This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 2/4/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

February 4, 2008

 

3. Watersheds

 

DELTA ISSUES:

Guest Commentary: Time for a modern Delta policy - Contra Costa Times

 

Guest Commentary: It's our water; Delta report revives long-standing North-South feud - Vacaville Reporter

 

VENTURA RIVER FISH LADDER IN USE:

Fish spotted using $9 million fish ladder - Ventura County Star

 

INVASIVE SPECIES AND LAKE CASITAS:

Water district to hold meeting on boating - Ventura County Star

 

CEQA ABUSE:

Editorial: CEQA's being hijacked; where are the enviros?; Environmental groups watch silently as special interests misuse state's key statute - Sacramento Bee

 

 

DELTA ISSUES:

Guest Commentary: Time for a modern Delta policy

Contra Costa Times – 2/2/08

By George Miller, D-Martinez, represents California's 7th District in the U.S. House of Representatives

 

State and federal water policies have pushed the Delta to the breaking point by diverting hundreds of millions of gallons of water from the Bay estuary to giant agricultural operations and cities across the state.

 

Water policy has always been controversial, but until recently not many Californians paid attention to where our water went or how it was used.

 

But now that our native fisheries are in a tailspin and the government's plans for managing the Delta have been ruled illegal, people are more focused on the Delta than ever.

 

It's a fact that the government ignored scientific evidence and breezed past the devastating environmental impact of the water diversions from the Delta. It is clear that the fragile ecosystem has given all it can give, and something must be done.

 

A congressional hearing in Washington looked into some of these issues last week.

 

Before we launch any extremely expensive schemes to pipe more water from the Bay-Delta we should take a look at the antiquated policies that distort how we use this important resource.

 

We may find that we can reduce a lot of the strain on the system just by modernizing water policy.

 

To begin, we should immediately end the subsidies that have been promoted by the farm lobby since the early 1900s.

 

The way the system is set up, massive cotton farms in the Central Valley are encouraged to sign long-term contracts for water at discounted prices -- subsidized by federal taxpayers.

 

On top of that sweetheart water deal, the government adds millions of dollars in crop subsidies. But that's not all. In fact, taxpayers and the environment pay again and again: The water itself often becomes these farms' most valuable commodity, as water contractors make huge profits reselling scarce water to cities and counties that need it more than they do.

 

Why should the federal government sell through a middleman instead of directly to the real users of our precious water?

 

Choosing subsidized crops over the health of the Delta is illogical and unsustainable. Eliminating unnecessary and distorted subsidies will help us put the state's water to better use. With our diverse economy and growing population, we have better uses for this water than shipping it to where it's no longer needed at a price we can no longer afford.

 

In addition to ending these out-of-control subsidies, federal agencies that have helped hurt the Bay-Delta should be forced to comport with environmental protections and the state's vision for the region.

 

Until a recent court ruling, the Bush administration's attitude was that no matter the science, no matter the law and no matter the effect on fish and wildlife, the diverting of millions of gallons of water from the Delta would continue unabated. That approach must end.

 

We should instead emphasize the development of "new" water that doesn't put further strain on fragile watersheds.

 

As California's landmark investments in energy efficiency and conservation have paid enormous dividends through the years, so too will state and federal investments in groundwater cleanup, water recycling and increased water-use efficiency. And if federal agencies can't help water agencies in California develop water without overtaxing the Delta, the time may have come to take the reins away from them.

 

One idea worth considering is to follow the model of the California Coastal Commission, which has the power to force federal agencies to comply with California's goals for coastal management and restoration.

 

Those of us who enjoy the natural resources of California and depend on its reliable water supply have a responsibility to future generations. Although there's no easy way to balance the goals of a sustainable water supply and a healthy Bay-Delta, we can start by correcting some of the decades-old policies that just don't hold water. #

http://www.contracostatimes.com/columns/ci_8149784?nclick_check=1

 

 

Guest Commentary: It's our water; Delta report revives long-standing North-South feud

Vacaville Reporter – 2/3/08

By Pat Snelling, Vacaville resident and freelance writer who follows water issues

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's Blue Ribbon Task Force released its report this month, and it brought back to surface many of the same old problems we addressed back in the 1970s.

 

The task force, called "Delta Vision," said it would come up with new solutions to the dwindling population of Delta smelt, but instead it came up with the same old argument: Who is left to maintain the Delta if Los Angeles gets its fresh water from Northern California?

 

The Delta is a fragile ecosystem. It encompasses the major rivers that carry fresh water coming down from the Sierra snowpacks, channeled by a maze of aging levees which pool into some of the richest habitat critical for more than 500 species before it flows into the ocean water that fills the San Francisco Bay.

 

The flow of fresh water coming through the Delta keeps the ocean saltwater from contaminating the surrounding land and the aquifer below the ground.

 

Schwarzenegger set up the Delta Vision Task Force after a court order shut down the Tracy pumps, citing the danger to the Delta smelt, whose numbers were dropping to critical levels.

 

This interrupted a major source of water for Southern California, already feeling the effects of a shrinking supply of water from the Colorado River and Owens Valley.

 

But Southern California's population continues to grow, and so do its needs.

 

Needless to say when the Tracy pumps were shut down, the governor decided the Delta Vision team need to look into the matter.

 

The task force's report said California needs to collect more water during wet years and hold onto it down in Southern California. It also talks about building a better "linkage" between the source (the Delta) and the storage (some place down south). It sure sounds like a concept that almost split this state in half a few years back: The Peripheral Canal.

 

The task force did everything to avoid calling it that.

 

Solano County residents always get a little skittish when someone mentions "Peripheral Canal."

 

In the late '70s, when Northern California was in the middle of a major drought, Solano County residents were told to ration their water, while Southern California residents didn't have to.

 

In fact, Southern California called on its political influence to keep the Tracy pumps shipping fresh water south because it said farmers and residents in the south needed their water, too.

 

As a result, ocean water began seeping deeper into the Delta, and area farmers found salt water leaching into their water supplies.

 

The relationship between the north and south soured when Northern California residents, using water restrictors in their showers, putting bricks in their toilet tanks to reduce water and watching their landscaped yards die because for lack of water, would turn on their televisions and see a Malibu resident hosing down his driveway with the very water denied to Northern California residents.

 

The battle became so heated, there was even talk about splitting the state in half.

 

Now with the serious danger to the Delta smelt population and all of the wildlife that they support, the Blue Ribbon Task Force appears to be solely focused on alternative waterways for the residents in the south without looking at the environmental impact on this fragile ecosystem in the north.

 

Despite all the work this Blue Ribbon Task Force did, it failed to see the impact a different link would have on the salinity in the Delta channels if the water were captured upstream. It didn't discuss the impact less water would have on the sloughs. It didn't mention how to protect the valuable wildlife preserve.

 

Farmers are concerned about what will happen when government officials leave them to fight an aging levee system alone.

 

The report doesn't even address the farmers put out of business because salty water would be allowed to rise.

 

A few years ago, a major levee failed and Jones Island near Stockton was flooded. The Department of Water Resources stepped up the fresh water release coming out of the mountains to hold back the ocean water until the levee could be repaired. The report does not discuss what would happen if we had another levee failure such as that.

 

After all the struggles Solano County has gone through to protect its residents and environment, is it too much to ask that the Delta Vision Task Force give just as serious consideration to our concerns about the Delta as they have given those major cities downstream?  #

http://www.thereporter.com//ci_8157273?IADID=Search-www.thereporter.com-www.thereporter.com

 

 

VENTURA RIVER FISH LADDER IN USE:

Fish spotted using $9 million fish ladder

Ventura County Star – 2/3/08

 

An underwater camera snapped a photo last week of what biologists believe is the first steelhead trout of the year to pass through a fish ladder on the Ventura River.

 

The first of two fish was spotted swimming upstream on Thursday, through the $9.5 million fish ladder built to allow fish to go around the Robles Diversion, which sends water to Lake Casitas.

 

Though steelhead and rainbow trout are hard to differentiate, biologists think this was an endangered steelhead that came from the ocean because of its large eye size and its 21-inch length.

 

"This is exciting news," said Casitas Fisheries Biologist Scott Lewis.

 

A day later, a 25-inch fish also thought to be a steelhead was seen swimming upstream through the ladder.

 

After last year's dry weather, when no fish were seen swimming upstream, officials are hoping many more steelhead will swim up from the ocean and into the upper reaches of the Ventura River. #

http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2008/feb/03/fish-spotted-using-9-million-fish-ladder/

 

 

INVASIVE SPECIES AND LAKE CASITAS:

Water district to hold meeting on boating

Ventura County Star – 2/3/08

 

The battle date has been set.

 

On March 4, the Casitas Municipal Water District will hold a hearing on whether to close Lake Casitas to outside boats in order to protect it from invasive mussels.

 

In anticipation of a large crowd, the meeting will be in the Nordhoff High School cafeteria, which holds 400 people. It will start at 5:30 p.m., when experts on the issue are expected to speak followed by comments from the public.

 

The issue of closing the popular fishing lake has been a contentious one since the board started addressing the problem in the last few months.

 

Some members of the board fear that the mussels could be transported to the lake on boats and could do severe damage to the district's ability to delivery water.

 

One proposal to protect the lake is to close it to outside day-use boats. #

http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2008/feb/03/water-district-hold-meeting-boating/

 

 

CEQA ABUSE:

Editorial: CEQA's being hijacked; where are the enviros?; Environmental groups watch silently as special interests misuse state's key statute

Sacramento Bee – 2/2/08

 

With shameless abandon, lawyers and monied players are abusing the state's premier environmental law – the California Environmental Quality Act.

 

Lawmakers enacted CEQA in 1970 so citizens could identify development projects that posed an unacceptable environmental impact, and change them or challenge them. Over the years, various interests have hijacked this law for nonenvironmental purposes, and conservation groups have looked the other way.

 

All of us know about "neighborhood groups" that have exploited this law to prevent construction of affordable housing. Corporations have used CEQA in an attempt to stifle competition. An example is the Westfield Corp., the Australian owner of the Downtown Plaza mall, which is now suing the city over its approval of the railyard development, slated to bring new retail and housing to downtown.

 

Labor unions are an even larger abuser of CEQA. In recent years, labor groups have used environmental lawsuits, or the threat of such suits, to stop or slow down power plant construction, hospital expansions and housing developments. The unions' lawyers always seem to disappear once a developer has signed an agreement to hire only union labor.

 

Critics call this practice "greenmail," a polite term for legal extortion. The combined effect is to drive up the cost of new houses, hospital beds and other projects, with little or no benefit for the environment.

 

Consider the example of William Kopper, a former mayor of Davis. Kopper is suing, or threatening to sue, the railyard, the Greenbriar project in Natomas, Placer Vineyards and the Yuba Highlands project in Yuba County over alleged CEQA violations. Kopper won't disclose his clients, but his history is well known.

 

In the late 1990s, the Mid-Valley Trades Council hired Kopper to challenge the impacts of a proposed auto raceway in Yuba County. After the trades council reached agreement with the developer, Kopper dropped his objections. "I wasn't authorized to do any more work on it," Kopper told The Bee.

 

A few years ago, Kopper sued to halt Roseville's westward expansion. The lawsuit was dropped after developers signed a project labor agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 340, the United Association Local 447 and the Sheet Metal Workers Local 162.

 

Oddly, environmental leaders in California have remained mum on this hijacking of environmental law. Their silence reflects a marriage of convenience between labor and environmental groups and, possibly, some financial entanglements.

 

For several years, a group called California Unions for Reliable Energy has used CEQA to slow or block power plants, including a geothermal plant in Imperial County. As it happens, CURE employs a law firm founded by Tom Adams, the current president of the California League of Conservation Voters.

 

Defenders of CEQA should be outraged. They also should be worried. As the abuses and misuses mount, they create ammunition for industry groups that would like to see California's landmark law revoked or seriously weakened.

 

Greenmail hurts CEQA's credibility. Why are leading environmentalists complicit with their silence? #

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/681073.html

####

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive