This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY -11/26/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

November 26, 2008

 

2. Supply –

 

 

Farmers evaluate Klamath agreement to remove four dams

California Farm Bureau Federation Ag Alert

 

Growers face difficult planting choices

California Farm Bureau Federation Ag Alert

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Farmers evaluate Klamath agreement to remove four dams

California Farm Bureau Federation Ag Alert – 11/26/08

By Christine Souza, Assistant Editor

Depending on their water source, farmers and ranchers near the California-Oregon border have differing views of a recent decision by Oregon-based hydroelectric power company PacifiCorp to remove four of its dams along the Klamath River. For Klamath Project irrigators, the agreement comes as a critical step, whereas irrigators downstream in the Scott River and Shasta River valleys see it as a potential threat to their own water supplies.

 

"The agreement regarding the dams appears to be a milestone in a very difficult history of conflict over the water resources of the Klamath Project," said Chris Scheuring, managing counsel for the California Farm Bureau Federation Natural Resources and Environmental Division. "Still, folks on Klamath tributaries downstream are worried about how the implementation of the settlement may affect their own rights to divert water for irrigation and stock watering, so we'll be following this issue closely to try to ensure that all of our affected members can continue their operations in the face of difficult environmental constraints."

 

PacifiCorp, the state of California, the state of Oregon and the federal government agreed in principle on Nov. 13 to remove the dams, to give threatened coho salmon and other fish species access to 300 miles of habitat in the river and improve water quality. The agreement would dovetail with a plan by 26 Klamath Basin stakeholders released in January-- the proposed Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, a comprehensive solution for the region's water needs that expressed support for dam removal. Stakeholders include irrigators represented by the Klamath Water Users Association, as well as environmentalists, tribes, fishing groups and government agencies.

 

"This agreement in principle was a positive and necessary step forward toward the overall vision of the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement to provide long-term security for communities up and down the basin," said Klamath Water Users Association Executive Director Greg Addington. "The Klamath Water Users Association in general does not like the idea of dam removal, but in this unique instance and as part of the bigger package, it gives us what we need to continue as a viable economic industry."

 

The agreement does not guarantee the removal of the dams, but simply provides a complex framework for what may be the largest dam removal project in history.

It calls for PacifiCorp to raise charges to its ratepayers by 2 percent over time to contribute $200 million toward decommissioning the dams. Proponents say these costs should be less than what it would cost PacifiCorp ratepayers to relicense the dams with updated fish passage. The state of California tentatively agreed to put up a $250 million bond. A final agreement would require legislation in both states and in Congress. The plan sets a timeline for the drafting and signing of a final agreement to remove the dams, with a target removal date of 2020.

 

The agreement compels the federal government to assess the costs and benefits of dam removal and as a result, scientific and engineering studies will be conducted in consultation with state, local and tribal governments and other stakeholders. A final determination will be made by March 31, 2012.

 

Tulelake farmer Scott Seus, who chairs the Klahmath Water Users Association Power Commithtee, calls the agreement a first step towards restoration of the river and assurance that farming continues up and down the Klamath River watershed.

 

"We are somewhat in control of our destiny and if everything goes as planned, it is something we can live with," Seus said. "Our other alternative is to keep going to battle in the courts and let new administrations dictate how the Klamath survives or fails."

 

Klamath Project irrigators like Seus remember vividly the 2001 water shutoff, when the federal government issued biological opinions under the Endangered Species Act that required higher water levels to protect endangered suckerfish and higher flows to protect threatened coho salmon. As a result, they are seeking improved water supply certainty as part of the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement. They are also asking for reliable and affordable power and protection against added regulatory restrictions if new threatened or endangered species are listed in the area.

 

But Scott River and Shasta River valley irrigators downstream, who were not at the table during negotiations for the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, are concerned about the implications for their farming operations.

 

"Siskiyou County Farm Bureau is concerned that in dry years, such as this year and last year, the Klamath will dry up in spots and the government will be looking to the Scott and Shasta rivers to make up those flows," said Siskiyou County Farm Bureau Past-President Mike Luiz. "We are worried about the loss of water storage during dry years at the four reservoirs: Copco 1, Copco 2, JC Boyle and Iron Gate. These water storage facilities keep water flowing not only for the fish, but for irrigators."

 

Other areas of concern include encroachment of private property rights, a reduction in funding for restoration projects, increased regulation and water quality issues.

"The loss of Copco II and Iron Gate reservoirs would also result in the taking of property value for those who live around the lakes," Luiz said. "This would translate into a substantial portion of these people's properties being taken with no reimbursement and no means of getting it back."

 

Downstream irrigators also say they wonder if the removal of the four dams would even lead to the well-intended result of a rejuvenated fish population.

"We would like to make certain that this dam removal goes through a peer review process and is based on sound science," Luiz said. "As this plan moves forward, we will ensure that our voice is heard."

 

Copies of the Agreement In Principle and accompanying letters from the Department of the Interior to the states and PacifiCorp can be found at www.DOI.gov.#

http://www.cfbf.com/agalert/AgAlertStory.cfm?ID=1181&ck=2AC2406E835BD49C70469ACAE337D292

 

Growers face difficult planting choices

California Farm Bureau Federation Ag Alert – 11/26/08

By Steve Adler, Executive Editor

Clay Goodman removed the stumps of wind-damaged almond trees from a Sutter County orchard last week, in preparation for planting replacement trees. Almonds remain a popular crop, but many farmers face tough decisions about what crops to plant for 2009.

 

For California's agricultural producers, whether they specialize in permanent crops, annual crops or livestock, next year is fraught with uncertainty. The biggest concerns are threeh--water availability, work force availability and the cost of farming.

 

Farmers are making tough decisions now and in the coming weeks regarding what to plant, how much to plant and how to best use a water supply that could fluctuate dramatically depending on how much precipitation the state's watersheds receive over the next five months.

 

Livestock producers face similar difficult decisions. Do they start severely culling their herds, or do they expand? The high cost of feed will have a major impact on those choices.

 

Throw into the equation the regulatory challenges created by legislation such as the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act, and the picture becomes even murkier.

 

"Clearly for many Central Valley growers, access and price of water is first. Second, labor availability and cost is vital for many crops. Third, input prices, fertilizer and fuel especially, have been up and now down. This is a tough call to decide to lock in input prices now or hope they continue to come down," said Daniel A. Sumner, director of the University of California Agricultural Issues Center in Davis.

 

"Fourth, the same issue in reverse on the output price side. Not only have field crop prices dropped, but the stronger dollar and worldwide recession cause serious concerns for the market for wine, nuts and crops that depend on export markets and economic growth," Sumner said.

 

Water drives orchard and vineyard decisions

There is continued interest among growers for planting certain permanent tree crops like almonds, pomegranates and olive trees for oil--but only from growers who have a reliable water supply. Some San Joaquin Valley growers with poorer quality water are turning to pistachios.

 

"Growers definitely are taking account of the amount of irrigation water they will have next season," said John Duarte of Duarte Nursery in Hughson. "Pistachio trees are in high demand from farmers because consumer demand for pistachios continues increasing, and the trees can tolerate brackish irrigation water and so could be planted in parts of the San Joaquin Valley where other, less tolerant trees cannot."

 

He said growers with adequate water "are attracted to almond trees by strong consumer demand and strong prices."

Sutter County almond grower Clay Goodman's planting decisions are influenced by a severe storm that swept across Northern California last January, with high winds that toppled thousands of almond trees in the Sacramento Valley. Goodman was more fortunate than neighbors who lost entire blocks of trees, but by the time the winds eased, there were 300 trees down in his orchard.

 

Goodman removed the trees earlier this year and now is pulling out the stumps so he can replant.

 

"The trees in this orchard are only 11 years old and are in their prime, so I didn't want to rip out the entire orchard and lose that production," he said. "Had it been mostly old trees, we would've cleared the whole thing. But it would cost more than it would be worth to lose those with four to five years of no production."

Barry Bedwell of the California Grape and Tree Fruit League in Fresno said he expects to see a continued removal of fruit orchards.

 

"We expect a contraction of tree fruit acreage and production for peaches, plums and nectarines," he said.

 

He said the economic outlook is such that there must be a major restructuring of the stone-fruit sector.

 

"Unfortunately, I'm not sure it's going to be accomplished in an orderly fashion to maximize benefits for the growers and shippers," Bedwell said. "Given the credit situation, it will be very difficult to get financing for tree fruit operations in 2009."

 

Rich Hudgins of the California Canning Peach Association in Sacramento sounds a little more optimistic, at least in the short term.

 

"We're cautiously optimistic for the 2009 crop. There's a supply-demand balance in the sector and we're crossing our fingers that Mother Nature will be kinder to us than in 2008, when there was a significant amount of frost damage. That reduced our 2008 crop by about 15 percent."

 

Hudgins noted that the downturn in the economy might actually have a side benefit for fruit growers.

 

"To the extent that people are eating more meals at home, there may be an increase in the opportunities for canned peaches to be served. School lunch programs also may present a renewed opportunity for canned peaches to offer a more cost-effective alternative to school-lunch fruit requirements," he said.

 

Commercial sales of fruit trees have been very low, with one exception--cherries, w said Robert Woolley of Dave Wilson Nursery in Reedley.

 

"I don't think the decline in fruit tree sales is in response to the financial meltdown. It has more to do with the dramatic changes happening in the southern San Joaquin Valley and changes in ownership of property," Woolley said. "These changes are to some extent fueled by the water situation and major restructuring of the tree fruit sector. Much of the land in tree fruit right now is being held for conversion to nut and citrus production. We're unsure of the long-term outlook for stone fruit production."

 

One segment of the fruit sector that continues to do well is citrus, particularly the popular new mandarin varieties.

 

"There's a big surge of Clementine interest for 2009 plantings that wasn't anticipated by the nursery industry," said Roger Smith of TreeSource Citrus Nursery in Exeter.

 

"There are other things being planted. Lemons have picked up in our region as well as the late-season navels that are really good, have a strong shelf life and great shipability," he said, adding that cara-cara pink navels and some late seedless varieties like Golden Nugget also are being planted.

 

"I tell my growers who are struggling to be of good cheer because citrus isn't what is struggling, it is what they have that is struggling," Smith said. "There are alternatives out there where they can make, in some cases, very good money if they just take out things that are not making money and go in with other citrus and be successful."

 

Duarte pointed out that he is also seeing an increase in demand for grapevines. "Growers are buying all varietals. The shortage of grapes this year has alerted wineries that they need to establish solid supplies for the future."

 

Agreeing with that observation is Nat DiBuduo, president of Allied Grape Growers in Fresno.

 

"All grapes in 2008 were harvested and sold for higher prices, but production was off," he said. "The wineries have already started talking about inventories in 2009. I think that bodes well for growers. And, for the first time, I'm recommending growers go out and actively seek planting contracts--but farmers need to understand their own economics to make sure they can make a living."

 

For table grape growers, two major concerns are water and the work force. If things go well, production in 2009 could reach 100 million boxes, an increase of 3 percent to 4 percent over this year, said Bedwell.

 

"Water is always a concern, but for table grapes it's even a higher concern than for many other crops grown in California," he said. "Most table grapes are grown on the east side of the San Joaquin Valley, a region served by the state and federal water projects."

 

The outlook for being able to hire an adequate work force is mixed, Bedwell said, emphasizing the need for comprehensive immigration reform. "The reality is that the weaker economy has placed more individuals back into farm labor, but that is no guarantee of an adequate work force without comprehensive immigration reform," he said.

 

Field-crop farmers watch markets, skies

For annual field crops such as cotton, wheat and rice, there is no definitive trend at the present time. Wheat, for example, will be planted--or not planted--depending on where a grower is located, said Robert Falconer, executive director of the California Wheat Commission.

 

In the Imperial Valley, many farmers are under contract to grow durum wheat, which is highly sought after for making pasta.

 

"Some of them will go ahead and seed it. If they get good rain, they may make a grain crop. If they don't get the rains, they may cut it for hay. They may go ahead and plant, but depending on what happens will determine what they do with the crop," Falconer said.

 

"Those who are in the San Joaquin Valley could possibly put off their decisions longer because they have to irrigate anyway, but in Northern California, where they typically rely on rain, a lot of wheat is already planted or farmers are in the process of planting now," he said.

 

Many farmers in the Sacramento Valley use wheat as a rotational crop when they're not growing processing tomatoes. They plant wheat to help rejuvenate the soil so they can plant tomatoes the next year.

 

Kole Upton, who farms in Merced and Madera counties, said wheat is a rotation crop for him regardless of market conditions. He grows about 1,300-1,400 acres of wheat every year.

 

"I use wheat as a rotational crop in the winter every year, and then I rotate into corn or tomatoes or something else," he said. "We're going to have to plant something in the winter. We're going to have a certain number of our acres that are going to be planted with a winter crop, and when we do the analysis, wheat comes out the best."

Upton said that in years past he has planted a lot of cotton, "but the cotton market is just terrible, so we gradually moved a lot of acres from cotton to corn. We're continuing that this year."

Mark Bagby of the Calcot cooperative in Bakersfield said he expects California's cotton acreage will be lower in 2009. He noted four main factors that will drive what farmers will do: availability of water, competing crops, the economy and what their lenders say.

 

"Upland cotton prices have collapsed because of the slowdown in the world economy and textile mills consuming less cotton. With alternatives such as processing tomatoes, corn, alfalfa and other produce, more cotton acreage is being converted to these more profitable crops," he said.

 

According to Bagby, the one bright spot is the rise in price of cottonseed. There's huge demand from dairies, but with the state's reduced acreage, there's less supply and that has driven up prices.

 

Tim Johnson, president and CEO of the California Rice Commission in Sacramento, said it is too soon to make a prediction for 2009.

 

"The problem is you're not going to be able to make a plan until you have more information, and there isn't any information on the factors that impact farmers: no idea what the water situation is going to be. You really won't know what level of impact that's going to have until the irrigation districts get a chance to digest that. That won't happen until the spring," he said.

 

The second factor rice farmers will look at is the price of alternative crops, such as processing tomatoes, safflower, corn and sunflowers, Johnson said, adding that growers won't have a sense of where the market is going until January or February.

 

For alfalfa producers, a number of variables will impact planting intentions, including water, market prices, fuel costs and consumer demand, said hay market analyst Seth Hoyt of Ione. "But water for irrigation is the key to success in 2009."

 

The hay market has been dropping in the past couple of months and a bigger decline emerged in the past few weeks.

"The biggest negative right now for hay growers is the milk price. Dairy farmers buy 75 percent of the alfalfa hay in California and when milk prices drop dairies hurt financially. That's a big problem for hay growers," Hoyt said.

 

"Falling input costs in 2009 will help dairies and hay growers alike, but remember that corn prices are dropping, too," he said. "As prices fall on both sides of the balance sheet, it's hard to say how prices will settle and whether there will be an adequate profit margin for farmers."

 

Vegetable acreage may decline

Lettuce, California's top vegetable crop, will likely see some production declines next year, primarily because of the state's water crisis.

 

"I'm hearing from many of my members that acreage is being cut back. The commodity that I'm hearing more than any other is iceberg lettuce. A lot of it is because of the water situation. They may not have the water to irrigate the crop," said Jim Bogart, president and general counsel of the Grower-Shipper Association of Central California in Salinas.

 

Some Imperial Valley lettuce growers are electing to reduce their lettuce acreage and plant other commodities like wheat that are bringing better prices, reports Ayron Moiola, executive director of the Imperial Valley Vegetable Growers Association in El Centro. Other vegetables such as broccoli, cauliflower and carrots are also trending down, but there won't be a huge decline in those commodities.

 

"I think we are going to see almost the complete end of asparagus in the Imperial Valley next year. It could be below 200 acres and that is really something," she said. "This is because of the ramifications of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and also the need for specialized labor. Asparagus is a labor-intensive crop that is just too expensive to grow."

 

California strawberry growers set a new production record this year, with another six weeks before year's end, according to Carolyn O'Donnell of the California Strawberry Commission in Watsonville.

 

The commission is currently surveying members to determine how much acreage will be planted next year. Demand for strawberries continues strong and speculation is that acreage will at least remain the same next year and may even increase.

 

For farmers who grow processing tomatoes, water tops the list of uncertainties because of both the drought and the legal actions that have reduced supply, said Bret Ferguson of Lemoore, who chairs the California Tomato Growers Association board. The world economy, including instability in fuel and fertilizer costs, is also a concern, he said.

 

"We expect fewer acres will be planted and that processors will have trouble getting all the contracted acres they need. We planted about 270,000 acres last year and the price was $70 a ton, which was good. But, with the water situation, I think we'll have trouble getting more acres planted. We're in price discussions with processors now," he said.

 

Diversified grower Larry Hunn of Yolo County identified his primary "money-making" crops as processing tomatoes and cucumbers. He said he doesn't anticipate making any big changes next year.

 

"Our acreage is in our vegetables, and all of that is pretty consistent from year to year. We don't fluctuate too much. Our attitude is: Keep doing what we do the best and try to stay diversified rather than trying to jump into one crop or another. That way if you have something go downpoor production or price--then it doesn't hurt you as badly," he said.

 

"We try to keep our rotation about the same year to year," he said. "It's kind of hard to guess the market, so we try to be stable with what we do and not try to chase the market too much."

 

As farmers work to finalize their 2009 plans, UC Davis agricultural economist Steven C. Blank observed that in California, most fair-sized farms grow several different commodities.

 

"Farmers are making some shifts one year to the next based on market conditions, but overall, they are looking at sort of balancing their exposure to different types of markets and risk," he said.

 

"When you are talking about getting into tree and vine crops, that is because in the long run, they have performed more profitably, but they are more risky," he said. "So in the short run, like this year, if water availability is a big source of uncertainty, they may put off planting the new orchard and put in an annual crop to hold on and wait and see."

 

Blank said he thinks farmers are going to be very conservative in their plans.

 

"If you've got a contract to deliver some commodity, you've got to deliver that. And yet you may prefer to not be in that market because of cash flow needs and what not. So there's a lot of juggling going on right now," he said. #

http://www.cfbf.com/agalert/AgAlertStory.cfm?ID=1179&ck=DABD8D2CE74E782C65A973EF76FD540B

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive