This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATER QUALITY - 8/22/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

August 22, 2007

 

4. Water Quality

 

URBAN QUALITY ISSUES:

Merchants told water is tainted; Chula Vista center connected to pipes carrying treated sewage - San Diego Union Tribune

 

PERCHLORATE:

Perchlorate delay prompts protest - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION:

Water cleanup plans advance; JPL treatment plant still needs city's OK - Pasadena Star News

 

 

URBAN QUALITY ISSUES:

Merchants told water is tainted; Chula Vista center connected to pipes carrying treated sewage

San Diego Union Tribune – 8/22/07

By Anne Kruger, staff writer

 

Shop owners in a Chula Vista business park knew something was wrong with their water. It tasted bad, smelled funny and had a yellowish tint.

 

“You would flush the toilet, and it looked like it wasn't flushed,” said Amy Wise, co-owner of the Candy Bouquet, which sends out candy arrangements.

 

The Otay Water District assured the merchants that the water was fine, but the merchants weren't convinced. The park's property manager sent a water sample to a private lab and got some shocking news Friday.

 

For two years, occupants of the 17 businesses in Eastlake's Fenton Business Center have been drinking and washing their hands in treated sewage water.

 

Somehow, the park was hooked up to a pipe carrying recycled water – treated wastewater intended solely for irrigation – instead of drinking water. Now the Otay district is dealing with distraught merchants and the question of how this could have happened.

 

Signs are now posted on all the businesses warning people not to drink the water. Two food-related businesses – the Candy Bouquet and Dream Dinners, a store that provides ingredients for make-and-freeze meals – were closed by the county Department of Environmental Health.

 

Yesterday, water district representatives met with the business owners in a hot, empty office at the business park. About 20 people crammed into the tiny room and peppered officials with questions.

 

“We just want peace of mind,” said Joe Padilla, owner of a computer store.

 

Otay General Manager Mark Watton didn't have a lot of answers, but he did make some promises. The water district would pay for medical tests for workers, and would compensate the businesses for their losses.

 

“We want to do whatever we need to do to make things right,” Watton said.

 

Watton said the water system has been repaired, but the state Department of Public Health requires more clean samples before the water is deemed safe and the two food-related businesses can reopen. Watton said he expects that to happen tomorrow afternoon.

 

Ken August, a spokesman for the state Department of Public Health, said officials are investigating.

 

“We have learned about the situation and we are evaluating it,” Au gust said.

 

Recycled water is not tested as rigorously as drinking water because it is not meant to be consumed. Several shop owners expressed concerns that they or their employees could be sickened by the lingering taint of bad water.

 

Watton said this is the first time he has heard of recycled water being accidentally sent to a drinking tap in the county.

 

Reports tell of cases elsewhere, including San Antonio in 2002 and Calabasas in 1997. The San Antonio Water System recently paid $19,500 to settle a 2003 lawsuit filed by 13 people who alleged they were sickened by the treated wastewater.

 

Otay officials say they are still trying to figure out how the mistake occurred.

 

Watton said when the three buildings of the business park were constructed in 2002, they apparently were connected to a purple pipe, the color that usually designates a recycled-water line, instead of a pipe with drinking water.

 

The business park opened in July 2005, and the water that flowed in was made up of about four parts drinking water to one part recycled water, Watton said.

 

In May, the Otay Water District entered into a deal with the city of San Diego to buy 6 million gallons of recycled water a day from San Diego's two reclamation plants. Otay began pumping 100 percent recycled water instead of the blend of recycled and drinking water.

 

That's when the merchants noticed the funky smell, look and taste.

 

Josh Bristol, the owner of a home-decorating store, complained to Otay officials in an e-mail July 27. Watton said workers flushed the system clean and thought the problem was resolved.

 

Wise, who co-owns the Candy Bouquet with Angela Mason, said she contacted the business park owners a couple of weeks ago when she noticed the water's yellowish tint.

 

The private lab's testing showed the presence of total coliform bacteria. The bacteria is not necessarily harmful, but its presence indicates contamination. The lab warned that the sample appeared to be recycled water, and said occupants should be warned not to drink it.

Recycling water for irrigation is not the same as the long-discussed plan in San Diego to send highly treated wastewater back to taps, a program detractors have dubbed “toilet to tap.”

 

Although most businesses in the Eastlake park are open, the owners of the Candy Bouquet and Dream Dinners wait and worry about the damage to their reputations.

They said their customers are not at risk. Wise said her business uses only prepackaged candy. Jennifer Kober, owner of Dream Dinners, said customers are required to wear gloves when preparing food and no one drinks the tap water or uses it in food preparation. Only filtered water was used with the ingredients and in the coffee brewed there.

 

Wise said she fears she'll lose customers when they see the county's “closed” notice.

 

“People don't want to know the excuses,” she said. “They just see the sign on the door.”  #

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20070822-9999-1n22otay.html

 

 

PERCHLORATE:

Perchlorate delay prompts protest

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 8/22/07

By Jason Pesick, staff writer

 

RIALTO - They had planned to gather at the county building here for a state hearing to determine if three companies should have to clean up water contamination.

 

Instead, members of the Riverside-based Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice held a rally to protest the hearing's suspension.

 

"How many more years do we have to wait?" said Susana Negrete of San Bernardino in Spanish.

 

Dozens of people marched along Foothill Boulevard to the county Department of Behavioral Health building and then back along Foothill to protest the lack of progress toward cleanup.

 

"Justice delayed is justice denied!" they chanted while carrying signs calling for cleanup.

 

They also carried "WANTED" posters with pictures of the heads of the three companies - Goodrich, Pyro Spectaculars and Black and Decker - accused of being responsible for the pollution. The signs labeled each man "Public Enemy #1."

 

From industrial sites used since World War II on the north end of the city, high concentrations of perchlorate are flowing south toward Colton and possibly west toward Fontana.

 

Rialto's estimate of the cleanup costs comes to $300 million. The chemical was discovered in the city's water supply in 1997.

 

Perchlorate is used in the production of explosives, including rocket fuel, fireworks and even airbags.

 

It can interfere with the thyroid's production of hormones that are important to the development of the nervous system.

 

Rialto, whose Water Department serves about half the city, has hired a team of lawyers to pursue the parties responsible for the contamination.

 

But that effort has faced a number of delays and has continued to increase in cost.

 

CCAEJ's executive director, Penny Newman, called the companies "domestic, corporate terrorists" and called on Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to put together a task force to take action.

 

Aside from the City Council, she said no other elected officials have taken action to clean up the perchlorate.

 

Newman called the state regulatory agencies charged with dealing with pollution "totally impotent."

 

"Such delays would not be tolerated in any other situation," she said.

 

Newman said that every day that no action is taken, the perchlorate continues to move through the city and contaminate more drinking water.

 

Water from contaminated wells is treated before being served to residents.

 

Tuesday was supposed to be the first day of state hearings to determine whether the three companies are responsible for part of the mess and whether they should be made to clean it up.

 

Those companies have been able to delay the hearings numerous times by raising complaints about the fairness of the process.

 

On Aug. 13, the companies filed suits in Los Angeles County Superior Court saying the process would violate their due process rights in part because the people prosecuting them had been talking about the case with the State Water Resources Control Board.

 

The board and the prosecutors had been discussing the case outside the hearings.

 

The judge decided to issue a temporary stay to stop the hearings from going forward until she could listen to both sides' arguments.

 

On Friday, the court date for her to listen to those arguments was delayed until October because of scheduling issues after the state board's lawyer asked the court to move the issue to San Bernardino.

 

If that move happens, a court hearing on the fairness of the state hearings would again be delayed.

 

CCAEJ was supposed to be a party in the state board hearings, meaning it would have had the same amount of time in the hearings to make its case as the city of Rialto, the three companies and local Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board staff, the prosecutor.

 

But the process has taken so long and was such a drain on resources that CCAEJ had to drop out, Newman said before the rally.

 

As a nonprofit, the organization doesn't even have a lawyer to help it comply with the 26 subpoenas it received.

 

"I think it really raised for us how this public process ... has been really converted into this legal morass," Newman said.

 

During its time at the hearings, the organization wanted to focus on the key components it feels should be in a cleanup order.

 

Now that it is not a designated party in the hearings, its time will be allocated for public comment.

 

Newman said more pressure will be put on elected officials to push this process forward.

 

"This is an environmental disaster over there," she said. #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/search/ci_6684914?IADID=Search-www.dailybulletin.com-www.dailybulletin.com

 

 

GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION:

Water cleanup plans advance; JPL treatment plant still needs city's OK

Pasadena Star News – 8/20/07

By Elsie Kleeman, staff writer

 

PASADENA - A proposed treatment plant to clean groundwater contaminated by JPL's Superfund site has moved another step closer to reality.

 

Plans for the $3.1 million plant, which would be built on city land at 2696 Windsor Ave., were recently approved by a consortium of state and federal oversight agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

 

"We all agree that the path forward that we've described ... is the right path forward," said Steve Slaten, the project's manager for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which is overseeing the cleanup.

 

The project will now be considered by Pasadena city officials. The city is requiring a design review, an environmental impact analysis and a conditional use permit for the plant.

 

At public meetings last year, many residents of the residential area of Northwest Pasadena and surrounding Altadena expressed concern about the noise, dust, traffic and visual blight that the construction of a treatment plant might bring.

 

"We have acknowledged that we will address those concerns during construction," Slaten said.

 

Though plans for mitigation efforts have not been drafted yet, Slaten said, "the city process called the initial study, which we're putting together right now, will have all the detailed specifics."

 

Slaten expected the study would be completed in the fall.

 

The city's environmental review process will investigate whether the NASA plan adequately mitigates such quality-of-life issues.

 

It also will include more opportunities for public comment, said John Poindexter, Pasadena's planning manager.

 

Slaten expected construction on the plant to begin next year, with the majority of the work being done in summer 2008.

 

The new treatment plant would be the third NASA has built to curb and treat a spreading plume of toxic perchlorate and volatile organic compounds that leached from waste pits in the 1940s and 1950s.

 

High doses of perchlorate have been shown to disrupt thyroid function in humans. Both perchlorate and volatile organic compounds are possible carcinogens.

 

The two other plants on the JPL campus and for the Lincoln Avenue Water Co. in Altadena will continue to remain in service, Slaten said. The JPL plant is now being expanded.

 

NASA and Pasadena are also debating who is responsible for funding the perchlorate cleanup at a fourth location, known as Sunset Wells.

 

A NASA study has claimed JPL was not the source of the that pollution, but a city consultant has called some of the agency's methods and results into question.

 

Though the city is still hoping to find NASA responsible, Shan Kwan, Pasadena Water and Power's director of water said it is going forward with designing and building the plant to keep the contamination plume from spreading further. #

http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/search/ci_6674109?IADID=Search-www.pasadenastarnews.com-www.pasadenastarnews.com

####

No comments:

Blog Archive