This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 3/5/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

March 5, 2009

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

 

 

Opinion:

On Coping With the Drought

Let's innovate and conserve

San Francisco Chronicle

 

Opinion:

On Coping With the Drought

Don't let the rain get away

San Francisco Chronicle

 

Grass-roots call for action on Delta

New group's first symposium draws nearly 300

Stockton Record

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Opinion:

On Coping With the Drought

Let's innovate and conserve

San Francisco Chronicle – 3/5/09

 

 

The ongoing struggles of managing California's limited water supply to support our cities, farms and natural environment are well known. As we face what some are calling one of the worst droughts in California history, we must all learn to conserve water wherever possible. Just as the Bay Area has long been the center of innovation in technology, today San Francisco is pioneering a new approach that encourages "water entrepreneurs" to find more cost-effective ways to reduce water use.

 

Water utility conservation efforts have often focused on residential water use through efficiency programs that promote low-flow toilets, drought tolerant landscaping and efficient washing machines, for example. Certainly, through these financial incentives, education, efficiency standards and legislative requirements, we have reduced the demand for water in many areas of California over the past 30 years. As we continue to pursue these programs aggressively, we must also look beyond our homes to the business sector to find the next significant water-saving opportunities.

 

Water use in the business sector is far more variable than in the residential sector. There are a wider variety of devices, processes and water quality needs, making businesses considerably less adaptable to a one-size-fits-all program to save water. To capture the potential savings in San Francisco's businesses, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, supported by Mayor Gavin Newsom and the Board of Supervisors, is offering cash incentives to independent efficiency experts who can identify and implement cost-effective ways to save water in the city's businesses.

 

Initial exploration of this approach has led to a number of interesting projects. A hotel converted all of its old ice machines from water-cooled to high efficiency air-cooled models, saving about 8 million gallons per year, recovering their investment within four months. A hospital retrofit of steam machines used for sterilization saved about 6.5 million gallons of water and $80,000 per year on its utility bills. And a sprout growing company is on track to filter and reuse its processed water, saving an estimated 70 percent on current water use and $100,000 per year.

 

The customers are saving money on both water and wastewater bills, and in the cases where hot water is being saved, on their energy bills as well. In each case, the businesses relied on the SFPUC's efficiency experts to identify the opportunities and provide technical support all the way through implementation. At the end of this experimental pilot program, the SFPUC estimates it will have saved 800 acre-feet of water over 10 years (or nearly 261 million gallons!) while spending 20 percent less than it would have to deliver the water in the first place. Thus, the SFPUC expects to save money while protecting the environment.

 

The program was highly cost effective for customers as well, whose investments will be fully returned through lower water bills within three months to three years.

Nobody knows how much cost-effective, "low-hanging fruit" of commercial water conservation is out there. Opportunities in San Francisco, which has little outdoor landscape irrigation and a fairly moderate climate, will be very different from those in Fresno or San Bernardino. But virtually all cities in California, as well as in many other parts of the country and the world, face serious challenges ahead as population grows and water supplies shrink. We believe offering rewards for conserving water supplies will encourage entrepreneurs to find opportunities that have yet to be pursued.

 

Public utilities normally perform the indispensable public service of providing us with adequate supplies of healthy water at a fair price. As President Obama has stated, it is not less government nor more government that most people want. It is government that delivers services most effectively. In that quest, using private incentives where they work best can help public utilities do a better job of providing clean water for homes and businesses. #

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/03/05/EDJS1681AI.DTL

 

Opinion:

On Coping With the Drought

Don't let the rain get away

San Francisco Chronicle – 3/5/09

Donn Zea is president of the Northern California Water Association.

 

Californians are accustomed to living with danger - and protecting themselves against it.

Homeowners in earthquake-prone areas carry insurance to protect themselves against financial ruin. In forested areas, homeowners clear nearby brush and trees to create defensible space and are sure to have insurance in the event that catastrophic wildfire hits their community.

 

Everyone plans for the worst - because it's the smart thing to do.

 

Unfortunately, as a state we have not planned for the worst when it comes to our water supply, especially during a warming climate.

Rather than stockpiling water as insurance against drought years, California does little to capture water to save for a "dry day." Instead, we allow water to flow from our mountains into streams and rivers, ultimately ending up in the Pacific Ocean.

 

As the water flows into the ccean, so too does our protection against drought.

 

As California leaders struggle with today's budget and economic crisis, it's easy to delay action on other important and impending crises. Yet, if we don't address these issues today, we set ourselves up for a future water crisis that would dramatically affect our economy and our personal, industrial and agricultural supply.

Some might think that recent rains mean that we can relax because the drought is over. Unfortunately, these rains are a drop in California's huge bucket. No one can forecast the future, but droughts are inevitable and we lose time - and water - by failing to increase our capacity to store it.

The lack of investment in California's water storage capability is startling.

 

Forty years ago, about 20 million people lived in California. Today, nearly twice as many people live in our state.

 

In those 40 years, much has changed - a huge influx of people who created innovative technology, an expansion of agricultural production to feed our country, and the creation of a unique and vibrant California lifestyle.

 

To keep up, we have built new highways, thousands of new schools, and countless roads to serve our increased population.

 

Not since Lake Oroville was completed in 1967 have we added any major improvement to our water storage capacity.

 

As a result, when drought hits, we have an amount of water suitable for California in 1960 - not 2009. Without increased storage, we would have little water to serve Californians during a drought or to release into our rivers to protect the fish and wildlife that depend on it.

 

A critical component to increased water storage is a proposed reservoir in Colusa County, where we are fortunate to have a natural bowl formation at the old John Sites Ranch. The California Department of Water Resources has identified this reservoir as one of the most cost-effective and environmentally beneficial alternatives for water storage in the state. DWR has included Sites in its plans for increasing water storage and states that "surface storage is particularly useful in providing drought protection."

 

Without damming a river and with minimal environmental disruption, water could be put in this new reservoir through existing canals that already come close to the property.

 

When needed, the water could flow back into the Sacramento River, helping to protect fragile river ecosystems and the delta, and providing water for Californians and our economy. The site is well above sea level so it could naturally flow downstream.

 

In total, this new reservoir could hold nearly 2 million acre feet of water - twice the surplus of Folsom Lake and about half that of Shasta Lake.

This increased water storage would help California in a drought and against possible climate change impacts. In addition, it would help our state better manage our water to prevent flooding in Northern California, particularly Sacramento.

 

Some state leaders, including Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and top legislators, have supported increased storage, including the Sites Reservoir.

As we look at another below-normal rain year, despite the recent rain, and a difficult dry summer, it is time to address this issue and not let it remain on the back burner of Sacramento's agenda.

 

The Sites Reservoir site was identified as a possible water storage location more than 15 years ago. Yet today it remains only a hope for California's water crisis.

Californians prepare for disasters - it's time for our state to get the "insurance" that water storage provides.

 

For more information or to see more details on the Sites Reservoir plan, visit www.norcalwater.org,#

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/03/04/ED051680EH.DTL

 

Grass-roots call for action on Delta

New group's first symposium draws nearly 300

Stockton Record – 3/1/09

By Alex Breitler

 

LODI - This was their day.

 

Tired of attending agency meetings where they feel their voices are not heard, Delta farmers, anglers and environmentalists had their own symposium Saturday to seek solutions and get organized.

 

"It was a big call for action," said striped bass fisherman David Scatena of Stockton.

 

Scatena became the latest member of the grass-roots group Restore the Delta, which hosted Saturday's event. About 270 people attended, making it one of the largest meetings held purely for the people who live, work or play in the Delta.

 

No government officials dictating the agenda. None of the powerful water agencies pushing for a peripheral canal. Only a diverse cross-section of Delta interests, from farmers in their boots to water lawyers in their suits.

 

"Our goal is that each and every one of you becomes a Delta advocate," Restore the Delta organizer Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla told the crowd.

 

This wasn't just about fighting a canal, although there was plenty of opposition in the room to the state's plans to funnel freshwater around rather than through the Delta.

 

Local officials presented their view on a better solution: Water conservation, flood basins to recharge sagging groundwater aquifers, collection of rain water that runs off our homes and businesses, water recycling and desalination, strategies that can make distant regions of the state self-reliant, said Tom Zuckerman, a longtime Delta landowner and advocate.

 

The gloom and doom that clouds over the Delta these days is overstated, some of those in attendance said. The risk of an earthquake crumbling multiple levees and causing mass flooding is not so great as has been claimed, Delta engineer Chris Neudeck said.

 

But the greatest emphasis might have been on how to step up pressure on the state as a process that could lead to construction of a canal speeds along. U.S. representatives Jerry McNerney, D-Pleasanton, and George Miller, D-Martinez, echoed calls for cohesiveness, even between groups that might not ordinarily see eye to eye.

 

"We need to protect this Delta, and we're going to do that by organizing ourselves," McNerney said.

 

State Assemblywoman Lois Wolk, D-Davis, said she hopes this is the beginning of a strong effort to raise the profile of the Delta.

In a 2007 survey commissioned by the city of Stockton, nearly half of the city's residents only had a vague idea or no clue at all as to where the Delta is located. Its legal outer boundary runs north to south near El Dorado Street.

 

Saturday's symposium will be followed up by a written report outlining some goals, Barrigan-Parrilla said.#

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090301/A_NEWS/903010316

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive