This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 4/08/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

April 8, 2009

 

2. Supply –

 

Metropolitan district staff urges up to 15 percent cut

The San Diego Union Tribune

 

Well users pumped up over an ample supply

The San Diego Union Tribune

 

It's fish vs. grapes in battle over water

The Santa Rosa Press-Democrat

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Metropolitan district staff urges up to 15 percent cut

Local supplies might soften blow to San Diego area

The San Diego Union Tribune – 4/8/09

By Michael Gardner

 

The Metropolitan Water District yesterday sent the strongest signal yet that it plans to curtail deliveries – including those to San Diego County – for the first time in 18 years.

 

In a memo, Metropolitan's senior staff recommended that the board of directors next week approve a complicated formula that essentially would short customers by at least 10 percent and perhaps as much as 15 percent starting July 1.

 

A 10 percent cut would equate to enough water to serve 740,000 Southern California households for a year.

 

The blow likely won't be as severe to San Diego-area households and businesses, thanks to the availability of some local supplies to offset shrinking deliveries from Metropolitan, a Los Angeles-based wholesaler.

 

“We will be less than Metropolitan. The numbers are still changing,” Bob Yamada, a resources manager for the San Diego County Water Authority, said as he scrambled to interpret the latest proposal.

 

At first blush, Yamada said his agency's overall deliveries to water districts from Fallbrook to Chula Vista could be scaled back by about 7 percent if Metropolitan settles on a 10 percent reduction.

 

Not all of the water authority's 24 customer agencies will face a reduction of that magnitude. Some districts can offset reductions by the authority because they are able to buy water from other sources.

 

Last year, a regional push for voluntary water conservation netted savings of about 5 percent – roughly half of what water officials sought.

 

Given months of advance warning that rationing was a near certainty, agencies have been crafting plans to achieve greater conservation through mandates.

 

There is a mix of strategies, including higher rates to discourage use above what is deemed a minimal level of need. Some agencies also plan to restrict when and how to use water, and some plan to charge extra for new water meters.

 

Some water managers said using higher rates as leverage to squeeze more savings reflects a growing shift away from the approach of bygone days, which included no-watering schedules and “conservation cops” patrolling neighborhoods.

 

“Customers did not appreciate the water cops' mentality,” said Kim Thorner, general manager of the Olivenhain Municipal Water District, which serves parts of Carlsbad, Encinitas and Escondido. “What they wanted was, 'Tell me how much is in my bucket and let me do what I want with my bucket.' ”

 

But a behavioral approach is part of San Diego city's strategy, said Jim Barrett, its water chief and a Metropolitan board member.

 

Barrett raised the possibility that San Diego could avoid setting individual water budgets if the regional shortage is less severe than anticipated. Instead, he said, the city might rely on behavioral restrictions, such as specified periods for lawn watering.

 

“We have been constantly rethinking our approach,” Barrett said.

 

So far, San Diego has prepared for mandatory cuts of 20 percent. For single-family residences, that would mean reducing use by the equivalent of 5 percent indoors and 45 percent outdoors. It would be up to residents to figure out how to make the reductions so they can avoid fines.

 

Metropolitan's directors are expected to approve a rationing plan when they meet Tuesday. The wholesaler delivered 528,300 acre-feet to the water authority last year, which amounted to about 80 percent of the San Diego agency's supplies.

Jeffrey Kightlinger, Metropolitan's general manager, said his district must curtail supplies given a third straight year of disappointing snowpacks in the Sierra Nevada.

 

Moreover, about 40 percent of Southern California's supply from the north could be diverted by restrictions on pumping water south out of the Sacramento Delta. Those measures are meant to protect imperiled smelt and salmon. #

 

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/apr/08/1n8water001511-metropolitan-district-staff-urges-1/

 

Well users pumped up over an ample supply

Drillers report more inquiries, but costs deter most

The San Diego Union Tribune – 4/8/09

By Robert Krier

 

By the numbers

 

 30 – percentage of California's water needs met by groundwater in an average year

 40 – minimum percentage of the state's water demand met by groundwater in a drought year

 5 – percentage of residents in San Diego County who use groundwater

 

Sources: California Department of Water Resources; San Diego County Water Authority

 

Roughly 95 percent of the region's residents will almost surely have water rationing, higher rates or both by summer because the San Diego County Water Authority's supply is dwindling amid drought.

 

The other 5 percent appear to be in better shape, thanks to their reliance on groundwater.

 

In June, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a statewide drought after two consecutive dry years depleted the state's reservoirs. The drought and pumping restrictions to protect endangered fish in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta likely will force reductions in water deliveries to Southern California.

 

Not included in the state's water grid are about 45,000 rural and backcountry residents who use groundwater supplied by small agencies or pumped from their own wells.

 

Although the winter wasn't exceptionally wet in the backcountry, the storms replenished groundwater supplies in most aquifers.

 

“The wells are not bubbling over, but we should have sufficient water to get through the year,” said Ed Huffman, president of the small Wynola Water District near Julian.

 

More than 20 inches of rain have fallen on the Wynola area since July 1. Sonic measuring devices show that the district's wells contain more than enough water to serve its 86 properties through the summer, Huffman said.

 

The picture is much the same in Pine Valley, east of Alpine and north of Interstate 8.

 

“We're feeling like we'll be doing fine this year,” said Philip Boerman, manager of the Pine Valley Mutual Water Co., which has about 700 customers. “We're not asking for any cutbacks.”

 

Rob Horne owns one of the more than 30,000 private wells in the county. He draws groundwater from his 20 acres located three miles southwest of Cuyamaca Peak.

 

If King Creek flows through his property in the spring, he has no fears of water shortages later in the year. It has been going strong.

 

During the 2006-07 rainfall season, Horne recorded 6.57 inches of precipitation, yet his well still met his water needs. This year, he has measured more than 19 inches.

 

“I'm kind of resting easy,” Horne said.

 

Few city dwellers have the option of drilling a well because they lack space, and county restrictions limit where one can be put. But some water agencies' customers who have large lots in semirural areas are being tempted by the allure of groundwater.

 

Inquiries about well installations in places such as Ramona and Poway have increased recently, well diggers said.

“Lots of people are calling us for bids, but pulling the trigger and going ahead with it is a different story,” said Tim Hettich, office manager at Acme Drilling in Escondido.

 

When most residents learn that drilling, pumps and other equipment can cost an average of $20,000, they say no thanks.

The price tag didn't deter Lee Dawson, who owns 9 acres in Blossom Valley, east of Lakeside. He's hoping that a well being drilled on his property can be installed for less than $20,000, but he's prepared “to go $30,000 without blinking an eye.”

 

Dawson, whose water is supplied by the Padre Dam Municipal Water District, figures he'll recoup the cost of the well within a few years. He paid more than $5,000 for water in 2008.

 

Dawson said he reduced his water use by 20 percent each of the past two years but is still being asked to cut outdoor consumption by 45 percent this year.

 

“We have trees, grass, bushes, hedges – it's all part of the layout here,” he said. “What would it look like if everything turned brown?”

 

Jim Bennett, the county's groundwater geologist, said San Diego is “not a water-rich county,” and no one drilling a well is guaranteed easily reachable water. If the subsurface is fractured rock, which dominates the hills of the backcountry, drilling is even more hit and miss.

 

Bennett said he'll formally assess the county's groundwater status next month, but he knows that some areas, such as the Borrego Valley, have lingering overdraft problems.

 

Russ Seevers, who installs well pumps, said that in general, the water table in the county has dropped.

 

“A deep well in '91 was 500 to 600 feet,” Seevers said. “Now they're drilling up to 1,300 feet.” #

 

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/apr/08/1m8wells225443-well-users-pumped-over-ample-supply/

 

It's fish vs. grapes in battle over water

The Santa Rosa Press-Democrat – 4/7/09

By Bob Norberg

 

SACRAMENTO — Using water in sprinklers is the most effective way to protect the multimillion dollar grape crops in Sonoma and Mendocino counties from frost. But growers turning on their pumps can also cause a rapid drop in the Russian River that can strand and kill endangered and threatened salmon, state water regulators were told Tuesday.

 

The state Water Resources Control Board held a workshop to discuss the use of water for frost protection, acting on a request from National Marine Fisheries Services following the frequent and deadly frosts that occurred a year ago.

 

The fisheries service is asking the water board to enact an immediate ban on all diversions from the Russian River for frost protection.

 

“Coho population has collapsed and they are practically extinct,” said David Hines, of the national service. “Chinook and steelhead are doing better, but they are low and at risk for extinction.

 

Growers and North Bay water officials, however, said that frost protection was necessary.

 

“You have to frost protect or you lose your crop, or a substantial part of it,” said Nick Frey, president of the Sonoma County Grape Commission.

 

They asked instead for the chance to work together to better forecast when frost is expected to help with releases from Lake Mendocino, while looking ahead to putting more gauges in the river to better monitor levels. Also, to put telemetry on growers pumps to tell when and how much is pumped and eventually build off-stream reservoirs.

 

“We don’t need a prohibition, we don’t need a water master, we need better tools, we need more information,” said Sean White, general manager of the Mendocino County Flood Control and Irrigation District.

 

There were two kills of fish on the Russian River caused by rapid drops in river level last April because of water being pumped out for frost protection, spurring the need to come up with different ways to handle frost protection, said Derek Roy, a special agent for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

 

“I don’t know the total number, but due to the life cycle of fish, we know that the numbers were large and significant,” Roy said.

 

He acknowledged that frost protection is an integral part of grape growing, but “it’s our job to protect the fish,” Roy said.

One of the kills was on the Russian River in Mendocino and involved coho salmon, which are listed as endangered. The second was in Sonoma County and involved Chinook, which are listed as threatened.

 

Whatever action the water board takes would affect the Russian River watershed, which covers 40,000 acres of grapes in the Alexander, Dry Creek, Knights and Russian River valleys, which is two-thirds of Sonoma County’s grape-growing area.

 

In Mendocino County, if would affect an industry that has a $70 million crop, employs 1,000 people and generates $220 million for the economy, said Glenn McGourty of the UC Cooperative Extension.

 

McGourty said the April 20, 2008 frost that caused so much damage saw temperatures drop to 23 degrees, for which there is no protection that would have been effective in preventing damage.

 

He also said that in Mendocino County, there are now grape crops planted in areas that are susceptible to frost, areas which would not have been planted 50 years ago.

 

Using sprinklers for frost protection can take 400 acre-feet of water, but that one was so severe it took 800 acre-feet.

 

McGourty also said that forecasting is so accurate now they can predict a frost two to three days ahead of time, allowing time for the Sonoma County Water Agency to release extra water from Lake Mendocino.

 

 “We knew a freeze was coming in. We didn’t know how bad it would  be,” McGourty said.

 

McGourty also said it is apparent that Lake Mendocino is critically low and water is a scarce commodity.

 

“We would have a really tough time if we can’t frost protect, the game would be over before it begins,” McGourty said. “We’d rather struggle later in the year with irrigation.”#

 

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20090407/articles/904079898

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

No comments:

Blog Archive