This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 9/4/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

September 4, 2007

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People

 

Editorial

California greening -

San Francisco Chronicle

 

Opinion:

Water and our region's economy -
San Diego Union Tribune

 

Hope rising for Valley flood bill -

Stockton Record

 

Editorial

Caught in the deluge -

Stockton Record

 

When it comes to resources, our strength is in numbers -

The Stockton Record

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Editorial

California greening

San Francisco Chronicle – 9/4/07

 

GERMANY BROUGHT its call to action in the fight against global warming to California last week, following similar presentations to the European Union and the G8 conference of industrial leaders.

 

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier made his only U.S. stop in California on a multi-country tour to spread the word about the need for global cooperation on climate change.

 

The message: California's policies and innovations in cleantech and greentech distinguish us as a global leader on climate change. Germany, also a green innovator, wants the state as a political partner to help shape attitudes toward climate change.

 

"When it comes to shaping this first global century, we (California and Germany) are kindred spirits. My hope for the future is that we will cooperate not just culturally and economically, but also much more politically," Steinmeier told a packed room Aug. 30 at a joint meeting of the Commonwealth Club of Northern California and the World Affairs Council in San Francisco.

 

Flattering, perhaps, that the German foreign minister has accorded a state the political recognition typically bestowed upon a nation, especially when he called California "the most important testing laboratory for our global future."

 

The proposal, however, wasn't purely political, but also practical. Steinmeier met with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger earlier in the day to propose bringing California into the European market to trade pollution credits. Requiring industry to pay to pollute is the linchpin to California's plan to reduce greenhouse gases.

Does it make sense to link pollution-trading markets in different countries, on separate continents, with different rules, regulations and goals? Experts on both sides of the Atlantic say it will be difficult, but it can be done.

 

European pollution-reduction targets are more aggressive than what has been proposed in the United States, even in California. But global warming is not the only concern.

 

The recent dash by Russia and other nations to the Arctic, to claim oil and gas reserves newly exposed as the polar ice melts, lays bare the potential for conflict over diminishing energy sources. A shift away from an oil economy to new energy sources is a global security issue. Conversely, global warming and warring are linked.

 

California and Germany are leaders in green technologies, and share many priorities on addressing climate change and developing sustainable energy sources. A closer working relationship would advance the progress of both.

 

The fight against global climate change will take global cooperation. If it takes region-to-region collaborations to span the globe, then let it start here.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/09/04/ED1NRSI8N.DTL

 

Opinion:

Water and our region's economy
San Diego Union Tribune – 9/4/07

By Robert B. Horsman

San Diego County faces a challenge that could have far-reaching impacts on its $150 billion economy and the quality of life for its 3 million residents. Weather-related, legal and regulatory factors are combining to threaten our water supply like never before.

 

The good news is we have a chance to do something about it. We have the opportunity to come together as a region and commit to saving water now.

The implications are simple: Every drop of water we can save now puts us another drop further away from potential mandatory water use restrictions next year, the kind of cutbacks that hurt our economy during the region's last major drought from 1987-1992.

 

The need for everyone – including business – to pitch in and conserve water voluntarily could not be more urgent. Historic dry conditions across the West are affecting all of our water supplies. We are in the midst of one of the driest periods in San Diego County's recorded history. Our two main sources of imported water, the State Water Project and the Colorado River, aren't faring any better.

 

If that wasn't bad enough, the SWP, which provides 40 percent of San Diego's water, shut down its pumps temporarily in June to protect the delta smelt, an imperiled fish. It is still subject to federal and state court actions later this summer that could result in reduced water deliveries to San Diego later this year, next year, or even beyond.

 

If anyone thinks that reduced water deliveries will not affect San Diego, they need to think again. Water is the lifeblood of many industries crucial to the well-being of the San Diego region's economy. For many commercial operations, water shortages translate to diminished production, increased costs and lost jobs. For example, San Diego's agriculture sector (which has a $5.1 billion annual economic impact) has been advised that growers who participate in a discount program offered through the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California should expect a 30 percent cut in water deliveries on Jan. 1. That will force many growers – some already reeling from last winter's devastating frost – to reduce their operations and generate less income next year.

 

San Diego's life sciences industry, which relies on dependable water supplies for manufacturing, cleaning and other purposes, has grown into an $8.5 billion industry annually with more than 36,000 employees in San Diego.

 

Impacts from potential water shortages now would have a great impact to our overall economy. The San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce recognizes the importance of water supply reliability. Over the last 15 years we have urged the San Diego County Water Authority and its member agencies to plan for and invest in long-term solutions to our water supply needs. They have, spending billions of dollars in conservation programs, capital improvements and water transfer agreements that have increased reliability and will pay even more dividends in coming decades.

 

For now, however, increasing conservation is our best protection against potential supply shortages next year. To boost awareness of the need to conserve, the Water Authority recently launched the “20-Gallon Challenge” campaign. It calls upon everyone in the region to reduce their water use by 20 gallons per day, per person. If everyone were to save this amount, we would save enough water by next summer to meet the residential and business needs of more than half a million people.

 

Our region's commercial sector must embrace this challenge, too. Businesses can contribute by finding ways to increase their water efficiency. There are relatively easy and painless ways to do it, including cutting back on landscape irrigation (or using recycled water on landscapes) and installing water-efficient devices and appliances wherever possible.

 

The Water Authority also offers commercial and industrial water users specialized assistance, such as incentives on purchasing water-efficient equipment and audits that help businesses implement water-saving measures. Businesses can call 1-800-986-4538 for incentive information or 858-522-6756 to find out more about individualized audits.

 

Businesses also can help by promoting the 20-Gallon Challenge to their employees and customers. The Water Authority has posted an extensive list of conservation tips for residents and businesses on its Web site (www.sdcwa.org). Finally, business leaders can secure a better water future for San Diego by imploring the Legislature and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to move forward now on a long-term solution to safely and reliably convey adequate water supplies from the Sierras to Southern California.

 

San Diego's economy rebounded from the last drought to become bigger, more diverse and more dynamic than ever before. It's worth investing a little time and effort now to ensure we'll have the water our region needs to sustain our economy for decades to come.

Horsman is president and chief executive officer of the San Diego National Bank and chairman of the board of the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce. #

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070904/news_mz1e4horsman.html

 

Hope rising for Valley flood bill

Stockton Record – 9/4/07

By

 

SACRAMENTO - Legislation to step up the Central Valley's flood-control efforts has stalled all year, but a compromise among key Democrats in the state Legislature may break the jam before the year's session ends Sept. 14.

 

Major floods strike about every decade in the Valley, and cities such as Stockton, Lathrop and Thornton could face disaster should their levees break. Lawmakers in Sacramento have been grappling with proposals to upgrade and maintain levees while at the same time discouraging development in the danger zone for years - but those efforts have redoubled since Hurricane Katrina wrecked the Gulf Coast two years ago.

 

What is emerging now is a proposal that would:

» Require improved flood protection for cities with at least 10,000 residents. This protection would be twice that required by the federal government, able to withstand a flood that has a one-in-200 chance of occurring each year.

 

» Mandate cities and counties to change their future development plans, once the state study is completed in 2012, to reflect high-risk areas. Once locals do that, they will be barred from approving new subdivisions in flood areas unless those areas have the upgraded protection, the developer promises to build it, or the area is in the process of an upgrade.

 

» Require the state to analyze the entire Valley levee system, looking for weaknesses and identifying areas that can be improved, and not just by armoring the levees. For instance, a bypass for flood waters built upstream might help an urban area downstream.

 

"That is new for California," said state Sen. Michael Machado, D-Linden, a sponsor of the bill.

 

Lois Wolk, D-Davis, another of the bill's sponsors, said the proposal will make a difference when the floods come. "We are in an area of very high risk for flooding, and as urbanization continues, more and more people are in harm's way," Wolk said. "We are coming up with a package of bills that can balance growth with keeping people safe."

 

Should the bill pass, it would probably require Lathrop, Stockton and San Joaquin County to upgrade their levees even further.

 

Local residents would be required to pay a share of the cost - recent improvements in Stockton cost homeowners several hundred dollars each - but the bulk would come from the Proposition 1E bond funds voters passed last year.

 

None of these upgrades would be required until at least 2015, but federal officials may force cities such as Lathrop to begin improving their flood protection even earlier. The Federal Emergency Management Agency could declare levees in Lathrop and part of Stockton and Thornton unsafe to live behind, meaning residents would have to buy flood insurance at a cost of several hundred dollars a year.

 

The state proposal is a mixture of earlier flood-control bills sponsored by Machado and Wolk. The two lawmakers agreed on a compromise late last month, but it is not expected to receive Republican support.

 

Republicans say the state should use the bond money to fix existing levees and let local cities and counties upgrade beyond the federal limits on their own initiative. Several developments proposed for west Stockton are voluntarily upgrading to the so-called 200-year protection. And, for example, developers around the Mississippi River near St. Louis routinely advertise that their subdivisions offer added flood protection.

 

Machado said he's not surprised at Republican opposition. "I don't think you're gong to find Republicans enthused about any Democratic bill right now," he said.

In addition, there is a potential legal problem. Aides to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger are worried that the study required in the bill could open the state to legal liability for levees it does not control, such as the old agricultural levees in the area between Lathrop, Manteca and Ripon. Studying these levees raises the question of whether the state will be held liable should they fail.

 

At issue is a lawsuit that emerged after the 1986 floods that cost taxpayers more than $500 million to settle. State officials don't want to be on the hook for another lawsuit, and right now they are. If a levee failure wipes out Mossdale Landing, for example, the state is on the hook even though it was the city of Lathrop that approved new development in an area that has historically flooded.

 

Machado says the state is overly nervous: "They're running skittish," he said. "They can be held harmless on that - their obligation is for (state-maintained) levees."

Wolk and Machado said they expect the flood-control bill to be heard late this week.#

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070904/A_NEWS/709040318

 

Editorial

Caught in the deluge

Stockton Record – 9/2/07

San Joaquin County's interests in the Delta's water and ecosystem must be protected before it's too late

 

» NOTE: First of two parts.

Californians are being deluged by distorted data, inflammatory accusations and regional spin when it comes to the issue of water.

In the middle of this growing tide of problems sits the San Joaquin Delta, the state's main freshwater source and long-neglected estuary.

The Delta isn't the only dilemma:

 

» Rivers flowing to the Pacific Ocean from the Sierra Nevada are dammed, diverted and dumped on.

» Environmental degradation can be found on most waterways.

» The largest water conveyance systems are man-made engineering marvels that distort the natural order.

» Flood protection is based on the work of exploited laborers who helped construct the Delta region's now-primitive and vulnerable earthen levees 100 years ago.

 

Water quality, availability and reliability are continually at stake and at risk.

 

The subject bores or intimidates most Californians. As long as water flows from taps, the toilets flush and the fields get irrigated, why worry?

 

For some San Joaquin County residents, however, water is about to become a personal and costly issue.

 

Federal Emergency Management Agency administrators have established 100-year flood-protection standards for the county.

They're in the process of reviewing the strength and stability of the levees that protect expanding urban neighborhoods in Stockton and Lathrop west of Interstate 5.

 

In locations where levees fail to meet FEMA standards, property owners will be required to purchase flood insurance at a projected rate of $400 for every $100,000 of value. To be fully protected, the owner of a $250,000 home would have to pay an additional $1,350 to $1,400 a year.

 

Paying for such unexpected insurance will be difficult, if not impossible, for property owners who already are overextended financially in a depressed housing market.

 

Officials at FEMA expect a final map of the county's 100-year flood plain to be completed by spring 2009.

 

The situation will be even more complicated for developers whose projects still are in the planning stages.

 

The water issue also has become muddied by renewed discussion of building a canal that would route Sacramento River water around the Delta.

The peripheral canal concept - rejected by voters 25 years ago - continues to be discussed because of Southern California's dependence on Northern California water.

 

In accommodating that need, state and federal pumps near Tracy - surprise, surprise - have had an adverse impact on fish and the environment.

 

As momentum grows to once again study such a canal, scientists and hydrologists are saying it might worsen the Delta's already-damaged ecosystem.

 

They argue that the Delta already suffers from a lack of fresh water in the San Joaquin River. Rerouting Sacramento River water would just compound the probem.

Though there are dozens of other issues that need attention and resolution, too many county residents don't pay enough attention.

 

That's dangerous, because politicians and bureaucrats who make decisions that impact the Delta could accept the arguments of powerful outside special interests if those in San Joaquin County aren't actively and aggressively involved.

They should be.

 

A large portion of California's freshwater supply converges in the San Joaquin Delta.

Everybody wants a share.

If we don't become guardians of San Joaquin County's interest, who will be?

If we're not careful, the deluge, distortion and spin will leave the county stuck in the backwater. Again.#

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070902/A_OPINION01/709020306/-1/A_OPINION

 

When it comes to resources, our strength is in numbers

The Stockton Record – 9/3/07

Second of two parts

 

San Joaquin County, despite its status as the San Joaquin Delta's freshwater hub, has been treated merely as a transfer point - important but ignored, involved but taken for granted.

 

That might be changing.

 

Taking a cue from the San Joaquin Council of Governments' "one-voice" approach to transportation issues, members of several government agencies are working to develop a similar regional approach to and flood-protection issues.

 

The Central Valley Resources Agency, though in a embryonic stage, is having some effect.

 

When Rep. Dennis Cardoza, D-Merced, held a regional conference on flood-control and levee issues in August, members of the new agency participated.

"We need to make sure our elected officials have regional support when addressing the needs of our region," said Steve Ding, once an aide to former Rep. Richard Pombo, R-Tracy.

 

He cited three goals for the group, which will be trying to help:

 

» Those who live in flood zones and need to understand the implications.

» Government agencies and others who must work toward common goals.

» Identify and articulate regional needs.

 

The group's unique public-private partnership combines interests in San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Merced counties.

 

State Department of Water Resources administrators soon will release grant funds. The new Valley agency's representatives are planning to make forceful requests.

In the past, Sacramento County officials, with better organization and priorities regarding levee and flood protection, have taken more advantage of similar funding opportunities.

 

The involvement of city and county officials will be vital for this new partnership to be effective. So will a structure that includes private interests but doesn't allow them to dominate the agenda.

 

To be successful, Central Valley Resources Agency dealings must be open to scrutiny by the public and devoted to its best interests.#

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070903/A_OPINION/709030310/-1/A_OPINION

 

 

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost1.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive