This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Item for 11/18/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

November 18, 2008

 

1.  Top Items -

 

San Joaquin River restoration bill postponed until 2009

McClatchy Newspapers

 

San Joaquin River plan aims to appease districts

Waterway dispute finally settled after two decades.

Fresno Bee

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

San Joaquin River restoration bill postponed until 2009

McClatchy Newspapers – 11/18/08

By Michael Doyle, staff writer

 

WASHINGTON —The Senate will postpone until early next year action on a big public lands bill that includes efforts to restore the San Joaquin River, lawmakers decided Monday.

 

While not entirely unexpected, the delay disappoints those who had hoped to resolve the long-simmering river restoration issue sooner rather than later. It also gives supporters and opponents more time to maneuver.

 

"It's unfortunate that the Senate could not move on this bill," said Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, adding that "it is my hope that the House will move quickly" in January.

The ambitious San Joaquin River plan is one of about 150 bills folded into an omnibus public lands package that's designed to attract widespread political support. Other California elements include a Madera County groundwater bank project and a John Krebs Wilderness designation in the Sierra Nevada.

 

Lawmakers once spoke of moving the massive legislation during the lame-duck congressional session this week, but that schedule proved too ambitious amid ongoing negotiations over an economic stimulus deal and an auto industry bailout.

 

"Rather than move forward on the lands package, which is ... so important to a lot of senators and certainly a lot of people around the country, we're better off waiting until we come back," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced early Monday afternoon.

 

The San Joaquin River bill would restore water flows next year below Friant Dam and return salmon to the river channel by 2013. It is designed to settle a 20-year-old lawsuit won by environmentalists unhappy over loss of the river's once-thriving salmon run.

 

The San Joaquin River plan is supported by myriad lawmakers, environmental groups and several dozen water districts. Negotiations last week appeared to resolve lingering concerns of farmers in the Los Banos area, who wanted to protect their own long-term water contracts.

 

"We've been through a little bit of a roller coaster," acknowledged Ron Jacobsma, general manager of the Friant Water Users Authority, but "in many ways, the settlement today is better than what it was two years ago."

 

Even so, farmers worried about losing irrigation supplies could use the next several weeks to resist the river provision. Last week, Kings County Farm Bureau president Tim Larson urged California lawmakers to go slow.

 

"Our concern is not only for our future, but extends beyond the boundaries of our county to include our neighboring counties," Larson wrote, citing a "lack of federal funding (and) a risk of future litigation."

 

More broadly, some conservative lawmakers as well as organizations including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce raised alarms about the overall public lands bill as being pork-laden.

 

Reid said Monday that unnamed senators threatened to invoke a rarely used Senate rule requiring that the entire bill be read aloud on the Senate floor. At well over 760 pages, Reid estimated that it would take at least 24 hours to get through the reading.

 

Reid's decision means the bill will return in a markedly different political environment. The Democrats will hold at least 57 seats in the Senate, giving them more leeway to force through legislation.

 

"In January, we'll have more votes," Reid said, adding that the public lands measure will be "the first or second thing we do when we come back in January."

The overall package could change, reflecting the Senate's own changes. Several senators from states that have provisions in the current bill, including Idaho and Alaska, are leaving Capitol Hill, although that won't necessarily mean the states' provisions will be stripped out.#

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/244/story/56020.html

 

 

San Joaquin River plan aims to appease districts

Waterway dispute finally settled after two decades.

Fresno Bee – 11/18/08

By CAROL REITER

A federal bill that would restore water flows and return salmon to the San Joaquin River had some local water districts worried.

But amendments to the bill were agreed upon Monday, and those amendments should drown the worries of the districts.

 

The bill will go before the Senate early next year as part of a big land-use package and would make sweeping changes to the San Joaquin River.

Negotiation for some of the districts was done by the Merced law firm of Mason, Robbins, Browning and Godwin.

 

Art Godwin, a lawyer with the firm, said growers downstream of the river were worried about seepage issues. If the river gets more water flow, water would seep into the growers' land. That could kill whatever is being grown on the acreage.

 

"We were worried about seepage and also about the cost," Godwin said. The cost has been estimated to be anywhere from $500 million to more than $1 billion. Godwin said the districts were worried that the money would run out before the restoration was finished.

 

Another worry, especially for the Merced Irrigation District and San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority on the Westside of the county, was reintroducing Chinook salmon to the San Joaquin.

 

Currently, the spring run of the salmon only happens on the Sacramento River. But salmon were common in the San Joaquin and other rivers in the past.

The salmon is a threatened species, and if it ended up in other rivers, those water districts might have to mitigate for it.

 

"The Merced Irrigation District was worried because the Merced River ends at the San Joaquin," said Godwin.

 

The district was troubled by the possibility that the salmon might accidentally go up the Merced River, Godwin said. But fish screens proposed by the amendments would make sure that doesn't happen.

 

Dan Nelson, executive of the San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, said the negotiations that took place over the past several weeks have satisfied the districts.

"We were worried that there would be increased price impacts to the third-party districts," Nelson said. The districts are considered third party because they weren't part of the lawsuit that started the restoration. The lawsuit, which focused on reintroducing fish into the river, was settled in 2006, 18 years after it was filed.

 

"The farmers in the third-party districts have developed an agricultural community that provides a valuable supply of food, fiber and thousands of jobs," said Nelson. "This community would be in jeopardy if their water supply or their ability to farm were threatened."#

http://www.fresnobee.com/local/story/1019421.html

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

No comments:

Blog Archive