This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 2/22/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

February 22, 2008

 

2. Supply

 

WEEKEND STORM IN CENTRAL VALLEY:

Big storm to blast region; Wind gusts up to 70 mph expected when worst of it hits Saturday afternoon - Sacramento Bee

 

SNOWPACK ISSUES:

Sierra snowpack triple 2007's total - Visalia Times Delta

 

WATER BANKING:

More questions on AVEK water bank EIR; SCE and air district express concerns - Mojave Desert News

 

WATER SUPPLY ISSUES:

Editorial: A local water war - Long Beach Press Telegram

 

COLORADO RIVER ISSUES:

Valley water is safe from Vegas raid; Official: 'There is no plot in Nevada to shut down California agriculture' - Desert Sun

 

Editorial: California, neighbors must manage water with care - Desert Sun

 

 

WEEKEND STORM IN CENTRAL VALLEY:

Big storm to blast region; Wind gusts up to 70 mph expected when worst of it hits Saturday afternoon
Sacramento Bee – 2/22/08

By Matt Weiser, staff writer

 

Sacramento Valley and Sierra residents should prepare for another high-intensity storm this weekend that will bring strong winds along with heavy rain and snow.

 

Unlike the Jan. 4 storm, when wind gusts topped 80 mph and caused long power outages, this new storm won't be quite as powerful but it may last longer.

 

Forecasters say residents should plan for gusts above 50 mph for nearly a 24-hour period starting at 1 p.m. Saturday, with peak winds as high as 70 mph. The Valley could see as much as 2 inches of rain by Sunday night, while Sierra passes could see more than 2 feet of snow.

 

"The whole weekend's a washout," said Elyssa Lynn, senior meteorologist at the state Department of Water Resources. "Power outages are a possibility for that extended period of time. Learn your lesson from that storm in early January."

 

The National Weather Service on Thursday issued a high wind watch and a winter storm watch covering nearly the entire weekend.

 

The weather today should be relatively calm. Residents are urged to use the break to tie down or store loose objects in the yard and around the house, stockpile extra food, candles, blankets and batteries, and prepare for power outages.

 

The Valley's main rivers should not see flooding problems because reservoirs still have ample storage.

 

Localized stream and urban flooding are possible depending on how the storm develops. Clearing street drains and gutters will be good preparation.

 

"It's looking kind of messy," said Cynthia Palmer, a weather service meteorologist in Sacramento. "The precipitation will move in on Saturday and increase in intensity late Saturday afternoon and evening. Overnight will not be pleasant."

 

A gale warning is in effect along much of the Northern California coast. The shore near San Francisco and Monterey Bay could see swells as great as 25 feet.

 

The storm is particularly strong, Lynn said, because it stretches all the way across the vast Pacific, drawing moisture and boosting wave intensity as it comes.

 

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District is monitoring the storm, spokeswoman Dace Udris said, with two crews put on short notice for emergencies and more available if conditions worsen.

 

"If staffing needs to be readjusted as the storm comes in, we'll go ahead and do that," she said. #

http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/730944.html

 

 

SNOWPACK ISSUES:

Sierra snowpack triple 2007's total

Visalia Times Delta – 2/22/08

By Hilary Meeks, staff writer

 

This year’s snowpack is three times larger than last year’s — good news for those disappointed by 2007 lake levels.

“Last year it was pretty grim,” said Frank Gehrke, snow surveys coordinator with the California Department of Water Resources.

Cold January storms dumped loads of snow in the Sierra Nevada range east of Visalia, he said. Currently, the snowpack near Visalia is about 85 percent of the seasonal average — the amount normally recorded by April.

Average snowpack depth translates to 22 inches of water, officials said. Last year at this time, the “snow-water” equivalent was 8 inches.

The Valley’s water supply could use an above-average snowpack by season’s end, Gehrke said.

“A lot of the reservoirs have gone down,” he said. “Because of that, we like to have quite a bit better than average snowpack to refill the reservoirs.”

The first few weeks of February saw disappointing snowfall, Gehrke said. But a weekend storm is expected to pack a wallop.

Between 4 and 7 inches of snow were expected Thursday night, with 1 to 2 feet more expected at higher elevations Saturday and Sunday, said meteorologist Kevin Durfee with the National Weather Service in Hanford.

Snow could fall as low as 4,200 feet on Sunday, he said. The storm also will affect Visalia. Saturday is expected to be cloudy and mild, with an 80 percent chance of rain Sunday.  #

http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080222/NEWS/802220328

 

 

WATER BANKING:

More questions on AVEK water bank EIR; SCE and air district express concerns

Mojave Desert News – 2/21/08

By Bill Deaver, staff writer

 

ROSAMOND — The Kern County Air Pollution Control District (KCPCD) and Southern California Edison have joined critics of an environmental document prepared for a water banking scheme proposed by the Antelope Valley/East Kern Water Agency (AVEK) west of Rosamond.

 

The complaints from SCE and KCAPCD are the latest criticism and concerns leveled at the draft environmental impact report (DEIR) AVEK has circulated. The agency wants to develop a water bank around 60th Street West and has encountered opposition from residents, Kern County Planning Dept. officials, and others.

 

In a letter to AVEK, KCAPCD chief David Jones complained that the district, which is responsible for managing ir quality in East Kern, was ignored in the consultation phase of the study and has not received a copy of the DEIR.

 

Jones also noted that the DEIR for the project, which is in Kern County, does not appear to have been prepared in accordance with Kern County guidelines.

 

Location questions

 

Both the KCAPCD and SCE letters raise questions about the location of the proposed facility, which they say are not clearly spelled-out in the DEIR.

 

The SCE letter, written by Cathy Hart, the company’s Antelope Valley public affairs region manager, complains that “the Draft EIR does not provide a clear project description...”

 

Hart also notes that the study ignores potential impacts to existing and planned SCE power lines in the area.

 

It also ignores potential impacts to birds that would be attracted to the area by water and could be killed by wind turbine blades. And it ignores “cumulative” impacts to a private water bank west of AVEK’s plus a proposed wind energy projects, Hart’s letter said.

 

“The (DEIR) must address all potential impacts to SCE facilities,” 

Hart wrote AVEK.

 

Air quality questions

 

Jones said the DEIR doesn’t contain information to help the district determine air quality emissions during construction and operation, nor does it “address the project’s contribution to greenhouse gases.” 

Jones’s letter listed 10 items of concern involving air quality questions not addressed in the DEIR.

 

“Due to the deficiencies in you DEIR, we cannot make a determination of whether the project will pose a significant impact,” Jones concluded.

Despite all of the questions raised by the project and the DEIR, AVEK board members have already purchased the land for the water bank and plan to lease it back to the farmer they bought it from.

 

A privately-developed water bank further west of the AVEK project does not appear to have the problems associated with the AVEK effort. #

http://www.desertnews.com/mdn/story4.html

 

 

WATER SUPPLY ISSUES:

Editorial: A local water war

Long Beach Press Telegram – 2/22/08

 

The issue is so complicated most people don't realize it, but cities in the Long Beach area just lost a water war. The big winners were L.A. and San Diego.

 

The losers aren't feeling any pain yet, but they probably will in the next drought. A water allocation plan approved last week by the Metropolitan Water District tips the balance heavily in favor of L.A., San Diego, Orange County and fast-growing Inland Valley communities.

 

The MWD, eager to keep the peace among its municipal water customers, says there isn't really any problem, but we're not so sure. City officials and the heads of water agencies say otherwise.

 

It's not about supply, as Long Beach Mayor Bob Foster says, it's about money. Under the new plan, residents of cities in the Long Beach area would pay a bigger share proportionately than L.A. and the faster-growing areas. Water bills could go up in Long Beach as much as 22 percent, in addition to any MWD rate increase (and a substantial increase is coming). Foster says the new plan doesn't follow practices laid down in state law.

 

MWD officials say, soothingly, that the new plan spreads drought-related water cuts as evenly as possible. But local officials say that in a drought Long Beach and others would need more water than allocated, and would be penalized financially.

 

MWD sells water imported from the Colorado River and Northern California to 26 cities and water agencies in Southern California's six counties. Its 37 board members have 192,196 weighted votes, and cast 176,523 of them in favor of the allocation plan. (The outcome was lopsided because just three members, L.A., San Diego and Orange County, have a total of 100,000 votes.) The only ones voting against the plan were Long Beach and the Central Water Basin, which serves 30 communities including Lakewood, Downey, Paramount and Compton.

 

What can the losers do about it? Not much: Try to change the law (good luck), sue, or just assert the legal rights they thought they had and let the winners sue.

 

Creating an allocation to benefit L.A. is particularly galling to Long Beach, which imposed a water-rationing educational campaign that has reduced usage 8 percent, while L.A. has done very little. If all communities in the region would reduce usage 10 percent, it could wipe out the region's current water deficit.

 

Problems are coming, for sure. Even assuming a normal rainfall, the MWD will draw down its water reserves this year by as much as 30 percent. Last year it was 20 percent. At that rate, there won't be reserves for very many more seasons.

 

Long Beach Water Department has a plan to free itself from having to buy imported water within 10 years or less: increase water recycling, implement its proprietary desalination system and, of course, continue to promote conservation.

 

Others would be wise to do some of the same, and soon. #
http://www.presstelegram.com/opinions/ci_8328905

 

 

COLORADO RIVER ISSUES:

Valley water is safe from Vegas raid; Official: 'There is no plot in Nevada to shut down California agriculture'

Desert Sun – 2/22/08

By Keith Matheny, staff writer

 

Despite what the mayor of Las Vegas says, no one will raid Coachella and Imperial valley farmers' water to maintain big-city needs.

 

So said leaders of two of the largest providers of urban water in the western United States on Thursday.

 

Instead, the agencies are focusing on cooperative efforts, more conservation and finding new water sources.

 

They hope that will be enough in the face of challenges such as continuing drought, court-ordered supply cuts to protect endangered fish and population growth.

 

"There is no plot in Nevada to shut down California agriculture," said Patricia Mulroy, general manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority, which delivers water to 2 million customers in and around Las Vegas.

 

Tensions in the agriculture-vs.-urban water debate were stirred last week when Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman indicated valley farmers would face a water crisis before Sin City ever would.

 

"No one is going to allow us to dry up," Goodman said at a Feb. 14 news conference following a study indicating that Lake Mead, where Las Vegas gets about 90 percent of its water, could dry up by 2021.

 

"The Imperial Valley farmers will have their fields go fallow before our spigots run dry," Goodman said.

 

That raised the ire of valley farmers and water officials.

 

"Those are fighting words," said Nicole Rothfleisch, executive director of the Imperial County Farm Bureau.

 

Fallowing is a sensitive issue in Imperial County. The Imperial Irrigation District in 2003 entered into a 75-year agreement to provide San Diego with water, in part through fallowing. This year, 20,000 acres of farmland will be unused as part of the program.

 

Though farm owners are compensated for their participation, it has profound ripple effects, Rothfleisch said. Sixty percent of landowners are absentee, she said, so fallowing does not necessarily benefit the tenant farmers who actually live in the community and shop in local stores.

 

It also impacts those who support the farming industry: fuel providers, harvesters, tractor repair shops and fertilizer and seed providers.

 

One result is higher prices, as farm-support businesses try to make ends meet or competition lessens as some leave the market, Rothfleisch said.

 

"Anything that drives the cost of farming up is a great concern," she said.

 

Lake Mead report questioned

 

The Lake Mead report from San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography found the major repository for the Colorado River water that sustains much of the Southwest could dry up because of current use and global warming.

Mulroy questioned the study and called the probabilities of such a water catastrophe "slim."

 

But Vegas is working to get more of its eggs out of the Lake Mead basket.

 

The authority is developing unused groundwater supplies from eastern and central Nevada, expected to provide up to 125,000 acre-feet of additional supply per year, Mulroy said. And that amount can be doubled because the authority would reuse all of that water, she said.

 

One acre-foot provides a typical Coachella Valley home enough water for a year.

 

Southern Nevada is working cooperatively with its neighbors on water-banking, Mulroy said. Through an agreement, it pays Arizona to store unused Colorado River allotments in the Arizona Water Bank, a vast underground aquifer.

 

Nevada can then use that water when it needs it, at agreed-upon drainage rates.

 

The authority is also banking 20,000 acre-feet of its unused river water in California, she said.

 

"To start declaring war on one another makes absolutely no sense - we'll all go under," Mulroy said.

 

Solving needs

 

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California provides water to more than 17 million Californians in Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties.

 

The district is also solving its water needs through diversifying supply, conservation and cooperative partnerships, assistant general manager Roger Patterson said.

 

Blythe area farmers voluntarily fallow portions of their fields to create water supply under one program, he said.

 

They can fallow up to 30 percent of the land in the Palo Verde Irrigation District, under the agreement. Metro Water pays farmers up-front for signing into the program and a per-acre fee when the water is actually diverted, Patterson said.

 

That will produce 111,000 acre-feet of water for cities and other uses, he said.

 

"You can do a lot when you take the voluntary approach, rather than the hardline approach," he said.

 

Programs to line with concrete the Coachella and All-American canals, causing less absorption loss, also freed up water.

 

Metro Water has paid $200 million to Imperial Irrigation District since the 1980s for programs to improve farming efficiency and water conservation, Patterson said, giving to Metro the water saved.

 

Using less

 

Both Southern Nevada and Metro emphasized their conservation efforts.

 

The Nevada authority has spent $100 million on turf-removing, Mulroy said. That and other conservation efforts have meant the authority now uses 45,000 acre-feet less water than it did six years ago, despite increasing population by 400,000 people, she said.

 

"Our board just approved another 23-percent rate hike to encourage conservation," she said. "We're serious about it."

Metro is producing 800,000 acre-feet of water per year through conservation - more water than it got off the Colorado River last year, Patterson said.

 

Metro officials can also go out on the spot market to buy water from farmers or districts who may have some to spare, such as rice farmers in Northern California, Patterson said.

 

That's costlier, but possible, he said.

 

Desalination technology, removing salt from ocean and briny groundwater, remains in the works, though widespread usability is still far off, Patterson said.

 

The lower basin states along the Colorado River - California, Nevada and Arizona - reached agreements last year with the federal Bureau of Reclamation on how to partition the river water in times of shortage.

 

"That spirit of, 'We've got to work our way through this together,' is where we're at on this," Patterson said.

 

But as Lake Mead drops to about half its capacity, and its elevations continue to fall, drops below certain levels would trigger an emergency reconvening of the basin states, Mulroy said.

 

"If it gets that bad, yeah, it will be a difficult conversation," she said. #

http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080222/NEWS07/802220374/1006/news01

 

 

Editorial: California, neighbors must manage water with care

Desert Sun – 2/22/08

 

Nevada Mayor Oscar Goodman has a lot of nerve saying he'll take Southern California water from farming before he'll allow Las Vegas to run dry.

 

But it would be wise to consider the source - first of the ridiculous comments, and then of the water.

 

"No one is going to allow us to dry up," Goodman boasted at a news conference that followed a study about a potentially shrinking Lake Mead and an editorial in the Las Vegas Review-Journal, in which the newspaper's editorial board wrote, "We'll wager that all the farms in California's Imperial Valley, which suck up the lion's share of (Colorado River) river water, will go fallow before Lake Mead does."

 

We believe our counterparts at the Las Vegas Review-Journal were focusing their editorial more so on picking apart a recent study, "When Will Lake Mead Go Dry?" than on picking a fight with California.

 

Nonetheless, Goodman's words sparked ire in California and especially in the Coachella Valley, prompting some to say that the mob defense lawyer turned popular mayor has touched off a "water war."

 

First off, Goodman is known within his own territory for making provocative statements that garner loud headlines.

 

His Feb. 14 comments, in which he said, "Imperial Valley farmers will have their fields go fallow before our spigots run dry" did the trick, but are nothing more than the uninformed ranting of a lame duck mayor.

 

He can talk all day about taking water from California, but is that realistic? Would we allow that to happen? Just as he vows he will not let Nevada spigots run dry, we would never let him, or anyone else, touch ours, especially what we use to produce food for the nation.

 

A University of Utah law professor called the statement political and not one based on legal rights and that is true. California has some of the most solid water rights in the Southwest, if not the nation, that were secured early. We have our forefathers to thank for that, but that doesn't mean the water that flows to California isn't at risk. It is and it is at risk for our neighboring states as well.

 

The Colorado River compacts are divided into upper and lower basin allocations. The Upper Basin states are Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. The Lower Basin states are Arizona, California and Nevada. The Colorado River also provides water to Mexico pursuant to a treaty.

 

These states have and will continue to fight for their share, but instead of resorting to careless threats, leaders in the compact states would better serve themselves and each other by working together to find ways to conserve the water.

 

Leading scientists say drought and global warming will result in the shrinking of the Colorado River. Is the water going to run out right now? Will Lake Mead be a dust bowl in 10 years, or even 20? The answer to these questions almost certainly is no. But we do have population growth and atmospheric changes that are threatening our water.

 

What our leaders must say and do is manage the Colorado River during drought as well as wet years, ensure replenishment of ground water, protect water storage and promote conservation at every level of government and save the hot air and drama for something far less important. #

http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080222/OPINION01/802220372/-1/newsfront

####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive