This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 7/6/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

July 6, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

NORTH BAY WATER CONSERVATION EFFORTS:

WATER SAVINGS FALLING SHORT; Hot spell blamed for high use, but Water Agency indicates it may take tougher steps - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

AGRICULTURE ISSUES:

Drought a drain in wine country - USA Today

 

DESALINATION:

Water Department Works With UCLA On Desalination - Gazette Newspapers (Long Beach)

 

 

NORTH BAY WATER CONSERVATION EFFORTS:

WATER SAVINGS FALLING SHORT; Hot spell blamed for high use, but Water Agency indicates it may take tougher steps

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 7/6/07

By Bob Norberg, staff writer

 

Over the first four days of state-mandated water conservation, North Bay residents failed to meet the target of a 15 percent reduction, water officials said Thursday.

ADVERTISEMENT


The Sonoma County Water Agency said its customers used 853 acre feet of water between July 1 and July 4 -- 61 acre-feet more than the target of 792 acre-feet.

"It's too early to tell, but if the numbers continue, we will be asking for more from our contractors without a doubt," Water Agency spokesman Brad Sherwood said.

The agency has been ordered by the state to cut its take from the Russian River by 15 percent for four months, compared with the same four months in 2004.

The water would be saved in Lake Mendocino for the fall salmon run. Without the reduction, the lake would be virtually dry by the end of October.

Pam Jeane, the deputy chief of operations for the agency, blamed the recent spate of hot weather for missing the 15 percent target.

The first four days of this July were as much as 10 degrees hotter than in July 2004.

"We are going to have periods of time like this week where it is really hot, where we will see significant differences like this, and there are weeks where the fog will roll in and there will be significant differences the other way," Jeane said.

"The water we pump is so weather dependent that it is difficult to look at it over a short period of time and say it is meaningful," she said.

Still, Jeane said, the Water Agency was looking for a good start toward meeting the conservation goal.

"It is a little disappointing because there has been a message out there since April about the need to save water," Jeane said. "It is a little disconcerting."

The Water Agency, which supplies water to 600,000 homes and businesses in Sonoma and Marin counties from Windsor to Sausalito, passed the conservation order on to the cities and water districts that contract to buy its water.

Cities and water districts have said they have conservation programs in place, and many said they believed they already were meeting the 15 percent goal.

But use for the first four days of July amounted to a reduction of 8.5 percent over the same four days in 2004.

"There is no cause for immediate concern," Rohnert Park Councilman Jake Mackenzie said. "But as the summer would go on, if there was going to be a systemwide problem in meeting the 15 percent, the contractors would have to look at mandatory rationing, there is no doubt in my mind, if that is what the data shows."

"It is early in getting people both informed and acting," said Nick Frey, president of the Sonoma County Wine-grape Commission. "Cool weather will probably help."

The growers represented by Frey's group draw water from the river or wells and aren't Water Agency customers but they also have been asked to conserve, as have Ukiah, Healdsburg and Cloverdale.

The agency will issue reports every Monday on water use during the four-month conservation period, Sherwood said. #

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20070706/NEWS/707060360/1033/NEWS01

 

 

AGRICULTURE ISSUES:

Drought a drain in wine country

USA Today – 7/6/07

By John Ritter, USA Today

 

SONOMA, Calif. — Charles Willard swears by his new high-tech outdoor irrigation system that uses satellite-monitored ground weather stations around the region to manage how much water his grass and plants receive.

 

Cool or cloudy means less irrigation. A heat wave tells the system to water more often. It shuts down for weeks during winter rains. The goal is for Willard's landscaping to get enough water to thrive, but not a drop more.

 

Willard, a marketing consultant, says he's using at least 10% less water a month with the $600 system, which he got for $300 with a rebate. "It's been reliable, certainly efficient based on the numbers," he says. "I haven't touched it other than minor adjustments. I don't even think about it anymore."

 

The debate here and in other parched areas of the nation is whether such voluntary measures will be enough to conserve water supplies. Parts of the USA — including California, much of the West and Southeast — are in a drought, or near-drought, and face the prospect of mandatory restrictions.

 

"Certain segments of the population won't do anything unless they're forced to, and penalties, including for some people (utilities) shutting off water, (are) serious enough," says Liz Gardener, Denver Water's conservation manager.

 

The agency isn't pushing to fine users for excessive watering as it did during Colorado's severe 2002-03 drought, she says. Billboards and bus signs urge conservation with the slogan "use only what you need."

 

'Pressure' on grape growers

 

Last month, California officials ordered the Sonoma County Water Agency to cut the amount of water it draws from the Russian River by 15% to keep the level high enough for fall salmon spawning. The unprecedented mandate is affecting 750,000 of the agency's customers in Sonoma and Marin counties, including growers of some of the nation's finest wine grapes.

 

"We're in a very desirable place to live, and we know there's tremendous pressure for the water we use to grow our grapes from urban sources and fisheries," says Pete Opatz, a viticulturist who manages vineyards for Vino Farms in Sonoma and Napa counties.

 

San Francisco, Los Angeles, other California cities and Alameda County have asked consumers in the past three months to voluntarily use less water. Supplies stored in reservoirs will be adequate the rest of this year, but another meager snowfall in the Sierra Nevada likely could mean mandatory cutbacks next year.

 

"Another winter like last winter and we're in serious trouble," says Brad Sherwood, spokesman for the Sonoma water agency.

 

The Sierra snowpack, which melts in spring and supplies much of California's water, was 27% of its normal volume this year.

 

Rocky Mountains snow that melts into the Colorado River and supplies water to 30 million people, including Las Vegas and Southern California, has also been anemic most of this decade.

 

Water-saving plumbing codes and rebates for water-efficient appliances have reduced water wasted indoors nationwide, but outdoor use keeps growing, even in dry areas where lush, irrigated lawns can't be justified, says Amy Vickers, a conservation consultant in Amherst, Mass.

 

"Having a lawn and other irrigated landscaping in a desert, even if it's watered efficiently, still uses a tremendous amount of water," she says.

 

When a city asks for voluntary cutbacks on watering lawns, it may not see the drop it expects, Vickers says. "When you say, for example, only water every other day or every third day, people start assuming that they should water on those days whether they need to or not," she says.

 

The only proven strategy for cutting outdoor use, Vickers says, is a mandatory water schedule backed up by enforcement and penalties.

 

Conservation a 'fact of life'

 

In April, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission asked the 2.4 million Bay Area residents it serves to cut water use by 10% by June or face possible rationing. By mid-June, the agency had seen an 18% drop in projected use, but that could have been because the weather was unseasonably cool, says spokesman Tony Winnicker.

 

As temperatures warmed, water use spiked again. "We don't feel like we're out of the woods, by any means," he says. "Conservation is always going to be a fact of life in California."

 

During the state's last severe drought, from 1987 to 1992, some consumers knew they would be restricted to a water allotment based on previous use and reasoned, "Wow, I'll turn on the faucets now so my allotment will be higher," Winnicker says.

 

Raising the cost of water achieves only limited reductions, particularly among affluent consumers, says Kathy Nguyen, water conservation coordinator for Cobb County, Ga. "Water is a basic life need, so the higher you raise the price, there's only so much savings," she says.

 

Long term, it's unclear whether conservation will be enough. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has proposed building two huge, multibillion-dollar dams so the state can store more water. But he faces stiff legislative opposition.

 

Among wine-grape growers in Sonoma and Napa counties, conservation "has been pounded into everybody's head for 15 years," Vino Farms' Opatz says. Most vineyards have sophisticated instruments that give precise data on soil moisture and the water content of vines so growers don't start irrigating too early in the late spring.

 

To achieve the mandated 15% reduction, some growers will delay irrigation. That will please wineries that buy the growers' grapes, because starting irrigation later stresses the vines, and more stress produces a tastier grape. But less water and more stress means a grower produces fewer tons of grapes, and growers get paid by the ton.

 

"That's always going to be the compromise when we talk water in our industry," he says.

 

Contributing: Marissa DeCuir; Stefanie Frith, The (Palm Springs, Calif.) Desert Sun; Tim Evans, The Indianapolis Star; Dan Nakaso, Honolulu Star-Bulletin; Jeff DeLong, Reno (Nev.) Gazette-Journal; Marty Roney, Montgomery (Ala.) Advertiser; Wes Johnson, Springfield (Mo.) News-Leader; wire reports.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-07-05-insidewater_N.htm

 

 

DESALINATION:

Water Department Works With UCLA On Desalination

Gazette Newspapers (Long Beach) – 7/5/07

By Harry Saltzgaver, Executive Editor

 

Long Beach’s Water Department will take advantage of the huge technical research capability at UCLA to speed the evaluation of seawater desalination using the “Long Beach method.”

 

The agreement means UCLA will conduct bench-scale membrane evaluations, theoretical model development, data modeling and optimization studies. The laboratory research work will use and complement data being gathered at Long Beach’s 300,000-gallon per day test facility and a companion Under Ocean Floor Intake and Discharge Demonstration System.

 

Long Beach has been working for the last decade to perfect a method to take salt and minerals from seawater to provide a new source of potable water. The city has patented a dual membrane method created by since retired Water Department Assistant General Manager Diem X. Vuong that is expected to be much cheaper than the current standard of reverse osmosis.

 

The $5.4 million desalination plant, next to the Haynes Power Plant on the border with Orange County, began operation a year ago. It runs side-by-side desalination tests with reverse osmosis and various configurations of the Long Beach dual membrane approach to find the most energy-efficient method.

 

“We think that this will be a win-win relationship,” Dr. Robert Cheng, assistant general manager for the Water Department, said in a press release. “It is one that allows Long Beach to make use of UCLA’s state-of-the-art academic research facilities to answer specific questions that we may not have the resources to address, while exposing UCLA’s students and staff to real-world applied research issues.”

 

In addition to the work on the desalination process, the Water Department is studying the potential for underground pipes to draw water from the ocean and return the mineral-saturated brine that remains after the process back to the ocean. The concept is that the ocean floor will act as a natural filter, lessening the environmental impact of both pumping water into the treatment plant and sending the remains back to mix with the ocean.

 

Studies are expected to take at least another year. Then the city must find the money — likely from the federal government and other governmental partners — to build a full-scale desalination plant. Officials have said it will be at least 2012 before that happens.

 

It costs up to $1,200 an acre-foot to desalinate water now. An acre-foot of water is about enough to supply a family of four for a year. Long Beach currently buys imported water from the Metropolitan Water District for about $500 an acre-foot, and well water produced locally is even less expensive.

 

The new desalination method could drop the price to between $700 and $750 an acre-foot — a price that could be competitive by the end of the decade. #

http://www.gazettes.com/waterucla07052007.html

####

No comments:

Blog Archive