[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: Watersheds - 11/25/2008

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

November 25, 2008

 

3.   Watersheds –

 

Planning agency sued over shorezone plan

Tahoe Daily Tribune

 

How Arctic melting could benefit shippers, oil companies

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

Planning agency sued over shorezone plan

Tahoe Daily Tribune, 11/25/2008

By Adam Jensen and Elaine Goodman

 

Conservation groups filed a lawsuit in federal court Friday, saying they are trying to force environmental review of a shoreline development plan for Lake Tahoe.

The suit, filed by the League to Save Lake Tahoe and the Sierra Club, alleges the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency adopted new land-use regulations without thorough consideration of environmental and public access impacts.

However, a TRPA spokesman said extensive environmental analysis was conducted and that the lawsuit has the potential to interfere with programs designed to protect the lake’s environmental health.

The TRPA Governing Board adopted the shorezone ordinance amendments Oct. 22. The amendments govern the use of Lake Tahoe’s lakefront areas by public and private landholders.

“The shorezone ordinance amendment allows an unprecedented level of development along the shoreline and dramatically increases motorized boat traffic at Lake Tahoe,” Carl Young from the League to Save Lake Tahoe said in a press release announcing the lawsuit. “The ordinance fails to remediate for the detrimental water pollution impacts on Lake Tahoe’s famously clear waters.”

In the press statement, the groups contend that the new regulations would increase motorized boating, adding more than 62,000 boat trips to current annual boat traffic — increasing noise, water and air pollution; limiting public access; diminishing the scenic quality of the lake; and increasing the threat of introducing such invasive species as the quagga mussel.

By allowing construction of 138 new piers and an additional 1,862 buoys, the plan will produce a further decline in the lake’s clarity and scenic quality, the groups claim.

The new construction will have substantial impacts on water quality, air quality, low-impact recreational activities, and fisheries, the groups allege. The additional boat use created by new piers and buoys will lead to a major increase in the discharge of fuel constituents and combustion byproducts such as nitrous oxides, particulate matter, and hydrocarbons, the groups claimed in the statement.

The lawsuit lists two attorneys with the nonprofit environmental law firm, Earthjustice, as counsel for the conservation groups.

The amendments to the shorezone ordinance are needed in part because updated science does not support the TRPA ban on development in fish habitat, agency officials have said.

TRPA spokesman Dennis Oliver on Friday called the lawsuit “counterproductive” and “unfortunate.”

“The updated shorezone ordinances are the result of many years of hard work and collaboration among all stakeholders — and the best science available — and represent our best hope of protecting the lake by better managing and mitigating the impacts of development and boating activities,” Oliver said in a statement.

Oliver noted that an environmental impact statement was certified by the TRPA Governing Board before approval of the shorezone amendment.

And the lawsuit has the potential to obstruct programs beneficial to the lake — including the Blue Boating program that is being developed and removal of illegal buoys, Oliver said.

“It focuses our attention on litigation rather than protecting the lake,” he said.
Blue Boating is an inspection and certification program that would check boats’ environmental friendliness, for example, whether their engines are tuned for high altitude and if they’re disposing of sewage properly. It might also include inspection for invasive mussels, according to Oliver.

Oliver declined to comment in detail Friday on the legal merits of the lawsuit, saying the TRPA had not had time to thoroughly review it. #

 

http://www.tahoedailytribune.com/article/20081124/NEWS/811239989/1003/NONE&parentprofile=1056&title=Planning%20agency%20sued%20over%20shorezone%20plan

 

 

How Arctic melting could benefit shippers, oil companies

McClatchy Newspapers, 11/23/2008

By RENEE SCHOOF

WASHINGTON -- With global warming melting the Arctic's eons-old ice at an alarming rate, shipping and oil companies are looking ahead at how to exploit the new open waters.

 

For the past 30 years, the summer Arctic icepack has been shrinking. In 2007, the melt reached record levels. This past summer, the ice shrank to the second smallest area on record. 

 

And while much of the discussions so far have been focused on dealing with global warming and on preserving habitat and protecting polar bears and walruses, another change is looming. When will commercial interests be able to develop the once-impregnable region?

 

Scientists say the Arctic's seas could be essentially free of ice in the summertime by mid-century.

 

"I'm convinced, based on models and observations, the trend is one of accelerated ice loss, and we're probably looking at a scenario, even with the best efforts to mitigate (global warming), that we'll continue to see loss," said Richard Spinrad, director of research for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

 

Already, shipping has increased within the Arctic Circle to serve the oil and gas industry.

 

The recent increase has been the result of a spike in commodity prices, not to capitalize on retreating sea ice, said Lawson Brigham, a former Coast Guard captain and climate scientist who made many voyages into the Arctic and around Antarctica.

 

The pull is strong in a world dependent on petroleum. In July, the U.S. Geological Survey issued the first public estimate of the petroleum resources north of the Arctic Circle. Its findings: 90 billion barrels of oil and 1,670 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

 

Brigham is helping plan for the changes ahead as chairman of the Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment of the Arctic Council, an intergovernmental forum of eight Arctic nations.

 

"We don't profess to know exactly how industry will move ahead, but we know there's an increase of ships in the Arctic Ocean, and maybe that increase hasn't been matched by policy responses from safety and environmental standpoint, so that's what we're working on," he said.

 

Brigham was the captain of the icebreaker Polar Sea in 1994 when it teamed in a scientific expedition with Canada's Louis S. St. Laurent to make the first ocean-to-ocean surface voyage over the North Pole. "There was a lot more ice there than there is today," he said. "Quite an extraordinary difference in 14 years."

 

Except for some cruise ships and icebreakers, the traffic in the Arctic now is regional - mostly ships going in and out to provide transportation for the oil and gas industry, he said.

 

Oil companies have been looking at Alaska's arctic waters as a new frontier.

 

And in the past two years, the Bush administration has leased large parts of those waters - the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas.

Shell was the main buyer of the Chukchi leases in February, spending $2.1 billion.

 

"Shell, like many other national and international oil companies, is actively assessing Arctic opportunities," said Shell spokeswoman Darci Sinclair.

 

Conservation groups and Native communities challenged the Minerals Management Service's approval of a permit for Shell to drill exploratory wells in the Beaufort Sea. On Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that the MMS did not conduct the "hard look" at environmental impacts required by law and canceled the permit.

 

"We're very concerned about the aggressiveness the Bush administration has shown about oil and gas leasing in polar bear habitat," said Mike Daulton, the legislative director of the National Audubon Society.

 

Alaska's oil mostly is produced on land. The U.S. Minerals Management Service estimates Alaska's offshore waters hold 26.6 billion barrels of oil that are technically recoverable, and that nearly 90 percent of it is in the Arctic.

 

Shell wants to drill in open water during the summer and fall seasons.

 

"We can only conduct exploratory drilling in open water conditions because of the mobile nature of our drill rigs," Sinclair said. "From season to season, as we drill exploratory wells, those wells will be capped over the winter and revisited when the open water allows."

 

"In the event the project moves in to the development and production stages, we envision putting in place a permanent structure that can withstand moving sea ice," she said. "We have yet to decide what that structure would look like."

 

There's also competition. Russia has claimed a vast territory in the Arctic Ocean by declaring that the undersea Lomonosov Ridge is its continental shelf, setting up a dispute with the U.S., Canada and other Arctic nations.

 

The U.S., Russia and other nations agreed earlier this year to use the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea to sort out competing claims. The U.S. can't bring any claims, however, because the Senate hasn't ratified it.

 

Development hasn't proved easy so far for Russia's national energy company, Gazprom, in the Shtokman gas field near Murmansk, even in open water of the Barents Sea, said William Chandler, an energy expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

 

"If there weren't almost insurmountable technical and financial challenges to get that stuff, why isn't it happening?" Chandler said.

 

Russia also has problems on land, where ice roads needed for development in the Western Siberian basin are melting earlier, leaving less time for exploration and development, Chandler said.

 

U.S. Navy Cmdr. Andrew Garlington, who works on maritime security policy, said the Navy is planning for increased use of the Arctic.

 

"But let me give you a caution," Garlington said. "When you hear ice-free waters in the Arctic, that doesn't mean it's free of all ice. That just means it's less than 10 percent coverage. It's still a very dangerous and dynamic environment up there."

The Coast Guard also is looking north and working with Canada and Russia on oil spill response plans.

 

The Northwest Passage between Baffin Bay and the Beaufort Sea was navigable for a period starting late last August, and also the year before. But Michael Storgaard, a spokesman for A.P. Moller-Maersk, the world's biggest shipping company, said it's shallow with many narrow straits, not fully mapped in detail and lacking large-scale rescue and repair facilities.

 

"For now, we do not see any immediate commercial possibilities in connection with the Northwest Passage," he said. "Our view is also that it will be some time, perhaps even decades, before we see a more consistent commercial utilization."#

 

http://www.sacbee.com/702/story/1421454.html

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the SWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California