This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 4/30/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

April 30, 2009

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

 

Water Coalition want to take plight to D.C.

The Fresno Bee

 

City Hall to fight water district

The Antelope Valley Press

 

Regional agencies take lead in updated water plan
The Imperial Valley Press

 

Climate change, population growth drive projections
The Imperial Valley Press

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Water Coalition want to take plight to D.C.

The Fresno Bee – 4/29/09

By Robert Rodriguez

 

Members of the California Latino Water Coalition, who recently staged a four-day protest march that drew thousands, said Wednesday that they now want to take their plight to Washington, D.C.

 

"We want to keep building the momentum and bring civic leaders and celebrities to Washington," said entertainer and comedian Paul Rodriguez, a member of the coalition. "We have to keep this fight for water alive."

 

Rodriguez, who led the demonstration that began in Mendota on April 14 and ended with a rally at the San Luis Reservoir, joined more than 50 others at the Fresno County Farm Bureau offices for a planning meeting.

 

Among the first steps is to thank the marchers and supporters with a free comedy show on May 9 in Firebaugh.

 

"Right now, people need something to lift their spirits. It's good to see people laugh," Rodriguez said. "Besides, Jay Leno did it for the auto workers, and I'm a lot funnier."

 

Rodriguez said he wants to invite some of his fellow comedians, including Gabriel Iglesias.

 

The March for Water, as the event was called, drew protestors from every walk of life and included farmers, farmworkers, business owners and politicians.

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger attended the final day of the rally and was criticized by some for not doing enough.

 

During Wednesday's meeting, coalition members vowed to not let their cause be ignored or misunderstood. They want to continue to raise awareness and pressure lawmakers for more water.

 

Among the goals is to ease the Endangered Species Act to allow more water through the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta for Valley farms.

 

Coalition members argue that environmental restrictions have pinched water supplies, forcing growers in the Westlands Water District to fallow thousands of acres. And unemployment rates in some rural communities have reached 40%.

 

Mario Santoyo, a member of the coalition, said it succeeded in accomplishing one of its main objectives: drawing state and national attention to the issue.

 

Now, he said, the coalition needs to continue to spread its message that water for Valley farms should not be restricted for the benefit of endangered species in the delta.

 

"We need to continue to let the entire state know that this is a problem," Santoyo said. "We need to make changes to the ESA [Endangered Species Act], and we need to make that trip to Washington to make that argument."

 

Coalition supporter and Fresno radio personality Ray Appleton said the group is up against a big opponent that is armed with more money and lobbyists.

 

"But we are not going to stop until we win this," Appleton said. #

 

http://www.fresnobee.com/local/story/1368136.html

 

City Hall to fight water district

The Antelope Valley Press – 4/29/09

By Alisha Semchuck

 

PALMDALE - City officials have geared up to fight water rate increases proposed by the Palmdale Water District and are urging all property owners within the water district boundaries to join the battle.

 

City officials plan to send a letter to all property owners within the water district, urging them to write letters of protest to the water district said Mike Mischel, director of Public Works for the city.

 

"We feel that strongly about this issue," Mischel said.

 

Under state law, the proposed rate hikes - which are expected to amount to increases of 65% to 200% for some customers - can be blocked if more than 50% of the district's property owners protest in writing. The protests must be submitted before the end of a public hearing scheduled for 7 p.m. Wednesday, May 13, in the water district offices, 2029 East Ave. Q.

 

Protest letters must contain the tax assessor's parcel number, which can be found on the annual property tax bill.

 

The decision to urge property owners to oppose the rate hike follows a letter from Palmdale City Manager Steve Williams to water district directors requesting a postponement of rate hikes until city officials and Palmdale School District administrators can evaluate the proposal.

 

"The formulas used to determine the rate are very complex and do not appear to be based on accurate information," Williams stated in that letter. Furthermore, he added, neither the water district staff nor city employees were able "to calculate what the new costs will be."

 

"Steve's letter says it all, the parameters of what we would like, what has to happen for the community to be able to walk together on this," Palmdale Mayor Jim Ledford said Tuesday. "I think Steve's letter outlines how you get there and bring the entire community along."

 

PWD General Manager Randy Hill defended the proposed rate increase as a necessity.

 

"The (water) district has a serious problem, and it's one that has to be addressed," Hill said.

 

Hill said the new rates are needed because the district's financial reserves have dwindled to dangerously low levels and because water usage is approaching the district's maximum water supply.

 

"Our proposed rate increase addresses both of those issues. It encourages water conservation. And it generates the revenue we need," Hill said.

 

Hill said the district has $4 million in reserve, compared to $45 million five years ago. He said he does not know how much reserves have changed in the last 1½ years, since former General Manager Dennis LaMoreaux was placed by the PWD board on administrative leave, then resigned.

 

Based on the water rate budget study developed by Raftelis Financial Consultants Inc., a firm the PWD board contracted in September for $136,000, the water agency needs $30 million of revenue in 2009 and $39 million in 2010 "to meet expenses and carry out the district's programs," Hill said. "The proposed rate (increase) will ensure that money."

 

Hill said those figures reflect total revenue required for those years. If passed, the rate increase would provide $18 million to PWD in 2009 and $21.5 million in 2010, based on the Raftelis report.

 

City officials question the accuracy of the Raftelis report.

 

"It's unfortunate that we have to take this position, but the interest of our community members has driven us to this point," said City Councilman Tom Lackey.

 

Lackey said the increase is "not clearly justified. That's part of the problem."

 

"When you ask that kind of sacrifice from a resident, you have to clearly justify the reason why. That hasn't taken place. There's too many ambiguities, too much generalization. That doesn't wash. That isn't the way you're supposed to operate," Lackey said.

 

When the city was going through its budgetary crisis and had to make cuts and sacrifices, Lackey said councilmembers, the mayor and administrative staff sought input from residents to resolve a deficit of potentially $27 million.

 

"We're just trying to support the community and get the Palmdale Water District to be more responsive," Lackey said.

 

The rate hike has the community talking, including members of the Palmdale Woman's Club, whose board members are expected to discuss May 7 whether to protest the increase, past president Patricia Shaw said. The club is a Palmdale Water District property owner through its ownership of its clubhouse, and many of the club members are retired and living on fixed incomes.

 

At this time of economic shortfalls in the third consecutive dry year, many water agencies have raised rates or restructured their water rate budget structure, including Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency, a wholesaler, and Quartz Hill Water District, a retailer.

 

AVEK raised its rates by roughly 3.6% in January, said board member Keith Dyas. Another increase of an undetermined amount is expected to take effect on Jan. 1 , he noted.

 

Notice will go out in midsummer for a public hearing in September on the 2010 rate proposal, Dyas said.

 

Peggy Powell, a Quartz Hill Water District board member, said that agency adopted a new water rate budget structure following the Irvine Ranch Water District model, the same basic model that Raftelis drafted for the Palmdale Water District. It is based on the number of residents in a household, lot size and area of the property that requires outside water, plus several other factors.

 

Quartz Hill Water District General Manager Chad Reed said the agency implemented a rate increase in late 2007 that raised the flat rate - the monthly water meter fee - and a water usage charge.

 

In a three-year increase, Reed said, water bills are going up approximately 2% each of those three years. The average residential bill in 2007 went up $1.43 a month to $19.64 for customers with three-quarters-inch water meters, and $2.05 a month to $28.28 for residential customers with one-inch meters.

 

The Quartz Hill board in January unanimously passed a resolution for a new water budget rate structure that changed usage charges and also added a monthly charge for the first 10 units of water - 7,480 gallons - whose cost had been included in the monthly flat rate, Reed said. Under the new rate structure, some customers have the potential to lower their monthly bills. If they stay under 75% of their monthly allocation, then they get a discounted price.

 

Reed said customers who take advantage of that discount will pay 63 cents per 748 gallons, less than the 67 cents per unit Quartz Hill Water district pays to purchase the supply. The Quartz Hill district general manager said the difference is subsidized by people paying for higher tiers because they exceeded their allocations.

 

"Everything over 67 cents goes into a water conservation fund for rebates and (conservation) programs," Reed said.

 

John Mlynar, Palmdale's communications manager, said people can go to the city's Web site at cityofpalmdale.org, where a copy of the letter from Williams to the water board is posted as well as a sample letter people can use for their own protest purposes.

 

"We put a copy of the letter (Williams) sent so people can understand the reasoning behind it - understand what we're thinking. If people feel the same, they can click on and download a sample letter in English or Spanish that they can mail or walk in by 7 p.m. (Wednesday) May 13," Mlynar said.

 

Exactly how many property owners must protest to block the Palmdale rate increase is not known.

 

Hill said he did not know how many properties are within the Palmdale Water District boundaries, but he would find out by Thursday's water district board meeting.

 

Williams said city officials are researching how many properties are in the water district. He estimated there were possibly 30,000 to 40,000 property owners.

 

"That number is just a guesstimate off the top of my head," Williams said. "We are obtaining information that would give us the mailing addresses."

 

Williams said his main grievance is the lack of communication from the water district regarding the increase, which he said makes the situation seem like public policy decided behind closed doors.

 

"The city has gone through a very rigorous process in adjusting our budget to address a sharp decrease in revenue, which included public meetings, transparent public disclosure of our financial situation," Williams said. "I believe the Palmdale Water District should do the same thing to disclose to the public the full rationale leading to the proposed rate increase."

Ledford concurred.

 

"We need to do a little more discovery as a community," Ledford said. "We need the community as a whole to speak out with one voice. That's how you do it. We've got to engage the stakeholders. We're in it with them. That will get the message across."#

 

http://www.avpress.com/n/29/0429_s4.hts

 

Regional agencies take lead in updated water plan
The Imperial Valley Press – 4/29/09

By Megan Bakker

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An updated state water plan will place emphasis on regional agencies to develop and implement water management strategies, pushing to diversify agencies’ water sources and reduce dependency on water transfers, according to officials within the state’s water department.

“Think of it as a financial portfolio, and how you want to be diversified,” said Mark Stuart, the chief of the southern district of the state’s Department of Water Resources.

California is working on updating its overall water plan for 2009, and Wednesday the department held a meeting in El Centro to go over the plan’s impacts on the Colorado River Region, which the Imperial Valley is part of, and gather public input.

While the water plan is only an advisory document, it is used by an increasing array of legislators and local agencies to drive their water policy decisions, said Paul Dabbs, the supervising engineer and project manager for the water plan.

“This is the only document that looks at the entire state and its problems,” Dabbs said.

The state water plan places a heavy emphasis on regional water plans and efforts that local agencies can coordinate.

The Imperial Irrigation District has already worked on conservation measures like the lining of the Coachella Canal and the All-American Canal, which will conserve 26,000 acre-feet and 67,700 acre-feet of water, respectively. Planning measures include the quantification settlement agreement, which coordinates water transfers between the IID and other southern California water agencies.

Other options in the future could include increasing groundwater storage, which the IID is working on with Coachella Valley Water District, and water recycling programs.

The IID is also working on its own regional water planning measures. There are two different regional plans, one that is driven solely by the IID, and another, which must be approved by the state, that incorporates the county and the cities.

“Then, from talking with the county and the cities, it became clear that we needed a regional management plan,” said Anisa Divine, the IID’s senior planner for resources planning and management department.

The second plan, called the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan, was submitted to the state Wednesday, and would create an “Imperial Region.”

“The IRWMP process would engage the stakeholders in the community and help to build consensus and support for solutions to pressing water supply and demand problems,” Divine said in an e-mail.

If the state approves the plan, the Imperial Region could apply for state funding for water projects that are developed by the region.

Wednesday’s meeting also focused on getting input from local agencies.

Participants said that the Colorado River Region section could focus more on the Salton Sea, as information about the sea was lacking in the report.

Divine said her focus was on ensuring that the state’s plan accurately reflected the Imperial Valley’s and the Colorado River region’s situation.

“I’m working on ground truthing,” Divine said.

Divine said she also plans to closely follow agricultural water use efficiency data.

Candace Nelson, from the Imperial County Farm Bureau, was also on hand to provide an agricultural perspective.

“I think agriculture provides a huge value to the state,” Nelson said. “Don’t leave agriculture as an afterthought.”

Members of the public can review the draft of the state’s water plan at www.waterplan.water.ca.gov, and can submit comments to the agency until June 5.#

 

http://www.ivpressonline.com/articles/2009/04/30/local_news/news06.txt

 

Climate change, population growth drive projections
The Imperial Valley Press – 4/29/09

By Megan Bakker

 

One of the core components in the updated state water plan claims that without conservation measures, a combination of climate change and increased population growth will drastically drive up demand.

“If the temperatures get warmer, there will be more rain and less snow, which will affect run-off in the state,” said Paul Dabbs, the supervising engineer and project manager for the water plan.

The water plan predicts that California’s mean temperature may rise 1.5 degrees to 5 degrees Fahrenheit by 2050, which could lead to an increase in water demands, particularly for agriculture. Temperature increases could also increase evaporation, which could lower stream flows and concentrate agricultural run-off and urban wastewater discharges.

Based on this data, combined with models for population growth, government action and changes in technology, the water plan predicts three basic scenarios for water use statewide.

“We’re taking a look at existing water demands and projecting out,” Dabbs said.

In one scenario, with expansive growth and minimal action, the state water plan predicts that by 2050, the state of California will need an additional 11 million acre-feet per year to satisfy demands. A middle-of-the-road scenario sees slightly slower population growth, but a drastic decrease in farming that reduces water demand, and predicts a 6 million acre-feet increase in demand. With conservation efforts and strong action, that estimate drops to only needing an additional 2 million acre-feet.

“It’s a more efficient future,” Dabbs said.#

 

http://www.ivpressonline.com/articles/2009/04/30/local_news/news07.txt

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 



[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS -WATER QUALITY- 4/30/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

April 30, 2009

 

4. Water Quality –

 

ESCONDIDO: Water issues addressed at Gregory Canyon workshop

The North County Times – 4/29/09

By Tom Pfingsten

 

ESCONDIDO ---- About 100 people attended a workshop Wednesday at Escondido City Hall focusing on the proposed Gregory Canyon landfill and how it may affect a river that provides drinking water for thousands of North County residents.

The Regional Water Quality Control Board was in Escondido to gather public comments on the first draft of a technical document released three weeks ago called "Tentative Waste Discharge Requirements."

The latest in a long history of public forums to address the dump proposal, Wednesday's meeting gave opponents of the project another chance to sound off against the idea of placing a landfill adjacent to the San Luis Rey River.

The board is scheduled to vote on the list of requirements ---- essentially a permit ---- in August. If approved, one of the last major hurdles delaying the project would be removed.

Gregory Canyon Ltd., the company behind the proposed 183-acre solid waste landfill, has said it will build a 6-foot-thick liner beneath the dump, and staff members with the water quality board confirmed Wednesday that the liner would be the most advanced and "conservative" in the state.

But Ruth Harber, a member of RiverWatch and long-time landfill opponent, wasn't convinced.

Holding up a household light bulb, she said the mercury inside such bulbs would make its way into the landfill, which would eventually leak toxic chemicals into the river.

"We will all be glowing, all the way to Oceanside," Harber said. "This thing is a time bomb."

Those wary of the canyon's proximity to the San Luis Rey said recent water woes in Southern California have made it even more important to ensure that the river can be tapped for drinking water.

During Wednesday's meeting, dozens of people took turns speaking out against the proposed dump, including officials from Oceanside, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors, the Sierra Club and the Rainbow Municipal Water District, as well as those who live near Gregory Canyon.

San Diego County Supervisor Pam Slater-Price called Gregory Canyon "the wrong project in the wrong place," citing the increasing need for local supplies of clean water.

"It is my opinion that the No. 1 thing we need to look out for in this county is water quality and water protection, because we're in a drought situation," Slater-Price said. "The need for this landfill does not (outweigh) the many problems ... that could possibly occur."

The proposal calls for a landfill to be built on a 1,770-acre site about three miles east of Interstate 15 and two miles west of the Pala Indian Reservation. The facility would accept 1 million tons of garbage per year for 30 years, and has raised questions about increased traffic on Highway 76, as well as air and water pollution.

Of those issues, water quality has dominated the debate for more than two decades.

According to the water quality board's Web site, the landfill would be able to accept municipal solid waste, inert waste and dewatered sludge, but not hazardous waste.

The issue of how the dump might affect the nearby river was addressed in the document issued by the water quality control board earlier this month.

The waste and waste by-products contained in a landfill would "present a significant threat to water quality in the San Luis Rey River watershed, if those wastes are not properly managed," the report says.

But staff members seemed inclined to believe most of the bases had been covered by Gregory Canyon Ltd. and in the water quality board's tentative requirements.

"I know many of you have doubts about liners," said water quality staffer John Odermatt. "This system is the most conservative liner system in the state of California."

Still, the doubts persisted.

Lenore Lamb, environmental director for the Pala band of Mission Indians, pointed out that the dangers of landfill pollution do not ease when a dump stops accepting trash.

"We oppose this landfill because it will pose a threat to the water supply for hundreds of years ---- long after the developer is gone," said Lamb.

Several officials asked the water quality board to consider how many North County residents drink water that would flow within a mile of the Gregory Canyon landfill.

Dave Seymour, general manager of the Rainbow water district, told the five water quality staffers that his district is working on a deal to harvest 3,600 acre-feet of water every year from the San Luis Rey ---- equivalent to 15 percent of the district's annual demand.

An acre-foot is almost 326,000 gallons.

"There is no water out there available to replace the water in the San Luis Rey basin," he said. "I can tell you, as a water professional, that we're looking for water all the time.

"All the assurances in the world, and all the money in the world, aren't going to do any good for the people who need the water," added Seymour.

Downstream, the river satisfies about 25 percent of Oceanside's demand for water, and a city staffer attended Wednesday's meeting to reinforce concerns over whether Oceanside will always have a source of drinking water in the San Luis Rey.

The water quality board will continue accepting comments on the tentative waste discharge requirements through mid-July.#

 

http://www.northcountytimes.com/articles/2009/04/29/news/inland/fallbrook/z078567bf05104d29882575a5007b9991.txt

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 4/30/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

April 30, 2009

 

3. Watersheds –

 

Delta fix a must, speaker warns

The Stockton Record

 

State agrees to resume stocking trout in Marin reservoirs

The Marin Independent Journal

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Delta fix a must, speaker warns

The Stockton Record – 4/30/09

By The Record Staff

 

STOCKTON - Someone must make a hard decision about how to fix the Delta, a decision that will likely involve trade-offs, a Stanford University professor of civil engineering told alumni and community leaders on Wednesday.

 

Delta smelt are "definitely on the way out," Stephen G. Monismith said during a luncheon address, while other species such as striped bass and salmon also have declined.

 

Changes to the state's water delivery system - such as a peripheral canal, the "$10 billion experiment" - may not be enough, he said.

 

"We seem to be getting more and more questions," Monismith said. "I wish it was as simple as re-plumbing the Delta."

A key issue, he said, is how much fresh water flows through the Delta and out into San Francisco Bay.

 

When flows are high, saltwater is pushed back to the west; during low flows, salt creeps into the Delta and potentially affects the amount of food available for fish, not to mention water quality for farmers.

 

He said a holistic approach to the Delta is needed, rather than considering its many parts piece by piece.

 

"At least people are starting to think about what we want the Delta to be," he said.#

 

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090430/A_NEWS/904300327/-1/rss14

 

State agrees to resume stocking trout in Marin reservoirs

The Marin Independent Journal – 4/29/09

By Nels Johnson

 

In what he called a "big victory for fishing in Marin," an effort by state Assemblyman Jared Huffman has persuaded the state Department of Fish and Game to resume the trout stocking program at Lagunitas and Bon Tempe lakes.

 

Huffman said it's possible a rainbow trout plant could be made in "a matter of weeks," but because the stocking program is suspended during warm summer months anyway, it will certainly resume by early fall.

 

"It's great news, just great news," Huffman said.

 

"Oh, my god!" exclaimed veteran Bon Tempe angler Dr. Hank Simmonds, a Marin Healthcare District board member who refused to buy a fishing license this year, or a water district pass, in protest of the trout stocking ban. "I thought it was all just a ploy by the state to save money," he said, adding, "I'll have to go out and buy a license."

 

The program that deposits trout into hundreds of lakes across California was outlawed in November in designated waters, including the Marin reservoirs and about 175 others, pending an environmental study required by Sacramento Superior Court Judge Patrick Marlette. The judge acted after a lawsuit that contended non-native fish imperil native species including the endangered red-legged frog.

 

But Huffman, a fisherman and former Marin Municipal Water District director, was convinced the two Marin lakes were inappropriately included in the ban, because district rangers have never found a red-legged frog in them and the lakes are "two or three dams removed" from threatened salmon and steelhead fisheries in Lagunitas Creek.

 

"If I didn't feel very confident we weren't putting endangered species at risk, I wouldn't have gone to bat" for the program, Huffman said.

 

The assemblyman said he was inundated with letters, e-mails and calls from people angry about the stocking ban, including parents "distressed they had no place to take their kids to fish." Anglers led by Milt Hain of Fairfax rallied at Western Sport Shop in San Rafael and circulated petitions signed by more than 800 people urging the ban be eased.

 

Huffman, who monitors the Department of Fish and Game as head of the Assembly's Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee, convened a meeting of water district personnel, including Gregory Andrew, Marin Municipal fishery manager, and Fish and Game brass.

 

In a formal report to Fish and Game, Andrew said: "Our survey data indicates that California red-legged frogs have not been observed in MMWD reservoirs and high densities of bullfrogs might preclude red-legged frogs, despite some good habitat. There was one occurrence of a single red-legged frog documented in Lagunitas Creek, below Kent Lake, in 2006."

 

Further, Andrew reported, "While it is not impossible, in my opinion there is a remote chance for any trout that are planted into Lake Lagunitas and Bon Tempe reservoir to enter Lagunitas Creek."

 

Huffman said, "Fish and Game feels the facts and data are sufficiently compelling that they can resume planting in these two lakes" despite the Sacramento court decree requiring an environmental report. A Fish and Game spokesman was not immediately available for comment on whether plants will resume next month, or next fall.

 

No trout have been planted in Marin Municipal lakes since last fall, but the reservoirs have remained open to fishing.

 

Judge Marlette's ruling followed a 2006 lawsuit filed by the Stanford Legal Clinic on behalf of the Pacific Rivers Council and Center for Biological Diversity. The judge decided that stocking contributed to declines in native fish and frogs, including the red-legged frog, mountain yellow-legged frog, Cascades frog, California golden trout, McCloud River redband trout and Santa Ana sucker.

 

The red-legged frog, the inspiration for Mark Twain's story "The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County," is the largest native frog in the West. The frog, listed as a threatened species since 1996, has been sighted across Marin, most recently in Bolinas.#

 

http://www.marinij.com/marinnews/ci_12256451

 

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 4/30/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

April 30, 2009

 

2. Supply –

 

Los Angeles water projects to get stimulus boost

The Los Angeles Times

 

Vista Irrigation District declares Level 2 drought

The San Diego Union Tribune

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Los Angeles water projects to get stimulus boost

The Los Angeles Times – 4/30/09

By Alexandra Zavis

 

Email Picture

The Los Angeles district of the Army Corps of Engineers plans to use its share of federal stimulus dollars to help complete a backlog of projects aimed at improving the local water supply, officials said Wednesday.

The new funding includes $6.5 million for delayed repairs and improvements to the Los Angeles County river system, $5.1 million for water recycling and $17.4 million to finish a dredging project to prevent mud-choked Upper Newport Bay from becoming a meadow.

Nearly $184 million in all has been allocated to the district, which covers 226,000 square miles in Southern California, Arizona, southern Nevada and a small part of Utah. The funding is part of $4.6 billion in allocations to the corps under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which President Obama signed into law in February.

"In many cases the projects that we have on this list are projects that have kind of hung out there for a while without the necessary funds to complete them," said Col. Thomas Magness, who commands the corps' L.A. district. "We finally have a chance to complete the projects, put them in the portfolio as 100% and turn over the project."

District officers estimate that the funding will create or save about 1,472 jobs directly related to the work and 2,558 positions in supporting fields, including companies that provide materials and services to the contractors.

"We are very excited," said Dave Kiff, assistant city manager for Newport Beach.

Mud flats, fed by sediment that washes into Upper Newport Bay via the San Diego Creek, have been building up in the ecologically important estuary for years, greatly reducing the water level. Eventually, the reserve became so choked with sediment and growth that coyotes and other predators could walk across to what had been small islands, disturbing nests and eating eggs, including those of the endangered least tern. Tons of silt were also spilling over from the upper bay into the lower bay, grounding vessels in the Newport Beach marina.

In October 2005, dredging crews began removing 2.3 million cubic yards of accumulated muck, but funding started running out about halfway into the project, Kiff said.

The corps, the lead agency on the project, was supposed to cover 65% of the estimated $38.5 million cost, with state and local agencies providing the rest. Local authorities funded their $13.5-million share with money raised for coastal protection under Proposition 12 of 2000. Until now, however, Congress had only appropriated $17.5 million of the roughly $25-million federal share.

In the meantime, the corps estimates that the project's tab has ballooned to more than $50 million, driven in part by rising fuel costs.

Together with some additional local funding, Kiff said, the new federal money should be sufficient to finish dredging by the summer of 2010.

"It's a little ironic that it took a recession and stimulus package for the government to complete its share," Kiff said.

The additional $6.5 million for the L.A. County drainage system will allow the corps to perform delayed maintenance and repairs to the channels and dams, clear out vegetation and debris that is inhibiting water flow, remove graffiti and update recreation plans for the area, corps officials said.

"That work is never complete," Magness said.

The $5.1 million for water recycling will help the West Basin Municipal Water District reduce the region's dependence on imported water from Northern California and Colorado, said General Manager Richard Nagel. West Basin already delivers 35 million gallons of recycled water from the El Segundo wastewater treatment plant -- water that would otherwise be dumped into the ocean. The extra funding will be used to build new pipelines and a pump station in another step toward doubling capacity by 2020, Nagel said.

Also on the corps' list are:

* $27.5 million for flood control along the Santa Ana River, part of a $2-billion project that corps officials say is about 90% complete.

* $2.5 million to finish deepening the turning basin at the Port of Long Beach.

* $1.98 million to assess the condition of the San Pedro breakwater and dredge the L.A. River estuary.

* $500,000 for a survey of the Dana Point Harbor breakwater, where officials want to check recent storm damage repairs.#

 

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-la-water-stimulus30-2009apr30,0,2788263.story

 

Vista Irrigation District declares Level 2 drought

The San Diego Union Tribune – 4/29/09

 

The Vista Irrigation District on Wednesday declared a Level 2 Drought Alert, which limits outdoor watering to certain days and times, with mandatory water-conservation measures to begin June 1.

 

The district provides water service to more than 123,000 people in the city of Vista and portions of San Marcos, Escondido, Oceanside, and unincorporated areas of San Diego County.

 

The move falls in line with action by the San Diego County Water Authority, which recently told its 24 member agencies that starting July 1 there will be a 20 percent reduction in water supplied.

 

Earlier this week, the Padre Dam Municipal Water District and the Fallbrook Water District approved Level 2 drought declarations. Padre Dam serves more than 100,000 residents from Santee to Alpine.

 

Specifics will vary by water district. #

 

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/apr/29/bn29drought-vista-water/?northcounty&zIndex=90911


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

Blog Archive