This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 11/26/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

November 26, 2008

 

3. Watersheds –

 

Decision to not stock lakes irks some mountain counties

Sacramento Bee

 

Salmon one of nature's endangered

Marysville Appeal Democrat

 

Editorial:

Stop handing Delta water rules to activists

San Diego Union Tribune

 

Overwhelmed by conservation, Yolo County wants a say

Supervisors consider local regulation of mitigation efforts

Sacramento Business Journal

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Decision to not stock lakes irks some mountain counties

Sacramento Bee – 11/26/08

By Phillip Reese and Cathy Locke

Alpine County depends heavily on fishing.

 

Plentiful trout in the sparsely populated area 45 miles southeast of Placerville draw anglers who, in turn, keep restaurants and hotels running.

So when the state Department of Fish and Game this week released a list of lakes and streams that won't be stocked with fish until at least 2010, it landed in Alpine County with a thud.

 

"These waters are our economy," said Skip Veatch, an Alpine County supervisor and its former sheriff. "If they are not populated our economy is going to go down the drain."

 

Last week, state Fish and Game officials agreed to stop stocking fish reared in hatcheries – including trout, bass and catfish – in lakes and streams where the practice threatens 16 native fish and nine native frog species. The deal was struck with environmental groups pushing reforms of state hatchery and stocking programs.

After a tense weekend, several communities got the news Monday: The Sierra would be hit hard.

 

Eleven lakes or streams in Alpine County won't be stocked until at least 2010. Sixteen El Dorado County fishing spots, including large swaths of the American River, won't be stocked. Twenty-two lakes or streams in Nevada County won't be stocked.

 

In Sacramento County, Lake Natoma will not be supplemented by the state.

 

"That's trophy trout fishing," said Dan Bacher, editor of the Fish Sniffer, a biweekly magazine for fish enthusiasts, referring to Lake Natoma. "I can't see any reason not to stock that lake."

 

Bacher said he has mixed feelings about the state's announcement. Fish are threatened in many places, and something needs to be done. But the lakes that won't be stocked seem random, Bacher said. And the wild fish now in those lakes might see their ranks drastically reduced.

 

"What might seem like a good thing for the environment – if they are putting pressure on the wild population, that's going to have the opposite effect," Bacher said.

Others offered an unqualified endorsement of the new measures.

 

"A lot of these lakes were historically barren," said David Lass, Northern California field coordinator of Trout Unlimited. "All of these fish have been stocked over the last 100 years, maybe in places they shouldn't have been."

 

In many cases, Lass said, stocking lakes and streams with hatchery fish has run counter to the state's mission of preserving native species.

"The Department of Fish and Game has kind of just been haphazardly planting fish for recreational value," Lass said. "This will make the Department of Fish and Game take a look at (its) stocking program and be strategic about it."

 

Others said many fisherman prefer catching wild fish, anyway. Casual fishermen who like easy catches will be disappointed, they say.

 

Philosophical debates aside, most agree the new rules will have a negative short-term impact on communities that depend on visits from anglers, especially those near the high-altitude, smaller lakes that tended to be targeted.

 

"Our county is in really bad shape," said Tonya Dowse, executive director of the Siskiyou County Economic Development Council. "So, obviously, this is very bad news."

 

About three dozen lakes in Siskiyou County will not be stocked by the state until at least 2010 – the highest number in California. Siskiyou is known for its rustic climate, plentiful hiking opportunities – and its fishing.

 

"We want to make sure nothing goes extinct, but I suppose we're just another place where they've not shown a balance," said Jim Cook, a Siskiyou County supervisor.

 

That imbalance has created a situation where some counties with multiple lakes that won't be stocked sit next to counties that hardly will be impacted at all.

Many popular fishing lakes, including Folsom Lake and Oroville Lake, will still be stocked.

 

"We could actually get some traffic coming our way," said Dan Lyster, director of Economic Development for Mono County, which sits directly south of Alpine County. Mono had only one lake on the no-stock list.

 

The lakes and streams were chosen according to the specific terms of a court order, said Fish and Game spokeswoman Jordan Traverso. The list is still tentative.

One option available to Cook and others is to stock the lakes themselves, Traverso confirmed. But that's unlikely given the tough budget situation many counties are in.

 

"Alpine County lives on a thread and they're going to destroy the economy," said Melanie Sue Bowers, whose family has owned a cabin on Lower Blue Lake since the 1930s. "What will happen is they are going to condense so many people in the area that the lakes that are going to be stocked are going to be overfished." #

http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/1428494.html

 

Salmon one of nature's endangered

Marysville Appeal Democrat – 11/26/08

By Howard Yune, staff

 

It was a giant among salmon, three times the size of its peers — an 85-pounder that turned up in the upper Sacramento River, believed the largest in three decades.

But the reason for the fish's girth had a darker layer — a population crash that has led to severely restricting fishing on West Coast shores and rivers.

 

"It had its last year basically free because there was no commercial fishery," said Doug Killam, a state Department of Fish and Game researcher in Tehama County.

The giant salmon discovered in late October, 20 miles south of Red Bluff, was one of a much-thinned field in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, where record low counts of chinook salmon have shrunk the Mid-Valley's angling season and started to threaten the businesses and tourism linked to it.

 

"The preliminary results are that they're similar to last year's returns — which were dismal," said Scott Barrow, a senior Fish and Game biologist in Sacramento.

Fall salmon counts have plunged nearly 90 percent from their 2002 peak of about 800,000, leading to a federal cancellation this year of ocean fishing and a shortened, restricted season for California's anglers. Earlier, state regulators predicted as few as 54,000 salmon would migrate up the Delta this fall.

 

Fish and Game delayed the Sacramento River season's usual summer opening to November, and anglers can keep only one salmon a day through year's end.

State biologists are surveying the current salmon run by checking video footage around the river, doing riverbank surveys on foot and counting dead fish, said Killam. The Pacific Fishery Management Council, regulator of West Coast fisheries, will release the season's salmon count in late January.

 

Any improvement leans heavily on winter rainfall breaking a string of nearly two full years of below-average precipitation, which have helped drive down river levels and impede salmon's journeys from the ocean to the rivers to spawn. The need for rain is more acute with the Delta's water nourishing not only North State fisheries, but Southern California cities and farms where much of the water is delivered.

 

"The tributaries, the dams at Oroville and Shasta, they're so low now that if they're not replenished, the whole state's going to be in trouble. The whole state depends on that," he said.

 

With dams and water pumps killing or slowing many salmon, authorities have stepped up releases of young salmon smolts downriver in hopes of easing their journey to the Pacific. Fish and Game has set out about 20 million smolts in the Sacramento Delta and the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife has released another 12 million, according to Harry Morse, a Fish and Game spokesman.

 

But the releases are only of limited help to anglers and the businesses dependent on them, a longtime Mid-Valley tackle shop owner, Mike Searcy said.

Birds, mammals and striped bass often find the young fish to be easy pickings "like putting a 3-year-old in front of a tiger," he said.

 

Those young fish surviving the gauntlet need two or three years in the ocean to mature to catchable size, perhaps more time than already battered business owners have.

 

"Either you have to find another way to make money without salmon, or you're going to close," said Searcy, who runs Star Bait and Tackle in Linda, where business is down 30 percent from a year ago. "You're going to see a lot of stores close, small ones and even big ones with their huge overhead."

 

Some good news came out of Washington Tuesday, as the Bush administration released the remaining $70 million of the disaster relief that Congress appropriated to help salmon fishermen and related business after the West Coast fishery collapsed last summer. Congress appropriated $170 million, but last September the administration held back revenues to help cover costs of the fish census.

 

Congress rejected the plan.#

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/news/salmon_71579___article.html/peers_among.html

 

Editorial:

Stop handing Delta water rules to activists

San Diego Union Tribune – 11/26/08

 

Environmental activists continue to deny Californians more water in the name of saving fish.

 

Last year, responding to an activist lawsuit, a federal judge ordered a 31 percent cut in water pumped from the San Joaquin-Sacramento Delta – a water supply for 25 million residents. The judge acted in an effort to end the decline of the three-inch-long Delta smelt.

 

Last year, responding to activists, a judge demanded that the Department of Water Resources, which runs the State Water Project in the Delta, get a permit to “take” Delta smelt. The California Fish and Game Commission ordered the state to restrict pumping to protect larval and juvenile as well as mature smelt.

Last year, responding to activists, the Fish and Game Commission ordered protection of a kindred fish, the longfin smelt. This action extends the pumping restriction period to six months of the year.

 

In February, responding to activists, the commission declared longfin smelt a candidate for state endangered species status. This month, the commission extended for 90 days restrictions to protect the longfin smelt from State Water Project pumps. It also rejected a request by the state Department of Water Resources to mitigate the impact of pumping impacts on longfin smelt in lieu of stopping the pumps.

 

Federal regulators, too, have a role. On Dec. 15, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will release its revised biological opinion on the Delta smelt's federal status. The fish is likely to be declared, again, endangered.

 

And the impact on smelt of the restrictions so far? Zero. In the last five years, eight smelt were caught in the pumps. The regulations have saved none. Others suspect other culprits in the smelt's decline, such as pollutants, invasive species and drought.

 

Only the pumps, however, offer the huge, adverse impacts on the water supply for 25 million residents.

 

Just how adverse is that impact? Between increasingly onerous smelt rules and continuing drought, the state Department of Water Resources projects that in 2009 wholesale water agencies may get as little as 15 percent of the water they need. Even record snowmelt in the Rockies won't help, since the State Water Project can't deliver it.

 

What would help? A new official attitude that comes right out of a state Supreme Court ruling and recognizes, as Director Don Koch of the Department of Fish and Game put it, “the importance of various agencies' responsibilities to protect both humans and fish.”

 

Also at work is the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, a move to address all possible hazards to Delta wildlife's overall health, including a system to convey water for people around instead of through the Delta. A sizable coalition led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, and water and wildlife agencies will run up against the activists and their strident opposition to the dual duty for the Delta.

 

At least 25 million Californians north and south have all the reason they need to encourage the success of the coalition's efforts. #

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/op-ed/editorial2/20081126-9999-lz1ed26bottom.html

 

Overwhelmed by conservation, Yolo County wants a say

Supervisors consider local regulation of mitigation efforts

Sacramento Business Journal – 11/26/08

By Celia Lamb, staff writer

 

§                                  

Yolo County officials and farmers are growing nervous as water utilities, housing developers and private conservation banks eye the county as a prime spot for wetlands mitigation efforts.

 

Five proposed and pending projects would convert about 2,500 to 3,000 acres from farmland to riparian wetlands, vernal pools and other habitats, Phil Pogledich, senior deputy county counsel, wrote in a report to the Board of Supervisors.

 

And there could be more acreage on the way. The Bay Delta Conservation Plan, created by water agencies, environmentalists and state officials, proposes restoring and creating 100,000 acres of wetlands in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Among the proposals: remove levees at the south end of the Deep Water Ship Canal, which connects to the Port of Sacramento, to inundate 2,000 to 5,000 acres of farmland.

 

County officials are concerned enough to consider regulating wildlife habitat projects. Although they have not proposed specific measures, they have suggested mimicking Solano County, which requires a conditional use permit for wetlands-creation projects. That approach means the project proponents have to prepare environmental reviews detailing potential impacts to adjacent farms and wildlife species.

 

Restoring habitat

The companies and agencies that want to build wetlands in the county have the same objective: to create and restore habitat for endangered and threatened species to offset damage in other places.

 

For example, ASB Properties, which is building the Yarbrough housing subdivision in West Sacramento’s Southport, wants to create 72 acres of inland wetlands as part of the 437-acre Putah Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank southeast of Davis. The company will sell “credits” generated by the bank to developers who need state and federal permits for wetlands impacts. It will also preserve Swainson’s hawk habitat on the upland acreage that continues to be used for farming, helping the company satisfy state regulators overseeing plans for the Southport development.

 

Generally, Swainson’s hawks and wetlands are not compatible. Swainson’s hawks hunt for rodents by flying over low-lying field crops, such as alfalfa. But wetlands do provide habitat for other threatened species, such as giant garter snakes, salmon and Delta smelt.

 

Westlands Water District, which supplies irrigation water in the San Joaquin Valley, bought about 3,400 acres in the lower Yolo Bypass to restore tidal wetlands. The water district aims to create habitat for the endangered Delta smelt. Westlands receives water pumped out from the southern Delta via the Central Valley Project and State Water Project, and it has faced severe water shortages due to pumping restrictions ordered by a federal court judge to protect the smelt.

 

Local coordination

The county is working on a habitat conservation plan, called the Yolo Natural Heritage Plan, that would coordinate wildlife projects for many species. The plan area overlaps with the Bay Delta Conservation Plan.

 

County Supervisor Mike McGowan said he’s concerned that “uncontrolled development” of wildlife habitat could interfere with the county’s habitat plan and impact agricultural areas such as Clarksburg’s winegrape-growing region.

 

“It comes down to local versus statewide or regional authority,” McGowan said. “I’m a local government guy, and I happen to believe we know what’s best.”

County agricultural commissioner Rick Landon said the creation of wildlife habitat can indirectly impact farm operations on adjacent land. Waterfowl might mow down crops, for example.

 

Farmers also worry they might face production restrictions if an animal crosses over from a habitat area into their fields.

“Endangered species don’t know where the property line is,” Landon said.

 

County oversight of habitat projects might help reduce losses of good agricultural land, Landon said.

 

“Right now, there is absolutely no oversight,” he said. “You can buy land in Yolo County, make habitat and nobody says anything about it. There may be a location where the agricultural land is marginal where (habitat projects) might be better. It would be good to at least take a look at it and be strategic.”

Mostly the county just wants the big-picture thinkers to pay more attention to local concerns, McGowan.

“I don’t know that we need an ordinance yet,” he said. Some organizations, including Westlands Water District, are open to a “collaborative approach,” he said.

“I’m at least cautiously optimistic,” he added.

 

Non-local interest

Bob Webber, manager of Reclamation District 999, which supplies water to farmers in Yolo County east of the Deep Water Ship Canal, is more skeptical. He’s concerned that powerful San Joaquin Valley and Southern California water interests want to flood land in his district to show they are protecting smelt and salmon so they can get federal approvals for a canal to convey water around the Delta.#

http://sacramento.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2008/11/24/story6.html?b=1227502800%5E1737616

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive