This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 7/12/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

July 12, 2007

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People

 

LEVEE ISSUES:

S.J. levees called unfit; Homeowners, developments may be hit hard - Stockton Record

 

FLOOD CONTROL:

Editorial: Floods and farming; Sacramento River needs urban, rural strategy - Sacramento Bee

 

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT:

Water district director named high-paid adviser; District CEO Stan Williams and former board member Greg Zlotnick defend decision as best for the district - Palo Alto Online

 

ANTELOPE VALLEY WATER PLAN:

Deadline looms for final version of AV water plan - Antelope Valley Press

 

 

LEVEE ISSUES:

S.J. levees called unfit; Homeowners, developments may be hit hard

Stockton Record – 7/12/07

By Greg Kane, staff writer

 

The state flood-control agency doesn't think levees running along the San Joaquin River between Weston Ranch and Lathrop are fit to provide 100-year flood protection - a belief that could curb area development and force nearby homeowners to purchase flood insurance.

 

California Department of Water Resources Deputy Director Leslie Harder said in a recent letter that the levees are vulnerable to water seeping through their walls, a process known as underseepage. As a result, the state refused to sign an agreement that would give the reclamation district maintaining the levees a two-year window to prove they meet federal flood-protection standards.

 

The denial throws a new wrinkle into a plan federal officials hoped would keep thousands of San Joaquin County homes from being thrown into a newly created flood plain when revised flood maps are released later this year. Reclamation District 17 is the first of many expected to ask the DWR for its support in the coming weeks, and further rejection raises questions about whether the Federal Emergency Management Agency will grant extensions.

 

"It may become a poster child for a larger problem," said Steve Winkler, the county's deputy public works director.

 

The extension was offered earlier this year by FEMA, which is updating flood maps across the nation. Many county levees that FEMA doesn't expect to meet 100-year flood protection requirements before the draft maps are released in October can apply for a two-year "partial accreditation," allowing more time to prove their worth.

 

Levees that don't meet FEMA's requirements and aren't awarded partial accreditation will be erased from the new flood maps, forcing many homeowners who live behind them to purchase flood insurance, which typically costs $400 a year for every $100,000 worth of coverage. FEMA also provides flood insurance.

 

The levees the DWR refused to support protect mostly farmland. But Ricardo Pineda, a supervising engineer with the state agency, said Wednesday that a break along one of those stretches would likely threaten homes in nearby Weston Ranch and Lathrop.

 

Levee officials challenge those assertions. Dante Nomellini, an attorney who represents the district, said recently the levees passed federal standards in the 1990s, and those standards have not changed since.

 

Underseepage is a common problem levees always have and always will face, Nomellini said. "Boils and seepage are not unknown to levees. They've been a product of levees since there have been levees," he said.

 

It's not clear whether the DWR's refusal will affect the district's extension. FEMA spokesman Frank Mansell said Wednesday there are meetings being held with state and local officials about how to proceed. Applications for extensions aren't due until the end of August.

 

There are already worries in Lathrop about how decertification would affect development. Richland Planned Communities, a developer working on a 6,800-home community in Lathrop, has raised concerns about the remapping effort, and the Manteca Unified School District recently postponed building a middle school because of similar fears.

 

Decertification of those levees also would likely force homeowners with federally backed mortgages in Weston Ranch and areas of Lathrop to purchase flood insurance, Pineda said.

 

The combined loss of planned development and mandatory insurance for residents would not be easy to swallow for the community, county Supervisor Steve Gutierrez said.

 

"It could be devastating," he said. #

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070712/A_NEWS/707120332

 

 

FLOOD CONTROL:

Editorial: Floods and farming; Sacramento River needs urban, rural strategy

Sacramento Bee – 7/12/07

 

When the Sacramento River floods, it doesn't stay tidily within its banks. The Sacramento Valley is proof of that.

 

Time was when the river at flood stage sprawled throughout the Valley, creating something that looked more like a sea. Levees now line the river and for the most part contain it. Yet the Sacramento has breached its banks somewhere just about every time the system is stressed.

 

This happens despite the best of intentions and considerable work to strengthen levees and direct the huge flows into various bypasses along the way. But it's reality.

 

Urban areas like Sacramento, with the most people and the most structures at stake, will inevitably have greater protection than rural areas that have mostly crops behind them. This is a river that simply cannot be armored to the hilt everywhere. The question is whether landowners and farmers in rural areas that face a greater chance of flooding should get some new form of compensation for their vital role in the overall system.

 

It certainly seems fair. Yet this would formalize something about flood control that understandably makes some rural landowners uncomfortable.

 

This is an important conversation to have between the rural and urban leaders of the Sacramento Valley. And it's good that Sacramento's congresswoman, Doris Matsui, has been trying to launch the dialogue.

 

Sacramento itself faces threats from two major rivers, the American River as well as the larger Sacramento. As a recent story by McClatchy Newspapers' David Whitney detailed, much progress has been made along the American River, thanks to spillway and levee projects that are in the works.

 

But the Sacramento River remains a work in progress. And one piece of the challenge is to recognize the importance of farming in the Sacramento Valley to providing flood protection for urbanized areas.

 

"The best flood protection," Matsui said in a recent interview, "is more farming." Farming in traditional flood basins will continue to maintain an important flexibility in a flood control system. When a farm floods during a huge storm, the lands retain and absorb waters that otherwise would flow downstream. Urbanizing these areas and fortifying subdivisions behind new levees would have the effect of sending a lot more water downstream during high river flows.

 

So if farming is an essential part of the overall system, shouldn't its role be identified and the farmers be rewarded? Of course.

 

But making that a reality is as tough a diplomatic assignment as there is in regional politics.

 

Matsui's efforts don't yet have the support of Rep. Wally Herger, the Republican from Chico who represents much of the Sacramento Valley. The public tone seems respectful, which is encouraging. But Matsui's efforts to create a funding program for Sacramento Valley flood relief through the next federal farm bill haven't yet been successful.

 

She should continue those efforts, but a federal source of funds for these local farmers is only one possible solution. Another is for urban areas within the Sacramento River floodplain to help compensate these farmers for providing the necessary relief valve to the flood control system.

 

It's important to realize that the flooding of farmland in a big storm isn't new. What's new is providing a steady form of funding for the farmers. Coming up with a system that is appropriate and fair is challenging, and it may take a while, but it is precisely what needs to be done. #

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/268221.html

 

 

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT:

Water district director named high-paid adviser; District CEO Stan Williams and former board member Greg Zlotnick defend decision as best for the district

Palo Alto Online – 7/12/07

By Becky Trout, staff writer

 

On Tuesday, Greg Zlotnick was a board member of the Santa Clara Valley Water District making about $230 per meeting. Today he is special counsel to the CEO Stan Williams at a salary of about $184,000 a year.

 

The newly created position was not publicized and the other six board members of the district, which delivers water and flood control services for most of Santa Clara County, weren't informed until June 28, when Zlotnick submitted his letter of resignation from the board.

 

"If that were done here in Palo Alto, where a council member were hired for an unposted, newly defined job and nobody knew the job was being headhunted for, I'd be terribly unhappy," Councilman Bern Beecham said Wednesday.

 

Beecham isn't the only one who smells something fishy.

 

The water district's board is now discussing "revolving door" legislation that would prohibit the immediate hiring of directors.

 

Both Zlotnick and Williams, who hired him, are being roundly blasted by the media, district critics and open-government advocates for the move.

 

But neither regrets the choice and both were eager to explain to the Weekly why the hire is good not only for Zlotnick's bank account but also for the district and its residents.

 

The water district supplies most of Santa Clara County with water, although Palo Alto and the northern Peninsula get water from San Francisco's Hetch Hetchy system.

 

Zlotnick, a Palo Alto native and 1982 Gunn High School graduate who now lives in Mountain View, said he did not apply for the job and was surprised when the offer landed in his lap.

 

"I did not know this was coming," Zlotnick said. But he gives Williams credit for recognizing the need for the position.

 

"What people think is somehow this was a nefarious action," Zlotnick said. "The way I look at this, the fact that the water district has a board member able to fill this position … is fortuitous."

 

The Sacramento-San Joaguin Delta, the source of half the district's water, is facing a crisis, both Zlotnick and Williams said. The recent decision to switch off the pumps that carry drinking and irrigation water to save the imperiled Delta smelt, a small fish, is one indication of the Delta's troubles, Zlotnick said.

 

Zlotnick has experience with CalFed -- the massive state and federal Delta project and as a water advisor for the California Department of Fish and Game.

 

He is an attorney versed in California's water issues and has been a district director for more than a decade.

 

No one was better to protect the district's interests in the Delta, Williams said. The urgency of the situation was complicated by the dry winter and the push by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to resolve California's water issues, he said.

 

"Everybody is ramping up their efforts to try to participate in what's going on. Something's going to have to change. The Delta is environmentally crashing now and there has to be some solution," Williams said.

 

Zlotnick said the new position -- which is new but was created using money already budgeted for salaries -- will involve Delta negotiations, leading the district as it adapts to climate change and developing a replacement flood control funding source when Measure B, passed in 2000, expires in 2016.

 

The hire was within Williams' authority as CEO, he said. He has control of 33 positions that are not represented by unions or bargaining units.

 

Williams said Zlotnick will not be the first person to move between the district's board and staff. Joe Pandit was a staff member who served on the board and then was rehired, Williams said.

 

Zlotnick's hire is "unique," however, Williams said.

 

Zlotnick was already representing the district in the Delta and state, but more was needed, Williams said.

 

Rather than realizing he needed another staffer, Williams said the need was for Zlotnick to work full time.

 

"The question was how do I get him to do that."

 

"He's our best, the best person this county can have represent us in these discussions," Williams said.

 

He acknowledged the district's attorney advised him to conduct an open, competitive recruitment.

 

Williams said he needed someone familiar with California water issues, the people involved, the district's position, the environment and Santa Clara County. And he needed that person right away, not in the three to six months a new recruitment usually takes.

 

"I could have written it out and gone out but it wouldn't have been a very fair process. There are so few people (to meet the qualifications) it would be really misleading."

 

"Then the question is, why do it? To tell people you did it. I think that's a weak response. It sounds better, but … who are you kidding and how much taxpayer money did you waste going through a process?"

 

Williams said he agrees that in general, a government agency shouldn't hire its political leaders and calls the criticism "just."

 

"When I made the decision, I was looking at our specific interest. I wasn't looking at making it a model," Williams said. "It could be misused."

 

Williams said he didn't notify the board earlier because having a board involved in hiring one of its members would be a "really dangerous thing."

 

Zlotnick said he's devoted most of the last 10 years to the water district doing nearly the same work he will now receive a salary for. To make that possible, his parents helped pay for some of his expenses.

 

"I've been fortunate," Zlotnick said.

 

He worked for a few law firms, but could only advise those who didn't do business with the water district.

 

"It was very difficult for me to find work that wasn't a conflict," he said.

 

Wednesday, one day before he technically started his new job, Zlotnick was already on the road to Sacramento for meetings about the Delta.

 

Zlotnick said he plans to remain involved in the San Francisquito Creek flood-control process as well, although he will no longer serve on the board of the Joint Powers Agency.

 

Beecham urged the board to consider the "propriety" of its action and pay attention to the advice it receives from its attorney.

 

The district is accepting applications for Zlotnick's vacated position. Applicants can live in Palo Alto, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Monte Sereno, Mountain View, Cupertino, Saratoga Stanford and portions of Sunnyvale or San Jose. Applications, available at www.valleywater.org are due July 19.

 

The board will select the next director, who will serve until Dec. 31, 2008.  #

http://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/show_story.php?id=5426

 

 

ANTELOPE VALLEY WATER PLAN:

Deadline looms for final version of AV water plan

Antelope Valley Press – 7/11/07

By James Rufus Koren, staff writer

 

LOS ANGELES - Grant applications and a final version of an Antelope Valley water plan originally were due to the state by this December, but the timetable was moved up last month, and on Tuesday the county supervisors approved paying nearly $500,000 to a consulting firm to get the applications and plan finished by Aug. 1.

 

The county's Waterworks District 40 has been putting off developing the Antelope Valley Integrated Water Management Plan, hoping to get grant money from the California Department of Water Resources and the State Water Resources Control Board.

 

"That means we have to do additional work to get the (water plan) done on time," said Melinda Barrett, a spokeswoman for the county Department of Public Works and the Waterworks Districts.

 

The board's decision Tuesday extends the county's contract with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, a firm that has been involved since October in the water management plan's creation.

 

The original contract, approved in October, was for $325,000. The new contract, which will last until June, is for $450,000.

 

Kennedy/Jenks will help finish the water management plan and prepare grant applications. The county is seeking approximately $25 million in funding for plan projects.

 

The plan, a draft of which was released in May 2006, eventually will combine efforts and resources from area water purveyors, cities, the county and other agencies for the purpose of working on major water projects. In 2002, the state set aside $380 million in grants for projects related to such plans.

 

The Waterworks Districts had a public meeting Tuesday in Palmdale to hear public comments on the proposed plan and will conduct another meeting at 7 p.m. Wednesday, July 18 at the Rosamond Community Services District offices, 3179 35th St. West, Rosamond. #

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost1.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive