This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 7/8/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

July 8, 2008

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

 

 

 

Santa Clara water board's part-time CEO draws high salary

San Jose Mercury News- 7/7/08

 

Water hearing strategy criticized

Associated Press- 7/7/08

 

Another blow in Nevada’s water fight

Deseret News- 7/8/08

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

Santa Clara water board's part-time CEO draws high salary

San Jose Mercury News- 7/7/08

By Paul Rogers

Olga Martin Steele was brought in to temporarily lead the Santa Clara Valley Water District in January after its former CEO Stan Williams resigned under a cloud of controversy for excessive spending.

 

But under a contract that the board will consider extending Tuesday, Steele is making more money than Williams - $252,000 a year - while working less time, only 32 hours a week.

 

She maintains a part-time status so she can continue drawing her $180,000 state pension, which she earned from previous government jobs. If the water board extends Steele's contract another six months, she'll receive $432,000 this year.

 

On Monday, Steele and the chair of the water district board defended the arrangement.

 

"I came here with a lot of experience and hit the ground running," Steele said. "I've made significant changes and have initiated a number of initiatives to streamline and better leverage resources and position the district for the difficult challenges that lay ahead. And I'm doing that for less money than if they had hired a permanent CEO."

 

Based in San Jose, the district provides drinking water and flood protection to 1.8 million Santa Clara County residents. Its $364 million annual budget comes from water bills and property taxes.

 

Board chair Rosemary Kamei said that Steele, 60, came in on short notice and has worked hard to bring stability to the agency.

 

Under her contract, she does not receive paid vacation, a car allowance or health benefits - benefits worth tens of thousands of dollars.

 

Kamei negotiated the deal, though she said Monday she was unaware how much Steele is earning in pension benefits.

 

"But we are paying her less than we paid Stan because we are not providing her any of the benefits that we provided him. In terms of what she brings to the district, I think she's doing an excellent job. In a very short time frame she has been able to do a lot of good things."

 

Steele said other governments agencies, including the city of San Jose, had temporarily brought back retirees. However, critics said such deals are often bad for taxpayers.

 

"We would not say that anybody pulling a pension should never be able to work again," said Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

 

"But the purpose of a public employee retirement system is to take care of people in their old age. When people are able to retire relatively young, they are able to double dip. The effect on the taxpayers means that there is less money for current services."

 

Extravagant retirement benefits are in part to blame for the state budget crisis, he added.

 

"Do we have someone who is living essentially off the largess of the taxpayer at an amount that most people would say is excessive? Yes." said Coupal. "California is simply known as the land of milk and honey when it comes to public employee salary and retirement benefits. This kind of thing is not sustainable."

 

Steele's predecessor, Williams, made $250,000 after the board gave him a 7 percent raise in his final days in office to help boost his pension.

 

Last year, the water district board pressured him to resign after he hired then-board member Greg Zlotnick to a newly created, $184,000-a-year job at the district without advertising the position or telling board members.

 

In December, the seven -member water district board hired Steele on a six-month basis while it looked for a new CEO. The vote Tuesday will be to continue the arrangement for another six months. Steele had previously worked at the district for eight years including as its chief administrative officer. Before returning to the water district, she worked as deputy director of the State Council on Developmental Disabilities.

 

But to date, the board has not interviewed any candidates for CEO, or advertised the position.

 

Kamei said she has been talking with several recruiting firms. She said the agency also is looking for a new chief financial officer and auditor, but that she hopes it can bring on board a new CEO by the end of 2008.

 

Steele, who owns a house in Clearlake, 120 miles north of San Jose, said she works four days a week, sometimes five shorter days, and lives in San Jose at an apartment during the week.

 

Under state pension rules, after 12 months of earning a salary and drawing a pension, she must choose one of the other, said Edward Fong, a spokesman for CalPERS.

 

"Once she reaches 12 months in January 2009, if she wanted to continue in this capacity, under state law she would have to suspend her retirement benefits, or "un-retire," he said.

 

In May, the water board approved significant pay raises for two of the district's other top employees, making them the most highly paid such employees of any water district in the state.

 

Water district counsel Debra Cauble's salary increased 8 percent to $221,720 a year. And board clerk Lauren Keller got a 5 percent raise, to $135,574 a year.#

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_9812351

 

 

 

Water hearing strategy criticized

Associated Press- 7/7/08

By BRENDAN RILEY

 

CARSON CITY, Nev.—A conservation group claimed Monday that a Las Vegas water agency wants to exclude ranchers, Indian tribes, local governments and others from full participation in hearings on the agency's bid for billions of gallons of rural Nevada water.

 

But a spokesman for the Southern Nevada Water Authority said the claim by the Great Basin Water Network has "nothing to do" with what gets presented at the state water engineer's review of the plan to tap groundwater in Snake Valley, more than 250 miles north of Las Vegas.

 

State Engineer Tracy Taylor has scheduled a July 15 prehearing conference on efforts by SNWA to pump up to 16 billion gallons of water a year from Snake Valley, which straddles the Nevada-Utah border. The pumping would be within Nevada's White Pine County.

 

Steve Erickson of the Great Basin Water Network said more than a dozen groups and individuals from both Nevada and Utah want Taylor to grant them "interested persons" status so they can fully participate in the hearings, but SNWA attorneys oppose the request.

 

"They want to keep the public out of this process as much as possible," Erickson said, adding, "And this from an agency that is unelected and unaccountable, and whose books are hidden from view. It's outrageous."

 

Scott Huntley, public information manager for SNWA, said the conservation group sued the state engineer over the same issue in an earlier hearing on a plan to pump water from another valley and lost at the state district court level. That ruling has been appealed to the Nevada Supreme Court.

 

"This is not a new issue," said Huntley, adding, "All of the issues the petitioners would raise will be addressed at the hearing anyway ... so additional participants won't actually add technical data to the case."

 

Critics of the pumping include some ranchers whose families have lived for generations in the sparsely populated area, in which Nevada's only national park is located.

 

Erickson said those seeking "interested persons" status include Salt Lake and Utah County governments in Utah; a regional water group representing eight rural Nevada counties, two Shoshone tribes and the Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation.

 

The applications are for the use of enough water to supply more than 170,000 homes. Taylor will have final say over how much groundwater the authority can safely pump from the valley to supply growth in southern Nevada.

 

SNWA officials say they already have enough water to justify construction of a pipeline network, at a cost of up to $3.5 billion, to carry rural Nevada water to Las Vegas.

 

Following a hearing in 2006, Taylor granted the authority permission to eventually pump nearly 20 billion gallons a year from nearby Spring Valley, also in White Pine County.

 

In February, Taylor held a hearing on the authority's plans to pump more than 11 billion gallons of groundwater a year from three valleys in central Lincoln County. No ruling has been issued yet in that case.#

http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_9809727?nclick_check=1

 

 

 

Another blow in Nevada’s water fight

Deseret News- 7/8/08

By Stephen Speckman

 

The Southern Nevada Water Authority has filed a request to deny "interested person status" to 15 applicants, including several from Utah, who want a say in a proposal to pipe water from sources near the Utah/Nevada border to Las Vegas.

 

"We oppose the pipeline," said Steve Erickson on behalf of the Great Basin Water Network. "We think there are other alternatives they should explore."

 

The Water Authority told Tracy Taylor, the Nevada state engineer, in its request for denial that the applicants have not demonstrated the "extreme" circumstances required to be declared an interested person.

 

But applicants Salt Lake and Utah counties, represented by a Reno attorney, are worried that piping water from a basin in the Snake Valley region could turn the area into a "pollution spewing ... dust bowl." The attorney and a Carson City law firm last week filed briefs with Taylor, asking him to decide in favor of the applicants.

 

Groups that include Erickson's, conservationists and the Central Nevada Regional Water Authority are fighting the Southern Nevada Water Authority's claim that applications for interested person status were not filed in a timely manner.

 

The second group wrote in their brief to Taylor that the proceedings to decide whether to pump water from the Snake Valley will be complicated "no matter how you cut it."

 

"Participation from these parties will certainly not make matters worse, and will only serve to give the state engineer all of the facts necessary to make his determination," the document states. "Therefore, they should be allowed the opportunity to defend their interests, as only they can do, rather than trust that some other protestant will 'carry the water."'

 

Erickson said Taylor may make a decision on the applicants next week during a hearing in Carson City.

 

Last month the National Congress of American Indians approved a resolution opposing the pipeline project on the basis that it would lower Great Basin groundwater tables, dry up springs and wells and harm plants, animals and people.

 

In the meantime Utah Geological Survey researchers are spending $3 million on drilling into and monitoring aquifers in the Snake, Hamlin and Tule valleys to learn more about how much water is at stake, what the quality is like and whether the aquifers flow into one another.

 

The state funding for the study was in response to the Southern Nevada Water Authority applying with Taylor's office for water rights to 110,000 acre-feet of groundwater on the Nevada side. Although pumping hasn't started, Taylor has given the go ahead to pump up to 40,000-acre feet west of Great Basin National Park in Nevada.

 

Should Nevada get those rights so close to the border?

 

"That's an interesting question," UGS hydrogeologist Lucy Jordan said last month. "It depends who you ask. That's where the big problems come in. Whose water really is it?" #

http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,700241415,00.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

No comments:

Blog Archive