This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATER QUALITY - 8/30/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

August 30, 2007

 

4. Water Quality

 

PERCHLORATE:

Environmental groups find fault with state's perchlorate standard proposal - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

Rialto's toxic perchlorate plume may prompt emergency decree - Riverside Press Enterprise

 

Council members talk water pollution in capital - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

LOS OSOS:

Supervisors OK $25,000 tax for Los Osos homeowners; That would be in addition to a $40 monthly bill for maintenance and a one-time expense to hook up to the wastewater treatment system - San Luis Obispo Tribune

 

GROUNDWATER CLEANUP:

Editorial: What's the delay? Clean up refinery pollution - Bakersfield Californian

 

 

PERCHLORATE:

Environmental groups find fault with state's perchlorate standard proposal

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 8/30/07

By Jason Pesick, staff writer

 

The state is in the final stages of setting a standard dictating how much perchlorate can be in your drinking water.

 

The cap on the amount of the widespread contaminant that can be in the drinking water could be in place within weeks.

 

But the proposal of 6 parts per billion is not one that will sit well with the environmental community.

 

It could also lead to hikes in water rates, as water purveyors are forced to begin cleaning perchlorate from the water they serve.

 

"We're disappointed that in light of all the accumulating evidence that perchlorate is harmful at levels well below this that California decided to stick with 6 ppb," said Bill Walker, vice president for the Environmental Working Group's West Coast office.

 

Perchlorate has been discovered in drinking water throughout areas of Southern California used for agricultural, industrial and military purposes.

 

On Aug. 6, the state Department of Public Health submitted a standard of 6 ppb to the state Office of Administrative Law. Once its review is complete, it will send the regulation to the secretary of state to sign off on.

 

Since the state began developing the standard, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a study showing that even at low levels, perchlorate can affect hormone levels in a large percentage of women.

 

The proposed standard is also higher than the 2 ppb set by Massachusetts last year.

 

Perchlorate is used in the production of explosives like fireworks and rocket fuel.

 

Chilean fertilizer used in agricultural areas around the Southland is also thought to be responsible for perchlorate contamination.

 

It can affect the functioning of the thyroid, which is important for metabolism and neurological development.

 

Between August 2002 and August 2007, 251 wells had reported having perchlorate at a level of 4 ppb or higher in California.

Of those, 114 are in San Bernardino and Riverside counties.

 

The process of setting a standard began in August last year when the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment set a public health goal of 6 ppb.

 

Its task is to only take public health into consideration when setting that goal. Then the Department of Public Health takes into account how practical the proposed standard would be.

 

A few months after the public health goal was set, the CDC study came out in October.

 

"This is going to be important information for those people who are setting acceptable levels (for perchlorate)," one of the study's co-authors James Pirkle, said when the study came out.

 

Massachusetts officials said they came to a level of 2 out of caution and a difference of a opinion with California officials over how much perchlorate people ingest from other sources besides water, like food.

 

Massachusetts officials said they thought people take in a fair bit of perchlorate from other sources besides water, so they wanted to set a lower standard for perchlorate in water.

 

While environmentalists aren't satisfied with California's proposed standard, because they see it as too high, some water purveyors have a very different complaint.  

 

It will cost them millions of dollars to clean perchlorate out of water and lead to rate hikes.

 

The East Valley Water District will have to spend tens of millions of dollars building facilities to treat perchlorate ranging from levels of 6 to 12 ppb in some of its wells, said General Manager Bob Martin.

 

He said there will be an 11 percent rate increase this year, and that's just the beginning.

 

"For us it's more of a nuisance," said Ken Manning, CEO of the Chino Basin Watermaster.

 

A combination of treatment systems, blending contaminated water with clean water, and shutting down some wells has worked for his agency, he said.

 

If California adopts Massachusetts' standard of 2 ppb, that would have presented more of a challenge, he said.

 

Agencies around Rialto, where industrial sites on the city's north end have led to perchlorate contamination of up to 10,000 ppb, say they aren't too concerned over the new standard.

 

This is because with the help of grant money, they've been treating the water to the point where they can't detect perchlorate in it.

 

"We're pretty well geared up for it," said Anthony "Butch" Araiza, general manager of the West Valley Water District.

 

Representatives of water purveyors said that if California set a standard of 2 ppb, the costs would have been much higher because of the low levels of perchlorate found throughout the region and the fact that the Colorado River, a major source of water in Southern California, is contaminated with low levels of perchlorate.

 

The level in the river has been decreasing, but it is still at about 2 ppb, said Mic Stewart, water quality manager for the Metropolitan Water District.

 

After the CDC study came out, environmentalists asked the state to review the proposed standard early and start the process over again, but the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment declined, citing a lack of information.

 

The next review of the standard will be in 2009, said Sam Delson, deputy director of the office.

 

Last year, Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill authored by then-state Sen. Nell Soto that included provisions allowing the state to compare its standard with other states' standards and would have made the process of determining a standard more transparent.

Walker called the new standard a compromise.

 

"I think frankly it's a political calculation by the Schwarzenegger administration that there are obviously lots of voices out there in industry and much more powerfully in the military establishment who don't want a strong perchlorate standard set because it's going to cost a lot more to clean it up," he said. #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/search/ci_6755145?IADID=Search-www.dailybulletin.com-www.dailybulletin.com

 

 

Rialto's toxic perchlorate plume may prompt emergency decree

Riverside Press Enterprise – 8/30/07

By Jim Miller, staff writer

 

SACRAMENTO - Rialto officials will consider declaring a local state of emergency in an attempt to get state aid to clean up a steadily moving perchlorate plume.

 

Aides to Gov. Schwarzenegger suggested the action during a meeting Wednesday in which Rialto leaders said perchlorate contamination poses a growing threat to the city's drinking water.

 

Both sides will follow up early next month.

 

Rialto leaders have become increasingly frustrated with delays in getting cleanup funds from the alleged sources of the underground pollution. The city has spent more than $18 million on legal fees, special water-filtering systems and other costs, and still lacks a cleanup order.

 

A Los Angeles County judge recently declared an indefinite halt to state water board hearings on the matter.

 

In a letter to Schwarzenegger on Wednesday, Rialto Mayor Pro Tem Winnie Hanson and Councilman Ed Scott complained that the city and its residents are the victims of a "brilliant joint multimillion-dollar scorched earth legal assault" by companies potentially responsible for the pollution.

 

In a related action, the Senate Rules Committee refused Wednesday to confirm two Schwarzenegger appointees to the state Water Resources Control Board.

 

"What has become absolutely clear is the state is woefully inept at enforcing its clean water laws," Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, D-Oakland, wrote in a letter to Schwarzenegger that mentioned the perchlorate problems in Rialto.

 

City officials said they need at least $25 million to drill wells around the plume to block its migration.

 

Governor's spokesman Bill Maile called the meeting with Rialto officials "positive and informative."

 

The perchlorate plume stretches about six miles from a 160-acre Rialto site where Goodrich Corp. and other companies operated in the 1950s and 1960s.

 

Patrick Palmer, a Goodrich spokesman, said the company has been cooperative. The company has spent more than $10 million to investigate and treat the perchlorate contamination, he said.

 

"What the city might call unfair legal tactics we call due process. That remains a fundamental tenet of our Constitution," Palmer said.

 

Perchlorate disrupts the thyroid's ability to absorb iodide, a component of brain and nerve development in fetuses and babies.

Pregnant women are vulnerable to the chemical.  #

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_R_bperch30.5368f3.html

 

 

Council members talk water pollution in capital

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 8/30/07

By Jason Pesick, staff writer

 

RIALTO - Two members of the City Council met on Wednesday with the Governor's Office in Sacramento to discuss perchlorate, a substance polluting the area's drinking water.

 

Mayor Grace Vargas and Councilwoman Winnie Hanson were scheduled to meet with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's office.

 

In a letter to Schwarzenegger from two members of the council, Hanson and Ed Scott - members of the council's perchlorate subcommittee - asked for cleanup money and complained about delays the city has faced trying to get the perchlorate cleaned up.

 

"While we wait, the equivalent of a toxic forest fire moves across our drinking water storage system unabated," the letter reads.

Perchlorate, which was used in industrial sites on the city's north end, is flowing through the city.

 

The estimated cleanup cost is $300 million.

 

Perchlorate can be harmful to human health by interfering with the thyroid gland, which is important for metabolism and neurological development.

 

A spokesman for Schwarzenegger couldn't be reached for comment Wednesday evening. #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/search/ci_6755141?IADID=Search-www.dailybulletin.com-www.dailybulletin.com

 

 

LOS OSOS:

Supervisors OK $25,000 tax for Los Osos homeowners; That would be in addition to a $40 monthly bill for maintenance and a one-time expense to hook up to the wastewater treatment system

San Luis Obispo Tribune – 8/30/07

By Sona Patel, staff writer

 

County supervisors have signed off on an engineer’s report that establishes how much in taxes most Los Osos property owners can expect to pay for a long-awaited sewer in the coastal town.

 

If paid in a lump sum, that assessment would be about $25,000 on average for a single-family home, according to the report approved Tuesday.

 

But county officials expect most homeowners to pay in twice-annual installments of $960 on their property tax bills.

 

With interest and administrative costs, that would amount to $57,600 if the county finances it for 30 years, according to figures given to The Tribune by Public Works officials Wednesday.

 

That would be on top of a monthly bill estimated at $40 on average, according to new county figures, to pay for ongoing operation and maintenance.

 

The amount of monthly bills was wrong in a Tribune front-page story Tuesday.

 

In addition to the assessment on property tax bills and the $40 estimated monthly bill for operation and maintenance, homeowners would have to pay a one-time expense to decommission their septic tanks and hook up to the sewer system.

 

That one-time expense — called “on-lot costs” — could range between $1,600 and $9,600, depending on the property, according to county estimates.

 

All these expenses—the assessment, the one-time expense and monthly bill for operation and maintenance — would total about $200 a month, county officials said Wednesday.

 

That assumes that a homeowner would pay the $25,000 assessment in twice-annual installments and would finance the one-time “on-lot” costs with a 20-year home-equity loan at 8.25 percent interest, according to an Aug. 14 Public Works Department report to the county Board of Supervisors.

 

Though county officials expect combined sewer costs to be about $200 a month, they explained in their report to supervisors that the costs could vary between $100 and $275.

 

That’s because the cost of construction would eventually depend on the technology and treatment plant site chosen, as well as methods of financing.

 

County officials also hope that state or federal grants or low-interest loans could lower the cost of the system. #

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/story/129364.html

 

 

GROUNDWATER CLEANUP:

Editorial: What's the delay? Clean up refinery pollution

Bakersfield Californian – 8/29/07

 

"Pretty please" works well enough when you're asking for the last slice of pie. It's considerably less effective when you're trying to convince industry to undertake expensive and time-consuming clean-up efforts.

 

"Pretty please" just isn't good enough when your charge is protecting the public's drinking water. Few responsibilities could be greater. Yet, over the years, "pretty please" seems to have been the primary enforcement strategy employed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board when it came to leaking contaminants at a Bakersfield oil refinery.

 

That strategy had to stop.

 

The regional water board has now issued a formal order requiring the current and past owners of the Big West Oil refinery on Rosedale Highway to clean up a toxic leak that dates to the mid-1980s. The regulating agency will force the owners to clean up contaminated soil and tainted groundwater beneath the facility.

 

It's about time. Where was the agency's order two decades ago when the first of these leaks was detected? Sidetracked by polite requests, apparently.

 

Letters between the water board and Shell, the refinery's former owner, are a study in comic ineffectiveness, with the board's strategy -- pushing for voluntary removal of soil contaminants, such as oil, gasoline, diesel, benzene and MTBE -- netting precious little in the way of meaningful action.

 

In one instance, Shell, and not the water board, was allowed to set its own deadlines for restarting a treatment system that had been shut down. The company missed all three of its self-imposed deadlines, with no apparent consequences.

 

City officials say some of the leakage could contaminate public drinking water supplies, including a Bakersfield well and the Kern River.

 

State Sen. Dean Florez, D-Shafter, has now jumped into the fray, asking Attorney General Jerry Brown to take legal action against Shell. Brown's office is studying the situation.

 

Water board officials say neither The Californian's investigation nor Florez's involvement were factors in the recent decision to toughen up, but the coincidental timing of the twin spotlights and the board's subsequent baring of its regulatory teeth make that position a little hard to believe.

 

Kern County Deputy District Attorney John Mitchell has seen the board in action several times over the years, most memorably when he was prosecuting the now-defunct Sunland Refinery for numerous groundwater violations. He discovered the water board had been writing letters to the refinery for more than 10 years asking that management take action, with no meaningful results.

 

Water board officials have complained that they are too understaffed to aggressively pursue polluters. But Florez said he could find no evidence of agency officials asking for significant staffing help. The water board, Florez said in his letter to Brown, "has a history of inaction." Pamela Creedon, the board's top officer since early 2006, disputes that characterization and promises more aggressive action. Good.

 

The board's past approach can't continue. It's been well documented that Bakersfield's air quality is among the worst in the nation. Now we learn that the city's water quality is at risk, too. The agency assigned to protect it must step up -- now. #

http://www.bakersfield.com/opinion/editorials/story/224216.html

####

No comments:

Blog Archive