This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATER QUALITY - 7/23/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

July 23, 2007

 

4. Water Quality

 

MERCURY CONTAMINATION:

Vallejo mines under state investigation for mercury - Vallejo Times Herald

 

NEW TREATMENT PLANT:

Colfax awards $7.9 million contract for new wastewater treatment plant - Auburn Journal

 

SALINITY ISSUES:

Soft water a sewer plant issue in Dixon - Woodland Daily Democrat

 

 

MERCURY CONTAMINATION:

Vallejo mines under state investigation for mercury

Vallejo Times Herald – 7/23/07

By Matthias Gafni, staff writer

 

As a state water board announced tighter restrictions on mercury limits in San Francisco Bay last week, officials have their cross hairs set on old mercury mines in the area, including some dormant Vallejo operations.

 

Tucked away in the mountains of north Vallejo, within two miles of Northgate and Hiddenbrooke communities, lie at least three shuttered mercury mines. These relics of the Gold Rush era potentially could be as dangerous as they are hard to find.

 

Three months ago, as the state water board prepared to tighten its mercury limits for San Francisco Bay, officials began re-examining the Bay Area's mines, including St. John's and Hasting's mines in north Vallejo.

 

Scientists have determined humans consuming fish laden with mercury face health hazards. Signs along the Carquinez and Mare Island straits, as well as other Bay Area waterways, warn fishermen to minimize their fish consumption from the bay.

 

Pollution washed out of old mines is thought to be the biggest source of mercury in the Bay, scientists say.

 

To attack that problem, Oakland-based San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board is planning measures to clean up or prevent movement of mercury-laden sediment that flows from an old mine in the hills above San Jose into the Guadalupe River.

 

The New Almaden Mine, the world's second largest mercury producer, served most of the fevered Gold Rush towns in the Sierra. And now, the bay receives contamination from the mine, as well as from the Sierra run-off, which still carries remnants from the gold mining days.

 

"It's a double whammy," said Diane Whyte, the water board's assistant executive director.

 

"We have a comprehensive strategy for reducing mercury sources for the whole region and one of the key parts is to do an update on part of the mines program," she said.

 

Her agency inspected St. John's Mine and its waste piles, along with Hasting's Mine in 1997, and again this spring.

 

"Nothing at this time show any big problems there," Whyte said.

 

"We saw nothing to warrant immediate action. There are still unresolved questions. We have to follow up on where the material has gone and any influence on Lake Chabot," she said.

 

According to the Solano County Historical Society, there's also the Brownlie Mine in that area, but no officials had heard of it or found any scientific documentation.

 

The watershed of St. John's Mine, which has a road off Columbus Parkway bearing its name, would lead to Lake Chabot next to Six Flags Discovery Kingdom. The Hasting's Mine sits on the Sky Valley side of the mountains, which funnels down to Hiddenbrooke's Sulphur Springs Creek, leading to Lake Herman.

 

Lake Herman, the Carquinez Strait and San Pablo and Suisun bays all fall on the state's 303D list of impaired waters. Each body of water records high mercury levels, with historic mining listed as the major factor.

 

Whyte said Lake Chabot also has mercury pollutants.

 

She cautions, however, that most of the Bay Area's lakes have high mercury levels due to naturally occurring levels of the metal, and the two local lakes have lower levels than the worst offenders.

 

"There's always some naturally occurring erosion in the soils. San Francisco is plagued by this in geology alone," Whyte said.

Researching the Vallejo mines has not been easy - especially finding them.

 

"We've been using Google Earth and just walking the area," laughs Whyte.

 

As part of the Sky Valley agreement, which led to the Hiddenbrooke development, St. John's Mine was blocked by rubble and the surface covered with rocks and shrubbery to camouflage the site. No environmental mitigation was done, Whyte said.

 

But the mines aren't even the most dangerous site, it's the processing points, Whyte said. Cinnabar ore is extracted, crushed and ground, the heavier portions are baked, the vapors captured and the cooled liquid yields mercury. It's at those furnace and processing points where the biggest pollutant danger lies, she said.

 

Sejal Choksi, director of programs for the San Francisco Baykeeper, an environmental group, said she's satisfied the state board, under the new plan, would identify all the mines that could potentially leak mercury into the bay or watershed. They also will assess those mines and the surrounding sediment, she said, to determine whether they need to be cleaned up.

 

"We've been assured that there are no significant problems with the environment that the community should be aware of," Choksi said.  #

http://www.timesheraldonline.com/fastsearchresults/ci_6442902

 

 

NEW TREATMENT PLANT:

Colfax awards $7.9 million contract for new wastewater treatment plant

Auburn Journal – 7/22/07

By Michael Althouse, Gold Country News Service

 

COLFAX - After more than a year of work, meetings and hearings, the Colfax City Council has finally awarded a contract to build a new wastewater treatment plant. Construction should be completed in late 2008.

Reconvening from an adjournment of last week's City Council meeting, the Colfax City Council met Tuesday in a special meeting to award a $7.9 million contract for constructing the new wastewater treatment plant.

The contract was awarded to general engineering contractor C.W. Roen in a 4-0 vote. Councilman Joshua Alpine was not present.

C.W. Roen was the lowest of four bids received by the city to construct the new plant.

 

Although the council did meet Tuesday in closed session to discuss "anticipated litigation," no mention was made during the public session of the status of a potential lawsuit from Allan and Nancy Edwards and the Environmental Law Foundation regarding alleged pollution generated from the current plant. (The lawsuit has been reported in the Colfax Record June 28 and July 5.)

The council also approved a separate $631,910 contract with Eco:Logic for construction management services.

The special meeting was held over from last week because final written notification from the State Water Resources Control Board approving the final plans and specifications had not yet arrived.

Bids received from the four contractors would have expired before the council had time to act at the next regularly scheduled Colfax City Council meeting on July 24.

According to Colfax City Manager Joan Philippe, the letter arrived about an hour before the 6 p.m. Tuesday meeting.

 

"We have been waiting for quite some time to get from the State Water Resources Board Division of Financial Assistance the final plans and specifications approval letter, which we received at about 10 minutes to five today, in order to be able to legally award the bid for this project," Philippe said. Although agreeing that the contract should be awarded, resident Ted Back had questions regarding some of the design changes and the costs associated. Back was one of two public members present.

"I know you're going to award the bid and I'm not saying not to; it needs to be done," Back said. "But these questions need to be answered. We're talking about a lot of money."

Philippe assured Back that she would follow up on his questions.

Although a groundbreaking ceremony has not yet been scheduled, Colfax City Engineer Tom Leland said it should be in August.

"It would be lucky if we got there by the end of the month," Leland said. "It will probably be the first week in August."

Colfax Mayor Sharon Gieras expressed relief with the vote result.

"Yes, thank you," she said.

Councilman Jim Albright was equally elated.

"Let's get this baby going," he said.

According to its Web site, C.W. Roen Construction Company is a general engineering contractor located in Danville. Founded in 1961, the company specializes in municipal public works construction including water treatment plants, wastewater treatment plants, pumping stations, storm water facilities and related projects.

Eco:Logic is an environmental consulting firm specializing exclusively in the lifecycle of municipal water and wastewater infrastructure, according to its Web site. Michael Althouse can be reached at Michaela@goldcountrymedia.com, or comment at auburnjournal.com. #

http://www.auburnjournal.com/articles/2007/07/23/news/top_stories/03plant23.txt?pg=1

 

 

SALINITY ISSUES:

Soft water a sewer plant issue in Dixon

Woodland Daily Democrat – 7/21/07

By Melissa Murphy, staff writer

 

Nobody disputes the need to reduce salinity levels in water treated at Dixon's sewer plant.

 

Whether residential use of water softeners is causing the problem, is another matter.

 

A citizens advisory committee, formed to help the city find a solution to its wastewater woes, will ask the City Council on Tuesday to approve a study that would look at what impact, if any, a ban on future installation of water softeners in the city might have.

 

Under state law, a community can enact laws to ban such softeners, but must first conduct a study that proves that prohibiting them will help the city comply with waste discharge requirements and water reclamation requirements, according to a staff report to the council.

 

Dixon has been ordered by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board to lower salinity levels at its treatment plant or face financial consequences.

 

An effort to raise sewer rates to fund an expansion at the plant was overturned by voters last November. Since then, the Wastewater Project Committee, an appointed group of citizens, has been looking at various options for improving the city's plight.

 

One point they've agreed on is that whatever long-term solution is reached, it will require citizen involvement.

 

"It is clear that the community will have to engage in efforts to address the matter as part of its overall wastewater treatment and disposal strategy," the staff report states.

 

The idea of banning future installation of water softeners came up several months ago and staff asked the city attorney's office to research the legal issues.

 

While it may be possible to ban future installations, dealing with the use of existing softeners won't be so easy.

 

Existing water softener regulation would require incentives and education programs to help people understand the environmental consequences of continued disposal of high volumes of salt into the waste system. The current units cannot be required to be removed because they were legally installed.

 

In other action Tuesday, the council will decide if it should commit $300,000 of redevelopment agency funds as leverage for a grant application to the State Department of Housing. The $300,000 would be used in conjunction with the $800,000 in grant funds city officials are hoping to get from the state for a First-Time Home buyer program.

 

The grant application is due Aug. 15, when the state will rate the applications and award funds by February 2008.

 

The City Council meets at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the Council Chamber, 600 East A St.

http://www.dailydemocrat.com/search//ci_6432483

####

No comments:

Blog Archive