This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 8/29/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

August 29, 2008

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

 

 

 

Editorial

Legislators: Dry up or water supply will

The Modesto Bee- 8/28/08

 

Orange County judge keeps storm-drain runoff standards in place for now:  earlier ruling against the rules had frozen them, preventing builders from getting necessary California state permits. A Los Angeles regional board must review the standards.

The Los Angeles Times- 8/29/08

 

A fearful New Orleans prepares for a potential Hurricane Gustav: The tropical storm is about five days away from possible landfall in Louisiana and is predicted to build to a Category 3 hurricane. Three years after Katrina, the mayor and other politicians are decis

The Los Angeles Times- 8/29/08

 

Eastern Municipal Water District has own 'cop' chasing down water wasters

Riverside Press- Enterprise- 8/28/08

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Editorial

Legislators: Dry up or water supply will

The Modesto Bee- 8/28/08

 

How long have Sacramento's politicians been arguing over a water bond? A year? A decade? Or does it just feel like forever?

 

As the politicians go round and round without budging, it's only natural to come full circle. And so we have. A couple of months ago, Gov. Schwarzenegger proposed a $9.3 billion water bond -- his second try for such a bond in two years. On Aug. 15, Assembly Democrats proposed a $9.8 billion water bond, their second try in two years.

 

After looking at the two very similar ideas, it's clear we've been here before. And the same issue that kept our elected officials from getting a bond onto the ballot in 2007 is likely to kill it again in 2008.

 

In 2007, Schwarzenegger proposed a $9.1 billion water infrastructure package with a down payment on two dams (Temperance Flat near Fresno and Sites Reservoir west of Sacramento), an improved "conveyance" (call it anything except a peripheral canal) and conservation programs. Sen. Don Perata, D-Oakland, countered with a $6.8 billion proposal, but his figures went up. When they did, the plans became similar in all ways but one: how the money would be allocated.

 

The governor's proposal was based on a "continuing" allocation, meaning once projects were approved there would be only regulatory oversight in spending the money. Perata's proposal required an "annual allocation" by the Legislature, which meant projects would be subject to annual review before the money to build them would be released.

 

Political principles can be adjusted, but divvying up money allows for no compromise. So the water bond never reached the ballot and Californians never got the opportunity to secure their liquid future.

 

Now it's August 2008, and it's déjà vu all over again. We have competing water bond proposals with very similar elements. The most significant difference is in how to allocate the money.

 

Fresno Assemblyman Juan Arambula is the leading proponent for the Democrats' effort. He says his bill is a good compromise -- except that it isn't, because it still contains the "annual allocation."

 

Assemblyman Tom Berryhill, R-Modesto, is leading the charge for the governor's proposal (originally carried by Sen. Dave Cogdill).

 

Berryhill has guaranteed that not one Republican will vote for a plan that includes annual appropriations because such annual review provides too many "offramps" for the money.

 

So we're back to the same old debate, and we're likely to get the same old result. The deadline for putting a water bond on the Nov. 4 ballot probably is Monday. Meanwhile, after two years of drought, cities up and down the state are restricting water use by 10 percent or 20 percent.

 

Arguing over water can be thirsty business. We just hope the politicians' mouths run dry before the state does.#

http://www.modbee.com/opinion/story/411200.html

 

 

 

Orange County judge keeps storm-drain runoff standards in place for now:  earlier ruling against the rules had frozen them, preventing builders from getting necessary California state permits. A Los Angeles regional board must review the standards.

The Los Angeles Times- 8/29/08

By Jean Merl, Staff Writer

A judge ruled Thursday that water quality standards designed to protect the region's beaches from polluted storm-drain runoff will remain in place, at least for the time being.

Orange County Superior Court Judge Thierry Patrick Colaw granted a request from a coalition of environmental groups that sought to keep the standards in place while the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board complied with the judge's order to review its runoff standards.

This summer, Colaw had ruled in favor of a consortium of local inland cities and a building industry association that had filed a lawsuit -- against the state Water Resources Control Board and the local board -- seeking to overturn the regulations.

The local board said the ruling, which applied to most cities in Los Angeles and Ventura counties, left regulators without a major tool to deal with storm water runoff into the ocean.

Builders could not get the necessary permits from the state board because the standards had been frozen.

"The court's decision provides much-needed relief and just in time for our Labor Day celebration," Francine Diamond, chairwoman of the local board, said Thursday.

David Beckman, an attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council representing environmentalists, also hailed the ruling.

"If you drink water or like to swim in the ocean, today was a very good day," Beckman said, adding that the environmental groups would still probably appeal the judge's ruling that the standards be reviewed and modified.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit said the local board had failed to consider whether the standards could be reasonably met and what economic effect they would have.

The disputed standards were imposed to try to end bacterial contamination at local beaches, some of which are among the most polluted in the state. Pathogens flowing from storm drains into the surf can cause rashes, ear infections and other maladies.#

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/environment/la-me-water29-2008aug29,0,7708109.story?track=rss

 

 

 

A fearful New Orleans prepares for a potential Hurricane Gustav: The tropical storm is about five days away from possible landfall in Louisiana and is predicted to build to a Category 3 hurricane. Three years after Katrina, the mayor and other politicians are decis

The Los Angeles Times- 8/29/08

By Miguel Bustillo, Staff Writer

NEW ORLEANS — Fear and foreboding gripped this still-mending city Thursday as a potential Category 3 hurricane whirled toward the Gulf Coast on the eve of Hurricane Katrina's three-year anniversary.

Tropical Storm Gustav, which was lashing Jamaica after Haitian officials said it had killed 51 people there, was still almost five days away from the Crescent City, according to the National Hurricane Center. Projections varied greatly, putting its path anywhere from the Florida panhandle to southeastern Texas by Tuesday.

But Louisiana seemed the most likely place for Gustav to make landfall, and politicians here were acting decisively to prepare for the worst -- a sharp contrast from the response to Katrina, which was widely criticized as disorganized and sluggish. New Orleans avoided a direct hit from Katrina on Aug. 29, 2005, but flooding after it came ashore led to levee breaks that inundated four-fifths of the city, killing more than 1,500 people in Louisiana.

New Orleans Mayor C. Ray Nagin left the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday and announced that he would order a mandatory evacuation of New Orleans if a Category 3 storm got within 60 hours of his city. Meteorologists predict Gustav will swell into a Category 3 hurricane, defined as a storm with winds between 111 mph and 130 mph.

"Ladies and gentlemen, in my estimation I feel we are ready for this threat," Nagin said Thursday during a City Hall news conference. He added that he did not expect an evacuation until Saturday.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal declared a state of emergency, activated the National Guard and triggered a government contract that allowed him to bring up to 700 buses to the hurricane zone to help with evacuations. The rising GOP star also said he was prepared to skip next week's Republican National Convention, where he is scheduled to speak.

"We have to take this storm seriously," Jindal said during a news conference in the capital, Baton Rouge. He added that state and federal authorities would ensure no looting occurred following an evacuation. "We want people to know their property will be safe."

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator R. David Paulison also traveled to Louisiana on Thursday to coordinate disaster response. Chertoff said during a news conference with Jindal that search-and-rescue teams and other emergency personnel were already mobilizing.

Officials' biggest fear by far was a direct hit to New Orleans, where post-Katrina rebuilding remains a work in progress. Roughly two-thirds of the population has returned and countless homeowners have used their savings to fix up their properties. But many homes still lie in disrepair, and the byzantine system of canals, pumps and levees that is supposed to protect the city from flooding remains incomplete.

"Although we have made strong strides in rebuilding our infrastructure, the levees have not been fully repaired and we have an $800-million budget gap to complete our sewage and water systems," Nagin said earlier in a statement.

Tourists nonchalantly strolled through the French Quarter on Thursday afternoon, and restaurants were filled with diners eating shrimp po' boys and catfish almondine as usual. But the city canceled some of the events it had planned for the third anniversary of Katrina, including a jazz funeral, and in neighborhoods hit hard by Katrina locals were apprehensively watching the Weather Channel.

A report published Thursday found that almost half of the deaths from Hurricane Katrina were people 75 or older, and drowning was the leading cause. Elderly residents may have disregarded warnings, feared abandoning their homes to possible looting, or simply didn't want to leave familiar surroundings, according to the study, which was published online and will appear in the October print edition of the journal Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.

Everyone was making plans to get out of town this time -- so much so that hotel rooms were already impossible to find in Baton Rouge. Some New Orleanians reported having to search as far as Arkansas to find emergency lodging.

"I'm going to tell you right now -- this time I'll be going," said Tom Allen, 46, as he helped rebuild a house on a concrete slab in the Lower 9th Ward, a neighborhood devastated by Katrina that is still largely vacant. Last time, Allen admitted, he thought he could brave it out. He had to rescue his elderly neighbors when floodwaters rose and wound up with thousands of others inside the fetid Louisiana Superdome.

"No use lyin' to you: I've got no faith in these levees," added Allen's work partner, Leonard Jacobs, 75, who had recently rebuilt his own home in the neighborhood. "We're in a soup bowl right here."

The threat of Gustav had already caused oil companies to evacuate more than 1,300 workers from offshore platforms in the Gulf of Mexico, driving the price of crude past $120 a barrel by Thursday afternoon. Another threat, Tropical Storm Hanna, also emerged Thursday, posing a potential threat to the Southeastern U.S.

In Chalmette, a city outside New Orleans in St. Bernard Parish that was also overwhelmed by floodwaters three years ago, neighbors watched Gustav's motions with squeamish stomachs.

A year ago, much of the area was still empty, and many vowed they would not return. There were still a fair number of damaged homes, including one still shrouded with a big blue roof tarp, but many residents had decided to rebuild after all, discovering that they missed the close-knit world of "Da Parish."

Lonney Sciortino leaned over his pickup truck, talking to neighbor Frank Lewis about how he was planning to take a gun with him during the evacuation, in case chaos ensued on the highway.

Both thought about boarding up their homes before deciding there was no use. Chalmette's potential problem, they agreed, would be flooding from failing levees, which is what inundated homes with more than 7 feet of water here after Katrina and after Hurricane Betsy four decades before.

"A lot of people were proud they rebuilt here a few days ago, but right now, it's a different mood," said Sciortino, 57, who lamented that his children, who used to live down the street, were now living in Gulfport, Miss., and Abita Springs, La. "If we get hit here one more time, we're done. Chalmette will be abandoned."#

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-usgustav29-2008aug29,0,3546049.story?track=ntothtml

 

 

 

Eastern Municipal Water District has own 'cop' chasing down water wasters

Riverside Press- Enterprise- 8/28/08

By JENNIFER BOWLES

The sun is just rising over the Inland region and Bill Stephens is on his cop beat, chasing down abusers. Water abusers, that is.

Perhaps the region's first and only water cop, he arms himself with a camera looking for over-saturated lawns across a vast area of western Riverside County from Moreno Valley to Murrieta that is served by Perris-based Eastern Municipal Water District.

 

"I just saw a spot back there," he said, bringing his van to an abrupt halt. He jumps out to check a broken sprinkler head outside a large commercial facility in Perris. The leaking water drenched the sidewalk and gushed down the curb to the road.

 

"That's running pretty good, I'd say a good six to seven gallons per minute," Stephens said.

 

Although Stephens scours the region only for runoff outside commercial and industrial complexes, the district's employees will start looking at residential yards for similar violations starting Monday. Fines beginning at $100 will be assessed if two warnings go unheeded.

 

"Pretty much anywhere that water leaves the property over the sidewalk and into the gutter, we're going to look for, taking pictures," he said.

 

Bill Stephens, a conservation program specialist with the Eastern Municipal Water District, has additional duties these days. He checks out signs of water runoff at commercial and industrial complexes. After two warnings, a fine will be issued.

 

In a time of drought and court-ordered restrictions on Northern California water that have reduced deliveries by at least 30 percent, agencies are taking a stronger look at the biggest water hog -- outdoor lawns. Lawns can account for 60 to 80 percent of a home's total water use.

 

The $100 fine assessed by Eastern will show up on a customer's water bill if a third violation occurs within 12 months of the first warning. The fine jumps to $200 and $300 for the fourth and fifth violations, respectively, and never goes beyond $300. People won't be penalized for runoff if they are washing their cars, the district said.

 

Like the commercial and industrial offenders, residents will have 14 days to fix the problem.

 

Stephens takes note of the offense outside the commercial facility, snaps a few photos and, like throwing a dart, tosses down his calling card on the soggy earth: a gray flag that reminds folks to "Use water wisely. Stop runoff."

 

"We don't want to collect the money. We want to get their attention," Stephens said.

 

The Water Beat

Since November, Stephens has been driving by schools, city parks, warehouses and other commercial properties in Perris, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, San Jacinto or Hemet.

 

Normally a conservation program specialist for the district, he tracks streams of water cascading over sidewalks and onto streets.

 

Sometimes the stained asphalt reveals a repeat offender. Other times, he has to crouch below bushes to find the culprit, whether it is a broken sprinkler head or an overactive irrigation system.

 

"This water is coming from somewhere," he says as he follows the trail to the front of a housing development. There, water from the sprinklers arcs over patches of browning grass, and instead waters the sidewalk and creates a canal at the bottom of the slope.

 

Stephens explains that the problem can be as simple as fixing the nozzle.

 

"It needs to be fine-tuned so you get that curtain of water, and so it picks up the brown spots," he said.

 

Other water agencies in the Inland region have talked about the idea of employing a water cop like Stephens but have yet to do it. Still, many Inland water agencies in the last couple of years have promoted drought-resistant plants and efficient sprinkler systems to homeowners as a way to reduce the amount of water used on landscaping.

 

Considering Hot Lines

Dennis Mahr, a spokesman with the Coachella Valley Water District, said desert cities have considered developing joint hot lines that would allow neighbors to report runoff.

 

At Eastern Municipal, which serves about 660,000 people, the water district has set up an e-mail account for residents to report overwatering.

In Long Beach, more than 3,000 reports of overwatering and other water-use violations have been logged in the last year on a city-run hot line, e-mail and Web site, said Ryan Alsop, a spokesman for the Long Beach Water Department. It is part of a major campaign that has helped the coastal city set 10-year record lows in seven of the last 10 months, he said.

 

Violation Means Letter

After a water violation report, the city sends a letter to remind people of the dire water-supply situation, but there is no fine, Alsop said.

 

Eastern's board approved the runoff fines for their residential customers in May as part of an update to its overall water-use efficiency plan.

 

Melanie Nieman, a district spokeswoman, said she hoped that once customers get a warning about runoff, they will call the district to get more information or request a water audit, where a district specialist would help them pinpoint their problem spots inside and outside the home.

 

She said recommendations may be as simple as turning down the irrigation system to fewer minutes or fewer days of the week.

 

"It's something that people can do without sacrificing their quality of life," she said.

 

Board member Randy Record, a San Jacinto farmer, said although he voted for the plan, he believes a tiered rate structure that would charge more for those who use more water than allocated would provide a stronger incentive. The district is working on that pricing system, which will start as early as spring.

 

"I'm going to reiterate to staff that that is the last resort," Record said of residential fines.

 

Record said he prefers the program to continuing to scrutinize large public landscaped areas that sit outside commercial and industrial venues. He said he still comes across vast amounts of runoff at a major intersection in San Jacinto, most likely coming from a gas station and a fast-food restaurant.

 

"Until we get those kind of situations resolved, I don't want to go after homeowners," he said.

 

Still, Record said, he doesn't think the public understands the depth of the water-supply problem. Water rationing could be in the region's near future, he said.

 

"If it doesn't rain this winter," he said, "it's going to be really serious." #

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_watercop28.47b28b7.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATER QUALITY - 8/29/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

August 29, 2008

 

4. Water Quality –

 

 

Water board sues U.S. over mothball fleet

The San Francisco Chronicle- 8/29/08

A regional water board is readying a lawsuit against the U.S. Maritime Administration claiming federal authorities have allowed toxic chemicals and metals from the mothball fleet to continue to leach into Suisun Bay.

Ex-teacher pleads no contest to filming girls 08.29.08

The San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board contends the 50-plus decrepit ships - some cargo ships dating to World War II - have dumped asbestos, used oil and as much as 19 tons of mercury, lead and copper from their hulls and pose hazards to water quality, commercial and sport fishing, fish migration and endangered species.

Unless federal maritime officials halt the pollution discharges in 60 days, the water board plans to file suit in U.S. District Court in Sacramento under the Clean Water Act.

Last fall, three environmental organizations sued to force the Maritime Administration to remove the ships from Suisun Bay. That case is winding its way through the federal court in Sacramento and is on track for a September 2009 trial date. Meantime, the ships remain - about 57 considered badly corroded.

Despite ongoing complaints, maritime officials said the water board's move was disappointing and highlights the agency's rock-and-a-hard-place position in the Bay Area.

In essence, the Maritime Administration said it cannot move the ships without first cleaning them, according to a U.S. Coast Guard requirement under the National Invasive Species Act. Cleaning the ships, however, can release more toxic substances into the water, thereby violating the Clean Water Act.

Public affairs Director Shannon Russell said her agency complied with the water board's January 2007 request to stop moving ships out of Suisun Bay for fear of water contamination and environmental damage. Working with the water board over the last two years, the federal agency attempted to create technology that would contain up to 90 percent of pollutants discharged from cleaning the ships' hulls.

Russell said the water board was not satisfied with the technology.

Meanwhile, the Maritime Administration disposed of more than a dozen obsolete and decaying ships from Virginia and Texas, all of which were in better shape than the vessels in Suisun Bay.

"Other states have concluded that it is better for the environment to remove these vessels in a timely manner," Russell said in an interview.

But Bruce Wolfe, executive officer of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, said the cleaning technology was less than convincing. More importantly, he said, maritime officials have dragged their feet on painting the ships and removing debris - measures that would help stem the noxious flow of chemicals and metals.

Recently, the Maritime Administration offered to move four ships to Mare Island in Vallejo for dismantling, Wolfe said. Still, Wolfe complained that maritime officials are not moving fast enough.

"That leaves over 50 ships out there," Wolfe said. "And there are so many problems it's obvious they're going to be there for a while. They need to take aggressive action to maintain those ships."

Wolfe suggested that the ships be sent to dry dock to be patched together and repainted. However, there are concerns that the ships may be too fragile to be raised out of the water.#

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/29/BA3R12K9BU.DTL

 

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 8/29/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

August 29, 2008

 

3. Watersheds –

 

 

+++++++++Nothing Significant++++++++++++

 

 

 

 

 

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 8/29/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

August 29, 2008

 

 

 

Editorial:

How dry we are! Let's act like it, too

The Sacramento Bee- 8/29/08

 

Perata's Measure to Improve State's Water System Passes Assembly Committee

California Political Desk

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Editorial:

How dry we are! Let's act like it, too

The Sacramento Bee- 8/29/08

 

The exposed stumps and shoreline of Folsom Lake tell the story this year.

 

With reservoir levels so low, Californians can't afford to waste a drop. Conservation has to be part of a multi-pronged strategy to stretch supplies and survive droughts.

 

To that end, Assemblyman John Laird is trying to pass a bill that would require a 20 percent reduction in urban per-capita water usage by 2020. Cities and counties would have flexibility in how to reach this target, but they could no longer casually water their sidewalks, as occurs almost every day in Sacramento, Los Angeles and other cities.

 

Laird's legislation, AB 2175, has passed the Assembly but is in trouble in the Senate. Its survival could depend on two local senators – Mike Machado of Linden and Darrell Steinberg of Sacramento.

 

Machado, a farmer, has long had his sights on AB 2175. Originally, the bill included a conservation target for agriculture, the largest consumer of water. Machado and other growers objected to this provision, so Laird weakened it to require just "best management practices" for farmers.

 

Despite that concession, Machado has continued to press for additional amendments. He seems determined to derail the bill.

 

For his part, Steinberg supports AB 2175 but is wavering on serving as its floor jockey in the Senate. With Folsom ordering mandatory cutbacks and the state facing a water crisis, the incoming Senate president needs to be out in front on this important conservation bill. A 20 percent reduction goal is doable. It shouldn't need to wait until next year.#

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1194414.html

 

 

 

Perata's Measure to Improve State's Water System Passes Assembly Committee

California Political Desk

The California Chronicle- 8/28/08

 

Legislation by Senate President pro Tem Don Perata (D-Oakland) that would fund water storage, reliability and conservation efforts with already approved bond money cleared the Assembly Special Committee on Water.

SB 1XX (Second Extraordinary Session) appropriates $842 million in Proposition 84 and Proposition 1-E dollars that voters passed in 2006. These funds are desperately needed by water agencies to address the current water drought and fire crisis and to provide immediate investments in water supply reliability.

"This bill is the first step to addressing California´s long-term water needs," Perata said. "SB 1XX gets money out the door immediately so water agencies can tackle the most pressing problems, boost supplies and improve water reliability for all Californians."

The legislation includes $200 million to help stabilize the Sacramento San Joaquin Bay Delta, the fulcrum of the state´s water supply system. The funding will help prevent catastrophic failure of the Delta´s levees and accommodate pumping restrictions mandated by a federal court ruling.

In addition, SB 1XX provides $100 million to help clean up ground water basins in Southern California that can store more water than the entire volume of Lake Tahoe.

A summary of the measure is below.

Outline of SB 1xx (Perata)

Total Appropriation: $842,457,000

Proposition 1E: $285,000,000

1. State System of Flood Control/levee improvement program: $135,000,000 to DWR for acquisition/design/construction of Delta emergency preparedness supplies/projects

2. Stormwater Flood Management program: $150,000,000 to DWR for stormwater flood management projects

a. At least $100,000,000 to address immediate public health and safety needs

b. $20,000,000 to local agencies for combined municipal sewer/stormwater systems

c. $20,000,000 available for SF Bay watersheds.

Proposition 84: $552,975,000

1. Small community drinking water: $50,000,000 to DPH for grants

2. Groundwater clean-up: $50,400,000 to DPH for contamination prevention/clean-up projects



a. up to $10,000,000 for projects on DTSC or National Priorities lists.

b. $2,000,000 for Tulare Basin and Salinas Valley pilot projects.

3. Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM): $213,275,000 to DWR:

a. $100,000,000 for implementation, including not less than $20 million for water conservation projects necessary to meet a 20 percent reduction in per capita water use by the year 2020.

b. $47,000,000 for planning and local groundwater assistance.

c. $35,575,000 for interregional projects

d. $20,700,000 for program delivery costs

4. Delta water quality: $95,000,000 to DWR

a. $55,000,000 to DWR for Delta water intake facilities projects

b. $40,000,000 for water quality projects

5. Delta sustainability early actions: $100,000,000 to DWR for restoration of Delta islands

6. Statewide water planning: $37,000,000 to DWR:

a. $12,000,000 for CalFed surface storage planning/feasibility studies

b. $15,000,000 for flood/water system re-operation pilot projects

c. $10,000,000 for update of Water Plan, including climate change impact evaluations

7. Protection of rivers and streams: $17,300,000:

a. $10,000,000 to the State Coastal Conservancy for Santa Ana River Parkway

b. $7,300,000 to DWR for Urban Streams Restoration Program

Proposition 50: $3,760,000

CalFed surface storage studies: $3,760,000 to DWR

Proposition 13: $5,722,000

1. $2,272,000 to DWR for Sac River Hamilton City Area Flood Control Damage Reduction

2. $3,450,000 to DWR for CalFed Drinking Water Quality Program: Franks Tract Pilot Project

Policy: Integrated Regional Water Management Guidelines

SB 1xx will incorporate IRWM guideline development concepts and language currently in AB 1654 (Huffman).#

http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/72536

 

 

 

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Item for 8/29/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

August 29, 2008

 

1.  Top Item -

 

 

 

Assembly Democrats prevail on water bill: With three days left in the session, legislators also vote to ban dogs on drivers' laps and put warnings on 'alcopops.'

The Los Angeles Times- 8/29/08

 

Assembly approves plan to invest in urgent water needs

The California Chronicle- 8/29/08

 

Canal foes: Delta promises broken: Farmers, anglers say health of estuary neglected

The Stockton Record- 8/29/08

 

Water bill divides county's reps: Malfa, Wolk disagree on climate change, effects of analyzing it

The Woodland Daily Democrat- 8/28/08

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

Assembly Democrats prevail on water bill: With three days left in the session, legislators also vote to ban dogs on drivers' laps and put warnings on 'alcopops.'

The Los Angeles Times- 8/29/08

By Nancy Vogel, Staff Writer

In a heated debate Thursday, Assembly Republicans and Democrats agreed that California needs more reliable water supplies.

But Republicans voted against spending $820 million from voter-approved water bonds because, they said, Democrats had not consulted them and too much of the money was dedicated to studies instead of construction.

"I'm studied out," said Assemblyman Joel Anderson (R-San Diego). "What my constituents want is brick and mortar."

But the dominant Democrats overrode Republicans' objections and passed a bill to spend $820 million from four water bonds.

The money would go toward preparing for an earthquake in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, from which most of the state's drinking and irrigation water is pumped; finding supplies for rural communities with contaminated aquifers; and projects around the state for conservation, recycling and groundwater cleanup.

"This is about putting to work money the voters want us to put to work," said Assemblywoman Lori Saldana (D-San Diego).

With three days remaining to approve or reject bills, the Legislature also acted to ban dogs in drivers' laps, improve patients' access to information on end-of-life care, adjust laws on abandoned newborns and put warning labels on fruity drinks called "alcopops."

The water measure, SB 1XX by Senate President Don Perata (D-Oakland), passed 43 to 25 and goes next to the Senate for approval of amendments.

Of the $18.5 billion California voters have agreed to borrow since 1996 for water projects, nearly $11 billion has been spent.

The measure to help terminally ill people received final passage in the Assembly on Thursday. It would require doctors and nurses to describe all legal end-of-life options for them, such as hospice care at home and the right to refuse treatment.

Republicans rejected the bill as a "slippery slope" that could encourage a sick person to seek death rather than burden family with their care.

"Life is precious and given by God," said Assemblyman Ted Gaines (R-Roseville), "so why are we looking for an opportunity to end life early?"

Democratic Assemblywoman Patty Berg of Eureka, author of the measure, AB 2747, said it was "built on a simple premise that better information leads to better outcomes." The measure passed 42 to 33.

The Assembly also passed bills that would ban people from driving with pets in their arms or on their laps starting next July and require makers of flavored alcoholic drinks -- often packaged to look like lemonade, cola or fruit drinks -- to put the uppercase phrase "Contains Alcohol" on each bottle.

The pet bill, AB 2233 by Assemblyman Bill Maze (R-Visalia), and the "alcopops" bill, AB 346 by Assemblyman Jim Beall Jr. (D-San Jose), have not been sent to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger because he has threatened to veto any non-budget bill sent to him before the Legislature approves a spending plan. The budget is 60 days overdue.

Meanwhile, in the state Senate, lawmakers approved a measure that would extend from 72 hours to seven days the period during which a newborn may be safely surrendered to a fire station or hospital with no prosecution for abandonment.

In L.A. County, where parents have a 72-hour amnesty period, four babies have been safely surrendered since January. County supervisors, saying existing law was adequate, opposed the bill.

Still, AB 2262 by Assemblyman Alberto Torrico (D-Newark) passed 33 to 3 and returns to the Assembly for final approval.

Times staff writer Patrick McGreevy contributed to this report.#

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-legis29-2008aug29,0,1216327.story

 

 

 

Assembly approves plan to invest in urgent water needs

The California Chronicle- 8/29/08

 

Today, during a special legislative session on water, the State Assembly approved a proposal to spend prior voter approved bonds on urgently-needed water storage, reliability, and conservation efforts. Senate Bill 1xx by Senate President pro Tem Don Perata (D-Oakland) appropriates approximately $820 million in funds from bonds including Proposition 84 and Proposition 1E, which voters passed in 2006.

"This week, during a hearing of the Special Committee on Water, Californians from throughout the state whose livelihoods depend on adequate water supply urged the state to step up and take the necessary steps to provide for this state´s water needs. Today, the Assembly responded by passing SB 1xx, which allocates funds desperately needed to provide relief from the current drought, help stabilize the failing Sacramento San Joaquin Bay Delta, and invest in water supply quality and reliability," said Assemblywoman Lois Wolk (D-Davis), chair of the Assembly´s Water, Parks, and Wildlife Committee and Special Committee on Water, who presented the bill on the Assembly floor.

"This measure is a first step to providing Californians throughout the state with a safe, reliable, long-term water supply. It is essential that we allocate these funds immediately in response to the state´s most urgent needs," she said.

SB 1xx makes a number of appropriations, most significantly $325 million to help stabilize the Sacramento San Joaquin Bay Delta, which supplies roughly two-thirds of the state with drinking water, and is the heart of California´s water and agricultural system. Funding targeting Delta projects includes:

135 million to the Department of Water Resources for essential emergency preparedness supplies and projects, particularly for projects that protect and improve Delta water quality and drinking water supplies.

100 million to prevent catastrophic failure of Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta levees, consistent with the Delta Vision Strategic Plan. Projects would improve the stability of the Delta levee system, reduce subsidence, and assist in restoring the ecosystem of the Delta—giving priority to projects that improve conditions for Delta smelt and other native fish.

50 million for drinking water intake projects to improve the quality of drinking water supply from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, including projects within Solano County.


Additional funds allocated by the measure include:

50 million for drinking water systems for small communities;

50.4 million to clean up contaminated groundwater aquifers; and

181 million for integrated regional water management planning and implementation of water projects to help provide Californians long-term, quality, sustainable water supply.

"This bill is the first step to addressing California´s long-term water needs," said Senator Perata, in a statement issued when the measure was approved Tuesday by the Special Committee on Water. "SB 1XX gets money out the door so water agencies can tackle the most pressing problems, boost supplies, and improve water reliability for all Californians."

Wolk urged her colleagues to put voter approved funds to immediate use.

"It has been 22 months since voters approved these bonds funds. We need to get this money into our communities where it can do some good," she said. "This isn´t a partisan issue. It´s not an urban, agricultural, or environmental issue. It´s not a north, south or an east, west issue. This is money for emergency preparedness, for drinking water quality, for groundwater contamination cleanup and other critical projects that water agencies and experts throughout the state have supported and worked very diligently to put to work in communities throughout the state."

The measure is supported by a broad coalition of water districts, local governments, business, labor and environmental organizations including the Association of California Water Agencies, Solano County Water Agency, California Alliance for Jobs, Nature Conservancy, California Water Association, and Planning and Conservation League. It now goes to the Senate for approval.

This week, the Assembly also plans to take up companion legislation to SB 1xx, AB 7xx by Assemblywoman Wolk. The measure works to prepare the state´s water system for the threats of climate change, by incorporating climate change information into California´s existing water planning efforts.#

http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/72556

 

 

 

Canal foes: Delta promises broken: Farmers, anglers say health of estuary neglected

The Stockton Record- 8/29/08

By , Staff Writer

 

The government should keep its promises.

 

So said farmers, anglers and water lawyers who got one last chance Thursday to protest a plan proposing a peripheral canal as the "linchpin" of the state's future water system.

 

The canal would take water from the Sacramento River near Hood and skirt it around the central Delta to state and federal pumps near Tracy, and from there to farms and cities as far south as San Diego.

 

One problem, critics say: The government historically promised that the Delta's needs would come first. Only surplus water would be shipped south.

 

"What is currently conveyed to the south is already too much water, and the Delta tells us so," said Dave Scatena, a fisherman.

 

In Stockton to hear his angst was retired environmental attorney Richard Frank, one of seven members of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force.

 

The team has written a report to be made final by the end of October. That report will go to the governor and help shape legislation next year to tackle the Delta's numerous problems, at an estimated cost of $12 billion to $24 billion over the next 15 years.

 

While Thursday's meeting was their last chance to publicly condemn the draft report, canal opponents vowed they would continue to fight. And many are seasoned veterans.

 

Rogene Reynolds, who lives on Roberts Island, brought a blazing red "Stop the Canal" button - a keepsake from the successful 1982 campaign against a similar proposal.

 

"This is a simple rehash of what we had 30 years ago," she said.

 

A Delta Vision spokesman said very little of the report is "in concrete" and that the public comments taken Thursday would help shape the final version.

 

Many observers, however, say they feel the whole thing is a done deal.

 

While the report says the environment and water supply should be treated as "co-equals," and while a canal would be only part of the proposed solution, critics note that the report fails so quantify how much fresh water will be needed to keep the Delta healthy. Indeed, that answer might never be known, according to the report.

 

What the government did know as far back as 20 years is that it would eventually need more water, said Stockton lawyer Dante Nomellini, who represents Delta farmers.

 

Millions of acre-feet of water were supposed to come from rivers on California's north coast - rivers that were deemed wild and scenic and could not be tapped.

 

Even though that water never materialized, exports from the Delta soared.

 

"You people have bought into this idea of co-equality" of the environment and water supplies, Nomellini told Frank. "That turns upside-down the whole promise ... that the needs of Northern California come first."

 

Nomellini said he expects a decade-long court battle.

 

Frank said Thursday's arguments were "well thought out" and that he'd share them with the rest of the task force.

 

"We have absolutely no power" in the ultimate outcome, he said. "We've been asked to hear from folks like you and come up with recommendations," but it will be up to the lawmakers after that.

 

And perhaps the judges.#

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080829/A_NEWS/808290337/-1/A_NEWS

 

 

 

Water bill divides county's reps: Malfa, Wolk disagree on climate change, effects of analyzing it

The Woodland Daily Democrat- 8/28/08

By ROBIN HINDERY


Yolo County's two Assembly representatives clashed Tuesday over legislation that seeks to incorporate climate change prevention into state and local water-planning efforts.

 

The bill, authored by 8th District Assemblywoman Lois Wolk, D-Davis, was approved 8-4 Tuesday by the Assembly Special Committee on Water, of which Wolk is chairwoman.

 

Assemblyman Doug LaMalfa, R-Richvale, whose 2nd District shares Yolo County with Wolk's district, is also a member of the 12-person committee and voted against the bill, along with the three other Republican members.

 

The bill would require the state Department of Water Resources, or DWR, to include climate change analysis in all of its water management reports and plans, including surface storage feasibility studies and plans related to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

 

After Jan. 1, 2011, the DWR would be prohibited from approving any integrated regional water management grants for plans that do not include such analysis.

 

To assist local water agencies in sifting through the ever-expanding body of research related to climate change, the DWR would be required to identify the most reliable climate change information.

 

"This bill will be the first comprehensive statute to begin preparing California to adapt to the climate change threat to California water resources," the bill summary states. "Those threats include a reduced Sierra Nevada snowpack and prolonged droughts in the Colorado River basin."

 

Supporters of the measure assert that water use and conveyance are significant contributors of greenhouse gas emissions that lead to climate change.

 

The bill analysis Wolk submitted to the water committee Tuesday cited a 2005 California Energy Commission study that found that water use amounts to 19 percent of California's total electricity usage.

 

LaMalfa, who has long said he does not agree with "the global warming theory," said the bill's efforts to guard against future environmental threats were both "premature" and "wasteful."

 

"This bill is really just a backdoor attempt to hinder the construction of any new surface water storage in California," he said in a press release Tuesday. "If this bill passes, it will mean that no local water agency will receive any state grant funds unless the agency agrees with the author's belief in global warming."

 

In addition to trying to make future water-planning efforts greener, Wolk's bill would also fund a study by the DWR examining how existing water recycling and conservation efforts throughout the state have helped reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

 

Some opponents of the bill worry that funding for such efforts would come from the state's overdrawn general fund, but Wolk and other supporters say funding could likely be found elsewhere, such as through Proposition 84, a safe drinking water bond passed in 2006.

 

The bill now moves to the Assembly floor, where it is scheduled to come up for a vote Thursday, according to Wolk spokeswoman Melissa Jones. The deadline to pass bills for the 2008 Legislative session is currently set for Sunday.#

http://www.dailydemocrat.com/news/ci_10325295

 

 

 

 

Blog Archive