This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 8/24/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

August 24, 2007

 

3. Watersheds

 

DELTA SMELT:

Hearing on Delta smelt delayed - Stockton Record

 

LAKE DAVIS PIKE:

Calif. hopes to hook lake's pike problem - USA Today

 

HYDRILLA:

More hydrilla plants found in Clear Lake around Soda Bay - Lake County Record Bee

 

WATERSHED RESTORATION FUNDS:

DWR Awards $10 Million in Grants to Study, Restore, and Value Watersheds - News Release, Department of Water Resources

 

 

DELTA SMELT:

Hearing on Delta smelt delayed

Stockton Record – 8/24/07

 

FRESNO - A federal hearing over how to distribute water to two-thirds of California next year without imperiling the Delta smelt will not continue until next week, an environmental group said Wednesday.

 

The hearing began Tuesday and was expected to last until today. A death in the family of one of the attorneys will delay today's testimony until Wednesday, a spokesman for Earthjustice said. #

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070824/A_NEWS/70823012

 

 

LAKE DAVIS PIKE:

Calif. hopes to hook lake's pike problem

USA Today – 8/24/07

By John Ritter, staff writer

 

PORTOLA, Calif. — Outside this community in the eastern Sierra Nevada lies one of the West's great trout lakes. At least it was until northern pike, a voracious consumer of trout, invaded and then defied costly efforts to eradicate it.

 

The pike so thoroughly infested Lake Davis that state wildlife managers poisoned the water 10 years ago and killed all the fish, including the lake's trophy-sized trout. Other lakes around the country have gotten similar treatments, but never before was a town's water supply poisoned.

 

Health concerns and bitter protests marked that nine-month ordeal in 1997-98. Word spread in the trout world: avoid Lake Davis. Tourism and local businesses suffered. But trout came back in abundance after the state restocked the lake with one million fish. And, in 1999, so did pike.

 

Now, eight years later, the state wants to poison Lake Davis again, vowing to do the job right.

 

"Hopefully it'll work this time," says Tammy Milvey, owner of Gold Rush Sporting Goods, who depends on fishermen and campers for 85% of her business. "I don't know if the community, the businesses, can handle another failure."

 

Milvey got $33,000 from a $9.1 million settlement approved by the California Legislature in 1998 after what wildlife officials concede was a botched effort to get rid of the pike. It wasn't enough, she says. "We're all losing now. People are just not coming to the lake," she says. "Where do we get compensated for our losses now. I'm just barely paying the bills."

 

Pike not only could destroy the lake's trout but also migrate into waterways draining into the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta above San Francisco Bay, threatening California's $2 billion-a-year salmon industry, says Steve Martarano, a spokesman for the state Fish and Game Department.

 

State learned from mistakes

 

Bill Powers was mayor of this town of 2,200 during the first poisoning. He and three others swam in the lake, chained themselves to a buoy and flirted with hypothermia in an attempt to stop it. Now, he's convinced the state learned from its mistakes and has a better plan.

 

"No one wants to see it done. It's sad that it has to happen," Powers says. "But after 10 years of chasing down answers, I think at least we can say it's going to be a one-shot deal and pose no health effects to the public."

 

A group called Save Lake Davis thinks unexplained illnesses were a consequence of the 1997 poisoning, including higher rates of cancer and learning disabilities, says Dan Wilson, an organizer. Research has not supported those claims, but Wilson says that's because state officials are satisfied that Lake Davis' water is safe even though trace amounts of poison remain.

 

"I agree with the scientists who say there's no safe levels of carcinogens in drinking water," he says. The city hasn't depended on lake water since 1997, but Wilson believes chemicals reached an aquifer that supplies wells.

 

Sarah Bensinger, owner of a store and campground near the lake, says Save Lake Davis represents fringe opposition and most people are eager to get the pike out. "I still get calls wanting to know are we going to blow up the lake, is it going to be drained, is there still poison in it," she says. "More harm's been done to me in the last eight years by not doing anything than if they took care of the issue right now."

 

The state's first pike eradication plan was flawed, but officials also did a poor job of public relations, Martarano says. This time, the department staffed an office in Portola, held several public meetings and involved residents in planning. It hired an economic consultant to assess local impacts.

 

When pike reappeared two years after the first poisoning, the state concluded that the fish escaped into streams and springs that drain into the lake, then returned once the chemicals dispersed.

 

This time, Martarano says, all the lake's tributaries, even small pools in the mountains, were identified with satellite technology.

 

They'll be poisoned first, shortly after Labor Day, then the lake itself will be treated, before tributaries get a second dose.

 

Want tourists to return

 

The same poison will be used as in 1997: rotenone, which deprives gill-breathing fish of oxygen but doesn't harm other wildlife.

 

A different method of spreading rotenone will be used so it disappears in a few weeks instead of months like last time,

Martarano says. The department will spend $16 million, deploy 550 people over several weeks and dump 17,000 gallons of poison into the lake, the biggest operation in its history.

 

"We often hear people say, 'Well, we fish pike in Minnesota and it's great. So why not here,' " Martarano says. "The answer is they've been existing for thousands of years in that habitat and they're native there."

 

Biologists believe pike were illegally introduced years ago into Frenchman Lake east of here and eventually made their way to Lake Davis, Martarano says. Poison was used in Frenchman in the late 1980s, and pike haven't returned.

 

Trout thrive in Lake Davis because of its rich food habitat. Pike like the lake because it's relatively shallow and has lots of vegetation where it can reproduce and hide to ambush trout.

 

"People are pulling out lots of fish, trout 20-24 inches long," says Margie Braddy, host at a campground on the lake. "It's just a matter of knowing how to do it."

 

Others say the fishing hasn't been as good this year because the state canceled its annual spring restocking in anticipation of the poisoning.

 

The city and Plumas County already are campaigning to bring tourists back to the lake with advertisements in fishing and outdoor magazines.

 

"Last time, once the lake tested clear and the state restocked it, we joked that there were so many fish you could catch a limit on a hook with no bait," says city manager Jim Murphy. "I think that will excite the tourist and the fisherman." #

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/environment/2007-08-23-lake-davis-trout_N.htm

 

 

HYDRILLA:

More hydrilla plants found in Clear Lake around Soda Bay

Lake County Record Bee – 8/24/07

By Tiffany Revelle, staff writer

 

LAKE COUNTY -- Another 10 hydrilla plants were spotted in Clear Lake over the past several days by agricultural technicians out looking for the invasive weed as part of the California Department of Agriculture's (CDFA) hydrilla eradication program for Clear Lake. That brings the total count of hydrilla found this year to 28, most of those finds being in Soda Bay.

 

Patrick Akers, CDFA's supervising scientist for the hydrilla project, said while the prolific aquatic plant is in several water bodies throughout the state, Clear Lake is one of the CDFA's biggest projects.

 

"We were expecting hydrilla to reappear after we stopped treating," said Akers in a Wednesday interview with the Record-Bee.

 

"We didn't know how much, but were expecting it to come back. That's part of the reality of this plant."

 

The CDFA has battled the hydrilla plant on Clear Lake since 1994. Akers explained that the herbicide fluridone, known by the trade name Sonar, has been used to combat the weed since 1996 in conjunction with a copper compound called Komeen. Since then, 2006 was the first time CDFA stopped applying the herbicide in order to determine if the eradication effort was effective.

 

"Hydrilla can look like it's gone for a long time, and once the control pressure is off they can come back," said Akers, adding that the CDFA bumped its crew up 50 percent this year in anticipation of just that.

 

The plant sprouts from tubers, which are potato-like seeds the size of navy beans. Akers said they can sit dormant in the sediment on the bottom of a water body for five to seven years waiting for ideal conditions to sprout into plants.

 

And once they do, they can double their biomass in a week to 10 days under ideal conditions, Akers explained.

 

Akers said while the weed has taken over water bodies stretching from Virginia to Florida across the southern U.S. including parts of Texas and Indiana, California is the only state that tries to eradicate the weed. It forms large mats that can take up 90 to 100 percent of a lake's surface, growing from an average depth of 30 feet, cutting off sunlight for other aquatic plants and sucking enough oxygen to create problems for freshwater fish.

 

"We're kind of running a big experiment here," said Akers of the CDFA's eradication efforts. "We don't have a lot of experience to draw on from other places to see how the game will play out with this plant." Akers added that the plant has reduced water delivery in the Imperial Irrigation District by 85 percent.

 

Florida spends roughly $30 million a year just controlling the weed, not eradicating it, said Akers. CDFA spends about $800,000 a year, which Akers said could go up by as much as $400,000 depending on how much Sonar is used. "We're probably going to put out 300 40-pound pales of Sonar, and they're about $800 per pale. Right there that's $240,000 of Sonar."

 

Approximately 150 acres on Clear Lake will get the treatment, and will continue to get the same treatment for at least the next three years.

 

"We take it very seriously about controlling the plants as young as we can possibly get them," said Akers, adding that in prime conditions the plants can produce new tubers in three weeks.

 

Akers said September is the time the plant usually starts producing tubers, although the particular type found in Clear Lake monoecious, a biotype of the hydrilla verticillata can produce tubers any time of the year.

 

Prime conditions for the plant to grow are when the water is above 50 degrees Fahrenheit, lots of sun and plenty of nutrients.

 

"The thing about Clear Lake is it's so murky that down at the bottom of the lake there's not a lot of sunlight, so it doesn't grow as fast," said Akers, adding that he's not convinced the plants agricultural technicians have been finding could make new tubers in three weeks. Still, he said, he knows they're getting close. #

http://www.record-bee.com/local/ci_6705535

 

 

WATERSHED RESTORATION FUNDS:

DWR Awards $10 Million in Grants to Study, Restore, and Value Watersheds

News Release, Department of Water Resources – 8/16/07

Contact: Kristyne Miller, 916-651-9621

 

SACRAMENTO -- The California Department of Water Resources, Division of Planning and Local Assistance, has awarded more than $10 million in CALFED grants to 27 watershed projects throughout the state. Originally, 95 watershed organizations asking for a total of $37.4 million applied for Proposition 50 watershed grants.

 

The money comes from the sale of $3.4 billion in bonds approved by voters as Proposition 50 in November 2002.The projects range from assessing the condition of watersheds to restoring local creeks and rivers to placing an economic value on the watershed approach.

 

A watershed is a region draining into a creek, river, river system or other body of water. In California, there are about 1,500 watersheds. Some are as big as the Sacramento River watershed that drains much of Northern California; others are as small as Laguna Creek watershed, which drains several miles in Sacramento County.

 

The list of 27 grant recipients is on-line at:
http://www.watershedrestoration.water.ca.gov/watersheds

The Department of Water Resources operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. #

www.water.ca.gov

####

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive