This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 2/27/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

February 27, 2009

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

 

Valley Latinos gain ground in California water battle

The Fresno Bee

 

Some See Splitting State as Solution

The Fallbrook Village News

 

Efficient toilets, appliances help save water

The San Francisco Chronicle

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Valley Latinos gain ground in California water battle

The Fresno Bee - Thursday, Feb. 26, 2009

 

SACRAMENTO — A new army has joined California’s water wars.

 

A group called the Latino Water Coalition is pushing for state-financed dams and canals, joining white farmers and big water districts.

 

The coalition — mostly comprising Hispanic business and civic leaders — is targeting the Legislature’s Latino caucus in hopes the lawmakers will break with other Democrats who oppose dams for environmental reasons.

Valley Latinos gain ground in California water battle

SACRAMENTO BEE FILE PHOTO

A supporter at a rally on the north steps of the state Capitol in July holds a button with a slogan used by the Latino Water Coalition. The coalition says farmworkers will bear the brunt of limited water supplies and has organized them for several rallies.

Advertisement

 

It’s a mostly personal appeal.

 

“We’re able to connect because these are individuals who, for the most part, understand the culture,” said Firebaugh City Manager Jose Ramirez, a Democrat and coalition member. “They speak our language.”

 

His farming town is reeling from the drought and pumping cutbacks at the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, the state’s water hub. In December, Firebaugh’s jobless rate was 23%.

 

Rather than quote numbers, the coalition likes to put a human face on its cause: hundreds of poor farmworkers whom they say will suffer if the state does not boost water supplies.

 

In early February the coalition sent about 60 workers to Sacramento to press their case before lawmakers. At a Capitol rally over the summer, at least 300 farmworkers marched and carried signs declaring “agua es vida,” or water is life.

The coalition is scoring some victories.

 

Assembly Member Tony Mendoza, D-Artesia, vice chairman of the 26-member Latino Legislative Caucus, said he would support a state bond that includes money for dams.

 

“I’m not from the Central Valley, but I understand,” Mendoza said. “I have family that lives there, I have relatives that live up and down the state and water is a critical issue.”

 

The Latino caucus plans to soon send a letter to Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, D-Los Angeles, and Senate leader Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, urging them to restart water negotiations.

 

Latino Caucus member Jose Solorio, a Democrat whose Assembly district includes Anaheim and Santa Ana, said the coalition is “an important new part of the debate.”

 

“It’s nice to know that the needs for water in the Central Valley extend far beyond the needs of Big Ag,” he said. Schwarzenegger has been trying to broker a water deal for two years. But Democratic leaders have balked at his $9.3 billion water bond proposal, which includes $3 billion for water storage, including possibly a dam near Millerton Lake east of Fresno.

 

The coalition supports the bond, as well as a proposed new canal to send water around the Delta to cities and farms. In the short term, they want the state and federal government to ease environmental regulations to increase pumping from the Delta. The rules are in place to protect endangered fish.

 

Environmentalists say conservation and ground-water storage are the quicker and cheaper options to boost the state’s dwindling water supplies.

 

Some groups say the Latino caucus is too focused on farms, while ignoring the clean drinking water needs of farmworker communities.

 

“I appreciate the fact that they’re going out and trying to engage folks on the ground,” but “I’m not sure they’re conveying the whole story,” said Debbie Davis, legislative analyst for the Environmental Justice Coalition for Water based in Oakland.

 

The Latino coalition was formed in 2006 after a meeting in Selma between Valley Latino leaders and Gov. Schwarzenegger. The governor “encouraged us to put together a coalition and spread the word,” said Mario Santoyo, assistant general manager of the Friant Water Users Authority.

 

“The water world has not been a world where there’s been great diversity of people,” Santoyo said. “There’s only a few Latinos in that world. I always felt kind of lonely.” #

 

http://www.fresnobee.com/local/story/1226116.html

 

Some See Splitting State as Solution

The Fallbrook Village News – 2/26/09

Joe Naiman

 

While most Californians lament that the state is broke and many criticize a broken system, an organization formed primarily by agricultural interests seeks tobreak up the state.

 

Citizens for Saving California Farming Industries (CSCFI) have proposed dividing California into a primarily coastal state and a primarily inland state.

 

The eastern portion would include 45 counties, including San Diego and Orange, while the western portion would cover 13 counties between the Los Angeles basin and the Bay Area.

 

“We’ll be able to manage what kind of revenue we’re getting,” said CSCFI chief executive officer and president Bill Maze.

Maze, who lives in Visalia, has seen the impact of the state’s problems both from county and state government positions.

He was in the California State Assembly from 2002 to 2008 and spent the previous 10 years on the Tulare County Board of Supervisors.

 

“They [the state] hold local government – cities, counties, and other special districts – hostage,” he said.

 

Maze saw a polarization of political parties while in the state legislature and also saw the results of a redistricting process intended to preserve incumbents rather than to represent citizens.

 

His Assembly district was the largest geographic state Assembly, House of Representatives, or House of Delegates district in the continental United States.

 

It covered 33,000 square miles including Highway 99 through the San Joaquin Valley, Twenty-Nine Palms and part of Lake Havasu and reached both the Nevada and Arizona state borders.

 

The passage of Proposition 11 in last November’s election may mitigate some of the gerrymandering of legislative districts, but Maze feels that the political process is still present.

 

“We’ve all had these little ‘plans’ to fix how we design the districts,” he said. “All of them still have political input into them.”

 

Those who represent large geographical districts often complain not only about the relative lack of political power compared to urban legislators but also about their inability to represent a variety of constituencies.

 

The diverse state constituency is seen as a need for two separate states.

 

“To me the final straw that broke the camel’s back was the passage of Proposition 2,” Maze said.

 

Prop. 2 addressed the housing conditions of poultry. Animal rights activists saw Prop. 2 as improving the welfare of agricultural birds while farmers doubt they can remain economically competitive with imported egg production.

 

“They’re going to put them out of business in California and we will lose tens and tens of thousands of jobs,” Maze said.

Although Prop. 2 passed on a statewide basis, it was rejected in 41 of California’s 58 counties.

 

“You have these kind of voting numbers of basically agriculturally uneducated city dwellers,” Maze said. “That’s the way we see this thing.”

 

The split would likely make the eastern portion of California a politically conservative state while making the coastal area a liberal state.

 

The general conservative politics of San Diego and Orange counties, along with strong agricultural economies, led to the placement of those coastal counties into the eastern state.

 

“It’s all the agricultural base of it as well as what has been more rational commonsense thinking,” Maze said.

 

Ironically, the type of conservative politics in the two states could be different.

 

While urban conservatives often focus on social issues, rural conservatives place more emphasis on local government, and water issues are also more important in the decisions of rural voters and legislators.

 

Maze was born in Woodlake and grew up in Exeter. He and his wife are both graduates of Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, which would be part of the western state.

 

While that would give the western remnant an agricultural college, Yolo County and the University of California Davis would be part of the eastern state, as would Fresno State University, University of California Merced, Cal Poly Pomona, and University of California Riverside.

 

“We can be very self-sustaining, self-supporting,” Maze said.

 

Maze also noted that the retention of the Port of San Diego, as well as river-accessible ports in Stockton and Sacramento, would allow for commercial transportation to the mostly inland state.

 

The deficit of the Los Angeles basin and the Bay Area wouldn’t be the problem of the eastern state.

 

“They’re getting the lion’s share of the state budget as well as having almost exclusive control of what the outcomes are,” Maze said.

 

The current population of what would be the coastal state is approximately 18.4 million while the population of the 45 counties slated for the primarily inland state totals approximately 19.6 million.

 

Currently a State Assembly district has a population of approximately 480,000 while a State Senate district contains more than 900,000 residents.

 

Maze isn’t averse to a unicameral legislature for the new state (currently Nebraska is the only state with only one legislative chamber) and feels that a part time legislature is a possibility in the eastern state.

 

“We ought to be thinking about how we change the whole legislature up there,” he said.

 

The proposed new state does not yet have a specific name, although Grand California has been mentioned as well as East California.

 

CSCFI had a booth at a farm show in Tulare in February and between 5,000 and 6,000 people dropped by on February 10.

 

Maze noted that the response in the San Joaquin Valley is approximately 95 percent supportive.

CSCFI will utilize an initiative ballot measure to divide the state.

 

“You think this legislature in California is going to get anything done?” Maze said. “This will be by the initiative process.”

The initiative, if sufficient petition signatures are collected, will likely be on the 2012 ballot. “It takes a long process here,” Maze said.

 

The actual petition process timeline could place the initiative on a 2010 ballot, but CSCFI will hold seminars and other educational forums throughout 2009.

 

Individuals will be identified to be county coordinators in each county; at this time no San Diego County or Riverside County coordinator has been identified.

 

The outreach will extend to other business groups in addition to the agricultural origin.

 

“People can really think about it,” Maze said. “Let’s really create some change to this state.” #

 

http://www.thevillagenews.com/story/36049/

 

Efficient toilets, appliances help save water

We're talking about a toilet here.

 

Specifically, the Toto toilet - a water-efficient commode made by Japanese company founded in 1917.

 

The toilet's legendary power-flush engineering has garnered fans for decades. But water experts say Toto and others like it which use as little as 1.28 gallons per flush, aren't just novelties or stylish accessories: They're a key component of water conservation in California.

 

Peter Gleick, of Oakland's Pacific Institute and the world's leading expert on global freshwater supplies, contends that if every Californian replaced their high-flow toilet, 40-gallon-per-load clothes washer and old, inefficient dishwasher, collectively they could save untold sums of water.

 

Other technology, from water recycling to desalination, holds promise as well. But everyday appliances still represent the low-hanging fruit of water conservation.

 

"We're faced with the reality of a diminished water supply in California that's going to force us to realize there are smarter uses of water available," Gleick said.

 

Using less water to flush is not a novel idea.

 

But as California struggles with an ongoing drought, crumbling water infrastructure and environmental restrictions on water diversions from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, water agency managers are looking for every advantage.

 

Many have tried to entice customers to swap out aging toilets or 40-gallon-per-load washers with rebates of $100 or more. These days, the customers are making the first move.

 

"There's an insatiable appetite for this stuff right now," according to Dan Carney, water conservation manager for the Marin Municipal Water District. "Because the technology is so much better, people are just thrilled."

 

Each generation has seen improvements in the amount of water used for flush toilets. In the 1930s and '40s, toilets used about nine gallons, Carney said.

 

From there, water-per-flush decreased to seven gallons, then five, 3.5 then to 1.6. While the low-flow 1.6-gallon toilets did mark a sea change in the bathroom, some of those toilets were known for requiring, uh, two flushes. The latest common toilet requires 1.28 gallons per flush. But there are already some that use just one gallon (waterless, or composting, toilets exist, too, but aren't as popular).

 

Most large manufacturers make high-efficiency toilets - Kohler, American Standard and Toto.

 

And while some buyers have been downright disappointed with clogs, high prices or even "fit," there are many low-flow toilet junkies out there.

 

On one Web site devoted to toilet reviews, a commenter wrote, "We just replaced two twenty-two year old toilets, which required 2 to 3 flushes before everything went down, with two (high-efficiency toilets from Toto). Is it possible to fall in love with a toilet? One flush ... gone! Clean bowl, very quiet, and only 1.6 gallons."

 

Frank Brown, who's been in the plumbing business in San Francisco for four decades, said more property owners are asking for low-flow toilets following audits of their systems.

 

"They say, 'The city has been out to my house and shown me how much water I'm wasting,' " Brown said. "They're concerned about the water shortage, and they want to keep saving."

 

Still, low-flow or high-efficiency toilets aren't cheap. Switching an old commode for a high-tech toilet costs about $550 on average, Brown said. (Fixing damaged flooring or sewer connections adds more to the costs).

 

In these days of wallet-watching, fewer consumers may opt to take the plunge, even with municipal incentives. Over the long-term, however, they may pay in other ways. If California's dry spell continues, for instance, many agencies may raise water rates.

 

That's when many more people may jump on the low-flow bandwagon, Brown said#

 

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/26/BARD164VN4.DTL

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive