This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 8/1/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

August 1, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER SUPPLY:

2-inch fish threatens area's water supply - Pasadena Star News

 

TUOLUMNE RIVER WATER:

Activists call PUC plan an unwise water grab; Two environmental groups say Tuolumne River water would go for suburban landscaping - Oakland Tribune

 

SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY CONSERVATION:

Efforts to save water paying off; County reports 16.6% reduction in diversions from Russian River, urges continued conservation - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

DESALINATION:

Panel to consider desal permit; Approval recommended for Cal Am's Moss Landing project - Monterey Herald

 

URBAN WATER SUPPLY ISSUES:

Dry wells could soon be flowing; Prunedale: Supervisors OK funds for pipeline project touted as lifesaver - Monterey Herald

 

Walton water pricey - Marysville Appeal Democrat

 

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER SUPPLY:

2-inch fish threatens area's water supply

Pasadena Star News – 8/1/07

By Alison Hewitt, staff writer

 

Delta smelt - endangered, finger-size fish that smell like cucumbers and live in the Sacramento Delta - could make the current drought even harder for Southern California.

 

Even about 400-odd miles away, the delta can have a major impact on Southern California's water, where billions of gallons of delta water are used every year. This year, the 2-inch fish are throwing their weight around.

 

Invasive species and pesticides in the delta mean the delta smelt population has been on the decline. When their yearly migration took them past the pumps that suck delta water down to Southern California, too many of the cucumbery fish were pulled into the pumps, said Sue Sims, spokeswoman for the State Water Project. The SWP, which distributes delta water across the state, then took the unprecedented step of shutting the pumps off for more than a week in June.

 

Southern California still received all of its water because the SWP drained a massive reservoir down to a quarter of its original capacity, and the pumps are back up to full speed again. But water levels in the delta and the reservoir are still low, and smelt will spawn again next year - and the pumps could be shut off once more.

 

"What happened this year will most certainly happen again," Sims said. "Nobody up here thinks this is a one-time occurrence.

 

"We've got a delta that's broken that needs to be fixed," she continued. "We've got to figure out a better way to move clean, safe water through the delta and protect the species that live there."

 

The prospect of another shutoff is worrying to local water officials.

 

At the Metropolitan Water District, a coalition of cities and water agencies spanning six Southern California counties, water resources manager Stephen Arakawa said the MWD has water stored in reservoirs and groundwater designed for use in dry years.

 

But this isn't just a dry year for Southern California. Usually wetter Northern California is also in drought. It's the eighth year of drought for the Colorado River, from which MWD used to get about half its water and now only gets a third.

 

Finally, the smelt could cut MWD's allocation of delta water by as much as 50 percent, according to some of the solutions being proposed, Arakawa said. That's a lot of strain to put on MWD's storage, he said.

 

"If we're facing multiple years of the smelt cutback, that storage is only going to last so long," he said. "If we have another dry year, that will make it even worse."

 

MWD is already making do with 60 percent of the water that it requested from the delta for the year, Arakawa said. At that level, the district's usual efforts to put "replenishment water" into the ground to buoy the water table have been curtailed.

 

There's no replenishment water available from the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, either, said General Manager Tim Jochem. Another pump shutdown in the delta would force the district to rely even more on storage, he said.

 

"We'll draw down our Southern California storage even more, putting us closer to the point where mandatory rationing is a possibility," Jochem said.

 

The cutback on "spreading water," as replenishment water is also known, is drying up local spreading grounds, like those north of Glendora and Azusa.

 

The Upper Canyon Basin Spreading Grounds - hefty lake-like basins where untreated water from sources like the MWD seeps into the ground to feed groundwater supplies - look like nearly-drained bathtubs.

 

The basin water levels have dropped 60 feet in the past six months, said Steve Patton, Glendora water division manager. There's still 20 to 30 feet to go before they hit bottom, he added.

 

Glendora still receives enough treated drinking water from MWD, but the City Council asked residents this week to reduce their water use by 10 percent.

 

"This is the lowest I've seen it, and I've been here 15 years," Patton said. "The water's just not available."  #

http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/news/ci_6513695

 

 

TUOLUMNE RIVER WATER:

Activists call PUC plan an unwise water grab; Two environmental groups say Tuolumne River water would go for suburban landscaping

Oakland Tribune – 8/1/07

By Douglas Fischer, staff writer

 

A San Francisco Public Utilities Commission proposal to draw more water from Yosemite's famed Tuolumne River is as unwise as it is unnecessary, two environmental groups asserted Tuesday. Most irksome: The bulk of the crystal-clear water is destined for suburban lawns and landscaping.

 

The report, by the Pacific Institute and the Tuolumne River Trust, claims the SFPUC's estimates for water use in 2030 overinflate demand and fail to pursue promising conservation efforts. The result, the groups say, is a missed opportunity to decrease the region's reliance on the river and a failure to prepare for the thinner Sierra snowpack expected with global warming.

 

"The policy choices are just out of whack," said Heather Dempsey, the Trust's Bay Area program manager and a report co-author.

 

"But we've met with intense resistance from the (commission) and their customers."

 

The utility is simply in the midst of assessing demand scenarios, noted SFPUC spokesman Tony Winnicker. No decisions have been made, and conservation remains a paramount priority, he added.

 

The groups' report, he said, will get the commission's full attention as it decides early next year what demand scenarios to adopt.

 

"We agree that as a region we can and should do more about water conservation, water recycling, and looking beyond our Sierra supplies," Winnicker said. "There are no missed opportunities. We have seized those that we can and are looking for more. We share the same priorities."

 

San Francisco's Hetch Hetchy water system, the region's largest, is in the midst of a massive undertaking to assess future water needs and the impacts of a $4.3 billion seismic retrofit program. It delivers water to 2.4 million customers in San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara and Alameda counties.

 

It also is under some pressure to find alternative sources to the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir, which plugs the Tuolumne River within Yosemite National Park and Preserve.

 

But rather than slack that thirst, the SFPUC expects to whet it by 11 percent over the next 23 years. The extra water will all go to the utility's suburban customers in San Mateo, Santa Clara and Alameda counties.

 

Today the utility draws 218 million gallons a day from the Tuolumne, enough to fill a tanker truck every two seconds. The utility's preferred scenario recommends taking an additional 25 million gallons a day from the river by 2030, with 60 percent of that extra water, according to the groups' analysis, going for outdoor water use: Golf courses, corporate landscaping, residential yards.

 

Hayward presents the most egregious example, said Dempsey, with a projected 45 percent increase in water use by 2030. The city's assumptions, she said, include a doubling of residential water use and irrigating a golf course with Hetch Hetchy water.

 

Hayward officials counter that the city's per capita water use sits well below other cities within the region, and that the city's growth patterns — with an emphasis on manufacturing — differ from those of cities on the Peninsula and South Bay.

 

As for the golf courses, two of the city's three courses are watered with either well or recycled water. The third is a new course in the hills, out of reach of such supplies but designed to use a minimal amount of potable water.

 

But any dispute over future Tuolumne River use risks obscuring two important points, cautioned Art Jensen, general manager of the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Authority. The Authority represents the 28 suburban cities and water districts buying water from San Francisco.

 

The first is that the SFPUC's projection is simply a conservative baseline estimate, he said. The second is that the seismic retrofit must not be delayed by any squabble over water needs some decades hence.

 

"We don't need all this water tomorrow," he said. "Let's get the improvements made, and if we can forestall the date we have to go to the Tuolumne River, great."

 

"We have a lot of common interests here." #

http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_6515165

 

 

SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY CONSERVATION:

Efforts to save water paying off; County reports 16.6% reduction in diversions from Russian River, urges continued conservation

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 8/1/07

By Clark Mason, staff writer

 

Drop by drop, gallon by gallon, the conservation efforts of consumers in Sonoma and Marin counties are leading to ever-decreasing use of Russian River water.

ADVERTISEMENT


As of Tuesday, the Sonoma County Water Agency said it had achieved a 16.6 percent reduction in the amount of water siphoned from the river, exceeding the state-mandated 15 percent level.

The agency delivers water to 600,000 residential and business customers in Sonoma and Marin counties.

"We continue to save water. Those are good numbers," said Water Agency spokesman Brad Sherwood.

He cautioned that the order to reduce Russian River diversions applies through Oct. 28 and conservation efforts need to be sustained.

"We haven't had an enormously bad heat wave, which drives up demand," he said. "Weather plays an enormous factor."

But Sherwood said the message has gotten out and people are genuinely concerned about saving water.

They also don't want to be singled out as water wasters and reported by their neighbors.

"The water cops have people concerned. They don't want to be tagged or embarrassed," Sherwood said.

Officials credit most of the reduction in Russian River diversions with conservation efforts, but some of the cities and districts that contract with the Water Agency also have switched to their own wells or local reservoirs.

The Water Agency is under state order to reduce diversions from the Russian River by 15 percent from July 1 through Oct. 28, compared to the same period in 2004.

The mandate is intended to save enough water for the fall salmon run. By reducing diversions from the Russian River, officials hope to retain more water in Lake Mendocino near Ukiah.

Santa Rosa, Windsor, Rohnert Park, Cotati, Petaluma, Sonoma and two Marin water districts -- all of which obtain water from the Water Agency -- have called for conservation measures by residents and businesses.

A relatively dry past winter is one reason Lake Mendocino is lower, but it's also because diversions of water from the Eel River have been cut back to preserve fish habitat in that watershed.

Officials call the situation a "regulatory drought." There's plenty of water in Lake Sonoma, but releases are also restricted there to prevent disruption of migrating endangered fish in Dry Creek.

The figures released Tuesday show the Water Agency pumped 5,713 acre-feet of water from the Russian River for the first 30 days of July, a 16.6 percent reduction from the 6,852 acre-feet pumped during the same period in 2004. An acre-foot is approximately 326,000 gallons.

Cities have also turned to other sources for water.

Glen Wright, Santa Rosa's deputy director of water resources, said the city activated two of its wells off Farmers Lane, which produce about 2 million gallons a day. Historically, he said, the city's total use in the summer is about 32 to 34 million gallons a day.

Wright estimated that roughly two-thirds of the reduction in Santa Rosa this past month can be attributed to conservation and one-third to switching to its own wells.

But Wright, like other water officials, said conservation efforts have caught on with the general public.

He said the city's water conservation unit has beefed up its staff to handle more than 20 calls per hour that come in to the hot line at 543-3985.

Residents and businesses can call to ask for a water audit to improve their own water habits or report instances of excess or improper outdoor water use. #

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20070801/NEWS/708010329/1033/NEWS01

 

 

DESALINATION:

Panel to consider desal permit; Approval recommended for Cal Am's Moss Landing project

Monterey Herald – 8/1/07

By Kevin Howe, staff writer

 

The use of Moss Landing Power Plant's cooling water intake system to feed an experimental desalination plant will be reviewed today by the California Energy Commission in Sacramento.

 

The commission will consider a permit allowing power plant owner Dynegy to alter the plant's cooling water intake system to feed an experimental desalination plant to be operated for a year by California American Water to see if turning seawater to fresh water to solve the area's water shortage is feasible.

 

The power plant's intake pipes would be modified to divert cooling water to the desalination plant, where it will be treated by reverse osmosis to filter salt and other minerals.

 

The resulting fresh water, along with the concentrated salty brine left over from the process, would be fed back into the power plant's outfall to Monterey Bay.

 

The pilot plant has been approved by Monterey County and the California Coastal Commission, said Cal Am spokeswoman Catherine Bowie.

 

The Energy Commission staff has recommended approval of the permit, she said, and "their findings are in line with the state Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Coastal Commission and Monterey County, which all found that the pilot plant will have no significant environmental impact."

 

Madeleine Clark, director of the Elkhorn Slough Coalition, disagrees.

 

In addition to Cal Am's pilot plant, she said, Pajaro-Sunny Mesa Community Services District is contemplating installation of a similar plant in Moss Landing, and a third pilot desalination plant there may be in the works.

 

"This decision should not be made in a vacuum," she said. "The cumulative effects of all three pilot plants need to be considered."

 

The Elkhorn Slough Coalition has voiced concern about the destruction of marine organisms sucked into the intake pipes and the increased in temperature, mineral and chemical content of the water that is discharged back into the bay.

 

"We ask that the commission deny Dynegy's petition and put an end to these continual delays by Cal Am to provide viable water supply to the Monterey Peninsula," Clark said.

 

The 6,500-square-foot pilot desalination plant will cost approximately $3 million and divert up to 288,000 gallons of seawater per day from the power plant's once-through cooling water intake system, which draws 180 million to 1 billion gallons a day.

 

The sea water will go through two parallel pretreatment processes and reverse osmosis systems, and the desalinated water — as well as the brine discharge produced by the pilot plant — will be mixed back into the power plant's outfall before being discharged into Monterey Bay. None of the desalinated water produced will be used for human consumption.

 

On the way through the plant, the water will be treated with or come in contact with various treatment chemicals, including chlorine, acids, coagulants, polymers and cleaning agents applied at various times to the plant machinery.

 

Discharge of such chemicals is expected to amount to less than 100 gallons a day, along with about 100 pounds of residual solids per day. The heaviest concentrations will go into a sewer system, not the outfall.

 

The facility will be used to test for water quality as required by the state Department of Health Services before that agency can issue a permit for the full-scale facility proposed by the company.

 

The pilot desalination plant is a precursor to development of a $200 million regional seawater desalination plant and distribution system by Cal Am at or near Moss Landing that would produce 11,730 acre-feet of fresh, potable water a year.

 

The water company's Coastal Water Project is its attempt to comply with a 1995 order by the state Water Resources Control Board to stop overpumping in the Carmel River.

 

That year the water board advised Cal Am that it was taking 14,106 acre-feet per year from the Carmel River aquifer, 10,730 acre-feet more than the state allows. The company has rights to only 3,376 acre-feet from that aquifer, but the state allowed Cal Am to continue drawing water over that amount to meet public needs until it can find a new source.

 

A court has ordered that producers of water from the Seaside basin aquifer — Sand City, Seaside, Cal Am and others — reduce their pumping from the aquifer's coastal subareas by 2,219 acre-feet and their pumping from the Laguna Seca subarea by 381 acre-feet, for a total reduction for the entire Seaside basin of 2,600 acre-feet by October 2027.

 

In 2004, the company proposed its Coastal Water Project, a desalination and aquifer and storage and recovery system to meet the state requirement.

 

The commission meeting begins at 10 a.m. in Hearing Room A, 1516 Ninth St. Audio from this meeting will be broadcast over the Internet.

 

For information, see www.energy.ca.gov/webcast/.  #

http://www.montereyherald.com/local/ci_6514174?nclick_check=1

 

 

URBAN WATER SUPPLY ISSUES:

Dry wells could soon be flowing; Prunedale: Supervisors OK funds for pipeline project touted as lifesaver

Monterey Herald – 8/1/07

By Jim Johnson, staff writer

 

A new pipeline system designed to deliver water to Prunedale residents whose wells have run dry, begun to peter out or have been contaminated got a big boost from county supervisors Tuesday.

 

The board agreed to dole out nearly $150,000 for project development and engineering costs for the proposal, which is being touted as a lifesaver for many in the so-called granite ridge neighborhood, some of whom have been out of water for years.

 

County officials have selected consultant RMC Water and Environment to conduct the study, which is expected to take about six months.

 

County officials and an ad hoc committee of community members have been meeting for months to develop the project, which would consist of a "backbone" water supply system including a main transmission pipeline, storage tanks and new water wells that could be connected to existing independent water systems.

 

If the consultant finds the proposal is feasible, the project would be paid for through a ballot measure voted on by potential customers in the area, which is bordered by Highway 101, San Miguel Canyon Road and Dunbarton Road. The ballot proceeds would also pay the county back for the development costs.

 

Lou Solton, a resident of the area who has served on the ad-hoc committee and is the county treasurer-tax collector, called the project a "well thought-out plan" that addresses a crucial "health and safety issue" in Prunedale.

 

Solton noted that about 1,000 homes in the area have already experienced water quality and quantity problems, as well as the "disturbing" trend of an increasing number of water trucks in the area.

 

Supervisor Lou Calcagno, who spearheaded the effort, noted that many residents have seen their property values plunge as their wells have stopped producing water. With this project, Calcagno said, "their property values will go way up."

 

Calcagno said concerns expressed by some Prunedale residents that the new water system could be growth-inducing are off base. He said the system will likely be restricted to existing lots of record and not for any subdivisions.

 

No one showed up at Tuesday's hearing to oppose the project, a fact that Supervisor Dave Potter noted and attributed to community outreach.

 

Calcagno said he expects some opposition as the project progresses.

 

County Water Resources Agency director Curtis Weeks said there will be community meetings to inform area residents about the project once the consultant begins the development work, though none have been scheduled.

 

Sig Matt, a 40-year Prunedale resident who has also served on the ad-hoc committee, said the lack of water should be a concern for the entire north county area.

 

"As a community, we should all come together to find a solution for this problem," Matt said.

 

The pipeline will only serve the granite ridge area for now, though it could be extended to other areas in Prunedale that are experiencing water shortages, according to county officials. #

http://www.montereyherald.com/local/ci_6514177

 

 

Walton water pricey

Marysville Appeal Democrat – 8/1/07

By John Dickey, staff writer

 

A glass of water that meets federal standards won’t be cheap for the 3,000 or so Walton-area homes using groundwater from a treatment plant.

Yuba City officials Tuesday put the price tag of converting to city surface water from the Feather River at $5,800 per home.

If residents choose instead to make repairs to the ground water system, that will be even more costly, adding up to $7,460 per home.

Residents without a water meter can add another $500 to the bill which could be paid in cash, as part of a monthly water bill, or as an assessment that shows up on property tax bills, if a district was formed.

Those figures work out to an annual payment of anywhere from $410 to $715 over 20 years, depending on whether the city gets a low-interest loan from the state and on which type of water residents decide on.

Costs were released at a community meeting at the Yuba City Moose Lodge, which was provided at no charge to the city. More than 100 residents packed the hall.

City officials say the need to fix the water system is prompted by new rules from the Environmental Protection Agency. Standards for the amount of arsenic allowed in drinking water were lowered from 50 parts per billion to 10 ppb.

“The water quality didn’t change – the regulations changed,” Utilities Director Bill Lewis said in an interview.

Residents are getting groundwater that averages 14.6 ppb, according to a city report.

Excessive nitrates are also a problem for one groundwater well that supplied extra water during summer. The state Department of Health Services ordered the city to take the well out of service.

“By losing that well, we no longer have enough water to meet their needs,” said Lewis.

Some residents may find the bill harder to swallow than the arsenic.

Dorian Kittrell, 44, of Littlejohn Road, figured infrastructure costs money. And he’ll get plenty of years of better water – though he faces costs of as much as $14,000 for his two lots.

But the older neighborhood is filled with aging residents who may struggle with the bill, worried Kittrell.

“I just feel sorry for all these elderly people, I really do,” said Kittrell.

The city is looking for a decision in September on whether to fix the former Hillcrest Water Co. groundwater plant or hook up to city surface water. The payment method has to be figured out by December. #

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/news/water_51956___article.html/city_residents.html

####

No comments:

Blog Archive