[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 4/24/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

April 24, 2009

 

3. Watersheds –

 

Inspections mussel-up price of Tahoe boating

The San Francisco Chronicle

 

Don't wait until it's too late for the San Joaquin River

The Modesto Bee

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Inspections mussel-up price of Tahoe boating

The San Francisco Chronicle – 4/23/09

By Tom Stienstra

 

The price of boating at Lake Tahoe will take a steep hike this year.

 

Starting June 1, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency will charge a $30 inspection fee for boats in the 16- to 25-foot range.

 

Another $10 will be added if the boat has a live well or bilge, typical for most fishing boats. Boat launching is already pricey at most ramps at Tahoe, often $10 and up.

 

Once a boat is inspected, an inspector will issue a boat sticker. As long as the sticker is intact, the boat will not have to be inspected again, according to Dennis Oliver at the agency.

 

The fee will have a sliding scale according to size, as low $10 for boats up to 16 feet long and as high as $60 for boats more than 39 feet, plus $10 for boats with live wells, bladders or ballast tanks.

 

The planning agency ordered boat inspections this past winter in response to the threat of invasive mussels, which first showed up in Lake Mead two years ago. With the boating season imminent, the agency says it needs to charge the new fees to pay for the program. In past years, about 50,000 boats have been launched at Tahoe.

 

Invasive Quagga mussels have been verified in Lake Mead and 16 other lakes and rivers on the Colorado River chain. Zebra mussels were found last year at San Justo Reservoir near Hollister in San Benito County.

 

An inspection is now required at launch ramps at many lakes in California, but Tahoe is believed to be the first in Northern California to charge $30 for it. At San Pablo Reservoir in El Sobrante, for instance, the same inspection is free.#

 

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/23/SP7F16UHMB.DTL

 

Don't wait until it's too late for the San Joaquin River

The Modesto Bee – 3/24/09

By Eric Caine

 

Caine is a Modesto resident and teaches at Merced College.

 

tool name

close

tool goes here

At almost 350 miles long, the San Joaquin is California's second-largest river. When it's running at full capacity, the San Joaquin delivers more than 7 million acre-feet of water, most of it to farmers (an acre-foot of water is enough to cover one acre to a depth of one foot).

 

Despite its mighty production, few Californians ever see the San Joaquin in any form other than flooded farm fields or water coming from a tap. These days it's hard to imagine steamboats once did a thriving business up and down the San Joaquin, but they did.

 

Now the river runs dry for a 60-mile stretch, and in many places it's not much more than a stone's throw across.

 

For years the San Joaquin has been the object of a bitter lawsuit pitting farmers, developers and environmentalists against one another. The focus of the lawsuit was the historic salmon runs that the river once was famous for, but the real rub was a familiar battle for the power to divvy up the west's most precious natural resource.

 

This time the fish won out and over $400 million has been allocated to bringing water and salmon back to that 60-mile desert where the San Joaquin disappears into dry ground.

 

Some of the players in the water game are understandably bitter about the court's decision to allocate water for fish. They argue that people should come first and the dire consequences of less water for people -- lost jobs, lost farm production and perhaps even lost farms -- should outweigh what seems to them an unfair legal decision.

 

The courts aren't the only target for people's wrath. Rep. Devin Nunes of Visalia, himself a politician, blames politicians. Of course it's usually the politicians from that other party, in this case the Democrats, who are to blame.

 

Nunes claims "radical greenies" bent on "destroying our economy in the San Joaquin Valley" have taken over the Democratic Party and have engineered a "man-made drought." The Republican congressman isn't too clear about how the "greenies" managed to bring about three consecutive years of less than average rainfall, but perhaps the explanation is forthcoming.

 

It's easy to forget that water shortages have been a looming threat for decades, and easier still to forget the San Joaquin River and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta are near a state of collapse because we have ignored their health.

 

Deferred maintenance always comes with a steep price, especially in the case of rivers and waterways.

 

Those calling for delays in beginning the task of restoring our waterways have good reasons for their positions, but they have forgotten that these are the same reasons we've always used to postpone the inevitable.

 

As painful as the fix is now, the consequences of a total collapse would be even worse, and unless we act soon, we're looking at a total collapse. We should have learned by now that the longer we wait, the worse it gets. Action now is painful; action later may be too late -- not just for salmon, but for all who depend on healthy rivers and waterways.#

 

http://www.modbee.com/opinion/community/story/673656.html

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.