Department of Water Resources
A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment
April 9, 2009
1. Top Item–
Federal officials ban salmon fishing off California coast
The Los Angeles Times
Longfin smelt not endangered in California, regulators say
The Contra Costa Times
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Federal officials ban salmon fishing off California coast
Dwindling populations of Chinook salmon force fishery managers to severely limit commercial salmon fishing in
The
By Maria L. La
Reporting from Millbrae, Calif. — Federal fishery managers voted unanimously Wednesday to ban commercial salmon fishing off the coast of California for the second year in a row, a move some fishermen fear could imperil the industry's future in the name of saving it.
The Pacific Fishery Management Council also severely limited commercial fishing off the coast of
Canceling the commercial season was the only tack to take "when your bread-and-butter stock is not producing," said David Bitts, president of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Assns.
"But if we don't go fishing next year," warned Bitts, a fisherman from
Only about 122,000 of the prized Chinook -- also known as wild king salmon -- are expected to journey up the
"It's terrible, to say the least," said David Goldenberg, chief executive of the California Salmon Council. "But we're going to have to deal with it, if the numbers of returning salmon are so low fishermen don't want to fish it."
But "dealing with it" could be easier said than done, and fishermen are not the only ones affected by the shutdown. The whole salmon infrastructure will take yet another hit, from gear stores and ice houses to fuel docks and processing plants. State officials estimated that the 2008 fishing ban resulted in a loss of $255 million and 2,263 jobs.
"Things are very fragile as far as the infrastructure is concerned," said Duncan MacLean, a Half Moon Bay, Calif., commercial fisherman and salmon advisor to the management council. "There's a lot of support businesses that will either relocate or go under."
The salmon industry received a miniature federal bailout after the 2008 season was canceled -- $170 million in emergency aid, of which about $120 million was disbursed to everyone from fishermen to charter boat owners.
"It's been a godsend for the entire industry," said MacLean, who traveled with others in the industry to
It is unclear whether more aid will be available to help assuage a second year of pain. At the very least, the industry hopes last year's leftovers will be distributed to keep fishermen and others afloat.
There is no single reason for
Recent ocean conditions have been too warm and there has not been enough food for so-called juvenile fall-run Chinook salmon, according to a National Marine Fisheries Service report.
MacLean also points to record water deliveries to
"There's no one smoking gun," MacLean said, "but there are a lot of spent shell casings all over the place."
The big question is whether the salmon population will rebound enough in 2010 for salmon fishing to resume in
Peter Moyle, a professor of fish biology at UC Davis, is dubious. "Ocean conditions are pretty good right now, and salmon numbers are creeping up again," he wrote in an e-mail, "but there is no guarantee such trends will lead to fishable populations in the next 2-3 years, or beyond."
Just before the unanimous vote, the council's
"It's very unfortunate we have no real ocean fisheries in California," said Marija Vojkovich of the California Department of Fish and Game, ruing what she called the state's "commercial nonseason."
"I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this is not what we deal with next year."#
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-salmon9-2009apr09,0,2167233.story
Longfin smelt not endangered in California, regulators say
The Contra Costa Times – 4/9/09
By Mike Taugher
Longfin smelt in the Bay and the Delta do not warrant protection under the federal endangered species law, regulators said Wednesday.
The fish are already protected under state law, but the decision to reject another layer of environmental protection angered environmentalists who said the fish is disappearing in
"I don't think their conclusion is credible," said Tina Swanson, executive director of the Bay Institute, one of three environmental groups that asked for the listing in 2007. "It's a tragedy."
A similar attempt to add the fish to the list of endangered species was rejected in 1994 when federal biologists determined that the fish was doing fine in parts of a range that extends from the Bay Area to
If it were listed, Swanson said state and federal water managers could be forced to allow more water to flow into the Bay instead of through pumps near
Longfin smelt, a cousin to the more severely threatened Delta smelt, is protected under
Despite its decision to not protect the Bay Area population under the federal law, the Fish and Wildlife Service said it would open a broader look at the status of species from
"They look at the species in the state of
http://www.contracostatimes.com/environment/ci_12100487?nclick_check=1
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of
No comments:
Post a Comment