This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS -WATER QUALITY-2/25/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

February 25, 2009

 

4. Water Quality –

 

Mining companies agree to pay $3 million for Lava Cap Mine cleanup
U.S. District Court approves final settlement
YubaNet.com

 

Richmond sewer spills nearly 1 million gallons into Bay

The Contra Costa Times

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Richmond sewer spills nearly 1 million gallons into Bay

The Contra Costa Times – 2/24/09

By Mike Taugher

Signs were posted at several shorelines and parks in Richmond warning that water might be contaminated with harmful bacteria after nearly 1 million gallons of runoff and raw sewage overflowed and spilled into the Bay.

 

Sunday's rainstorm flooded into cracks and leaks in the city's sewer collection system and overwhelmed the capacity of a sewage treatment plant, causing an estimated 890,000 gallons of untreated water to spill out of the sewer system near the Richmond marina.

 

The company that runs Richmond's sewer system estimated that the water was 90 percent stormwater and 10 percent raw sewage, a figure that state water quality regulators did not dispute.

 

Keller Beach, Brickyard Cove, Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline, Sheridan Point, Vincent Park, Shimada Friendship Park, and Point Isabel were all posted with the warnings, said Sherman Quinlan, Contra Costa County's director of environmental health.

 

Quinlan added that the sewage was highly diluted by rain and water in the Bay and probably does not pose much of a health threat.

 

"I strongly believe the impact is minimal," Quinlan said.

 

The warnings are expected to be lifted after test results show safe levels of bacteria. The first test results were expected back late Tuesday.

 

Sewage spills during heavy rain are common in much of the Bay Area. Old, leaky pipes take in more rainwater than the systems can handle.

 

The company that operates Richmond's sewer system disputed the characterization of the event as a spill.

 

"A spill implies a preventable event," said Mark Grushayev, program manager for Veolia Water. "This is an overflow. The system is designed to overflow to the Bay instead of to the streets and houses."

 

State water quality regulators, who have the authority to issue fines, said they were investigating.

 

"We're looking into the spill and collecting information," said Gina Kathuria, a senior engineer at the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board.

 

Also during the storm, an East Bay Municipal Utility District wet weather station at Point Isabel discharged 2.3 million gallons of sewage into San Francisco Bay. That station collects, screens and disinfects overflow before removing chlorine and sending it into the Bay, said EBMUD wastewater director David Williams.

 

Williams said that until last month, the Oakland-based utility was not required to report such discharges if the wastewater was successfully screened and disinfected. But a legal settlement reached last month requires the district to come up with a plan to eliminate the partially treated discharges and to report them.#

 

http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_11776705?source=rss

 

Mining companies agree to pay $3 million for Lava Cap Mine cleanup
U.S. District Court approves final settlement
YubaNet.com – 2/25/09

By: U.S. EPA

 

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 24, 2009 - The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California approved a $3 million settlement today between the U.S. Department of Justice, on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, and settling defendants Newmont Capital Limited and Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited to resolve liability at the Lava Cap Mine Superfund Site in Nevada County, Calif.

The EPA and DTSC will split the settlement proceeds based on their proportionate share of total past and future costs to cleanup the site -- estimated at just under $50 million, with $1.86 million to be paid to the United States and $1.14 million to be paid to DTSC.

To date, the EPA has spent more than $21 million at the site to clean up mine tailings and waste rock, collect and treat contaminated water from the mine, and divert the flow of clean surface water around contaminated tailings.

"Taxpayers are still paying for the legacy of the California gold rush -- the contaminated land and water that remain and continue to pose a health risk," said Keith Takata, the EPA's Superfund Division director for the Pacific Southwest region. "The EPA stepped in to clean up the mine waste, and we're pleased that Newmont is taking responsibility for its portion of the costs to repay the taxpayer's money."

Newmont Capital Limited and Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited -- two associated corporations -- owned and controlled the mine from 1983 - 1986, in a failed attempt to reopen the mine. Based on the Newmont entities' limited three-year association with the site and lack of active mining or exploration projects, the United States and DTSC believe that the $3 million settlement is fair and reasonable and consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, also known as the Superfund.

The United States and DTSC lodged the proposed consent decree with the District Court on September 12, and opened up a 30-day public comment period starting on September 19. After the close of the comment period, the United States sought entry of the decree as a final judgment. Today, the U.S. District Court agreed and entered the settlement.

In other efforts to recover cleanup costs at this site, the United States and DTSC filed a lawsuit against alleged former owner and operator Canadian-based Sterling Centrecorp Inc., and current owners Stephen P. Elder and Elder Development, Inc., seeking to recover the EPA's and DTSC's combined past costs of over $22 million as well as their future costs associated with the mine cleanup.

The Lava Cap mine, located 5 miles southeast of Nevada City, Calif., began gold and silver mine operations in 1861. From 1934-1943, the mine was one of the largest gold mines operating in California producing approximately 300-400 tons of ore a day. The mine was shut down in 1943 by Executive Order from the War Production Board, which prohibited production of non-strategic metals during World War II.

The mining operations resulted in waste rock and a mill tailings pile at the site. Mill tailings, also known as rock flour, are extremely fine-grained materials with high concentrations of arsenic that are easily suspended in water and susceptible to being carried downstream.

In January 1997, the upper half of the log dam built on the property to hold the mill tailings in place collapsed -- discharging over 10,000 cubic yards of arsenic-contaminated tailings into Little Clipper Creek, which spread downstream to Clipper Creek and Lost Lake and accumulated in the sediment and surrounding soil.

The EPA conducted a removal action in 1997 and 1998 to address the tailings release, stabilize the remaining tailings pile, and improve drainage. The Lava Cap Mine site was placed on the Superfund National Priorities List in January 1999. The NPL is the EPA's list of hazardous waste sites potentially posing the greatest long-term threat to public health and the environment.

In September 2004 EPA issued its cleanup plan for the mine area and has since removed the tailings and sediment along Little Clipper Creek and consolidated this waste with the existing mine tailings, constructed a cap for the tailings pile, and replaced the failed log dam with a rock buttress. The EPA recently issued its cleanup plan to address the arsenic-contaminated drinking water wells, which will be implemented in 2009. The EPA also expects to issue its proposed plan in 2009 to address the large tailing-deposits located along a mile and a half stretch of the creek downstream of the mine.#

 

http://yubanet.com/regional/Mining-companies-agree-to-pay-3-million-for-Lava-Cap-Mine-cleanup.php

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive