This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 8/28/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

August 28, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

Guest Column: Saving water now a critical issue - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

Guest Column: Demonizing farm is wrong 'green' approach - Tracy Press

 

 

Guest Column: Saving water now a critical issue

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 8/26/07

By Wyatt Troxel, president of the Inland Empire Utilities Agency

 

The message we delivered at this month's San Bernardino County Water Conference was a somber one - an adequate water supply is a critical issue facing the Inland Empire region because of the urban growth.

 

California is in serious drought conditions that are affecting other metropolitan areas from Denver to Las Vegas to Phoenix.

 

Our message is clear; it is time to get serious about saving water. Without rain, and without voluntary conservation efforts by all, the experts are forecasting that in the next few years we could be in for mandatory cutbacks statewide.

 

Over the past 10 years, the Inland Empire Utilities Agency has been shifting its vision and programs to better meet the needs of our communities to sustain our lifestyle and economic growth through better and more efficient management of our local water resources. Water conservation, capturing stormwater when it rains, and using recycled water for irrigation and other industrial uses will be key to drought-proofing our region.

 

When it rains, we need to capture the water and encourage it to infiltrate into the ground. We need to use recycled water whenever possible - you'll recognize where it is being used by its purple pipe. We need to develop our groundwater supplies, storing as much water as we can for future dry years. And overall, we need to do a better job of conserving the water we have.

 

Recognizing that water recycling is an essential component of a sustainable regional water resources management strategy for the Chino Basin, IEUA is building on its water recycling programs to continue to provide the region with an alternative water supply source to meet its industrial, landscape irrigation and groundwater recharge needs. Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Congressman David Dreier have both introduced legislation that will provide critical federal support for construction of new "purple pipes" to connect parks, golf courses and schools to irrigate public landscapes.

 

Conservation is an important source of supply as well. Building smarter, stopping the leaks, and making sure that we use the beautiful plants that are already adapted to a dry climate ensures that we can serve more people with less water. Conservation means making every drop count.

 

The Inland Empire Utilities Agency applauds Supervisor Brad Mitzelfelt for his leadership in organizing San Bernardino County's first water conference. As tough as some of the challenges facing our communities will be, there are clear principles - a strong water ethic for San Bernardino County - that should guide the next few years of investments in water supply development. #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/opinions/ci_6726616

 

 

Guest Column: Demonizing farm is wrong 'green' approach

Tracy Press – 8/27/07

By Steven Hoch, managing partner of the Los Angeles office of the Hatch & Parent law firm

 

In their understandable zeal to save the planet from itself, environmentalists might be guilty of overreach and overreaction — by viewing agricultural, and more specifically its management and practices, in the same regulatory light as pollution-causing industries.

 

It’s a sad turn of events.

 

For decades, a stalwart alliance existed between the agricultural and environmental communities. Each had a profound appreciation for the land and its resources; indeed, the agricultural community was viewed as a steward of the environment. But lately, these two groups have become strange bedfellows, each side tolerating the other. To paraphrase a classic Woody Allen joke (itself a paraphrase of a familiar Biblical passage), the lion did indeed layeth down with the lamb — but the lamb didn’t get much sleep.

 

And now, the lamb had better start running, because a continuing series of challenges has begun to cast agriculture as a polluter and resource abuser. It’s a situation that only growers and their extended business family can change — and must, in order to save their way of life, protect their legacy and continue to be the most productive and efficient farmers in the entire world.

The cases of National Resources Defense Fund v. Kempthorne, and Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman’s Associations v. Gutierrez — pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California — will likely be pivotal decisions, affecting the amount of water available to farmers in the Central Valley. Some say they could reduce water for farming by as much as 50 percent.

 

How can farming manage if farmers lose half of their water? And if that is what will happen, how will it happen and for how long? In the meantime, the need to provide food at a reasonable price and the impact on a huge economic engine might be ignored in deference to a perceived environmental issue.

 

This is troubling. Water resources are similarly at risk in such lawsuits as California Sportsfishing Protection Alliance v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, a suit just commencing in Superior Court.

 

This case relates to the use of Delta water by agriculture and how it affects the Delta smelt, an undeniably threatened species.

 

Yet it is clear that there is an entire laundry list of factors that could be contributing to the situation — not justthe amount of water (and maybe not even that).

 

This is not to suggest that when it comes to the environment, the agricultural industry should get a free pass. Some of its practices should be carefully examined, evaluated and changed. But a legitimate question needs to be asked as to whether the model for that examination — the creation and enforcement of environmental requirements used for manufacturing-based resolutions — fits agriculture.

 

Food, unlike manufactured goods, is a requirement for existence, one that needs to be available at a reasonable price. Yet agriculture is a risk-intensive business. Profit margins are often thin and subject to market and weather fluctuations, an impact other industries are not as sensitive to.

 

Agriculture is also a strong part of California’s economy — and, because growing plants aids in offsetting carbon emissions, it’s an increasingly “green” industry.

 

The agricultural community needs to be a gladiator in the regulatory arena. It needs to unite and speak up on its behalf — loudly and strongly. California regulators need to hear from the community and be made aware of the impact that a variety of environmental policies have on the farm. They need to be informed if the approaches suggested are rational and economical.

 

They even need to be told if there is, in fact, a real problem or whether the problem is being portrayed accurately or disproportionately to its impact.

 

If healthy, rational debate cannot inspire reasonable solutions, the agricultural industry shouldn’t shy away from litigation.

 

While they’re not likely to become allies in the near future, environmentalists and growers need to agree on one basic principle:

 

Saving the planet and saving the family farm do not have to be mutually exclusive causes.

 

Steven Hoch is the managing partner of the Los Angeles office of the Hatch & Parent law firm. He has 20 years of legal experience, most of which has entailed taking the leading position in major and complex environmental matters and civil actions. #

http://tracypress.com/content/view/10870/2244/

####

No comments:

Blog Archive