This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 11/6/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

November 6, 2008

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

 

Eastern Municipal Water District's tiered rates punish biggest users, reward frugal

Riverside Press Enterprise

 

After 2 centuries of shrinking, Alaska glaciers got thicker this year

Sacramento Bee

 

Beavers build a burrow and the town gives a dam

Email Picture

Eight of the rodents who took up residence in a downtown creek in Martinez, Calif., are staying put despite a noisy construction project near their lodge, supporters say.

Los Angeles Times

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

Eastern Municipal Water District's tiered rates punish biggest users, reward frugal

Riverside Press Enterprise – 11/6/08

By JANET ZIMMERMAN

The heaviest residential water users from Moreno Valley to San Jacinto to Temecula could pay 33 percent more than they do now under a tiered rate system proposed by Eastern Municipal Water District.

 

But low and moderate users would likely see no increase, and possibly a decrease, under the plan, said Chuck Rathbone, the district's chief financial officer.

Tiered rates were proposed in July. The numbers revealed Wednesday at a district board meeting are the first definitive indication of what prices would be.

The board will meet again Wednesday to hear more details and is expected to vote Nov. 19 whether to go ahead with the plan. Final approval is scheduled for Jan. 7 at the board's headquarters in Perris.

 

Two proposed rate changes are in the works for Eastern's 130,000 households.

 

The first is a rate increase, which could come in February, partly in response to a 14 percent increase passed on by Eastern's primary supplier, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. It likely will amount to a 10 percent jump, about $4.50 per month, for most customers, Rathbone said.

 

The second change would be the tiered rates, designed to penalize excessive water use and promote conservation after several years of drought and court-ordered restrictions on supplies from Northern California.

 

The system could significantly cost residents who maintain more than 10,000 square feet of landscaping at their homes. Customers with 3,000 to 6,000 square feet of landscape would likely see no change if they don't overwater; those with less than 3,000 square feet of landscape could pay less.

Consumers will find out how much they will pay beginning with notices in their February and March bills, information that could shock them into conserving, Rathbone said. The increase would take effect in April.

 

"It's a fair approach," he said. "Higher users will end up paying more."

 

Customers now pay the same per-unit rate no matter how much water they use -- $1.91 per unit for most customers in the district, depending on which city they live in and how much water has to be imported.

 

The new system would create four water-consumption levels and prices designed to bring in the same revenue for the district, but in a different configuration.

The first tier, or block, is the cheapest. It covers indoor use and is calculated at 180 gallons per day for a single-family dwelling with three people; allowances would be made for larger households and medical needs, Rathbone said.

 

The second tier is for outdoor use, such as watering the lawn, and would be calculated for lot size and weather conditions.

Rates increase significantly for the top two tiers. The third tier, "excessive," would kick in when a customer has used all the water in the first two tiers plus 50 percent of that total.

 

The fourth tier is "wasteful."

 

More than 70 percent of customers will be within their budgets, said Sanjay Gaur, the consultant helping determine the rates for the district. Twenty-eight percent of users will be penalized for high use, unless they cut back or apply for an adjustment, he said.

 

Such systems are in use elsewhere in Southern California, including Irvine and San Juan Capistrano. Irvine Ranch Water District has tiered rates that range from $1.07 per water unit to -- for the heaviest users -- $8.56 per unit.

 

Gaur said the tiered rates could produce a 20 percent drop in water use. #

http://www.pe.com/localnews/environment/stories/PE_News_Local_S_rates06.38f1f80.html

 

After 2 centuries of shrinking, Alaska glaciers got thicker this year

Sacramento Bee – 11/06/08

By CRAIG MEDRED, McClatchy Newspapers

Two hundred years of glacial shrinkage in Alaska, and then came the winter and summer of 2007-2008.

Unusually large amounts of winter snow were followed by unusually chill temperatures in June, July and August.

 

"In mid-June, I was surprised to see snow still at sea level in Prince William Sound," said U.S. Geological Survey glaciologist Bruce Molnia. "On the Juneau Icefield, there was still 20 feet of new snow on the surface of the Taku Glacier in late July. At Bering Glacier, a landslide I am studying, located at about 1,500 feet elevation, did not become snow free until early August.

 

"In general, the weather this summer was the worst I have seen in at least 20 years."

Never before in the history of a research project dating back to 1946 had the Juneau Icefield witnessed the kind of snow buildup that came this year. It was similar on a lot of other glaciers too.

 

"It's been a long time on most glaciers where they've actually had positive mass balance," Molnia said.

That's the way a scientist says the glaciers got thicker in the middle.

 

Mass balance is the difference between how much snow falls every winter and how much snow fades away each summer. For most Alaska glaciers, the summer snow loss has for decades exceeded the winter snowfall.

 

The result has put the state's glaciers on a long-term diet. Every year they lose the snow of the previous winter plus some of the snow from years before. And so they steadily shrink.

 

Since Alaska's glacial maximum back in the 1700s, Molnia said, "I figure that we've lost about 15 percent of the total area."

 

What might be the most notable long-term shrinkage has occurred at Glacier Bay, now the site of a national park in Southeast Alaska. When the first Russian explorers arrived in Alaska in the 1740s, there was no Glacier Bay. There was simply a wall of ice across the north side of Icy Strait.

 

That ice retreated to form a bay and what is now known as the Muir Glacier. And from the 1800s until now, the Muir Glacier just kept retreating and retreating and retreating. It is now back 57 miles from the entrance to the bay, said Tom Vandenberg, chief interpretative ranger at Glacier Bay.

 

That's farther than the distance from glacier-free Anchorage to Girdwood, where seven glaciers overhang the valley surrounding the state's largest ski area. The glaciers there, like the Muir and hundreds of other Alaska glaciers, have been part of the long retreat.

 

Overall, Molnia figures Alaska has lost 10,000 to 12,000 square kilometers of ice in the past two centuries, enough to cover an area nearly the size of Connecticut.

Molnia has just completed a major study of Alaska glaciers using satellite images and aerial photographs to catalog shrinkage. The 550-page "Glaciers of Alaska" will provide a benchmark for tracking what happens to the state's glaciers in the future.

 

Climate change has led to speculation they might all disappear. Molnia isn't sure what to expect. As far as glaciers go, he said, Alaska's glaciers are volatile. They live life on the edge.

 

"What we're talking about to (change) most of Alaska's glaciers is a small temperature change; just a small fraction-of-a-degree change makes a big difference. It's the mean annual temperature that's the big thing.

 

"All it takes is a warm summer to have a really dramatic effect on the melting."

Or a cool summer to shift that mass balance the other way.

 

One cool summer that leaves 20 feet of new snow still sitting atop glaciers come the start of the next winter is no big deal, Molnia said.

Ten summers like that?

 

Well, that might mark the start of something like the Little Ice Age.

 

During the Little Ice Age - roughly the 16th century to the 19th - Muir Glacier filled Glacier Bay and the people of Europe struggled to survive because of difficult conditions for agriculture. Some of them fled for America in the first wave of white immigration.

 

The Pilgrims established the Plymouth Colony in December 1620. By spring, a bitterly cold winter had played a key role in helping kill half of them. Hindered by a chilly climate, the white colonization of North America through the 1600s and 1700s was slow.

 

As the climate warmed from 1800 to 1900, the United States tripled in size. The windy and cold city of Chicago grew from an outpost of fewer than 4,000 in 1800 to a thriving city of more than 1.5 million at the end of that century.

 

The difference in temperature between the Little Ice Age and these heady days of American expansion?

About three or four degrees, Molnia said.

 

The difference in temperature between this summer in Anchorage - the third coldest on record - and the norm?

About three degrees, according to the National Weather Service.

 

Does it mean anything?

 

Nobody knows. Climate is constantly shifting. And even if the past year was a signal of a changing future, Molnia said, it would still take decades to make itself noticeable in Alaska's glaciers.

 

Rivers of ice flow slowly. Hundreds of feet of snow would have to accumulate at higher elevations to create enough pressure to stall the current glacial retreat and start a new advance. Even if the glaciers started growing today, Molnia said, it might take up to 100 years for them to start steadily rolling back down into the valleys they've abandoned.

 

"It's different time scales," he said. "We're just starting to understand."

As strange it might seem, Alaska's glaciers could appear to be shrinking for some time while secretly growing. Molnia said there are a few glaciers in the state now where constant snow accumulations at higher elevations are causing them to thicken even as their lower reaches follow the pattern of retreat fueled by the global warming of recent decades. #

http://www.sacbee.com/702/story/1375558.html

 

Beavers build a burrow and the town gives a dam

Email Picture

Eight of the rodents who took up residence in a downtown creek in Martinez, Calif., are staying put despite a noisy construction project near their lodge, supporters say.

Los Angeles Times – 11/6/08

By Richard C. Paddock

Reporting from Martinez, Calif. -- Beavers that took up residence in a downtown creek here are staying put despite a noisy three-week construction project to shore up the bank near their lodge, relieved beaver supporters say.

The eight beavers that live in Alhambra Creek near the city center have been spotted entering and leaving their lodge at dusk, even though workers drove 25-foot-long metal sheet piles into the ground a few feet from their burrow.

 "The beavers are fine," said Linda Meza, a spokeswoman for the beaver support group Worth a Dam.

But a new controversy over the project has emerged since Worth a Dam uncovered a photograph in the Martinez Museum showing that damage attributed to the beavers dates to at least 1999 -- seven years before the animals arrived.

Meza said the photo proved what the group had been saying all along: The $400,000 construction project was unnecessary.

Worth a Dam has criticized the City Council for improperly meeting in private on the issue and for bypassing an environmental review by declaring the situation an emergency.

"The city was aware that the beavers were not burrowing under the retaining wall," Meza said. "The premise for this emergency work was based on lies."

Martinez, located 35 miles northeast of San Francisco, was founded during the Gold Rush.

The city of 37,000 boasts that it was the home of conservationist John Muir, but it has also been the site of a huge oil refinery for nearly a century.

The first two beavers arrived in 2006, and since then they have been busy. They produced two kits, or baby beavers, last year and four more this year while building two lodges and four dams in the creek.

After word of the beavers' presence spread, tourists began visiting Martinez to see them -- an unusual occurrence for the refinery town.

But the property owner nearest the beaver habitat complained that the rodents were causing damage by burrowing into the bank and under the retaining wall. He threatened to sue the city if it didn't take action.

City officials at first planned to kill the beavers but backed off after many residents protested.

The City Council then voted to shore up the bank along a one-block stretch by driving sheet piles between the creek and the retaining wall.

Beaver supporters opposed the project for fear the animals might be killed or driven off, but the large rodents have proved adaptable.

With the last of the sheet piles in place, workers poured concrete between the piles and the retaining wall last week and finished filling in with dirt this week.

Even so, the dispute continues.

Last week, Worth a Dam uncovered the 1999 photograph of the creek taken when the water level was unusually low. The group says the photo clearly shows that a crack in the retaining wall was already evident.

Worth a Dam accuses the City Council of going ahead with the project to pacify an influential property owner even though it knew the beavers had not caused the problem.

"They met in secret, voted in secret, omitted in secret and lied in public," wrote Worth a Dam President Heidi Perryman in a post on the group's website.

"They spent nearly half a million of your taxpayer dollars on a Faustian contract that had nothing to do with public safety."

In an interview, City Manager Phil Vince defended the decision but declined to say whether the council was aware that damage to the retaining wall predated the beavers' arrival.

"I don't think it was a misguided project whatsoever," he said.

"We have invested a ton of time and effort to make this happen, and I am not interested in revisiting history."

Vince said that although some residents see protecting the beavers as a waste of money, he believes it is good for Martinez's quality of life to have the animals living downtown. He hopes the city can develop a long-term plan to protect its wildlife.

"I'm glad the beavers have stayed," he said. "Beavers on the whole are pretty resilient. They took it in stride."#

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-beavers6-2008nov06,0,5690120.story?track=rss

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive