This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 2/22/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

February 22, 2008

 

3. Watersheds

 

INVASIVE SPECIES:

Column: Invasive species threatening local waters - Sierra Sun

 

Quagga mussels a growing threat to Arizona water systems - Lake Havasu News Herald

 

YUBA RIVER ISSUES:

Yuba fish woes spawn lawsuit; Complaint filed in 2006 is amended - for fifth time - Marysville Appeal Democrat

 

RESTORATION OF STEELHEAD RUN:

Matt Stoecker's plan is to set the steelhead free to get back to Corte Madera Creek - San Francisco Chronicle

 

WATERSHED ISSUES:

Guest Column: It's Fish Trivia Time; What's happened to our salmon? - Napa Valley Register

 

 

INVASIVE SPECIES:

Column: Invasive species threatening local waters

Sierra Sun – 2/22/08

By Bruce Ajari, Gone Fishin'

 

The California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) recently released a press release regarding its concern about the New Zealand Mud Snail (NZMS) — an invasive species that was first found in the Owens River in Mono County in 2000.

Since that time the tiny snails have been confirmed in numerous other waters within California. According to Susan R. Ellis, DFG Invasive Species Coordinator, “New Zealand mud snails are just one of the many non-native invasive species that are impacting our natural resources.”

The DFG is appealing to the general public to help prevent further spread of the snails. Anglers and others who frequent California waters are asked to thoroughly clean all gear that comes in contact with the water prior to moving to another location.

In addition, individuals who are visiting state fish hatcheries should be careful to remove waders that have been in contact with affected waters before entering hatchery grounds.

NZMS reproduce rapidly and can crowd out native insects that aquatic wildlife depend on for their survival. The snails have now been found in the following waters and county since their discovery in 2000: Hot Creek (Mono); Bishop Creek Canal (Inyo); Lone Pine Creek (Inyo); Media Creek (Los Angeles); Lindero Creek (Los Angeles); Malibu Creek (Los Angeles); Solstice Creek (Los Angeles); Segunda Descheca Creek (Orange); Trabuco Creek (Orange); Piru Creek (Ventura); Putah Creek (Yolo); Lower Calaveras River (Calaveras/San Joaquin); Mormon Slough (San Joaquin); Lower Mokelumne River (San Joaquin/Sacramento); American River (Sacramento); Rush Creek (Marin); Lower Napa River (Napa); San Lorenzo River (Santa Cruz); West Antioch Creek (Contra Costa); and Alameda Creek (Alameda).

Most recently, it has been confirmed in Lake Shasta as well.

It is believed that NZMS spread to new river systems primarily by humans, although it is also possible that wildlife plays a role. Anyone who frequents lakes, rivers and streams can inadvertently move mud snails to new locations and therefore should clean their gear. For example, the snails can attach to debris and mud left on waders and survive for weeks in these moist conditions. When an angler or anyone else who has contaminated equipment visits a new stream, the snails can deposit there.

The snails form colonies that disrupt the base of the food chain by consuming algae and competing with native bottom-dwelling invertebrates. A population decline of invertebrates (small aquatic insects, or trout food) can follow the introduction of NZMS, which reduces fish forage. With a decrease in food availability, fish populations can decline as well.

NZMS can grow as large as one-quarter inch but are often much smaller and are parthenogenic or able to start a population with only one snail. NZMS have the potential of extraordinary population densities — up to nearly one million snails per square meter and comprising up to 95 percent of the invertebrate biomass of a river.

It is believed that population in New Zealand is kept in check naturally by a native parasite. In North America, however, native stream communities can be altered because the snail has no natural predators or parasites and its populations have flourished where they have been introduced. It is not believed that they can eradicated once established.

Here are some steps that the DFG recommends taking if you have been along a stream that is known to have NZMS:

• Have extra waders and boots for use in infested waters only. Store them separately.

• After leaving the water, inspect waders, boots, float tubes, boats and trailers, dogs and any gear used in the water.

• Remove viable snails with a stiff brush and follow with a rinsing.

• If possible, freeze or completely dry out wet gear before reuse.

• Never transport live fish or other aquatic animals or plants from one body of water to another.

Quagga and Zebra mussels that first invaded North America in the Great Lakes region have also been getting a lot of coverage in the media lately. Quagga mussels were found in the Colorado River in early 2007 and later in several bodies of water in San Diego and Riverside counties. Both of these species of mussels, which are native to Caspian Sea and Black Sea watersheds, are of great concern because of their ability to cause severe damage to the natural environment as well as to power plants and water supply intakes.

Invasive species are having a huge impact on our resources nationwide. Please exercise great care when you are out enjoying the great outdoors and be aware of accidentally transporting these unwanted visitors.

Threat is real for Lake Tahoe
The threat to Lake Tahoe waters remains real with at least some plans put in place to prevent the invasive mussels from making their way here.

An agricultural inspection station at Interstate 80 in Truckee and four others now looks for quagga and zebra mussels on boats coming into the state. This was made possible through a $2.5 million grant from the California Department of Food and Agriculture.

The Tahoe Resource Conservation District is hiring watercraft inspectors for the upcoming boating season to patrol Lake Tahoe waters. Also, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency has looked at buying a portable boat-wash station, which may be up and running by the end of July. #

http://www.sierrasun.com/article/20080222/SPORTS01/811758876

 

 

Quagga mussels a growing threat to Arizona water systems

Lake Havasu News Herald – 2/21/08

By John Rudolf, staff writer

 

In January 2007, the first quagga mussels were discovered in Lake Havasu. In the year since, the fingernail-sized mollusks have exploded in numbers, reproducing with unprecedented speed and threatening to cause untold damage to the interstate water distribution systems that pull water from the river at the south end of the lake.

As they spread, the invasive mussels may also pose a danger to local fish populations. As filter feeders, they pull sediment out of the water, letting more sunlight through and leading to algae blooms, which can hurt fisheries.

The mussels, native to Eastern Europe, arrived in the Great Lakes in the 1980s, where they eventually caused billions of dollars in damage to power companies and local economies. First spotted in Lake Mead early last year, the mussels have been found to reproduce three times faster than they do in the East, likely due to the Southwest’s warmer climate.

The ultimate impact of the mussel invasion is yet to be seen, but biologists warn that the creatures, which can attach to virtually any surface, have the capability to clog pipes and valves at hydroelectric dams and pumping plants.

“All the Colorado River users who take water from the river are going to be dealing with these issues,” said Dr. Ric de Leon, microbiology unit manager for the Metropolitan Water District, and head of the district’s quagga mussel control program. “These mussels grow to very high numbers, so as a water conveyer, it becomes an issue that they will begin interfering with water conveyance,”

In Lake Havasu, the invasive mussels are attaching themselves to the intake valves of the Metropolitan Water District’s Whitsett Intake Plant, which distributes water to 18 million people in Southern California. For several months, workers from the plant have been donning wetsuits to clean the valves, blasting away the creatures with high-pressure hoses.

“Some areas will have hundreds per square meter,” said de Leon. “Other areas will have in the thousands per square meter.”

Lake Havasu City’s water supplies, however, are not threatened, said city spokesman Charlie Cassens. “Fortunately the city does not have any significant water infrastructure in the lake that could be compromised by the quagga mussel,” Cassens said.

The city has only one intake pipe that draws raw water directly from the river. The rest of the city’s municipal water is drawn from groundwater that appears to be effectively filtering out the mussels’ larva.

That pipe, which supplies irrigation water mainly to golf courses during peak water use in summer months, may eventually have to be abandoned, Cassens said.

Mussels have been detected at Parker Dam, at the south end of Lake Havasu, but so far have not caused any major problems, said Bureau of Reclamation spokesperson Robert Walsh. “There are definitely quagga mussels at Parker Dam, but it is important to note that they are not affecting the plant’s water release or power generating operation,” Walsh wrote in an e-mail.

Last November, the Bureau hired an outside consultant to study the quagga mussel problem at Parker, Davis and Hoover dams. “That assessment indicated that the quantity of mussels and their apparent rate of growth is much greater at Parker Dam than at either Davis or Hoover dams,” Welsh wrote.

The study noted that the water supply intakes on the face of the dam were at risk of mussel settlement and growth, as well as other exterior and interior equipment.

The quagga mussels — a close relative to the zebra mussel — spread with such great rapidity due to their unique reproductive system. Unlike native mussels, which depend on an intermediate host species to achieve reproduction, the zebra and quagga mussels simply release their gametes into the water to breed. “They’re prolific, and they have this host-independent reproduction system, and that makes them very effective,” de Leon said.

California’s Fish and Game Department has launched an aggressive effort to prevent the further spread of the mussels into the state. Since being detected in the Colorado River Aqueduct system, which serves 26 municipalities in southern California, the quagga has spread to at least five reservoirs and several other lakes in California. “Any water body or water system that receives raw Colorado River water has been contaminated with the quagga,” said Alexia Retallack, spokesperson for California Fish and Game. Over the last year, border protection stations run by the California Department of Food and Agriculture have checked 82,964 boats entering the state. The purpose of the checks is to ensure that boats have been properly drained of water before they enter California, and that no mussels have attached themselves to parts of the boat.

The mussels can survive between three to five days out of water, during the summer, depending on the temperature, and as long as 30 days out of water in the winter.

So far the checks have netted 104 boats contaminated with quagga mussels or their larvae, which feel like sandpaper on smooth surfaces.

Biologist recommend completely draining all boat parts that can hold water, including bilges, live wells and motors, and waiting five days between visits to separate lakes. #
http://www.havasunews.com/articles/2008/02/21/news/doc47be38e850490934881849.txt

 

 

YUBA RIVER ISSUES:

Yuba fish woes spawn lawsuit; Complaint filed in 2006 is amended - for fifth time

Marysville Appeal Democrat – 2/21/08

By Andrea Koskey, staff writer

 

Environmental groups have amended a lawsuit demanding two federal agencies do more to correct fish migration obstacles in the Yuba River.

A 2006 lawsuit filed by the South Yuba River Citizens League and the Friends of the River was amended last week because the groups do not believe the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the National Marine Fisheries Service are doing enough.

The groups are trying to help three endangered fish — Chinook salmon, steelhead and green sturgeon — that use the Yuba River to swim past Daguerre Point Dam and Englebright Dam so they can spawn.

"Doing nothing is not an option at this point," said Steve Evans, conservation director for Friends of the River. "But that's what the corps is doing. They're absentee owners."

The groups say they want the Army Corps and the Fisheries Service to begin looking at ways to make ease fish migration up the river. The Army Corps declined comment.

National Marine Fisheries issued a 2002 biological opinion on all rivers and watersheds in the Central Valley, saying dams would "not jeopardize the continued existence of the species."

The opinion expired in 2007, but an extension of the document has been requested.

The suit, filed in federal court in Sacramento, said the opinion listed four reasonable measures to aid the fish but did not list a timeline.

Last week's filing, which runs 50 pages, was the fifth amendment to the 2006 suit.

"They had an opportunity to amend opinions and start the process to find a solution but they didn't," Evans said. "Daguerre Point Dam impedes as much as 40 percent of the salmon in the river."

Recent studies have shown a decline in fish populations throughout California.

Jason Rainey, South Yuba River Citizens League executive director, said the groups are asking the federal agencies to develop a solution.

The Yuba County Water Agency is a defendant, but Evans said "they are not after the agency."

Rainey said fish are not the Water Agency's main responsibility, and it should be in the hands of the federal agencies.

Both environmental groups are part of the Yuba River Accord, which regulates river flows to help the fish.

"The salmon can't benefit from the accord if they can't get up the river," Evans said.

YCWA General Manager Curt Aikens said the agency has done more than any other agency to help fish migrations, including the increase of flows to help fish habitat.

"A collaborative approach is a better way to solving problems than a lawsuit," Aikens said. "The Yuba County Water Agency has been the leader in the collaborative process to resolve fishery issues. Being grouped in with other agencies is frustrating." #

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/news/fish_60641___article.html/lawsuit_river.html

 

 

RESTORATION OF STEELHEAD RUN:

Matt Stoecker's plan is to set the steelhead free to get back to Corte Madera Creek

San Francisco Chronicle – 2/22/08

By Sam Whiting

 

Searsville Dam has held back San Francisquito Creek for about 115 years. It won't make 125 if Matt Stoecker can get it torpedoed to let the steelhead finally come home. Stoecker, 32, is a biologist from Portola Valley.

 

"Searsville Dam is located within the San Francisquito Creek watershed, which drains through Portola Valley and Woodside, down through Palo Alto and Menlo Park into south San Francisco Bay. The dam is owned by Stanford University. It was initially built to divert water into the Crystal Springs Reservoir to supply drinking water to San Francisco and other communities on the Peninsula.

 

For several years it was used for irrigation on the campus. It was a recreation facility for the early to mid 1900s.

 

There were concerts. Joan Baez played there, I think. She still lives right across from the preserve. In the mid-'70s Stanford turned it into Jasper Ridge Biological Preserve, which is over 1,000 acres. They shut down public access.

 

When I was in high school I used to sneak into the preserve to fish.

 

A steelhead is a rainbow trout that's been to the ocean. The rainbow trout are still in Corte Madera Creek, the main tributary to San Francisquito Creek. Those are the ancestors of steelhead. Because of the dam, steelhead can no longer get up into Corte Madera Creek but the trout are still there. Given the opportunity, those fish will head downstream, become steelhead and repopulate Corte Madera Creek on their own.

 

Stanford, ironically, has this Jasper Ridge Biological Preserve that is harboring this dam and reservoir that is one of the most negative ecological impacts in the whole watershed. The dam is about 65 feet tall and well over 200 feet wide. The reservoir is 10 percent of what it used to be in terms of its water storage capacity due to all the trapped sediment. This artificial reservoir is full of exotic fish like bass and crappie, catfish, bullfrogs. Stanford has done studies and you can see the non-native fish species are spilling over the dam and migrating down San Francisquito Creek. These fish are eating and competing with steelhead and other native fish and wildlife.

 

I formed Beyond Searsville Dam in early 2007, as an advocacy group. I'm trying to raise money to support an unbiased feasibility study on removing the dam. If you go to steockerecological.com you can see photos of the dam and underwater photos of steelhead in San Francisquito Creek that I've taken.

 

Within Stanford there is disagreement about Searsville. The biologists and professors teaching ecology have a different viewpoint than the facilities manager. Stanford definitely wants to preserve its water rights, but there's a way to remove the dam and have Stanford maintain and even improve its water rights.

 

Stanford has a unique opportunity here to be good stewards of the watershed and also to become leaders in this emerging field of dam removal. They can be one of the first institutions in the world to study the full ecological response of dam removal and how an ecosystem restores itself. It just takes them studying dam removal as a viable option, which they have not done thus far. Removing the dam would restore a valley and gorge that is currently submerged.

 

I haven't fished in Jasper Ridge since high school. I hope within my lifetime I'll be able to see steelhead upstream of the dam. I don't need to fish for them. Seeing them is enough."

 

The Lightbulb: I was downstream of Searsville Dam fishing and I saw a huge silver fish jump out of the water and bounce off the dam two times. I figured out it was a steelhead that had been to the ocean and come back, and couldn't swim home to spawn. The idea was to remove the dam and welcome steelhead back to Portola Valley and Woodside. #

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/22/CM87TPK78.DTL&hw=water&sn=003&sc=481

 

 

WATERSHED ISSUES:

Guest Column: It's Fish Trivia Time; What's happened to our salmon?

Napa Valley Register – 2/22/08

By Guy Carl, CPA and partner with BDCo Accountants and Advisors in St. Helena

 

In recent weeks, California’s dwindling salmon populations have received a lot of press. It’s been rumored that this year’s salmon fishing season might be canceled altogether.

Our various species of salmon, along with their relative — the steelhead trout — are among California’s most cherished native fish. Our state has an impressive list of native species, but many of our favorite game fish were actually introduced from other parts of the world.

Here’s a little quiz. Which of the following fish are native to California?

• Largemouth Bass

• Smallmouth Bass

• Striped Bass

• Rainbow Trout

• Brown Trout

You might be surprised by the answers:

• Largemouth Bass

California’s lakes boast some of the finest bass fishing in the nation.

The next world record is expected to come from one of them. But just 120 years ago, not a single largemouth lived here.

The first planting came in 1891 using bass from a lake in Illinois. The bigger Florida-strain largemouths were introduced in 1959, giving rise to trophy bass fishery we enjoy today.

• Smallmouth Bass

Could the bronze-backed brothers of the largemouth be native Californians?

Nope, they came from the state of New York.

Interestingly, California’s first smallmouth bass were introduced in 1874 into our very own Napa River.

But apparently the local fishermen were a little too skillful, and the bass were fished out before they could take hold.

Smallmouths were later introduced into other nearby waters, and now have healthy populations in many lakes throughout northern California.

• Striped Bass

Able to survive in fresh, salt, or brackish waters, stripers seem a perfect fit for the San Francisco Bay region.

That’s what officials thought back in 1879 when they transported 132 small stripers from New Jersey to be planted near Martinez.

Striped bass now can be found throughout the bay, delta, and most major rivers which flow into the system.

They have also been successfully planted in several reservoirs, including Lake Mendocino near Ukiah and San Luis Reservoir outside of Los Banos.

• Rainbow Trout

Stocked in waters across the United States and in locations throughout the world, the rainbow trout is the most famous native Californian in fishing circles.

Originally they were found in the same streams which support steelhead trout, with the only difference being that the rainbows do not swim out to the ocean like the steelhead.

Over the decades, fish hatcheries have performed extensive genetic engineering to the species so anglers will find them more “attractive” (i.e. bigger and easier to catch).

• Brown Trout

One of my personal favorite pursuits, the brown trout is not even native to this continent!

These ferocious fish immigrated to California from Europe in 1893.

They have found life here quite to their liking, and have developed a healthy wild population in numerous mountain lakes and streams.

All of these species, both native and non-native, have done very well in California and provide wonderful recreational opportunities for our anglers.

But in retrospect, should all those foreign fish have been introduced into our waters in the first place?

Could there be a price to pay for tinkering with Mother Nature’s designs?

The Kern River’s native California golden trout are one species which would be much happier if we humans hadn’t meddled in their business.

Thanks to us, brown trout first appeared in the lower reaches of the river and eventually worked their way upstream.

Browns compete with other trout for habitat and, being the larger and more aggressive species, have also become a major predator of the Kern’s goldens.

A series of wire and concrete barriers have been constructed at several points on the river just to keep the browns downstream.

Rumor has it the browns are still finding ways through.

Perhaps even more of a concern on the Kern is the introduction of hatchery-raised rainbow trout.

Rainbows are not native to this river.

They compete in much the same way as do the browns, but the rainbow’s genetics are similar enough to the golden’s that they will actually interbreed with each other.

Large sections of the river now contain only these “hybridized” trout, with the pure golden trout genes only found in the upper reaches.

I can’t help but wonder if non-native species are threatening our salmon and steelhead in much the same way as the browns terrorize the Kern’s golden trout.

The Sacramento-San Joaquin delta is home to strong populations of both largemouth bass and striped bass.

Young salmon and steelhead must pass through this gauntlet on their way out to sea, whereas 120 years ago these predators did not exist here.

The Napa River’s steelhead (along with the few remaining salmon) face a similar issue with the stripers which populate the river’s lower reaches.

Could it now be just a matter of time before our new “recreational opportunities” completely displace the native species in our waters? #

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2008/02/22/columnists/guy_carl/doc47be6913863ca678280255.txt

####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive