This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Item for 8/14/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

August 14, 2008

 

1.  Top Items -

 

 

 

Some in Delta mobilize to oppose peripheral canal proposal

The Sacramento Bee- 8/14/08

 

Water bond supporters rally in Sacramento

Visalia Times-Delta- 8/14/08

 

Community Groups Protest Schwarzenegger-Feinstein Water Bond Scheme

California Progress Report- 8/13/08

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Some in Delta mobilize to oppose peripheral canal proposal

The Sacramento Bee- 8/14/08

By Matt Weiser

 

Anxiety is building in Delta communities over proposals to build a canal to divert Sacramento River water around the estuary.

 

Such a canal has not been approved or funded, but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in February directed the state Department of Water Resources to begin environmental review of options in response to the state's water crisis.

 

Last month, DWR sent letters to 1,000 property owners announcing it may need to access their land for preliminary surveys.

 

This week it started a series of community meetings about those surveys.

 

Activist pastors have even held prayer vigils and community meetings, and new community groups have formed to protest the canal. Some property owners have vowed to keep state surveyors off their land.

 

"Some of the plans they are making will have a major impact on the lives of thousands of people who live in the area," said the Rev. Larry Emery of Walnut Grove Community Presbyterian Church. "I'm involved because as one of the churches here in the Delta, we're very concerned about our members and the whole community."

 

Residents of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta fear land-use and economic disruptions from a massive canal. They also worry related proposals to transform farming islands into restored marshland could jeopardize businesses and the region's tax base.

 

Emery's church is scheduled to host a meeting at 6 p.m. today, sponsored by a new group, Save Our Delta's Future.

 

One of the group's leaders is David Stirling, a former assemblyman, judge and deputy attorney general. Stirling is now vice president of the Pacific Legal Foundation, a conservative, Sacramento-based law firm known for fighting endangered species and habitat protections.

 

Clarksburg Community Church is also active. Its Web site includes a link on Delta planning information, and on July 26 the church hosted a 12-hour prayer vigil on the future of the region.

 

The church is working with another new group, North Delta Community Area Residents for Environmental Sustainability. The church's pastor, Dennis Montzingo, couldn't be reached for comment Wednesday.

 

Many critics view canal proposals as water grabs by Southern California akin to the peripheral canal that rejected by state voters in 1982.

 

"I think the peripheral canal will be a disaster for the Delta long term, and I'm going to fight them," said Dino Cortopassi, a lifelong Delta farmer in San Joaquin County. He purchased full-page advertisements in the Bee this week to stir opposition to a canal. "I'm presenting that as the view that I think other people should hold."

 

The primary Delta planning efforts are the governor's Delta Vision committee and the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan. Some observers say much of the anxiety has been overblown, based on little more than sketches of ideas from planners.

 

"They're trying to put out a rational plan that doesn't hurt agriculture and restores some of the fish habitat we've lost. I don't see anything wrong in that," said Peggy Bohl, spokeswoman for Concerned Citizens of Clarksburg.

 

However, she added, "We've got people in the Delta who farm, they fish, they play, and they need to be included."

 

About 25 million Californians depend on the Delta for a portion of their drinking water. In addition, it is the primary source of irrigation water for nearly 1 million acres of farmland in the San Joaquin Valley.

 

Business and political interests from the Silicon Valley to San Diego are pressing for better plumbing in the Delta to improve water supply reliability. This has been driven by a drought, and by a federal court order last year that curtailed Delta water exports in order to protect fish.

 

Residents fear the consequences, including salinity that could jeopardize Delta farming. Some of the Delta's 500,000 residents have said they feel left out of the debate.

 

"It's rather presumptuous that this thing is moving as rapidly as it is," said Robert Ferguson, a Union Island farmer and member of the Delta Protection Commission.

 

The meeting at Emery's church is one of three scheduled for tonight on the Delta's future.

 

The Delta Protection Commission, a state agency, meets at 5:30 p.m. in Walnut Grove to discuss how it will comment on a draft strategic plan by the Delta Vision panel.

 

And at 6 p.m. in Antioch, DWR hosts the third of six meetings on its desire to access private land for canal surveys. Relations already are so strained that some property owners intend to deny the state access to their land.

 

"I hope people don't accept it and don't allow them on their property," Ferguson said.#

http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/1155584.html

 

 

 

Water bond supporters rally in Sacramento

Visalia Times-Delta- 8/14/08

BY JAKE HENSHAW

 

SACRAMENTO — Hundreds of water bond advocates rallied outside the Capitol Wednesday as policymakers worked to find a last-minute compromise to get a multibillion-dollar measure on the November ballot.

 

'Water crisis'

The bond under discussion could fund a wide range of projects — from a possible new reservoir at Temperance Flat on the San Joaquin River to cleanup of contaminated groundwater in rural areas of Tulare and Monterey counties.

 

"We have a water crisis," Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, told the rally. "We can no longer kick this can down the road." A proposed $9.3 billion bond by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-San Francisco, has stalled most visibly over whether construction of new dams like Temperance Flat is the most effective way to meet the state's future water needs.

 

Community and environmental groups also have criticized it both for failing to do enough to clean up groundwater that is unfit to drink and for being proposed before previous bond money is spent.

 

"Rather than rush into another billion-dollar bond this year, our communities are calling for water reform that ensures California does not drift further into water crisis," said Mindy McIntyre of the Planning and Conservation League, a environmental coalition that urges delay.

 

The proposed bond is having a tough time competing for attention as the governor and legislators try to reach an agreement on a budget that was due July 1.

 

The pressure is on because a water bond and possible budget provisions face a Saturday deadline to qualify for the ballot, though it's unclear how firm the deadline is.

 

"But our water negotiations are bogged down with the stalemate and the clock is ticking to get both our budget reform and our water bond on the November ballot," Schwarzenegger told the rally in urging participants to lobby lawmakers.

 

Tulare County Supervisor Connie Conway, who spoke at the rally, said later that the west side of the San Joaquin Valley is suffering with water shortages, but she added that the groundwater used by communities on the east side is dropping.

 

"It's like who's next" in line for water troubles? Conway asked. "Is it going to take people in L.A. waking up with no water coming out of the faucet" before there's action on a new water bond?

 

In the Capitol, Assemblywoman Anna Caballero, D-Salinas, who also appeared at the rally, is part of a Democratic working group of half a dozen lawmakers appointed by the Assembly speaker to seek a compromise on a water bond.

 

"People are making decisions about what to plant," because of water shortages, she said.

 

The Democratic water group has been meeting for more than a week and Caballero said it's considering a bond closer to $10 billion that would include funds for new dams but also more money for issues such as contaminated groundwater and recycled water.

 

She said the group is drafting its proposal and planning to meet with Assembly Republicans and members of both parties in the Senate in a bid to line up votes.

 

"I think we've made some great progress," Caballero said, though she acknowledged that it's not clear if it's enough to pass a bond in the next few days.

 

She also acknowledged that Feinstein gave the group, including a few Republicans, a succinct message in a meeting Tuesday.

"Her message was very clear: Get it done," Caballero said of Feinstein.#

http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080814/NEWS01/808140318

 

 

 

Community Groups Protest Schwarzenegger-Feinstein Water Bond Scheme

California Progress Report- 8/13/08

By Jim Metropulos, Legislative Representative Sierra Club California

 

Protesting Governor Schwarzenegger and Senator Feinstein’s push for a November water bond, community groups throughout California rallied yesterday to expose the proposal’s failure to provide long-term and equitable solutions to California’s water problems. Community groups oppose the bond and are calling for immediate action from the Legislature to distribute existing bond funds that have sat unspent since 2006.

 

“Our communities are struggling as budget cuts dry up state support for our health, education and infrastructure programs. Now the governor is asking Californians to repay another $9.2 billion dollar water bond? We simply cannot afford to do that,” stated Debbie Davis, legislative analyst for the Environmental Justice Coalition for Water. “Ironically, this bond is called the ‘Safe Drinking Water Act,’ but it does nothing to address the drinking water crisis in thousands of communities in California.

 

"Our communities need funding for programs that help provide safe, clean drinking water. Despite a $9.2 billion dollar price tag, this bond doesn’t deliver.”

 

California’s recent drought has exacerbated water problems throughout the state, ranging from a lack of clean drinking water for rural communities to the collapse of the Delta ecosystem. Instead of creating new management solutions to old problems, the bond provides funding for the same types of projects that have already pushed California’s water system to the brink.

 

Proposed dams and surface water storage would take decades to put in place, and most profit special interests.

 

We have a water crisis today. This proposed bond wastes $3 billion on projects that will take decades to produce a drop of water. We don't need 19th-century solutions to today's problems.

 

Many are calling on the Legislature and the Governor to pass SB 1XX (Perata, Machado and Steinberg), releasing unspent funds from Proposition 84, passed in 2006. Over $800 million is being held hostage as leverage for a wasteful water bond.

 

The Legislature reportedly has until the end of this week to vote the water bond onto the ballot.

 

Jim Metropulos has been a legislative representative at Sierra Club California since the beginning of 2002. Before coming to the Sierra Club, he was committee counsel to the Washington State Senate's Environment, Energy and Water Resources Committee. He focuses on energy, water quality, water supply, parks and off-highway vehicles, wetlands and flood control issues.#

http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2008/08/community_group.html

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive