This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 7/17/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

July 17, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

SONOMA COUNTY WATER ISSUES:

County steps up water efforts; Next: Officials want state to help limit usage, feds to free more water from Lake Sonoma - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

ENFORCEMENT: 'Water cops' tag homes, threatening $500 fines - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

ST. HELENA WATER SUPPLY PLANNING:

Going dry in St. Helena; City weighs stricter water policies - Napa Valley Register

 

CENTRAL COAST WATER CONSERVATION:

WATER CONSERVATION GOALS MET - Monterey Herald

 

 

SONOMA COUNTY WATER ISSUES:

County steps up water efforts; Next: Officials want state to help limit usage, feds to free more water from Lake Sonoma

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 7/17/07

By Bleys Rose, staff writer

 

Freaked out and flummoxed that public pleas for water conservation aren't proving effective, the Sonoma County Water Agency is asking local grape growers and water customers, state and federal agencies for help in constricting the tap.

ADVERTISEMENT


Water Agency officials said late Monday that two weeks' worth of water conservation has produced a meager 9.9 percent decrease in water consumption, far short of the 15 percent decrease ordered by the state Water Resources Control Board.

"Our agency is having a difficult time operating the Russian River system due to regulations and diversions outside the agency's control and service area," said county supervisor Tim Smith, who also serves as a Water Agency board director.

The Water Agency says it lacks regulatory authority to do much more than cajole conservation out of private agriculture or the municipalities that supply water to about 600,000 residents in Sonoma and northern Marin counties.

So it wants the state Water Resources Control Board to help bring government and agriculture in line. Last week, state water board officials said they were prepared to take measures to enforce the order, even ordering the shutdown of water pumps.

Because the Water Agency's call for help was not released until late Monday, state officials did not have the opportunity to review it.

Here's what the Water Agency wants:

Grape growers in the Russian River, Alexander Valley and Dry Creek Valley to band together and cooperate on water diversions from the river.

Agency officials concede they are releasing water from the dam at Lake Mendocino with nothing but a guess as to how much agriculture -- mostly vineyards -- is sucking out downstream.

"No one benefits if stored water is lost to the ocean," said Bob Anderson, executive director of United Winegrowers of Sonoma County. "Hopefully we can find a way to cooperatively succeed in threading the needle."

The National Marine Fisheries Service not to interfere with the release of more water from Lake Sonoma.

Flow along the Dry Creek tributary into the Russian River is a focus of the federal agency, which is considering restrictions because too much water in summer harms coho salmon, an endangered species. A creek restoration plan from Marine Fisheries would help, Water Agency officials said.

Federal officials had not yet had the opportunity to review the request.

Cities -- like Healdsburg and Cloverdale -- that draw water from the Russian River, but don't get it from the Water Agency, to increase conservation efforts.

Cities that do get water from the Water Agency -- like Santa Rosa and Rohnert Park -- to undertake greater conservation that aims at the 15 percent reduction.

Agency officials said they are working with their contractors to develop accurate measures of water allocations so that cities and districts will know precisely how they are faring individually.

Smith said the Water Agency "is facing difficulties implementing the state-mandated 15 percent decrease in water use since 2004." He and other county officials have complained that the lack of water is, in part, a "regulatory drought" caused by restrictions imposed by federal agency rules on endangered species and by state-mandated reductions in water releases from Lake Mendocino.

All 116 pages of the Water Agency's "work plan" for dealing with the state-mandated 15 percent water-use decrease can be reviewed at www.sonomacountywater.org. #

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20070717/NEWS/707170364/1033/NEWS01

 

 

ENFORCEMENT: 'Water cops' tag homes, threatening $500 fines

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 7/17/07

By Bob Norberg, staff writer

 

The water pooled on the sidewalk Monday morning, soaking the newspaper lying in the driveway and flowing into the gutter of the neatly kept house in northwest Santa Rosa.

ADVERTISEMENT


"This is a pretty good indication, when the lawn is this uniformly green, that there is overwatering," said Dan Muelrath, Santa Rosa's water conservation coordinator and one of its "water cops."

Muelrath checked "Excess irrigation, water on sidewalk and in gutter" on a card, walked through the shallow puddles and left the card at the front door of the Piner Crest Drive home.

A woman at the house, who was retrieving her soggy newspaper, said they already had reduced the irrigation run time to eight minutes from 10 and still were trying to figure out their new controller.

"We've been trying to key it in and not get overspray," said the woman, who declined to give her name. "The controller is new for me; our gardener knows how to run it."

It was one of four houses Muelrath tagged within an hour during his morning patrol. In each case, sprinklers were running and water was flowing freely over sidewalks. He made a note to alert his staff to check three other houses and a business that had water covering the sidewalk.

They will be given 30 days to fix the problems or will face the possibility of $500 a day in fines -- or even have water turned off.

It is all part of the city's stepped-up water conservation program that includes patrols by Muelrath and three full-time "water cops" during the day and at night. They look for homes and businesses where there is overwatering or signs of broken irrigation or plumbing systems.

The city has also set up a hot line, 543-3985, for water waste reports.

It is all in response to a call for conservation by the Sonoma County Water Agency, which was ordered by the state in mid-June to cut the amount of water it takes from the Russian River between July 1 and Oct. 28 by 15 percent from the same period in 2004. The water is to be kept in Lake Mendocino, which is historically low, to be released for the fall run of chinook salmon.

After the first 15 days, the Water Agency is well behind its goal. Use has dropped just 9.9 percent below the 2004 level.

If the Santa Rosa doesn't meet its goal or if the Water Agency calls for an even higher conservation level, the city has an emergency program prepared.

The program has several levels that include rationing, no water for irrigation, pools and fountains and rules that water for new construction must be offset by savings elsewhere.

Santa Rosa is the largest contractor of the Water Agency, serving 48,700 homes and businesses and accounting for 40 percent of the agency's Russian River diversions.

The other major contractors are Rohnert Park, Windsor, Cotati, Petaluma and Sonoma and the Valley of the Moon and two Marin water districts.

Muelrath said Santa Rosa has had a voluntary conservation program in place since the late 1970s, when severe water restrictions were put into place because of a drought.

The city has allocated $500,000 for its current, three-year conservation program, primarily for a rebate system that gives $150 for low-flow toilets, $100 to $150 for front-loading washing machines, up to $350 for irrigation systems and 50 cents a square foot to replace lawns.

As part of the patrols, the city employees are particularly looking at homes that records show have high monthly water use, Muelrath said.

He said the city will provide advice and even send workers to houses and businesses tagged by the city's crews to help.

"We know that we can't get 15 percent from everyone, but we know that there are some people that we can get 50 percent from just because they are overwatering," Muelrath said.

He said preventing water waste in irrigation will meet the overall 15 percent goal. #

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20070717/NEWS/707170323/1033/NEWS01

 

 

ST. HELENA WATER SUPPLY PLANNING:

Going dry in St. Helena; City weighs stricter water policies

Napa Valley Register – 7/17/07

By Jesse Duarte, staff writer

 

If St. Helena is to leave its groundwater untouched and still have a significant amount of water in reserve, residents will have to reduce their water use by as much as a third.

That’s one conclusion of a new study evaluating St. Helena’s prodigious water consumption and skimpy water supply.

The study was conducted at the direction of St. Helena City Councilmembers who wanted to consider a water policy requiring the city to maintain 120 percent of its annual water demand — without factoring in groundwater — before new development may be approved.

The study found that the city’s annual use of 623 million gallons would have to be reduced by 257 million gallons to meet the requirements.

 

The exclusion of groundwater from water supply calculations reflects the city’s original intention to use wells only for emergencies, and never for more than 20 percent of the city’s water. According to the report, groundwater has supplied 18 percent of the city’s water over the last 10 years.

The study also confirmed the notion that St. Helena uses significantly more water per capita than other Napa Valley communities, with the exception of Yountville, which uses water at about the same rate. Although St. Helena’s per-household water use is almost 50 percent higher than Napa’s and Calistoga’s during the irrigation-heavy summer months, it uses less water than those cities during the winter.

According to the study, St. Helena’s water use peaks in the summer — at about three million gallons per day.

The report recommends the city reduce water use by educating the public about water conservation, increasing water rates, encouraging drought-tolerant landscaping, limiting the square footage devoted to landscaping on new lots, installing “smart” irrigation controllers and meters, and hiring a full-time water conservation coordinator.

Public awareness is at the center of the suggested reforms. To that end, St. Helena Mayor Del Britton included on the agenda of each city council meeting during the last several months a brief discussion of St. Helena’s water shortage, and a reminder the city might have to impose more water restrictions before the rainy season arrives.

The council agreed on March 27 to prohibit irrigating and watering on Mondays, allowing residents of even-numbered addresses to water their lawns on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays, while residents of odd-numbered addresses can water on Wednesdays, Fridays and Sundays.

Deeper restrictions, limiting households to 450 gallons per day and requiring commercial and industrial customers to reduce use by 15 percent, would be triggered when it appears Bell Canyon reservoir will fall below 25 percent of full capacity. With the reservoir at 55.3 percent of capacity as of Monday, public works director Jonathon Goldman said it’s possible that more restrictions will become necessary, especially since water consumption typically increases as the dry season wears on.

Environmental concerns over the effects of Sacramento-San Joaquin pumping on the Delta smelt, an endangered fish, have threatened to reduce the amount of water Napa County cities receive from the North Bay Aqueduct. Although St. Helena receives no water directly from the aqueduct, the issue could affect the city if Napa determines it is no longer able to deliver the annual 300 acre-feet it agreed to sell to St. Helena, Goldman said.

Many of the conservation strategies recommended by the report are not new. Susan Tiedemann of Napa Valley Ornamental Nursery said while there recently has been a slight increase in customers who consider water use a crucial factor in their landscaping choices, longtime St. Helena residents are well aware of the issue.

“This has been an issue for decades here,” she said. “People have known about it all along.”

Several customers have replaced their lawns with groundcover and water-retaining succulents — as much for easier maintenance as for water conservation, Tiedemann said.

Goldman singled out the St. Helena Unified School District’s installation of an all-weather track and field at the high school as a laudable water conservation strategy.

The idea of limiting the area of a lot covered by landscaping has also been raised in St. Helena. Planning Commission Sandy Ericson brought it up at a commission meeting earlier this year.

“You just can’t keep letting people have unlimited places to put tons of water,” she said this week. #

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2007/07/17/news/local/doc469c41abf2d61185017107.txt

 

 

CENTRAL COAST WATER CONSERVATION:

WATER CONSERVATION GOALS MET

Monterey Herald – 7/17/07

By Kevin Howe, staff writer

 

That's the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District's message to its public this summer, which despite the recent hot, dry weather, has seen water use by California American Water customers remain below target conservation goals.

 

"Water consumption has remained below the daily target every day this month," district water demand manager Stephanie Pintar told her board Monday.

 

The district is currently in "Stage 1" conservation, she said, which includes water-saving educational efforts, rebates, low-flow device distributions, requiring Cal Am customers to adhere to two outdoor watering days each week, and a tiered rate structure that jacks up water bills when customers exceed normal usage.

 

Continued water savings, Pintar said, have increased the "cushion" between actual production and the year-to-date water production target from 3.6 percent on June 12 to 4.1 percent as of Wednesday.

 

The district, she said, could go into more advanced stages of conservation, even though "triggers" for those stages haven't been tripped by water overuse. The district board has the discretion to impose additional restrictions if water use increases to the point of threatening water supply.

 

Pintar noted that the district and the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments are working with the Monterey Peninsula's hospitality industry on additional conservation measures, including serving water at restaurants only on request, and reminding hotel guests to reuse towels and linens during longer stays.District senior hydrologist Darby Fuerst said water drawn from the Carmel River Aquifer for the "water year" to date is 386 acre-feet below the pumping limit set by the state Water Resources Control Board, though he qualified that achievement by noting that more water than planned was drawn from the Seaside Basin Aquifer.

 

In 1995, the state water board restricted extraction of water from the Carmel River Aquifer to no more than 11,285 acre-feet per water year — October through September — and as of Thursday, 8,064 acre-feet had been pumped.

 

Pumping in the Seaside Aquifer, he said, remains 64 acre-feet under the court adjudication limits set on pumping there.

 

The district shouldn't be patting itself on the back, said Roy Thomas of the Carmel River Steelhead Association, who said the state water board ruling "had nothing to do with drought," but was a legal decision on what diversion rights California American Water had in the river aquifer.

 

Staying below that limit, he said, "doesn't mean we're saving water; we're just using it down to the limit."

 

Thomas appeared at the board meeting to urge district officials to take some action to salvage the steelhead trout "smolts" — juvenile fish ready to migrate from their freshwater spawning areas to the ocean — trapped in Carmel River Lagoon.

 

The lagoon water level is 3 feet at its deepest, he said. "You can wade across it in some places without getting your knees wet."

 

The fish, he said, will be lost if they stay in the lagoon over the summer.  #

http://www.montereyherald.com/local/ci_6393476?nclick_check=1

####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive