This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 2/7/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

February 7, 2008

 

2. Supply

 

TEST WELLS:

Bureaucratic tussling centers on county wells - Inside Bay Area

 

SANTA ANA RIVER WATER:

Deal creates shared facilities near Seven Oaks Dam, more water stored - Riverside Press Enterprise

 

LAKE OROVILLE RELEASES:

DWR uses variety of factors to determine water releases - Oroville Mercury Register

 

WATER RIGHTS ISSUES:

Redlands reverses course on water-reimbursement plan - Riverside Press Enterprise

 

 

TEST WELLS:

Bureaucratic tussling centers on county wells

Inside Bay Area – 2/7/08

By Julia Scott, staff writer

 

MOSS BEACH — It's been a long time since residents didn't have to worry about water flowing in Moss Beach and Montara. Residents rely on wells sunk deep into the earth — and pray they don't dry up.

 

Water has been so scarce for customers of the Montara Water and Sanitary District, in fact, that new water connections have been prohibited for the last 30 years.

 

That may change very soon. This week, the water district began drilling a 600-foot test well in Moss Beach that, together with another well they recently commissioned in the foothills of Montara Mountain, might cause new water connections to flow for the first time since the 1970s.

 

That's not the only good piece of news for beleaguered locals, for whom a good water connection is essential to maintaining property values. Some residents have resorted to digging their own wells, only to watch water pressure fluctuate and sometimes even fail.

 

On Dec. 19, a Santa Clara County Superior Court judge granted the Montara Water and Sanitary District immediate possession of three wells under the Half Moon Bay Airport, over the objections of San Mateo County, which runs the airport, and the Federal Aviation Administration, which controls it.

 

The water district felt the need to initiate eminent domain proceedings against the county to ensure guaranteed access to the wells, which supply about 60 percent of the district's water to customers.

 

The wells run along a grassy strip near the outer boundary of the airport parallel to Highway 1. They are sunk deep into the bowl of a large coastal aquifer that runs from the hills down to the sea.

 

In 2003, the water district discovered that the permit under which it had leased the land since 1943 could be canceled on six months' notice. That caused the California Department of Health Services to deny the district a $5 million loan to finance several badly needed upgrades. Eventually, the water agency concluded the only solution was to own the wells.

 

George Irving, general manager for the Montara Water and Sanitary District, called the judge's transfer of title a victory.

 

"This means that 60 percent of our water supply is safe forever," he said.

 

Not so fast, according to Chief Deputy County Counsel Deborah Penny Bennett. The Santa Clara County Superior Court still needs to rule on whether the water district has the right to take land by eminent domain that the county claims is actually controlled by the FAA.

 

"The FAA regulates the property, and the predecessor to the FAA transferred the property to the county with the condition that it could only be used for airport purposes," Bennett said. "We still believe that the county cannot give it away without running the risk that the federal government can take it back."

 

The county's argument was dealt a blow when the Superior Court ruled that the FAA was not a necessary party to the litigation, which prevented the case from being heard in federal court, as the county would have wished. The case was moved from San Mateo County Superior Court to Santa Clara County Superior Court at the request of the water district.

 

No trial date has been set, although the parties will begin mediation talks in the next two months.

 

If they had their way, the water district would use very little of the well water drawn from the aquifer under the airport. It's contaminated with nitrates and tricresyl phosphates. The latter come from a gasoline additive old airplanes once used.

 

"The airport water requires more treatment, and it's farther from storage. It has a higher per-unit cost to run the electrical pumps. It's not as good a water as the Alta Vista water," said Irving, referring to the well the district commissioned in October.

 

Once it obtains a permit from the California Coastal Commission, the Alta Vista well has the potential to pump 150 gallons a minute, or 6.5 million gallons a month from its depths. If the new test well the water district is drilling in Moss Beach fulfills its promise, water might flow again to new homes in one of the fastest-growing areas of San Mateo County. #

http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_8194211?IADID=Search-www.insidebayarea.com-www.insidebayarea.com

 

 

SANTA ANA RIVER WATER:

Deal creates shared facilities near Seven Oaks Dam, more water stored

Riverside Press Enterprise – 2/7/08

By Jennifer Bowles, staff writer

 

Efforts to capture more water from the Santa Ana River took a step forward Wednesday when Inland agencies agreed to share recharge basins below the Seven Oaks Dam near Highland to allow them to store more water underground.

 

The deal is part of a larger effort to drought-proof the Inland region and make it less dependent on imported supplies that are gripped by drought and legal restrictions. Santa Ana River water can then be sent to homes and businesses for drinking and other purposes.

 

Under the agreement, 65 acres of recharge basins -- ponds that collect water that then percolates into aquifers - - owned and operated by Redlands-based San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District would be used by the San Bernardino Valley Water Municipal Water District and Riverside-based Western Municipal Water District, which serves the western half of Western Riverside County.

 

The deal, however, hinges on the State Water Resources Control Board approving rights of the two water agencies for the additional water that would collect behind the dam. Spokeswoman Kathie Smith said the board should vote on those permits by June. The permit process started in 1991.

 

Environmental groups had also asked the board to consider saving some river water for the endangered species that live below the dam and require occasional flooding to maintain their habitat. The Santa Ana sucker that lives farther downstream also would benefit.

 

"That was something the state board was wrestling with ... how to ensure that the resources were not shortchanged or impacted by" the water districts' request, said Ileene Anderson, ecologist with the Center for Biological Diversity.

 

Under the agreement signed Wednesday in San Bernardino, the two water agencies would pay the conservation district for operation and maintenance costs when water is percolated for them, said Marv Shaw, general manager of the conservation district.

 

John Rossi, general manager of Western Municipal, said eventually more recharge basins would be constructed, but this agreement allows the water-savings to start sooner.

 

Rossi said the agencies wanted to come to an agreement to show the state water board that they have the ability to do something with the water.

 

"We'd rather store it for another day than see it go out to the ocean," Rossi said.  #

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_C_water07.412d26a.html

 

 

LAKE OROVILLE RELEASES:

DWR uses variety of factors to determine water releases

Oroville Mercury Register – 2/6/08

By Mary Weston, staff writer

 

When storms are forecast, California Department of Water Resources hydrologists like Tracy Pettit study precipitation tables, consider water storage rules and use formulas to calculate how much water should be released from the Lake Oroville Dam.

 

How much water DWR releases into the Feather River from Lake Oroville during the flood season depends on some rather complex calculations and rules but boils down to how much runoff is expected and how much space will be needed in the reservoir to accommodate runoff from rain and melting snow.

 

Pettit, of the DWR Division of Operations and Maintenance, said the U.S. Corps of Engineers Flood Control Plan outlines how much flood space has to be retained in the lake to hold various amounts of runoff.

 

"The wetter it is, the less water we can store,' Pettit said. "The dryer it is the more water we can store."

 

Flood watch runs from Sept. 15 to the end of June. During this potential flood season, DWR monitors how much water is stored in the dam compared with the Corps of Engineer's flood regulation rules for storage.

 

When the lake level (actual storage) is greater than the flood regulation rules for storage, water is released according to the flood regulation storage rules.

 

For example, when a storm is coming, Pettit would consider how much water is already in the lake, how much water is expected from rain—and/or from melted snow during a warm storm, and how much flood space will be needed.

 

She also considers how much water other agencies will be releasing into the Feather River, including in Yuba County and from Bullard's Bar, and she coordinates with other agencies such as the Corps of Engineers.

 

The expected amount of runoff from rain is calculated with a formula using the precipitation tables from the Feather River Basin, which contain current rainfall amounts and rainfall from past years.

 

Lake Oroville has a maximum storage capacity of 3.5 million acre feet. Required storage space can range from 375,000 to 750,000 acre feet during a flood season. During a very wet year or during the wet part of a season, needed flood space could rise to the maximum 750,000 acre feet.

 

So subtracting the maximum flood space of 750,000 acre feet from the maximum capacity of the reservoir of 3.5 million acre feet means the reservoir could retain a little more than 2.7 million acre feet during high runoff. In a dry part of the flood season, the storage could be increased to about 3.1 million acre feet.

 

When lake levels are low, such as the end of January when the lake was at about 1.3 million acre feet, no extra water is released except as required.

 

The Department of Fish and Game since 1983 has required minimum releases of 1,250 cfs into the Feather river.

 

When lake levels do need to be reduced to provide flood space, the rate that water is released into the river depends on factors such as how much water is being released by other agencies.

 

"We have a lot of coordination during flood season," Pettit said.  #

http://www.orovillemr.com/news/ci_8190411

 

 

WATER RIGHTS ISSUES:

Redlands reverses course on water-reimbursement plan

Riverside Press Enterprise – 2/6/08

By Michael Perault, staff writer

 

Redlands city officials have reversed a decision made two weeks ago, opting not to explore whether the city's water utility should pay $17 million to the general fund for use of Mill Creek water rights over the past 80 years.

 

City Council on Tuesday decided to suspend two contracts approved on a split vote last month. The contracts called for two consulting firms to study how the water department could finance reimbursement to the general fund and whether it would require a rate increase for water users.

 

Councilmen Mick Gallagher and Jerry Bean opposed the move to hire consultants to study the reimbursement initiative. Mayor Jon Harrison and council members Pat Gilbreath and Pete Aguilar voted in favor of the contracts but have since had a change of heart. On Tuesday, they voted to suspend the contracts.

 

That was welcome news to city resident Eric Fraser, who had criticized the reimbursement proposal and called it a "backdoor attempt" to generate revenue.

 

The city was considering the reimbursement because in 1926 its board of trustees, as the City Council was then known, authorized $525,000 in bonds to purchase Mill Creek water rights. Officials wanted to see whether the city water department, which provided the water to residents, could repay the city's general fund for its use of the water.

 

City Manager N. Enrique Martinez said he and city staff are seeking creative options to generate revenue. The money would have been spent on improvements to streets, curbs and sidewalks, not for salaries.

 

Opponents called the plan an attempt to raise taxes without taxpayer approval. They claimed it would have forced property owners to pay again for water rights they already owned.

 

"The debt service for those bonds was paid for by each of the individual property owners within the service area of the utility," Fraser told council members Tuesday evening.

 

Harrison said he appreciated the staff's effort to explore revenue-generating options, but he had concluded "that this is not the right recommendation at this particular time."

 

Gilbreath seconded a motion to cancel contracts with Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates to provide financial advice, and with Best Best & Krieger to provide bond counsel services. But she said a legal analysis of the reimbursement issue still is needed.

 

Consultants would have determined whether reimbursement could come from a sale of assets to the water utility through a bond issue, lease or other financing alternatives.

 

Bean said he worried such a proposal would diminish the public's trust in city leaders.

 

"It's obvious we do have needs in the city, and they have to be addressed by either finding traditional sources of revenue or perhaps going to voters for a tax," Bean said. "We have to come up with a solution on how to get the budget back on track." #

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_B_breverse07.4251dcc.html

####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive