This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 7/23/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

July 23, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

 SONOMA COUNTY WATER CONSERVATION:

Water uncertainty; CONSERVATION: Consumers, region's water districts scramble to find ways to meet requirement to cut usage of flow from Russian River by 15% - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

Water conservation improves dramatically; Sonoma County Water Agency's latest reading shows 13.1% reduction in use, close to 15% required by state - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

JAMIESON CANYON WATER TREATMENT PLANT TO BE EXPANDED:

Bigger plant, better water; Napa launches $48 million project; Bigger plant, better water to improve, increase water supply - Napa Valley Register

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION:

Next year may bring some serious water conservation - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

Guest Column: Wake up about our water supply - North County Times

 

DESALINATION:

Testing the waters for desalination in Santa Cruz - Santa Cruz Sentinel

 

NEVADA WATER ISSUES:

Nev. farmers fighting water plan - Associated Press

 

 

SONOMA COUNTY WATER CONSERVATION:

Water uncertainty; CONSERVATION: Consumers, region's water districts scramble to find ways to meet requirement to cut usage of flow from Russian River by 15%

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 7/23/07

By Bob Norberg, staff writer

 

From a computer console on West College Avenue, Dale Dunlap has his hand on the tap controlling the water supply for much of the North Coast.

ADVERTISEMENT


>From there, the Sonoma County Water Agency's six pumping stations, its 90 miles of pipeline, its hundreds of valves and the releases from both Warm Springs and Coyote dams can be remotely operated.

"That location is where we remotely monitor as well as control all of the facilities of the transmission system," said Pam Jeane, the Water Agency's deputy director of operations. "All of the information that we use comes through that center."

Dunlap, the senior plant operator, is "the captain of the ship," she said.

The control center plays an even more important role now as the Water Agency deals with a mandatory 15 percent reduction in the amount of water it takes from the Russian River.

The conservation mandate raises a number of questions, which Water Agency, city and water district officials have attempted to answer.

What's the problem?

Lake Mendocino is 68 percent full. If water is drawn out at the normal rate, the lake would be virtually dry in October when water is needed to support the fall run of Chinook salmon, which are listed as threatened on the federal Endangered Species Act list.

What about Lake Sonoma?

Lake Sonoma is 91 percent full, but getting more of that water into the Russian River is a problem. The National Marine Fisheries Service limits the amount the Water Agency can discharge from Lake Sonoma's Warm Springs Dam into Dry Creek. Too much water can damage the fishery.

Who must conserve?

Everyone who gets water from the Russian River is being asked either directly or indirectly to conserve.

The Water Agency is dealing directly with its contractors, which include the cities of Santa Rosa, Windsor, Rohnert Park, Cotati, Petaluma and Sonoma and the Valley of the Moon, North Marin and Marin Municipal water districts.

The state also instructed the agency to ask for conservation by those not under the agency's direct control, including the cities of Healdsburg, Cloverdale and Ukiah, the Mendocino County Water Agency, other smaller water districts and the agriculture community.

What's the target, and how is it measured?

The mandate is to reduce the amount the Water Agency takes out of the Russian River by

15 percent from July 1 to Oct. 28, compared to the same period in 2004.

The volume is measured at the agency's pumping stations at Wohler Bridge and near Mirabel Road. The agency in turn is asking its contractors to reduce their take by 15 percent.

Are there penalties if the reduction isn't met, for agencies and individuals?

The state has threatened to order the Water Agency to turn off its pumps if it doesn't meet the target, and the Water Agency has threatened to turn off the tap to its water buyers. The cities and water districts also have provisions to fine or even disconnect their customers who waste water. Those penalties kick in when water conservation measures are made mandatory.

I just moved into my home. What is expected of me?

Most of the cities and water districts are asking homeowners and businesses to use the best conservation practices, believing that if they do, the target can be reached.

That means reducing irrigation by 20 percent, making sure that sprinklers don't cause water to run into streets and sidewalks, and fixing faulty irrigation and plumbing systems.

People also are encouraged to install low-flow toilets and restricters on shower heads; run dish and clothes washers only with full loads; buy front-loading washers; and use a bucket and shut-off nozzle to wash cars.

How long is this going to last?

This may be a persistent problem because Lake Mendocino depends on spring rainfall and water from Lake Pillsbury.

This year, spring rains were light and more of the water once diverted to Lake Mendocino is being kept in the Eel River for its fishery, by order of National Marine Fisheries Service.

Is there a long-term solution?

The Sonoma County Water Agency believes there are a number of things that can be done, but most will take either state or federal approval. The agency wants to be able to discharge more water into Dry Creek, either by improving the habitat or by constructing a separate pipeline.

It wants the Army Corps of Engineers to release less water from Lake Mendocino during the winter, when extra capacity is kept as protection against floods.

It also would like National Marine Fisheries Service to increase diversions from the Eel River into Lake Mendocino and the Russian River.

What's next?

The Water Agency's contractors meet today as a group to come up with a plan to allocate water over the next 3½ months.

If the plan doesn't meet the 15 percent target, Water Agency officials said an agency allocation plan will be imposed.

Regardless of whose allocation plan is adopted, however, every city and water district in early August will know how much water they will get and can adjust their water conservation programs accordingly.

Has growth played a role in creating the shortage?

Growth is a factor in water demand, but because of conservation programs, 8.3 percent less water was used in June 2007 compared to June 2004. Santa Rosa, for instance, used 1.9 percent less water in June 2007 even though it added 1,567 new single-family homes, 56 multifamily units and 41 new businesses.

Agriculture accounts for 30 percent of the water taken from the Russian River, but the largest component, vineyards, have remained constant at 60,000 acres since 2004, according to agriculture officials.

Why is Marin County getting Russian River water?

The North Marin Water District's entitlement is based on it being a partner in building and paying for the Water Agency's transmission system since the 1950s.

The Marin Municipal Water District bought it in the 1980s, after the severe drought of 1976, and is a surplus customer, getting water mostly in the winter. #
http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20070723/NEWS/707230308/1033/NEWS01

 

 

Water conservation improves dramatically; Sonoma County Water Agency's latest reading shows 13.1% reduction in use, close to 15% required by state

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 7/23/07

By Bob Norberg, staff writer

 

The Sonoma County Water Agency is inching closer to a state mandate to reduce by 15 percent the amount of water it is taking from the Russian River, officials said Friday.

ADVERTISEMENT


>From July 1 through Wednesday, the last time a reading was taken, the Water Agency took 13.1 percent less water than for the same period in 2004.

It was welcome news for the Water Agency, which had not been seeing the necessary conservation during the first several days of July.

"Early in the week I mentioned we were seeing an upward trend," said Pam Jeane, the Water Agency's deputy director of operations. "Fortunately for us, we were not misreading it; we have been seeing it continuing to climb."

Jeane attributed the improvement to cooler weather and midweek rain. In early July, she cited the hot weather as a key reason for the slow start on conservation efforts.

The Water Agency was ordered in mid-June to reduce water diversions from the Russian River by 15 percent from July 1 to Oct. 28, compared to the same period of 2004.

The water will be saved in Lake Mendocino for later release into the Russian River for the fall salmon run.

The conservation order was passed on to the Water Agency's major contractors, the cities of Windsor, Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park, Cotati, Petaluma and Sonoma and the Valley of the Moon, North Marin and Marin municipal water districts.

"It is pretty incredible and pretty close to the 15 percent," said Glen Wright, Santa Rosa's deputy director of water resources. "We go out and hang tags and talk to people about their water. The effects take a few days and weeks until people repair their irrigation systems. There is a lag in time."

The Water Agency has scheduled a meeting Monday with its contractors to discuss the conservation mandates.

The agency was going to present contractors with an allocation plan setting the amount of water each would get through October, but the contractors have exercised their contractual right to try to come up with their own plan first.

Specific allocations would give the contractors a firm target and let them tailor their conservation plans accordingly, Jeane said.

A committee of contractors' staff will meet Monday to come up with an allocation plan, said Krishna Kumar, general manager of the Valley of the Moon Water District.

Jeane said a plan will be in place early next month. #

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20070721/NEWS/707210338/1033/NEWS01

 

 

JAMIESON CANYON WATER TREATMENT PLANT TO BE EXPANDED:

Bigger plant, better water; Napa launches $48 million project; Bigger plant, better water to improve, increase water supply

Napa Valley Register – 7/22/07

By Kevin Courtney, staff writer

 

To keep household taps flowing even in dry years, Napa is launching the most expensive public works project in city history, more than doubling the size of its Jamieson Canyon water treatment plant.

The $48 million expansion will help Napa to meet its water needs through mid-century, said Phil Brun,cq general manager of the city’s water department. The expanded plant will be named in honor of former Napa City Councilman Ed Barwick, who made securing Napa’s water supply a top priority when he served in office.

When the project is completed in mid-2010, Napa will be able to pump more water from the State Water Project, saving local supplies for the driest years. The city should have enough water to survive droughts without severe hardship until almost 2050, Brun said.

Consumer taste buds will benefit as well. Water arriving at the Jamieson Canyon plant from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta will get additional treatment, improving both taste and safety, Brun said.

 

Currently, the city draws 55 percent of its annual need from two local reservoirs, Lake Hennessey and Lake Milliken, with 45 percent coming from the State Water Project through Jamieson Canyon.

After the plant expansion, 75 percent of the city’s supply will come through Jamieson Canyon in a typical year, Brun said. The city will reserve Hennessey and Milliken for peak summer demand and dry years.

Built in 1967, when Napa had less than half today’s population, the Jamieson Canyon plant is woefully undersized, Brun said. Napa cannot take full advantage of its State Water Project entitlements, which are increasing annually, he said.

The 40-year-old plant can process 7,000 acre-feet per year. (An acre foot is enough water to cover one acre of land in one foot of water, or about 326,000 gallons.) The city’s state entitlement is 15,350 acre-feet, growing to 20,800 acre-feet by 2021.

Since annual allocations are usually less than entitlements, the plant’s new capacity of 16,000 acre feet will allow Napa to treat all available state water most years, Brun said.

Napa treats up to 1,500 acre-feet of state water at Jamieson Canyon for Yountville and Calistoga. Plant improvements will increase water quality and reliability for those Upvalley cities as well, Brun said.

The city pays $4 million a year to be part of the State Water Project, regardless of how much water it receives through Jamieson Canyon, Brun said. Napa will get more for its money after plant expansion, he said.

The State Water Project draws from Lake Oroville, in Butte County. The massive man-made lake dumps into the Feather and Sacramento rivers, then the water enters the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Napa extracts its share from Barker Slough, southeast of Travis Air Force Base, through the North Bay Aqueduct.

“Delta water is challenging to treat,” with taste issues that must be overcome, Brun said.

When modernized, Jamieson Canyon will use ozone — a naturally occurring, electronically charged form of oxygen capable of eliminating pollutants, bacteria and unpleasant odors — to treat the water. This will reduce the need for chemicals later in the treatment process, Brun said.

The water will taste better, Brun said. City water can sometimes have an earthy taste, especially in summer, he said.

Ozone treatment will help the city deal with “emerging contaminants,” such as society’s heavy use of skin lotions and aspirin, chemical traces of which find their way into water supplies, said Joy Eldredge, the city’s senior water engineer.

Health officials are concerned about trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids, byproducts of using chlorine to disinfect water. The presence of both will be reduced when plant improvements are finished, she said.

Expansion of Jamieson Canyon is part of a program of system improvements recommended by consultants in 1997. In recent years, the city has invested $25 million to build three water tanks and modernize lines.

To pay for these upgrades, the city raised water rates 5 percent a year for three years. Rate increases are now pegged to the Consumer Price Index.

The city has issued $48 million in water bonds to pay for the Jamieson plant upgrades, which include seismic strengthening. “This is our generation’s contribution to the overall integrity and reliability of the system,” Brun said.

A contract for the Jamieson Canyon plant, to be renamed the Edward I. Barwick Jamieson Canyon Water Treatment Plant, is scheduled to be awarded in December. #

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2007/07/22/news/local/doc46a3b1ca44151893877033.txt

 

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION:

Next year may bring some serious water conservation

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 7/22/07

By Andrew Silva, staff writer

 

We're OK for now, but another bone dry winter and things could get dicey.

 

Riverside County this past winter was drier than Death Valley, leading Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to declare an emergency last week because the county's agriculture has been hammered.

 

Water deliveries from Northern California will be 60 percent of what's allowed in a wet year.

 

Lake Mead on the Colorado River behind the Hoover Dam is less than half full.

 

If the drought continues, next year could see brown lawns and dirty cars if harsh conservation measures become the order of the day.

 

"Are we in a crisis? No. Is there cause for concern? Yes," said Michael Stevens, Mojave Water Agency spokesman.

 

The High Desert has long wrestled with a limited supply of groundwater. But efforts at stashing extra water underground when it's available, along with an expanding conservation effort, has officials reasonably confident they can weather the lack of storms.

 

Cities in the High Desert have adopted conservation ordinances, in some cases prohibiting lawns outside of new houses, Stevens said.

 

Those efforts will have to expand as the High Desert continues its dramatic growth.

 

"Policy-makers recognize we can't keep using water as we have in the past," said. "If people continue to come here, where are we going to get the water?"

 

San Bernardino County's population is projected to nearly double in size from roughly 2 million today to nearly 3.7 million by 2050. Population statewide is projected to rise from 36.5 million to 59.5 million.

 

That's why Schwarzenegger last week asked for further development of water projects, including new reservoirs.

 

Inland Empire valley areas are in a similar situation, though San Bernardino is blessed with what amounts to an underground lake between the mountains and downtown San Bernardino called the Bunker Hill Basin.

 

The area is also entitled to a good chunk of Northern California water shipped through the State Water Project.

 

But the lack of rain does have an effect.

 

After a wet winter two years ago dumped 26 inches of rain near downtown, the groundwater was nearly at the surface, said Randy Van Gelder, general manager of the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, which wholesales water to other agencies.

 

Today, the groundwater is about 50 feet below the surface. During a dry two-decade stretch lasting into the mid 1960s, the water level was down as much as 80 feet.

 

"We're in reasonably good shape, as long as the state can deliver the water it promised in January," Van Gelder said. "Right now, people are drawing water out of storage. Of course, it's kind of like your bank account if you're not putting anything back in. If we have a dry year next year, it'll be crunch time."

 

Though many areas of Southern California had their driest years on record, San Bernardino didn't quite hit that milestone.

 

During 2001-2002, only 2.5 inches fell, compared with 3.5 this year, according to county flood-control records. An average year sees about 16 inches.

 

The Municipal Water District plans to start placing newspaper ads and call on people to start conserving, especially outdoors.

 

Landscaping and yards account for as much as three-quarters of domestic water use.

 

The Southwest is subject to epic droughts, such as a "medieval megadrought" that may have lasted from 900 A.D. to 1,400 A.D. Global warming is projected to make drought cycles longer and nastier. But one dry year does not make a drought, said Jeanine Jones of the California Department of Water Resources.

 

Last year, the State Water Project was able to offer 100 percent of the amount entitled to water agencies.

 

"We just have to play the cards that are dealt to us.” #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_6435905

 

 

Guest Column: Wake up about our water supply

North County Times – 7/21/07

By Gary Arant, general manager of the Valley Center Municipal Water District and a member of the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Water Authority and the Association of California Water Agencies

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is traveling around California talking about his $6 billion statewide water plan, and I urge every resident in the surrounding area to pay attention. The future of our entire state depends on Sacramento legislators coming together to pass some version of the governor's plan, and I believe they can and must do it this year. The plan I refer to is and must stay comprehensive ---- that means a workable plan must provide for storage, conservation and improved Delta conveyance.

To understand why this is critical to the North County area, you must understand how the California Water Plan works. The Sacramento Delta, a large maze of levees, islands and farmland, is the hub of the State Water Project, which distributes the normally plentiful Northern California snowmelt throughout the state, including to our region. Unfortunately, the Delta has been failing for some time with crumbling levees, increasing ocean salinity and other severe problems.

 

Our area's dependence on imported water has a long history. One of our imported water sources is the State Water Project, and it has served us well, meeting more than 60 percent of our needs. However, with a growing population, climate change and aging infrastructure, we have an enormous challenge to secure this critical water source and make sure North County has the water it needs in the years to come.

 

 

That is why the governor has proposed a comprehensive water strategy to help California sustain its people, its vibrant economy and a healthy environment.

New infrastructure is needed to reliably supply the domestic, industrial and agricultural water needs of California. We must capture more water from storms and snowmelt runoff. The governor's plan calls for a $4.5 billion investment in surface and groundwater storage. The funding in the governor's plan will also help implement his Delta Vision, a process begun last September to develop a long-term Delta management plan.

One way to begin restoring the Delta's delicate ecosystem and ensuring water deliveries is to explore the possibly of building an alternative conveyance system in the Delta.

Factors outside the Delta are also threatening our water supply. California's population is projected to reach 60 million by the year 2050. Planning and conservation are essential to provide water to communities throughout California and to keep the state moving forward.

Conservation is a constant necessity in all water planning, but it's especially critical in dry years, such as this one. A dry winter reduced this year's snowpack to record lows, leaving us with less summer runoff to feed the Delta and fill our reservoirs. If California had more water storage, we could have captured more of last year's rainfall to help us cope with this year's shortage.

Our water system must be ready to cope with too much water, or too little, and to accommodate the growing needs of our region. We are planning not just for the near future but for generations to come.

The governor is a bold man with a knack for getting things done in Sacramento, but he can't do this alone. We may be 400 miles from Sacramento, but we must be engaged. Do your part this summer: Conserve water and talk to your friends and neighbors about the governor's plan. What happens in Sacramento doesn't just stay in Sacramento. It affects every North County resident, farmer and business. #

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2007/07/21/opinion/commentary/17_44_127_20_07.txt

 

 

DESALINATION:

Testing the waters for desalination in Santa Cruz

Santa Cruz Sentinel – 7/21/07

By Shanna McCord, staff writer

 

SANTA CRUZ — Salty ocean water could be turned into fresh drinking water in Santa Cruz by the end of the year.

 

City leaders and Soquel Creek Water District officials started construction Friday on a $4 million pilot desalination plant at the UC Santa Cruz Long Marine Lab that will test a water treatment system that would feed homes and businesses across the county if proven acceptable.

 

The 2,400-square-foot test facility is expected to pump 72,000 gallons of seawater a day, and possibly set the Santa Cruz Water Department and water district on the path to a shared $40 million permanent desalination facility they say would help shore up the area's water supply.

 

"I'm hopeful we can demonstrate that desalination will have a less-than-significant impact on the environment," City Councilman Ed Porter said Friday. "We need to take some prudent steps to ensure we have an adequate water supply"

Santa Cruz has been planning since November 2005 to augment its water supply in dry periods by building a desalination plant.

 

 The Soquel district has been looking for an alternative to its heavily used underground wells since at least 1997.

 

The Soquel district's directors worry saltwater may seep into underground supplies in the next few years if they are not given a chance to replenish.

 

"We've had a difficult 20 years now using more water than the rain provides," said Bruce Daniels, president of the water district's board of directors. "We need a continual new supply to make up for the deficit we've been experiencing".

 

The pilot plant — to be constructed by global engineering firm Camp Dresser and McKee — should be completed by October and running by November, according to Heidi Luckenbach, an engineer with the city's Water Department.

 

The test plant will operate for at least one year to examine details of the energy-intensive reverse osmosis process, impacts on marine life and the resulting water quality.

 

"We know it will work, it's a fairly proven technology," Luckenbach said. "We want to look at how to optimize treatment"

Treated water from the pilot plant won't be available for consumption; rather it will be thrown back into the ocean, Daniels said.

 

The city and Soquel district formed a partnership earlier this year to split the cost of building the pilot plant and the full-scale desalination plant if allowed to go forward.

 

The Soquel district plans to use desalinated water year-round while Santa Cruz would use the water as a back-up source during drought years when the Loch Lomond Reservoir runs low, roughly every seven years.

 

If a full-scale desalination plant is constructed in Santa Cruz, with capacity to produce 2.5 million gallons a day, the district would use an estimated 1 million gallons a day.

 

The Soquel district, with about 50,000 water customers from Capitola to La Selva Beach, set aside $1.5 million in its 2007-08 budget to help pay for the pilot plant and other required studies for building a permanent desalination plant.

 

The city received a $2 million grant from the state Department of Water Resources to help fund the pilot project.  #

http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/archive/2007/July/21/local/stories/03local.htm

 

 

NEVADA WATER ISSUES:

Nev. farmers fighting water plan

Associated Press – 7/23/07

By Brendan Riley, staff writer

 

CARSON CITY, Nev. --

Roderick McKenzie and other central Nevada farmers fear booming Las Vegas is going to suck their farmland dry.

 

They are fighting a plan to pump billions of gallons of water south across the desert for use in the fast-growing Las Vegas area, saying it would eat up groundwater supplies and spell the end for ranchers and farmers in rural valleys.

 

"It's not a smart thing to let the state engineer go into a valley and take water that's probably going somewhere else," McKenzie said. "Once the water table starts to drop it will continue to drop."

 

The Southern Nevada Water Authority wants to draw more than 11.3 billion gallons of groundwater a year from the Delamar, Dry Lake and Cave valleys, all in central Lincoln County and along the route of a proposed water pipeline that will stretch 250 miles across the state like a giant straw.

 

That amount of water, expanded through reuse and other means, could supply more than 100,000 homes in the fast-growing Las Vegas area, authorities say.

 

But McKenzie, who heads Lund Irrigation & Water Co., said water under nearby Cave Valley can be linked to subsurface water in the Lund area and a big drawdown in one area could hurt the other.

 

He is worried because ranchers in his company run cattle in Cave Valley in the summer and fall and depend on the springs.

 

"That's the whole basis of our protest," he said. "It's not knowing where the water is coming from in the first place, and not knowing where it's going."

 

The state's share of the Colorado River cannot sustain continued growth around Las Vegas, home to about three of every four Nevada residents. Drought has placed a greater strain on the river's supply.

 

After initially opposing it, Lincoln County has agreed to go along with the water authority plan, which is part of a $2 billion water pipeline project to tap into water around Nevada. The agreement states which groundwater basins in the county can be developed.

 

"This is very important because it's a critical part of our overall groundwater project," said water authority spokesman J.C. Davis.

 

Davis said Lincoln County's support will help during the state engineer's hearings on the plan. A prehearing conference has been set for Aug. 28 by the state engineer and the water authority has asked for Jan. 14-18 hearings.

 

Davis said the pumping will only take the amount of groundwater that is naturally replenished each year in the valleys. But opponents include the federal Bureau of Land Management, the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

 

Ranchers and other landowners who oppose the plan are getting support from groups such as the Western Environmental Law Center, Great Basin Water Network and the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, among others.

 

The water authority's theory on available groundwater is challenged by Susan Lynn of the Great Basin Water Network, who said the water "recharge" in the area is not substantial and pumping will dry up springs there and in adjacent areas.

 

"They don't call it Dry Lake Valley for nothing," Lynn said. "This is just simply mining of water. Once it's gone, it's gone."

 

The water authority's eventual goal is to tap into enough water in rural Nevada to serve more than 230,000 homes, besides about 400,000 households already getting the agency's water in the Las Vegas area, one of the fastest growing regions in the nation.

 

The agency hopes to begin delivering the rural groundwater to Las Vegas by 2015.

 

Economic analyst Jeremy Aguero said an inadequate water supply would have wide-ranging consequences, including a slowdown in investments and construction, reduced public services and other problems that could ripple across Nevada.

 

"Imagine a situation in which developers believed tomorrow couldn't be a better day because development would be stalled by insufficient water resources," Aguero said. #

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/financial/story/98956.html

#####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive