This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Item for 7/10/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

July 10, 2008

 

1.  Top Items -

 

 

With water precious, state faces heat, fires--and drought

Capitol Weekly- 7/10/08

 

California’s water management must adapt to climate change

Capitol Weekly- 7/10/08

 

U.S. proposes to put smelt on endangered list

San Francisco Chronicle- 7/10/08

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

With water precious, state faces heat, fires--and drought

Capitol Weekly- 7/10/08

By Lester Snow

 

Californians just experienced a Fourth of July weekend that graphically demonstrated how weather and climatic conditions can alter holiday activities that many of us traditionally take for granted.


Smoke choked the air as wildfires burned around the state.  A number of fireworks shows were cancelled.  Many lakes and reservoirs that are popular Independence Day destinations were less than half full.


As Golden State residents settle back into their post holiday workweeks, the dry conditions continue.  It’s a predicament brought about by two consecutive dry winters.  Northern California had its driest spring ever this year, while Southern California set low rainfall records last year.  Caught in this parching dry spell during 2007 and 2008, California also faces judicial cutbacks in Delta water exports to save endangered fish.  As a result of climate and court impacts, California water supplies are low.

 

California is in a drought, the first statewide dry spell since the years 1987 to 1992.  We’ll get through it…as we did in the 1929-1934 drought, and the one from 1975-1977, which was the California’s driest period on record.  


Coping with drought, however, is getting tougher for a variety of reasons, including increased demand.  During the 1929-1934 period, California’s population was less than six million.  By 1990, our ranks had swelled to 29 million.  Today, about 37 million people live in California.  By 2030, that figure is projected to top 50 million.


Getting back to the situation at hand, a number of efforts are underway to cope with the problem.  On June 4, Governor Schwarzenegger officially declared that the state is suffering drought conditions and called for a 20 percent reduction in water use statewide.  He urged local agencies to bolster conservation programs and to work with federal and state authorities to help farmers now suffering huge financial losses.


The Governor’s executive order directed the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to:
•    Facilitate water transfers to respond to emergency shortages across the state.
•    Work with local water districts and agencies to improve local coordination.
•    Help local water districts and agencies improve water efficiency and conservation.
•    Coordinate with other state and federal agencies and departments to assist water suppliers, identify risks to water supply and help farmers suffering losses.
•    Expedite existing grant programs to help local water districts and agencies conserve.


DWR is helping drought-stricken Central Valley farmers this summer by transferring up to 50,000 acre feet of groundwater through the State Water Project (SWP).  This water comes from wells in the Westlands Water District and will be moved to other parts of the Westlands service area that do not have groundwater access.


Additionally, DWR is lending 37,500 acre feet of water to Central Valley Project (CVP) contractors out of the San Luis Reservoir. An additional 25,000 acre feet is being made available by Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for the benefit of both CVP and SWP contractors.  


Furthermore, DWR is expediting $12 million in grants to water agencies and non-profit organizations and working with locals on an aggressive water conservation and outreach campaign.

 


Conservation is a very important piece of the water supply puzzle and it’s a prominent part of the Governor’s $11.9 billion water bond for water management investments that will address population growth, climate change, water supply reliability and environmental needs.


But here’s the plain truth: conservation will not help much in the sixth or seventh year of a statewide drought.  To mitigate dry periods, California needs more surface storage to capture excess water provided in wet years.


The last major state-built surface storage projects were completed 34 years ago and are not adequate to serve today’s population.  What’s more, as previously indicated, California reservoirs are low.  If we have no improvement next rainy season, there’ll be less reservoir water than during the worst of the 1976-77 drought.


Incidentally, to help local agencies and communities prepare for the possibility of another dry year and possible water supply interruptions, DWR has published an updated version of the Urban Drought Guidebook.  The guidebook reflects a wide array of water supply and demand approaches.  As water suppliers review and update their Water Shortage Contingency Plans, we hope the new information and examples of exceptional efforts by water suppliers throughout California and the United States will be useful.#

http://www.capitolweekly.net/article.php?_adctlid=v%7Cjq2q43wvsl855o%7Cx90513moznk3f5&issueId=x8zxm8u0rus23h&xid=x904qenf4us32g

 

 

 

California’s water management must adapt to climate change

Capitol Weekly- 7/10/08

By Mindy McIntyre

 

The summer of 2008 may be remembered as the summer of drought, fire and water rationing, or it may be remembered as the bellwether sign that California is facing a new normal when it comes to our weather and water supply.


California water management is founded on one simple assumption: that weather in the future will be relatively the same as it has been in the past. Unfortunately, that assumption is wrong.


We’ve invested billions of dollars in water systems that rely on what we consider our “normal weather pattern”- capturing water in periods of wet and average years to get us through our periodic dry spells.

 

Yet, scientists are telling us that what we consider “normal” weather in California will actually be abnormal under climate change. You see, scientists are finding that the American west, is getting drier, perhaps even much drier.  


According to recent reports, the two large reservoirs on the Colorado River, a major source of water for areas in Southern California, may dry up by 2021. The California Drought Update released in April by the Department of Water Resources indicates that we can expect the same sort of drying throughout California. The report states: “Standing where we are now in 2007 it would be a reasonable conclusion that southwestern North America…will have a drier climate in the future and that transition may already be underway.  Or to put it another way, though wet years will still occur, on average they will be drier than prior wet years while the dry years will be drier than prior dry years. The two decade period of overall wet conditions from 1976 to 1998 is likely to never be repeated as the region faces an intensifying aridity that will simply get worse as the century progresses…” (California Drought, An update 2008, California Department of Water Resources, page 76).


Yet, while many policy makers have accepted that we need to reduce our production of greenhouse gases in order to combat climate change, fewer are willing to acknowledge that our conventional wisdom on water management must also change.


Much of the water conversation in the Legislature focuses on a water bond to support old water strategies. The proposed water bonds would allocate billions of dollars for new dams to capture water in “wet” years. Yet, state and federal agencies have spent over $100 million studying those dams and, even based on past hydrology, the dams fail to provide benefits that are worthy of their price tags. No one has even considered how these dams would work under a drier future.


More of the same old water policies will not help California. Our old water policies simply do not make sense when one considers our new normal under climate change.


Fortunately, California does have options. The California Water Plan found that California could make available over 4 million acre feet of water annually (enough for over 16 million Californians) with improved efficiency in urban areas and development of recycled water. Regional stormwater capture, groundwater treatment and protection, and increased agricultural efficiency are also promising potential sources of water.


These new water resources can be implemented quickly, and they cost just a fraction of the cost of new dams. In addition, these resources have the advantage of being “climate-resilient,” which means that they will be as effective or more effective even as California’s climate becomes drier.

 

Despite the debate on dams, some leaders are already looking to shift the focus from old strategies to new policies that work under our changing climate. This session Assembly Member Krekorian introduced AB 2153 and Assembly Members Laird and Feuer introduced AB 2175. Both measures would significantly increased water efficiency in the state. AB 2175 is now in the Senate, and hopefully will move to the Governor’s desk. AB 2153, unfortunately, did not move passed the Assembly this year.


By taking advantage of untapped resources, California will be able to meet the water needs of our people, economy and environment. In order to do so, we must stop looking to the past and begin implementing policies and actions such as AB 2153 and AB 2175 that will bring our water management in line with our new normal.#

http://www.capitolweekly.net/article.php?_adctlid=v%7Cjq2q43wvsl855o%7Cx905e396m403tj&issueId=x8zxm8u0rus23h&xid=x9053dqe2dc3i4

 

 

 

U.S. proposes to put smelt on endangered list

San Francisco Chronicle- 7/10/08

 

The delta smelt, a tiny but important fish in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, could officially become "endangered" under a proposal announced Wednesday by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

 

Smelt are an indicator of the delta's health, and nearly 750,000 acres of farmland and 25 million people from the Bay Area to Central and Southern California rely on water from the delta.

 

The smelt population has plummeted with the decline of the delta's health, and in 1993 it was listed as threatened.

 

"There's a lot of fighting going on over this species," acknowledged Al Donner, a spokesman for the service. "It's often viewed as the signature species with regard to the condition of the delta."

 

The wildlife service is asking scientists to submit information about the smelt during the next 60 days. A decision to upgrade the status to "endangered" could come early next year.

 

The smelt, once ubiquitous in delta waters, is now close to extinction and could disappear entirely within two years. The debate over its status follows a federal court order last year to reduce delta pumping and to study the inadvertent killing of smelt at two giant pumping stations near Tracy, where fresh delta water is diverted throughout California.

 

The wildlife service maintains that changing the official status of the fish will make "very little difference" on regulations, as the fish is officially protected whether it is threatened or endangered. But environmental groups hailed the decision to consider action as an important step in the water battle.

 

"The condition of this species is really, really dire," said Tina Swanson, executive director of the Bay Institute, the Novato environmental group that monitors San Francisco Bay. "Its precipitous decline is a clear indication that we have a serious problem in the delta."

 

Swanson was one of the authors of a federal petition that prompted the wildlife service to consider changing the status of the fish.

 

"Diverting water is not without consequences," she said. "The delta smelt is one of the indicators telling us we have overdone it. Perhaps the change in status will underscore the urgency of the crisis."

 

But the Coalition for a Sustainable Delta, a group that supports continued diversion of delta water, maintains that restricting the pumping to protect the smelt could cost nearly $500 million a year in agricultural losses along with water shortages for the public.

 

Coalition spokesman Michael Boccadoro said it was "erroneous" to blame delta water diversion as the sole cause of the smelt's decline and that pollution, sewage and storm runoff also were responsible.

 

In addition to considering the smelt's status change, the wildlife service is also crafting a new "biological opinion" about the operation of the water pumps after a judge in Fresno agreed with environmentalists' challenges that the existing pumping plans were inadequate. The opinion, expected to be issued in September, would serve as the basis for the pumps' continued operation.

 

The condition of the delta, once a rich, biologically diverse refuge of fish and wildlife, is regarded by many environmentalists as dire. Some say it is no longer a true delta but a maze of man-made islands bordered by stagnant sloughs and buttressed by fragile levees that will disappear in the next big earthquake.

 

"Endangered" is the official term for a species in danger of extinction. "Threatened" means a species is likely to become endangered. The delta smelt - a 2-inch-long fish that smells like cucumbers - was once the most plentiful fish in the delta.

 

Other delta species have been classified as endangered, including the coho salmon and the winter-run chinook salmon. The steelhead, the green sturgeon and the spring-run chinook salmon are classified as threatened.#

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/09/MN3B11MB2U.DTL

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive