This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 8/14/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

August 14, 2007

 

2. Supply -

 

Opinion:

John Laird: Water conservation is answer for future

Sacramento Bee

 

Wells fill gap in conservation
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

 

Agency to work out water deal with West Kern

Antelope Valley Press

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Opinion:

John Laird: Water conservation is answer for future

Sacramento Bee – 8/14/07

Assemblyman John Laird, D-Santa Cruz, is chairman of the Assembly Budget Committee.

 

In the wake of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's recent statewide tour to push his water plan, there is a key fact all Californians should consider: The city of Los Angeles has grown by nearly 1 million people in the last 25 years, and current water use is virtually the same as a quarter-century ago.

 

Why? Water conservation.

 

Throughout urban Southern California, water conservation has reduced per-capita use by 39 gallons per day through replacement of inefficient water-using fixtures and improved landscape watering.

 

The amount of water "produced" through conservation, recycling and groundwater clean-up in Southern California is more than 900,000 acre-feet a year, more than the annual yield provided by the two dams that the governor has proposed.

 

The governor is right to highlight the challenge of providing water for California's future. Growth in California could increase our population by a quarter in the coming decades. Most of that growth is projected in drier, inland areas of the state.

 

The Sierra Nevada supplies all or part of the water used by at least 65 percent of Californians. Current climate change patterns are projected to cut the Sierra snowpack by half in the next century. And the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, where millions of acre-feet of water are sent elsewhere, is in a fragile condition.

The challenge is magnified because most water demands occur in areas where the water isn't -- requiring not just additional water, but expensive conveyance systems to get water to the areas that need it. Those conveyance systems consume massive amounts of electricity. In fact, according to the Pacific Institute, 19 percent of California's electricity is used to pump, clean, heat and treat water.

 

Water conservation must be a key part of any future plan. It is not the solution by itself, but it is the only water "source" that is common to every water district in the state. It also costs considerably less than any other water development alternative.

 

The Legislature should play a major role on this issue. Two bills I've authored will take water conservation to the next level in California. Both passed the Assembly and are pending in the Senate.

 

Assembly Bill 715 would phase in lower-flow, high-efficiency toilets and authorize waterless urinals for new construction. These toilets are now on the market, and a recently released study by the federal Environmental Protection Agency shows they work.

 

The Plumbing Manufacturers Institute, representing toilet manufacturers, supports AB 715. One manufacturer, Kohler, estimates annual water savings in California would be 232,000 acre-feet, based on the current number of toilets and the eventual switch of all existing toilets to high-efficiency toilets.

 

Manufacturers believe that just as California has led the way with last year's greenhouse gases law, California can start a national conversation by enacting more efficient guidelines for toilets.

 

When this bill passed and headed to the Senate, opposition came only from those who referred to the bill as "nanny government." Current-generation water-efficient toilets -- part of how Los Angeles grew by a million people and was still able to use the same amount of water -- were the result of legislation signed into law by then-Gov. Pete Wilson, hardly known as a fan of "nanny government."

 

A second bill, Assembly Bill 1420, would apply to jurisdictions seeking water management funds from the bonds approved by voters last November. To receive a grant from the state, the bill would require jurisdictions seeking the money to have good water conservation programs in place or planned.

 

Enactment of AB 1420 would result in annual savings of an estimated 300,000 acre-feet of water, begging the question: Why should we develop new water sources before we manage existing sources to best advantage?

 

As we consider how to plan for our future, we should make water conservation a key part of any solution. It's cheaper, it's everywhere and it's the easiest of the alternatives on the table. Once again, California can lead the way.#

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/323532.html

 

 

Wells fill gap in conservation
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT – 8/14/07

By BLEYS W. ROSE

 

The 19 percent reduction in Russian River water use has been achieved by cities' and the county's increasing reliance on their own well water as much as by homeowners getting stingy with their tap water.

After reviewing water use in July - the first full month of a state-mandated reduction in Russian River water usage - many water department officials across Sonoma County say they've pumped more ground water in place of water they would normally take from the Russian River.

Use of the river as a source of potable water has been restricted since July 1 by state authorities who ordered a 15 percent reduction in order to save enough in Lake Mendocino for the salmon spawning season in the fall.

"It may be half and half," said Glen Wright, Santa Rosa's deputy director of water resources, referring to the split of how much of the Russian River decrease can be attributed to consumers conservation and how much is being supplemented through increased use of city wells.

Santa Rosa, which is by far the biggest water user, decreased its river water usage by 6.4 percent over the July 2004 daily average. But in a better gauge that includes all water sources, the average number of gallons used per connection dropped 10.4 percent.

To meet the state-mandated 15 percent cutback in Russian River water, Wright said Santa Rosa in mid-July kicked into gear two wells on Farmers Lane that are putting water into the city's system, thus allowing the city to use less Russian River water.

Use of so-called "local production" of water to meet the state's 15 percent cut is, according to critics, a disingenuous manner of coping with the water shortage. The argument, coming from many of the county's environmental and slow-growth activists, centers on the current need for water conservation that could extend to include water shortages making necessary such things as building moratoriums, growth limits and development restrictions.

"Why should cities hand out development permits when we have a water situation that is not going away anytime soon," said David Keller, a former Petaluma councilman and leader of the Friends of the Eel River group.

"Solving the water problem by pumping locally also means we are draining the local water sources."

State water officials said this week they are satisfied with the way that the nine municipalities contracting with the Sonoma County Water Agency are reducing their Russian River water intake. However, they also said that, during a prolonged drought, this won't work.

"We are very confident that the people in your area are taking conservation seriously, but the order is for reduction in diversions only from the Russian River," said William L. Rukeyser, public affairs director for the state Water Resources Control Board. "Should this dry year extend to a multi-year event, then we may get to the point where you have to actually reduce consumption."

When the Sonoma County Water Agency last week released its tallies of average daily use during July for its contractors, it prompted questions about who was saving water and how.

Some city water department officials felt slighted because the totals reflected Russian River water and not their residents overall water usage. Some activists on water issues complained that conservation was ballyhooed when wells and reservoirs were actually more crucial.

In fact, the Water Agency itself is pumping more water out of wells in the Santa Rosa Plain, which caused a major discrepancy between the amount of water being saved at two metering stations on the river and by the various cities and water districts, which have 150 meters in different locations.

A Press Democrat survey of the nine cities and water districts using Russian River water provided by Water Agency aqueducts found drops in river water usage in July were attributable to increased well pumping as much as consumer conservation. Water officials in Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park, Petaluma and North Marin reported their total water usage dropped about 10 or 11 percent.

The survey also found:

Windsor's astonishing drop of 57 percent less river water usage was in error and was actually only 1 percent. The initially reported decrease in river water usage included only the change in the amount that the Water Agency pumped through the aquaduct and not the significantly larger amount that Windsor pumps from wells on the river.

"It is not a stellar performance," said Windsor's associate engineer Craig Scott, referring to the town's placement at the bottom of the list of Russian River water savers.

Windsor has been forced to take "stage two" water saving measures such as banning filling of new swimming pools and turf landscaping. While Windsor reduced from 13.1 to 10.4 million gallons the amount it drew from the aqueduct, its pumping from wells along the river increased from 173.6 to 175 million gallons.

Cities like Petaluma and Rohnert Park are lucky enough to have wells they are using to balance what they are taking out of the Russian River.

Rohnert Park city engineer Darren Jenkins said the city predicts the city will pump an average 1 million gallons a day from about 30 active wells "in order to help out the situation on the river." Since 1996, well pumping has been reduced from 4.8 million gallons daily to 300,000 gallons last year, he said.

"We are helping out, but we are not going past what we used to pump," Jenkins said. "We have the same concern about sustainability of water resources."

Two Marin County districts, North Marin and Marin Municipal, shifted to water stored in lakes and reservoirs in their area in addition to water conservation programs like rebates for water-saving appliances and recycled water projects.

Paul Helliker, Marin Municipal's general manager, said its reservoirs are down to about 94 percent of average as it relies on them to reduce Russian River water usage. In the July through October period, the district's share of Russian River water usually comprises only 25 percent of the 34 million gallons consumed daily and Helliker sees little problem in cutting that in half.

In the North Marin Water District, officials said they reduced Russian River water usage 24 percent by taking more from Stafford Lake, by a recycled water project at a local golf course that began this summer and through consumer conservation.

North Marin district manager Chris DeGabriele said about half the savings came from increased reliance on Stafford Lake, which stores about 4,000 acre-feet of Novato Creek water. "From my perspective it is immaterial where the water comes from. Hallelujah we have the local sources," DeGabriele said.

Perhaps the purest measure of conservation was in the Valley of the Moon Water District where usage of Russian River water was reduced 13 percent.

The district, which covers 6,800 Sonoma Valley customers from Glen Ellen through Boyes Hot Springs, had the same five wells pumping the same amount of water in July 2004 as it did last July, making it easy to peg the amount of reduction attributable to conservation at 13 percent.

"Everybody is doing what they can, reducing the watering cycle times by 20 percent, using nozzles on their hoses and avoiding over watering," said Krishna Kumar, general manager of the Valley of the Moon district.#

http://www.pressdemo.com/EarlyEdition/article_view.cfm?recordID=7296&publishdate=08/14/2007

 

Agency to work out water deal with West Kern

Antelope Valley Press – 8/10/07

By ALISHA SEMCHUCK
Valley
Press Staff Writer

 

PALMDALE - Given an imbalance between use and supply, Palmdale Water District must resort to purchasing supplemental water from another agency.

PWD's board of directors, in closed session Wednesday night, authorized agency General Manager Dennis LaMoreaux to negotiate the price and terms of a water contract with the West Kern Water District, said agency attorney Tim Gosney.

 

LaMoreaux will sit down at the negotiating table with West Kern District to work out a deal for 3,000 acre-feet of water. An acre-foot equals 328,851 gallons, the amount of water the average family of four uses in a year.

 

"What we're looking at is an exchange of water to have some additional supply for this year - for the rest of the year," LaMoreaux said. By the end of July, he pointed out, district customers went through about 3,000 acre-feet of water - "more than we had available."

 

That's because many customers failed to meet a request by the district board to voluntarily cut their use by 15%. LaMoreaux told the board that many residential users achieved a 10% reduction in water use. But schools and the city haven't succeeded in meeting that 15% goal. In some instances, that usage actually increased, he told directors.

 

"We have to work together with the other entities - the school districts and the city," said PWD Director Raul Figueroa. "I've seen city parks watering (grass and plants) at 10 in the morning. Dick Wells mentioned he was at DryTown and saw the sprinklers go off at 2 o'clock," Figueroa said, referring to the water board president.

 

"If we complete this deal and get that water, we still need our customers to reach that 15% reduction goal from now through the end of the year."

Had the PWD board not requested cutbacks, the district would have exhausted its entire 60% State Water Project allocation by mid- to late-September, LaMoreaux estimated. The State Water Project supply comes from the 444-mile California Aqueduct.

 

Once the allocation is gone, LaMoreaux pointed out, "the only supply would be groundwater for the remainder of the year. That would force us to ask for much more extreme conservation measures."

 

Although this is the first time the district is entering this type of water exchange with another agency, LaMoreaux said, "we've discussed different types of water sales or transfers over the past year."

 

Prior to the 2007 drought, which left many Southern California purveyors scrambling to find water, the district purchased rights to additional Table A water from Belridge Water District in Kern County, he said. Table A refers to the maximum amount each state water contractor is entitled to pull from the California Aqueduct in a 100% allocation year.

 

Until PWD struck a deal with Belridge, the Palmdale entitlement was 17,300 acre-feet. Water rights purchased from Belridge gave Palmdale an additional 4,000 acre-feet each year, for a total of 21,300 acre-feet, which took effect in 2000.

 

In addition to the price Palmdale must pay West Kern for the 3,000 acre-feet Palmdale will have to give West Kern 6,000 acre-feet "when the allocation is high. And we have 10 years to return that water," LaMoreaux said.

Figueroa said the board agreed to the deal considering the situation they're in.#

http://www.avpress.com/n/10/0810_s4.hts

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive