensburg with Contra Costa County said that although that county has yet to enter the Cool Counties campaign, it has joined the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, a group of governments committed to environmentally friendly development and the study of greenhouse gas emissions.

Haggerty said he is hopeful a majority of California counties will join by the time the California State Association of Counties meeting is hosted by Alameda County in November.

 

That could happen if similar programs in the past are an indication. The Sierra Club's Cool Cities program, working in conjunction with Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels, has been encouraging cities to sign on to the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement. Nearly 600 cities have signed on to that pact so far, including Albany, El Cerrito, Lafayette and Richmond in Contra Costa County and Berkeley, Dublin, Fremont, Hayward, Newark, Oakland, Pleasanton and San Leandro in Alameda County.

 

Josh Dorner, a spokesman with the Sierra Club, said that although the Cool Counties program is a necessary outgrowth of the Cool Cities initiative, counties have more control over land use and transportation and regional planning in general.

"Cities can do a lot," Dorner said. "But counties can do even more."#

http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_6563128?nclick_check=1

 

Editorial:

Our View: Much hot air on melting glaciers

Boxer’s calls for economy-killing laws against greenhouse gases aren’t backed by latest research

Marysville Appeal Democrat – 8/6/07

 

Sen. Barbara Boxer returned from a helicopter and boat tour of Greenland to breathlessly announce that because of global warming, “this massive glacier that’s five miles wide and 500 miles long ... (is) crashing into the sea ... moving, and it’s melting and every single day, 24 hours a day, 20 million tons of ice comes off that glacier and streams into the ocean.”

Her remedy? Pass a half-dozen new laws in Congress to stem evil manmade, greenhouse gas emissions by imposing Draconian limits on all industries. “From this trip,” she intoned, “you get the sense of urgency.”

Alarmists like Boxer claim Greenland glaciers are melting because of manmade carbon dioxide, which they say is warming the atmosphere at a dangerous rate. Some facts are called for.

“The problem for global warming alarmists,” wrote James M. Taylor, senior fellow for environmental policy at the Heartland Institute, “is that the poles currently show no sign of human-induced global warming.” Antarctica is in a prolonged cold spell, gaining ice, not losing it. Despite Boxer’s wide-eyed fervor, even Arctic temperatures have been relatively stable since the 1970s, Taylor said.

Worse yet (for Boxer and her co-alarmists), Greenland just had its two coldest decades since the 1910s, and “recent temperature readings indicate the cold spell is continuing,” Taylor said. While Greenland is losing ice at lower elevations, it’s gaining ice inland, more than offsetting the losses.

Boxer and her contingent of equally alarmed congressional tourists were presented with an illustration of what “could” happen “if” Greenland’s glaciers melted completely away, raising sea levels 20 feet. The problem, again, is that even the global warming proponents at the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have dramatically revised downward the scary prediction of 20-foot increases to a yawn-inspiring seven inches or so over the next 100 years, hardly enough to raise Boxer’s tour boat.

The Penn State University professor who developed an “illustration” of a 20-foot rise in sea level for the touring congressional delegation’s edification admitted it’s not really a forecast or a prediction. What it is, however, is merely another worse-case scenario employed to scare the public and their representatives into Draconian laws limiting liberty and wreaking economic havoc.

Before climbing aboard Boxer’s global warming tour bus, consider that the latest global warming research goes against alarmism. In the “most comprehensive ever” study on Greenland glacier movements, Danish researchers found in 2006 that “Greenland’s glaciers have been shrinking for the past century, suggesting that the ice melt is not a recent phenomenon caused by global warming,” let alone by recent manmade CO2 increases.

A 2006 study from Los Alamos National Laboratory, Space and Remote Sensing Sciences found Greenland’s warming rate in 1920-30 to be 50 percent higher than in 1995-2005, suggesting carbon dioxide “could not be the cause.” The study also concluded: “(W)e find no direct evidence to support the claims that the Greenland ice sheet is melting due to increased temperature caused by increased atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide.”

Physicist Dr. Syun-Ichi Akasofu, former director of University of Alaska Fairbanks’ Geophysical Institute and International Arctic Research Center, told a congressional hearing in 2006 that highly publicized climate models that predict a disappearing Arctic are nothing more than “science fiction.”

And, in July, Dr. Nigel Calder, co-author of “The Chilling Stars: A New Theory on Climate Change,” said flatly: “In reality, global temperatures have stopped rising. Data for both the surface and the lower air show no warming since 1999.” Meanwhile, CO2 has increased during that period, completely undermining alarmists’ call for Draconian measures to curb greenhouse gases.#

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/articles/warming_52221___article.html/greenland_global.html

 

 

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost1.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive