This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - WaterQuality-11/13/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

November 13, 2008

 

4. Water Quality –

 

 

Technology finds more pesticides

Imperial Valley Press

 

Well water a pipe dream

YC schools have relied on bottled water for 6 years

Marysville Appeal Democrat

 

Chemical firm to pay Sacramento County $2.4 million fine

Sacramento Bee

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Technology finds more pesticides

Imperial Valley Press – 11/13/08


 

 

 

 

 

 

Improved testing methods have led to an increase in pesticides detected in the New and Alamo rivers, according to a U.S. Geological Survey study released last week.

The study found 25 pesticides in the water of the rivers and 34 in the sediments around the rivers. Earlier studies in 2001 to 2003 found only 18 pesticides in the water and 19 in the sediments.

Despite the New River’s history of pollution problems, pesticides were found in higher concentrations in the Alamo River, according to the study.

Doug Barnum, a science coordinator with the USGS office in the Salton Sea area, said the findings don’t mean there are more pesticides in the river than before, just that the technology and testing methods have improved.

“It’s kind of like getting a better set of glasses to see better,” Barnum said.

The New and Alamo rivers originate near the Colorado River Delta in Mexico and flow north across the border and into Salton Sea. They get most of their water through agricultural drainage. The New River also receives treated and untreated municipal and industrial wastewater from Mexicali.

While this study only focused on the rivers, previous studies have shown very few of the pesticides make it to the Salton Sea itself, Barnum said.

Both rivers have histories of pollutant problems and are listed as “impaired” by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, meaning they don’t meet water quality standards.

Of the four most common compounds found in the rivers, three are considered low-toxicity pesticides, meaning they have a small impact to humans and wildlife in the area, according to the study. But several of the less-common compounds, when detected, were in high enough concentrations to harm aquatic life, according to the study.

Because of the way the rivers are fed by agricultural run-off water, there is no way to really prevent pesticides from entering the water supply.

“The only way is to have the farmers not use them anymore,” said Mike King, the Imperial Irrigation District’s Water Department Manager, about the pesticides.

In 2006, 1.1 million kilograms of pesticide active ingredients were applied to more than 60 different crops along the New and Alamo rivers, according to the USGS study. One kilogram is a little more than 2 pounds.

While the IID has done some work with the rivers in the past, King said the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was actually the governing body with regard to the rivers. If the IID wants to do anything with the rivers, it must first get permission from the corps, King said.

There have been several efforts over the years to clean the sewage in the New River. But little can be done about the pesticides already in the water and sediment samples. Some compounds, such as DDT, take decades to break down, said Jim Nickles, a spokesman for the USGS in Sacramento.

DDT was a pesticide used in the 1930s through 1960s. It was banned in the United States in the 1970s after it was revealed the pesticide could cause cancer in humans.

But samples in this study detected DDT among 14 total organochlorides, which are pesticides with similar chemical structures to DDT, in the sediment around the rivers.

“DDT just hangs around for a long time,” Nickles said.#

http://www.ivpressonline.com/articles/2008/11/13/local_news/news01.txt

 

Well water a pipe dream

YC schools have relied on bottled water for 6 years

Marysville Appeal Democrat – 11/13/08

By Ryan McCarthy

 

Until the wish list comes true, bottled water will have to do.

 

And at Central Gaither and Barry elementary schools in the Yuba City area, it seems to be doing pretty well.

 

"They thought that was the coolest," Barry school principal Tom Walters said of students reaction to the bottled water supplies that began a half-dozen years ago.

Wells in the area produce hard water rich in minerals that doesn't meet new federal standards. Moreover, Steve Plaxco, director of maintenance for the Yuba City Unified School District, said of the well water that, "it's almost salty tasting."

 

A recent "wish list" survey of improvements sought by schools in the Yuba City Unified district included Barry Elementary's desire for a permanent water supply, among other needs.

 

Plaxco said yet-to-be developed technology could solve the water issue and one day make bottled water unnecessary. But until then the two schools are expected to continue the arrangement that has Barry Elementary averaging monthly bottled water use of 935 gallons and Central Gaither a total of 482 gallons.

 

New wells were drilled at both schools several years ago in an unsuccessful try to find better water.

 

"I don't see an end to the bottled water," principal Walters said.

 

Drinking fountains at both school sites - located outside the Yuba City limits — were shut down and removed, Plaxco said. Classrooms provide bottled water that is also brought outside during the day in portable containers.

 

Debbie Everett, principal at Central Gaither, said plenty of water dispensers are provided.

 

Plaxco said the school district contracts with a Grass Valley firm for monthly water testing at the two schools as required by the state.

 

He praised the state Department of Health Services and its Redding office for its work with the school district on the water issue that led to the bottled water.

"Those guys have been great," he said.

 

"They really worked with us," Plaxco added, "to see what is the best solution."#

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/news/water_71063___article.html/bottled_schools.html

 

Chemical firm to pay Sacramento County $2.4 million fine

Sacramento Bee – 11/11/08

By Loretta Kalb and Chris Bowman

A large chemical manufacturer has agreed to pay Sacramento County $2.4 million after keeping the public in the dark about its handling of hazardous chemical wastes in Elk Grove, officials announced Monday.

 

Officials with Georgia-Pacific Chemicals said the plant that produces wood adhesives and industrial resins did not release anything into the environment that posed a health risk to the public or the facility's estimated 20 workers.

 

County environmental regulators, however, said they had no way of telling, because the company failed to provide the reports that would have allowed regulators to monitor waste disposal at the 25-acre spread on East Stockton Boulevard. County inspectors documented problems at the company's site as far back as 2003.

Major generators of toxic waste are required by law to obtain agency permits and routinely file public reports on the volume and type of chemicals on site to help enforcers detect potential hazards.

 

"The management and treatment of hazardous waste is a violation that is deemed very serious," said Dennis Green, chief of the county's hazardous materials division. "If it's not done properly, there is a potential that it can be a danger to employees and the environment."

 

The penalty is believed to be the largest of its kind for a local environmental enforcement agency in the United States, Val Siebal, director of the county Environmental Management Department, said in a press release. State and federal enforcers pursue more-serious pollution violations that carry larger fines.

 

The fine stems from health and safety violations the county issued in July for failing to get permits, conduct daily inspections of hazardous waste storage tanks or properly manage tanks that previously held toxic waste.

 

Green estimated that Georgia-Pacific saved $300,000 a year for three to four years by failing to haul its wastes to expensive disposal sites licensed to handle hazardous materials.

 

The company didn't have the permits required to dispose of the materials on site, he said. Yet, in some instances, the company diluted caustic and distillate wastes within hazardous waste limits before draining them down the sewer, according to the county enforcement order.

 

The county found no evidence that the company was dumping hazardous materials, Green said.

 

The company acknowledged it enjoyed an economic benefit by not following requirements, Green said, and the large fine was based in part on that financial gain to create "an even playing field" for other chemical plants that follow the environmental rules.

 

Julie Davis, a spokeswoman with Georgia-Pacific headquarters in Atlanta, said its subsidiary Georgia-Pacific Chemicals cooperated fully.

"Since this was uncovered in May 2007, we've been working with the county to address their concerns," Davis said.

The penalties are to be paid in four installments over 30 months. #

http://www.sacbee.com/378/story/1387231.html

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive