This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 7/7/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

July 7, 2008

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

 

 

Water service urges 10-percent cutback on use

Oroville Mercury News- 7/7/08

 

Manteca may oppose Peripheral Canal plan

Manteca Bulletin- 7/7/08

 

REACTION TO THE SUN’S WATER SERIES: The era of simple solutions is over

The Las Vegas Sun- 7/6/08

 

Water proves good resource in portfolio: More ways to invest in supply, technology

Chicago Tribune- 7/6/08

 

Village district fighting drought

Lompoc Record- 7/6/08

 

Utah-Nevada water standoff quiet, fierce

The Salt Lake Tribune- 7/5/08

 

Coachella Canal Lining Project Receives Award

Desert Local News- 7/4/08

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

Water service urges 10-percent cutback on use

Oroville Mercury News- 7/7/08

By Heather Hacking, Staff Writer


While many areas of the state are beginning to feel the pinch from lack of water with low lake levels, less feed on pastures for livestock, water cutback to farmers and restriction on when lawn can be watered, most urban water users in Northern California haven't had to make sacrifices.

 

However, a statewide drought has been declared and local water suppliers are asking people to do their part and cut back.

 

California Water Service, which supplies groundwater to residents of Chico, is asking for a voluntary cutback of 10 percent of water use, explained manager Mike Pembroke.

 

"In this case, we felt it was important we support the governor, who has issued a drought declaration," Pembroke said.

 

The 10-percent reduction would be based on water use this time last year.

 

It doesn't take a lot of sacrifice to cut back at that level. Outdoor watering is the biggest draw on water supplies and over watering is common.

 

Pembroke said the best time to water is early in the morning when water won't be lost due to evaporation. Also, never water so much that water runs onto the pavement.

 

Other little things can help such as taking shorter showers, turning off the faucet while brushing your teeth or shaving, and making sure pipes do not leak.

 

The water agency is also now using conservation water rates, which are tiered. Each unit of water is 100 cubic-feet, which equals 748 gallons. For the first 10 units of water, the price is 60 cents each. The rate increases to 64 cents for 11 to 32 units, and 68 cents above that.

 

Even with recent water rate increases, water in Northern California is cheap compared to other urban areas in the state. But Pembroke said people in Northern California should still conserve.

 

There are areas in the state that are in a crisis. Plus, water conservation will become the norm in the future.

 

Currently, more than a third of California Water Service's 27,000 customers are not on meters. That is due to change to meet state mandates. Pembroke said over the next several years, people without meters will convert to metered water supply.

 

For most people, converting to meters usually means less water use. If water shortages continue, Chico water users will be asked to use 20 percent less water, or more if the degree of shortage increases. #

http://www.orovillemr.com/news/ci_9806040

 

 

 

Manteca may oppose Peripheral Canal plan

Manteca Bulletin- 7/7/08
Dennis Wyatt,
Managing Editor

The "PC" words - Peripheral Canal - are surfacing once again.

The Manteca City Council is being asked tonight by the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors to stand with them in opposing the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force recommendations.

Leading the list of reasons why the supervisors want Manteca to oppose the recommendations is that it appears to promote a preconceived notion that an "isolated conveyance system" should be advanced as a solution without thoroughly analyzing the impacts of such a project on the Delta.

State politicians and bureaucrats alike avoid calling such an option a peripheral canal following the devastating political fallout from the 1982 election when voters overwhelming rejected the proposal 63 to 37 percent. The vote in the counties north of the Tehachapi Mountains exceeding 90 percent negative. The measure even failed in Los Angeles County that stood to benefit the most from such a canal.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has endorsed the "isolated conveyance" or the peripheral canal.

County opposition is based on the fact such a canal would seriously impact drainage in San Joaquin County and render most of the county's most productive cropland - the reclaimed Delta islands - infertile. The county has also gone on record against a plan that would flood the islands to address water issues elsewhere. The San Joaquin County General Plan identified such a strategy as having a bigger impact on the loss of county farmland than urbanization over the next 50 years.

More than 70 percent of all of the water used for ag and urban uses in California passes through San Joaquin County via the Delta.

Other county criticisms of the report include:

• it ignores the system of water appropriation and water rights that have been developed over the last century in California.

• failure to endorse integrated and regional focused water solutions.

• failure of the State Water Project to deliver a promised 5 million acre feet of supplemental water for California from the North Coast rivers.

Such a plan effectively died in the administration of Governor Ronald Reagan who became the last sitting governor to kill a dam project. The dam at the time was on the Eel River and would have flooded Round Valley.

The City Council meets at 7 p.m. tonight at the Civic Center, 1001 W. Center St.

http://www.mantecabulletin.com/main.asp?SectionID=28&SubSectionID=58&ArticleID=58410&TM=15845.78

 

 

 

REACTION TO THE SUN’S WATER SERIES: The era of simple solutions is over

The Las Vegas Sun- 7/6/08

Last Sunday, Emily Green’s depiction of the Southern Nevada Water Authority’s efforts to secure a future water supply for the Las Vegas Valley covered a lot of terrain. There was significant discussion of the presumed dire environmental consequences that would befall the rural areas if but one gallon of those available waters were to leave.

 

These presumptions ignore the science of hydrology, the environmental safeguards embedded in state and federal law, and the fundamental principles of Nevada water law that further protect the environment and existing users.

 

There has been a concerted effort for more than half a century to estimate the water resources in these basins that are available for use. In fact, the Nevada Conservation and Natural Resources Department published a series of water planning reports in the 1970s; one of those reports dealt with water for Southern Nevada and identified several valleys where water was potentially available for export to Las Vegas.

 

Research efforts include extensive studies by the Desert Research Institute, the Air Force (M-X Missile Program), the U.S. Geological Survey (Great Basin Regional Aquifer System Analysis) and the U.S. Interior Department (Southern Nevada Deep Carbonate Aquifer Study). The U.S. Geological Survey has published many reports in cooperation with the state of Nevada on the hydrology of virtually all of the basins in the state, beginning in the 1940s.

 

The ground water that can be obtained in these valleys under Nevada water law is considered the perennial yield, or the amount of water replenished each year by precipitation.

 

To capture this perennial yield, wells must be distributed to tap the ground water uniformly in areas where phreatophytes (deep-rooted plants) obtain the water from a ground-water table, so that the basin returns to a steady-state condition; because ground-water discharge equals the pumping volume, ground-water levels stabilize.

 

The time required to achieve this new steady state varies from basin to basin depending on many hydrologic factors and may take hundreds of years.

 

The effect of pumping on the water table is easily monitored and, if unacceptable to the Nevada state engineer, the impact can be mitigated. The ground-water travel time between basins is measured in decades to centuries, ample time to prevent environmental harm.

 

If need be, well fields can be relocated, pumping can be reduced and artificial recharge of ground water can be accomplished (depending on surface water availability). In short, numerous management options are available to ensure these valleys will not dry up.

 

However, the bigger issue was not what was said, but rather what was missing.

 

Nowhere in Ms. Green’s more than 20,000-word series was an alternative described that protects Southern Nevada’s residents if we lose Lake Mead to drought. We are in the eighth year of drought; Lake Mead is down 100 feet and will drop another 6 feet this year.

 

People who oppose this project generally point to one of two “solutions”: desalinization or growth control. Let’s take the second one first, because virtually everyone in the valley has an opinion about growth.

 

Economic repercussions aside — and thousands of people have already lost their jobs in the current economic downturn — let’s assume that not another person moves to the Las Vegas Valley. As it stands, 2 million people call Southern Nevada home, and they rely on the Colorado River for 90 percent of their water supply.

 

If climate scientists are correct and Lake Mead goes dry, there simply won’t be enough water for essential domestic uses, let alone fire protection. No community can conserve enough to survive on only 10 percent of its water supply.

 

We are not the only ones looking for alternatives. California just declared a state of emergency, and other Western states are scrambling to create secure water supplies. In an era of climate change, no city can afford to rely on a single source.

 

So what is the solution? Some suggest buying agricultural water from California farmers; but given the dire straits that state is in, California will inevitably take care of its own first. And let us not forget that those farm districts are among the most significant producers of winter fruits and vegetables.

 

How about desalinization, the favorite silver bullet for project opponents? The Southern Nevada Water Authority is actively working with Arizona and California on projects that will reduce the strain on the Colorado River — including desalinization projects in Yuma, Ariz., and Mexico — but lacking a coastline, Nevada would have to trade with its neighbors for any water acquired from desalinization.

 

In other words, Nevada would use the purified seawater in exchange for a share of its Colorado River water. This works only if there is sufficient water in Lake Mead to exchange, which is anything but certain.

 

I challenge the critics to present a viable alternative that can protect our community in the absence of Lake Mead.

 

Nevada has few surface water resources and must rely on ground water to help meet its needs. Currently, agriculture uses 77 percent of Nevada’s water resources, while cities and towns survive on less than one-quarter of those resources. As an aside, Dean Baker’s ranching operation draws on Nevada’s water but uses it in Utah, enriching that state’s economy. Despite that, there are still ground-water resources that can be safely developed for the benefit of Nevadans.

 

We are not working to draw on Nevada’s ground-water resources because it is easy or inexpensive; we are doing it because unless the federal government is willing to move large volumes of water over long distances into the Colorado River to make it once again a reliable supply, Southern Nevada must pursue this water.

 

A renewable water supply is available in east-central Nevada, and it can be used without destroying the environment or the communities in Lincoln and White Pine counties.

 

To that end, we entered into an agreement with the National Park Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management and the Bureau of Indian Affairs that states they will forever be involved in deciding how much water we pump at any given time, and from where.

 

At their request, we also agreed to use a hydrologic modeling program (MODFLOW) more common than Timothy Durbin’s proprietary model code — the reason Mr. Durbin’s model was not used.

 

Few people are left who don’t believe climate change will have profound effects on how we will live in the decades to come.

 

The two most daunting challenges are energy and water; both become more compelling every day in the face of an exploding global population.

 

Water managers everywhere, particularly in the American Southwest, have come to understand that their communities’ futures depend on cooperation with their neighbors more than ever before.

 

 That realization makes Utah’s behavior even more perplexing, given that the Lake Powell pipeline project delivering 130,000 acre-feet annually to St. George will significantly worsen conditions for an already drought-plagued Lake Mead.

 

We realize this new resource must be used responsibly. In addition to being a moral imperative, our nation’s laws demand that we safeguard existing water users and the environment.

 

There is no question that this supply is sufficient to protect our community from a catastrophic shortage without harming the environment. It is not an issue of whether water is available, but rather how much can be safely used each year and how it is best managed. At the same time, Southern Nevada must continue to aggressively pursue conservation, which has been vitally important to extending our community’s existing water resources and which will dramatically extend this new supply.

 

The era of simple solutions is over; the challenges facing the West in the coming decades are daunting. To meet these challenges, attitudes have to change. The future of all of our communities depends on it.#

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/jul/06/era-simple-solutions-over/

 

 

 

Water proves good resource in portfolio: More ways to invest in supply, technology

Chicago Tribune- 7/6/08



Battles over water rights for survival and economic growth were dramatically depicted in the films "Chinatown" about Los Angeles and "The Milagro Beanfield War" about the American Southwest.

The present-day story unfolding over water's future may offer opportunities for investors able to envision it as a valuable commodity that benefits companies involved in its sale, distribution, purification and infrastructure.

Corporate raider and oilman T. Boone Pickens has been buying up water rights in the Texas Panhandle in the belief that water is going to become scarce and salable. This follows the logic that climate change, shrinking lakes and rivers and population growth will make increasing portions of the world susceptible to water shortages.

With that in mind, governments and companies around the world are beginning to take steps to deal more effectively with the issue of water. The number of ways to invest in water-related companies has increased.

Most mutual funds and exchange-traded funds specializing in the sector have been, at best, flat performers over the past year. That's more than you can say for many other investments, yet there is no escaping the fact that investing is an endeavor that requires considerable patience.

"While water is the most crucial element of our lives, it has historically been cheap, and we pay little attention to things that don't cost any money," said Neil Berlant, portfolio manager of the $19 million PFW Water Fund. "Water has been largely neglected from a business and investment standpoint, but that is changing because the price of water is rising."

His fund invests in a wide range of industries related to water.

"There is really a long-term horizon for what is unfolding in the water industry, not a short-term story," Berlant said. "But I don't see anything high-risk or high-speculation in my portfolio, because I invest in growth companies with above-average prospects."

Food products that come from agriculture require irrigation and drinking water for livestock. Quality water is used in manufacturing, power generation and medical applications. Emerging markets, especially China, are putting greater demands on the water supply.

Another mutual fund, the $25 million Kinetics Water Infrastructure Fund, down 2 percent this year, includes in its stock portfolio France's Veolia Environnement SA, a giant water-treatment and waste-treatment company. The fund's recent report to shareholders noted that global spending on water continues to grow at a 5 percent to 6 percent annual rate, with further infrastructure upgrades on the horizon.

"People don't consider water a sexy industry, but it has potential for investors looking for a steady growth group," said Stewart Scharf, equity analyst with Standard & Poor's Corp. in New York.

Only about 3 percent of the world's water supply is drinkable, and much of that is in the ground or in ice, Scharf said. That is making methods of rendering undrinkable water potable, such as desalination, more popular. In addition, many of the pipes used to deliver water are old and decaying. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates $277 billion will be needed to be spent to upgrade U.S. water systems over the next 20 years, he added.

Scharf has "buy" ratings on shares of water-filtration companies Pentair Inc. and Pall Corp.

"Water investments are a way for individual investors to hedge and diversify their portfolios, perhaps investing 3 percent to 5 percent of their holdings with a long-term horizon," said Tom Lydon, editor of ETFtrends.com in Newport Beach, Calif. "What's considered a water company is not as purely focused as many people think, since it could include related things such as the technology that goes into the water supply."

With the primary growth of water-related investments currently in ETFs, Lydon points to:

•The $2.4 billion PowerShares Water Resources fund, which tracks the Palisades water index of companies in water treatment, water utilities and pipe and pump manufacturing. It is down 1 percent over the past 12 months.

•The $386 million Claymore S&P Global Water fund, which tracks the S&P global water index of water utilities, infrastructure and equipment. It is down 13 percent over the past year.

•The $34 million First Trust ISE Water fund, which tracks the ISE water index of companies that derive a substantial portion of revenue from the water and wastewater industries. It is down 6 percent over 12 months.#

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/yourmoney/chi-ym-water-0706jul06,0,3248334.story

 

 

 

Village district fighting drought

Lompoc Record- 7/6/08

With Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's recent declaration that California is in a drought, water conservation is becoming a hot topic.

 

The Vandenberg Village Community Services District is ahead of the game, offering new rebates to encourage water conservation so soon after the governor's statement.

 

“We initiated water conservation in 1996, and about a year ago we asked what we could do to expand our efforts,” said VVCSD General Manager Joe Barget.

 

So the district increased its rebate for ultra-low flow toilets to $160 per toilet, and offered two new rebates: $150 for high-efficiencey clothes washers and a “cash for grass” program that offers $2 per square foot of grass that is replaced with low-water use plants, rocks or synthetic turf.

 

With the governor's call to local water agencies to reduce water consumption, Barget said the district's efforts are coming at a good time.

 

“We were just trying to do the right thing,” he said. “Mainly we did it just to sustain the water supply.”

 

The drought the governor warned of is a result of less water in the Sacramento Delta and significantly lower snow pack in the Sierras, which means less state water.

 

But since the Lompoc area doesn't rely on state water, because it has its own groundwater supply, there is less impact - especially since the average yearly rainfall (about 14 inches) was met this year, thanks to the storms in January.

 

“We were hurting until January, “ Barget said. “But we had a high amount of rain, so January brought us up to our average.”

VVCSD Office Manager Cindy Allen said they sent out newsletters in late June describing the new rebates and already are getting calls: “Interest is picking up already.”

Because the VVCSD is seeing more water users moving into the area, specifically in the Providence Landing housing tract, it wanted to increase conservation to try to offset the new growth.

Vandenberg Village gets its water from the Lompoc Uplands Basin, one of three connected aquifers in the Lompoc Groundwater Basin. Mission Hills Community Services District also pulls water from this basin, while Lompoc pulls from the Lompoc Plains Basin.

The two districts and the city draw water from what is essentially one basin, yet there is no master conservation plan, Barget said. “But we do coordinate efforts,” he said.

That coordination includes participation in the Santa Barbara Countywide Integrated Regional Water Management Plan. Barget said that 29 county water agencies have worked together to identify over 100 water projects countywide. Of those 100 projects, the various groups agreed on 15 high-priority projects, one of which was in the VVCSD.

The State Water Resource Control Board, on June 3, approved $25 million in grants for the 15 projects, $4 million of which will go to VVCSD, which plans to use the money to help pay for upgrades to the Lompoc Regional Wastewater Plant which also serves VVCSD.Most of the projects are only tangentially related to conservation, according to Cindy Allen. “All the projects had to show water recharge benefits.” This means that each project approved must somehow result in an increase in aquifer levels.

“We'll give the money to Lompoc to cover the roughly 25 percent of our share of the costs,” Barget said.

In deciding what incentives to offer, VVCSD's Water Conservation Director Tina McManigal said she researched the types of incentives offered by other communities.

“We're trying to make conservation less inconvenient to the customers,” McManigal said.

The “cash for grass” program is the first of its kind in Santa Barbara County.

“About 60 percent of water usage is for irrigation,” Barget said. “And grass uses the most water, so any grass that can be removed will make the biggest difference.”

With a population of about 5,800 people in Vandenberg Village, Barget said that the yearly average water usage is 202 gallons of water per person per day. The peak usage is during the summer months of July, August and September, with about 60 million gallons used per month, compared to winter when only 20 million gallons are used per month.

“The biggest variable that influences how much community water is used is rain,” Barget said. “In years with little rain, water use goes up.”

For residents interested replacing grass with low-water use plants, the VVCSD has created, with the help of Miller Landscaping, a demonstration garden that showcases sustainable plants suitable for Vandenberg Village's soil and climate conditions.

McManigal said she's working on a brochure that will list plants used in the demonstration garden.

In association with other county water agencies, including the city of Lompoc, a water-wise gardening CD-ROM is being created. It will have plant lists as well as photos from local communities showing which plants are best suited for each area.

“We've already taken pictures for it,” McManigal said, “but it be next spring before we get it out.”

When it is ready, the CD will be available at the VVCSD and Lompoc offices as well as at local nurseries.

Lompoc, which has been offering water conservation rebates since 1990, has been working on added incentives as well. Some have been approved by the Utilities Commission and need only approval by the City Council, and others, such as a cash for grass program, are still in the discussion phase.#

http://www.lompocrecord.com/articles/2008/07/06/news/centralcoast/news03.txt

 

 

 

Utah-Nevada water standoff quiet, fierce

The Salt Lake Tribune- 7/5/08

By Patty Henetz

BAKER, Nev. - On moonless nights here in the Utah-Nevada borderlands of Snake Valley, the naked eye can see five planets, countless stars and the great swath of the Milky Way.

 

 Climb the hill to Great Basin National Park and one can see the nighttime glow of Las Vegas, whose leaders say their sprawling city must have the water under Snake Valley - or wither and die. And they are coming for it, making plans for a 285-mile pipeline to tap the aquifer that stretches from Salt Lake City to Death Valley and take the water south.


At the same time, Utah wants to build a pipeline on Lake Powell to suck up Colorado River water and send it northward to growing desert communities before it gets anywhere near Glitter Gulch.

 

For now, the two driest states in the nation are in a quiet standoff, fitfully negotiating or scuffing lines in the sand.

 

Eventually, though, the outcome of this tale of two pipelines, begun with an agreement struck 86 years ago to share the Colorado and now groaning under rapid population growth and climate distress, could shake the foundations of Western water law.

 

 Ask Dean Baker and Gary Perea to show you around Snake Valley and they take you to a grassy patch of federal land called Antelope Corral, where animals - perhaps coyotes or badgers - have dug a hole about six inches across to reach water a little

more than a foot down. It looks like desperation. The animals would have to force their heads or entire bodies down the hole to get a drink.

 

Not that long ago, this part of Antelope Corral was a waist-deep pond.

 

To Baker, a second-generation hay and cattle rancher, the animals' water hole stands as a fair example of what could happen to this west desert region if Las Vegas gets to build its pipeline.


Just to drive home the point, Baker leads the way up a dirt road soft as talc to a windswept 50-acre patch of scrubby sand piles and a few rusty square nails, the scant remains of a farm settled long ago. Across the road a ways is the Eskdale ranching and religious community, surrounded by a forest of tall, lush trees.


 There was a trade-off, Baker says: Loss for an individual rancher whose time was up anyway meant gains for the larger population of Eskdale, whose well pumping most likely caused the vegetation that once covered the ghost ranch to dry up and die.


At least the transaction took place within the boundaries of the community the town of Baker anchors, Baker and Perea say. It's something people here and neighbors, Utahns and Nevadans have accepted together.


But when Las Vegas tries the same logic to justify buying up water rights in this remote rural area to feed its nonstop urban growth, Baker and Perea object.


"They're taking the potential for growth in this valley down to Las Vegas," Baker says.


"We should be able to have a future and live out here," says Perea, a member of the White Pine County water district board, former county commissioner and current candidate for a new term. "There's a balance. But if you take all the water out, it's way out of whack."


The proposed Southern Nevada Water Authority pipeline could carry away 80,000 acre-feet of groundwater each year and would imperil every one of the valley's 600 or so residents, they say.


If the aquifer level drops 50 or 100 feet, which Utah water officials say is entirely possible, the roots of the sedge, rabbit brush and greasewood that hold down the soil couldn't reach the water. Dust storms could boil up from the basin and blanket the Wasatch Front, already struggling with degraded air quality.
   

 A month earlier, during an interview in her office, Southern Nevada Water Authority manager Patricia Mulroy made similar arguments against the 158-mile pipeline Utah wants to build from Lake Powell to feed growth in Washington, Iron and Kane counties.


SNWA, a coalition of five water conservancy districts, is housed in the gleaming Molasky Corporate Center in downtown Las Vegas. But even at 16 stories, the office tower is nearly lost in the chaos of red dust and cranes and construction of new casinos, hotels, residences and corporate and retail centers near the spaghetti bowl confluence of Interstate 15 and Highway 95.

 
Corporate gambling means billions of dollars to Nevada. Every new casino hotel hires 4,000 new workers, who need houses and shopping centers and schools and roads. Las Vegas' growth is Nevada's only economic engine. It needs more water, and there's plenty of money for the effort, Mulroy said.


The day of the interview, a dust storm shrouded the city. Mulroy said when she first looked outside, she thought it was fog, or something was wrong with her eyes. But that's just how it is here, she said.


Mulroy quickly ran through the talking points she has uttered repeatedly over the years to multiple news outlets in fierce defense of her arid city's future. She ticked off the historic Colorado River water-shortage-sharing agreement the seven Colorado Basin states signed last year, the effects of climate change on the river flows, the "world of hurt" Los Angeles and San Diego are in due to abysmal runoff from the Sierra Nevada, Las Vegas' dedication to better water conservation and the fact that more people work in a single Vegas casino than live in all of Snake Valley.


She brushed off Utah's concern about Snake Valley's fate should the Nevada pipeline go forward. The project won't hurt the ranchers, she said.


So, given that the Colorado River is overallocated - that is, there is far more water promised on paper than the river actually produces - given the needs of populous downstream states, given Las Vegas' imperative to grow, given that the Powell pipeline is planned for people who have yet to arrive in southern Utah, Mulroy said it would be "unreasonable" to develop the Lake Powell pipeline.


Up until now, Mulroy said, Utah has had the luxury of time, the ability to look only to its own needs. That has changed. "They have to become part of a larger system," she said.


''There's not enough water to say, 'This is mine, this is yours,' '' Mulroy said. "Neither Utah nor Nevada has time to go to court."


She smiled.
   
Winston Churchill once famously noted that observing Russian politics was like watching dogs fight under a carpet, an apt comparison to what's going on now between Nevada and Utah.

 

The states demand to have a say over each other's projects.


Indian tribes also insist that they be heard. Fermina Stevens, spokeswoman for the Elko TeMoak Band of the Western Shoshone said the Bureau of Indian Affairs in January signed an agreement that the tribe wouldn't oppose the Snake Valley drawdown. But the BIA - part of the Interior Department, which is managing the Snake Valley environmental analyses - didn't talk to the tribes first.


"The Western Shoshone people have always asserted Nevada is ours," Stevens said. "It never has been legally ceded to the United States. Except the United States is not willing to recognize that, of course."


Ona Segundo, chairwoman of the Kaibab Band of Paiutes in Pipe Spring, Ariz., said they were surprised to learn the Lake Powell pipeline would cut through their reservation. After the tribe objected, engineers working for Utah and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission moved the alignment on the map. But that doesn't mean the tribe can't weigh in.


As part of a standard federal environmental-impact study public comment period, Mulroy this month sent a letter to FERC claiming the power agency lacked expertise with the kind of environmental analyses necessary for the Lake Powell pipeline.


 In a June 19 e-mail, Mulroy told The Tribune that while "Utah is certainly entitled to utilize its apportionment" of the Colorado River, "SNWA is simply concerned about the impacts of a major water-supply project that will affect two rivers - the Colorado and the Virgin - that serve as major water supplies to southern Nevada."


 Launce Rake, a Las Vegas SNWA critic and opponent of the Snake Valley project, laughed at Mulroy's letter.


 "She's arguing there are going to be significant impacts from building a pipeline," Rake said. "Hello! Great god of irony, slay me."


 Utah lawmakers and local elected officials object to the Snake Valley proposal because they reckon the resultant lowering of the water table and ensuing dust storms would harm Utahns' respiratory health and destroy ranching in the southwestern part of the state. They want Congress to spend $6 million or more to redo the U.S. Geological Survey's study of Snake Valley basins.

 
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has said Utah lawmakers' push for further federal studies is just an attempt to grab Nevada's water.


Countered Utah Department of Natural Resources chief and former state legislator Mike Styler: "Nevada is free to do whatever it wants with its water. . . . They know any water brought to St. George will help Las Vegas because any return goes into the Virgin River."


 Building the Lake Powell pipeline, Mulroy said during the interview, will take an act of Congress. Still, Mulroy said, "there are no swords out." #

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_9791996

 

 

 

Coachella Canal Lining Project Receives Award

Desert Local News- 7/4/08

Staff and wire reports

 

SACRAMENTO, CA– GEI Consultants, Inc., one of the nation’s leading water resources, geotechnical, and environmental engineering firms, announced today that the Coachella Canal Lining Project was named the 2007 Project of the Year by the San Diego Chapter of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). As part of a multi-firm team, GEI provided design, construction management, and construction support services for the project.

 

The Coachella Canal Lining Project is a substantial accomplishment in meeting a goal of the 2003 Quantification Settlement Agreement to conserve Colorado River water. Prior to lining the last remaining earthen section of the canal with concrete, approximately 26,000 acre-feet of water seeped through the canal annually.  Now, instead of losing this precious resource through seepage, the conserved water is conveyed to San Diego for use.

 

“Water conservation, and the efficient use of water, is an important issue to California and all the other Colorado River Basin states,” said Wayne Dahl, Western Regional Water Manager for GEI, and engineer-of-record for the project. “Winning this award highlights the exceptional cooperation and resourcefulness demonstrated by the project partners to complete the project on schedule with no interruption of water deliveries to Coachella Valley growers.”  

 

The Coachella Valley Water District, the operator of the canal, was able to convey normal water deliveries during construction because the water never stopped flowing. The project team achieved this feat by constructing a new, concrete-lined canal parallel to the old canal within the same right-of-way.  

 

“The Coachella Valley Water District is pleased to receive such a prestigious award,” said Dan Charlton, Project Manager for the Coachella Valley Water District.  “The canal system has been serving Colorado River Water to the Coachella Valley for over sixty years and this construction implementation will help secure the conveyance into the future.”

 

The Coachella Canal is a branch from the All-American Canal, located near the California/Mexico border, and extends 123 miles northwest. The canal conveys about 300,000 acre-feet of Colorado River water annually, primarily for agricultural use. The $119.7 million Coachella Canal Lining Project includes a 36.5-mile concrete-lined canal, 25 inverted siphon undercrossings, one railroad crossing, six check structures, a maintenance road built from excess excavation material, and a variety of consequential environmental mitigation measures, such as the development of a 17-acre managed marsh, maintenance of the Dos Palmas aquatic habitat, maintenance of 325 acres of desert habitat, tree replacement, the installation of animal fencing and drinking facilities, and fishery mitigation.

 

The Project of the Year award recognizes a commitment to excellence in engineering for the design and construction of a high-quality, cost-effective and innovative project. The honor is based on categories such as the benefits to the well-being of people and communities, environmental mitigation, planning resourcefulness and unique construction methods.

 

The award was presented to the entire project team at the ASCE-San Diego Section Annual Awards Ceremony on May 17. The team was composed of: the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the California Department of Water Resources, San Diego County Water Authority, Coachella Valley Water District, MWH Americas, GEI Consultants, R&L Brosamer, Harvey Consulting Group, Landmark, AMEC Earth and Environmental, ASM Affiliates, and R.W. Beck.#

http://desertlocalnews.com/default.asp?sourceid=&smenu=&twindow=Default&mad=No&sdetail=4509&wpage=&skeyword=&sidate=&ccat=&ccatm=&restate=&restatus=&reoption=&retype=&repmin=&repmax=&rebed=&rebath=&subname=&pform=&sc=1423&hn=desertlocalnews&he=.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Well balanced article

Blog Archive