This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 9/7/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

September 7, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

DELTA RULING IMPACTS:

Small Fish May Lead To Reduction Of City’s Water Supply - Long Beach Gazette

 

Am Can, Napa may buy water to make up for shortfall - Napa Valley Register

 

Berryessa helps county stay hydrated - Fairfield Daily Republic

 

Contingency plans drawn up for possible SoCal water rationing - Associated Press

 

Editorial: Politicians frozen amid water crisis - Chico Enterprise Record

 

Editorial: Limits on growth; Threat of water rationing is a wake-up call - LA Daily News

 

Editorial: Water woes; They're going to get worse this winter - Vacaville Reporter

 

AG WATER SUPPLY ISSUES:

Farmers make emergency water request - Stockton Record

 

DROUGHT CONDITIONS:

Expert: Calif. 'Perfect Drought' Could Span 100 Years; In 2007, Parts of Southland Got Less Rain than Death Valley - KABC ABC Channel 7 (Los Angeles)

 

 

DELTA RULING IMPACTS:

Small Fish May Lead To Reduction Of City’s Water Supply

Long Beach Gazette – 9/6/07

By Kurt Helin, Editor

 

A judge’s ruling in Fresno last week may mean mandatory water conservation measures for Long Beach residents in the future.

 

U.S. District Judge Oliver W. Wanger ruled last week that the State Water Project was in violation of the federal endangered species acts because it is threatening the existence of the Delta smelt. The three-inch long fish lives in the Sacramento Delta — the fountain for more than half of the water coming to central California farms and Southern California faucets.

 

Long Beach gets just less than 40% of its water from the State Water Project.

 

Wanger ruled from the bench that there must be a reduction in water pumped out of the delta from December until June, the fish’s breeding time.

 

No one is exactly sure how much the reductions will mean, but many experts are estimating it will be about a one-third reduction if there is another dry winter, said Kevin Wattier, general manager of the Long Beach Water Department.

 

Earlier this year, the Water Department asked residents to start conserving water, but did not put any mandatory restrictions on water usage. That may change if and when water pumping from the delta is curtailed next year, Wattier said.

 

“We’ll likely go to various prohibitions of water use,” Wattier said. “Say, people can only water their lawns every other day, for example.”

 

The Water Department has a detailed, three-stage water shortage plan that calls for increasing levels of mandated conservation steps, Wattier said. Among the allowed possibilities is increasing water fees, thereby giving people an incentive to conserve.

 

There also are restrictions on water use by hotels, restaurants and other businesses.

 

Long Beach is not the only city considering restrictions. Santa Clara Valley, San Francisco and officials in a host of other cities throughout California are now reported to be looking at their options. In addition, it is possible some farmers will choose not to plant certain crops this year rather than pay steeper water prices.

 

Cities have a small idea of what could come — on May 31 of this year, the state Department of Water Resources announced it was shutting down pumps after a spike in deaths of juvenile Delta smelt. The pumps remained shut off for nine days.

 

In Long Beach, there was no dramatic short-term impact because the city has worked hard in recent years to expand its groundwater storage program, Wattier said. However, he added that reserve is not a long-term solution to any continued reduction of the water the city gets from the delta.

 

Wattier added the city is working on several long-term steps.

 

“We have the sea water desalination programs, we have an extensive water recycling program we could grow, and there are other steps,” Wattier said.

 

He added, however, that conservation from city residents would have a bigger impact, particularly in the short term. While the city has reduced water usage per capita by 20% in the past decade, more can be done, he said. #

http://www.gazettes.com/water09062007.html

 

 

Am Can, Napa may buy water to make up for shortfall

Napa Valley Register – 9/7/07

By Kerana Todorov, staff writer

 

Federal efforts to protect a small fish could leave Napa and American Canyon paying for more water.

The two cities may need to buy extra water to make up for possible shortfalls after a federal judge ruled to limit the amount of water pumped from the San Joaquin-Bay Delta to protect the Delta smelt, which only lives in that habitat. Both cities receive delta water via the North Bay Aqueduct.

 

While the full implications for Napa County of Friday’s ruling are unknown, both Phil Brun, general manager of Napa’s water department, and Robert Weil, American Canyon’s public works director, expect lower allocations of Delta water — the amounts of water the cities are entitled to buy. Allocations for 2008 will not be announced until December, according to the state Department of Water Resources.

American Canyon could be severely affected, Weil told the City Council Tuesday. Unlike Napa and other cities in Napa County, American Canyon does not have water reservoirs. This year has been dry, he also said.

In 2006, the city received 3,000 acre-feet of water from the North Bay Aqueduct, about 500 acre-feet from Napa and an additional 126 acre-feet from Vallejo, according to Weil.

To make up for the expected water supply shortfalls, Napa and American Canyon are considering a program that allows jurisdictions to buy extra water, Brun and Weil said in separate interviews.

Felix Riesenberg, an engineer with the Napa County Flood Control District, said the district would represent Napa and American Canyon before the State Water Contractors, a statewide association of public water agencies. The State Water Contractors would negotiate potential purchases of extra water from farmers, Riesenberg said.  No other cities in Napa County have not expressed an interest, he said.

U.S. Federal Judge Oliver Wanger issued his ruling Friday in Fresno.

According to the State Water Contractors, Wanger’s ruling could cut California’s water supplies by a third. The ruling restricts the ability to move water to Southern California, explained Jeanine Jones, interstate resources manager for the state Department of Water Resources.

Two pumps mentioned in the lawsuit are near Tracy and powerful enough to pump enough water in one day to supply Napa County with water for an entire year.

The North Bay Aqueduct receives its water from the Barker Slough Pumping Plant. The plant is part of the state Water Project, a water distribution system managed by the state Department of Water Resources.

The State Water Contractors represents 27 public water agencies statewide. #

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2007/09/07/news/local/doc46e0dc38eb423112663321.txt

 

 

LAKE BERRYESSA:

Berryessa helps county stay hydrated

Fairfield Daily Republic – 9/7/07

By Barry Eberling, staff writer

 

FAIRFIELD - Solano County will likely weather cuts of as much as 30 percent in delta water better than many other parts of the state.

The reason is the Lake Berryessa reservoir, which is 80 percent full and provides an alternate water source.

"We can switch to other supplies and be fine," Fairfield Assistant Public Works Director Rick Wood said. "We're not looking at any type of major conservation effort in Fairfield."

But that situation could change if a multiyear drought sapped the reservoir's vast water supplies.

U.S. District Judge Oliver Wanger on Friday ordered reductions in delta water exports from December through June 2008 to help protect the embattled delta smelt. Numbers for this small, native fish have tumbled in recent years.

Delta smelt are protected by the Endangered Species Act. They can get killed by the large pumps that lift water out of the south Delta near Tracy and into canals for delivery to Southern California metropolises and Central Valley farms.

Solano County gets its Delta water from smaller pumps in the north delta, pumps not involved in the lawsuit to save the smelt. Still, the system is still part of the State Water Project.

"Everybody in the water project gets the same allocation," said David Okita, general manager of the Solano County Water Agency. "If our allocation goes down 30 percent next year, that's a big impact on us."

The cuts have water officials from various parts of the state predicting dire consequences, with mandatory conservation a possibility.

"The ripple effects will undoubtedly harm our state economy and cause loss of jobs," Laura King of the State Water Contractors said in a press release.

Lake Berryessa gives local cities flexibility. The reservoir in Napa County serves Solano County cities and farms almost exclusively.

Fairfield, Vacaville and Vallejo get water from both Berryessa and the Delta. Suisun City gets water only from Berryessa. Dixon and Rio Vista use wells.

Only Benicia depends on the Delta. Okita said Benicia might need to make agreements with other cities to get some Berryessa water supplies if there is a major Delta cutback.

"It really depends on the weather," he said. "If it's a wet year, there wouldn't be any real impact at all."

Solano County water officials are looking at what happens next. Wanger's ruling is only for 2008 to give state and federal agencies more time to develop steps to try to save the smelt.

"The fear is this new judgment is going to become the floor and it can only get worse," Okita said.

Environmentalists have also been taking stock of the judge's decision. The National Resources Defense Council, which brought the lawsuit, said in a press release that the Delta can't provide clean water for people if the ecosystem is so sick that it can't support the smelt.

"Today's ruling appears to improve the smelt's chances of survival," NRDC Senior Attorney Kate Pooke said. "The question is whether it's enough to save the smelt from extinction."

Meanwhile, local cities can make the argument that the North Bay Aqueduct pumps shouldn't be subject to the same restrictions as the bigger state and federal pumps in the south Delta. It's uncertain how the state will respond.

They can also argue they are in the Delta's watershed, legally putting them among the first in line for Delta water supplies, ahead of cities outside of the watershed. The state has yet to recognize this claim.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has appointed a commission to find ways to save the Delta and still deliver water to cities and farms. Among the ideas on the table is a new version of the peripheral canal to take water for farms and cities around the Delta.

"It's an interesting time," Wood said. "All of these issues are coming to a head."

http://local.dailyrepublic.net/story_localnews.php?a=news02.txt

 

 

Contingency plans drawn up for possible SoCal water rationing

Associated Press – 9/6/07

 

LOS ANGELES—Contingency plans currently being drawn up could force Southern California water officials to order rationing next year.

 

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, serving 18 million people in six counties, warned Wednesday that mandatory rationing could become necessary for the first time since 1991.

 

The district imports about two-thirds of its water from Northern California and the Colorado River.

 

Last week, U.S. District Judge Oliver Wanger in Fresno ruled water imports from the north must be cut up to 30 percent to protect the delta smelt, a small fish threatened with extinction.

 

Adding to the problem are the threat of earthquakes and flooding, saltwater intrusion and aging levees in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

 

"We have further evidence that the delta is in crisis, if there was any doubt about it," said Lester Snow, director of the state Department of Water Resources.

 

The Metropolitan Water District stands to lose more than 10 percent of all the water members use because of the court decision.

 

Although it's unclear how much water will move south, the district is preparing an allocation plan on how much it might be able to provide the 26 cities and water agencies it serves, assistant general manager Roger Patterson said.

 

Each member agency will determine how much residents will have to cut back.

 

"The question is 'how soon do we need to go into that kind of decision-making?'

 

Do we have to do that in 2008, or do we rely on our reserve account—or (banked water) savings—to not do that in 2008? Those are the policy decisions that will be made," Patterson said.

 

It's hoped a rainy winter and voluntary conservation efforts will thwart rationing, he said.

 

Los Angeles gets nearly 70 percent of its water from the district.

 

"If we have rationing in Los Angeles, it won't be the first time that that has happened," said David Nahai, president of Department of Water and Power commissioners. "If that is what will be needed in order to safeguard our water supplies, well, so be it. But we'll have to see just what this plan is that Metropolitan Water District will be putting forward."

 

The district plans to present its allocation plan to the DWP board this fall.  #

http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_6819557

 

 

Editorial: Politicians frozen amid water crisis

Chico Enterprise Record – 9/7/07

 

There could be a silver lining -- and not just for the delta smelt -- in a federal judge's decision to cut back on water that's sent south from the delta.

 

Of course, there's only a silver lining if you have faith in the Legislature. That's a big "if."

 

In a perfect world, where politicians faced challenges head on and compromised to find solutions, the Legislature and governor would face facts: The state's huge problem just got a lot worse, and they need to fix it.

 

The huge problem is that the state's population is growing and the water supply is not. A judge's decision on Friday made it worse. He cut the amount of water that is sent south by about one-third in order to protect the delta smelt, a tiny fish on the endangered species list.

 

The judge did what he was obligated to do under federal law. He had to take steps to protect an endangered species.

 

It's up to the politicians now to figure out ways to make up the shortcoming, which amounts to about 1 million acre-feet for people in the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California. One million acre-feet represents enough water for about 2 million families for a year.

 

Now the state is faced with tough decisions. Large cities may be forced to find their own water sources or force rationing. San Joaquin Valley farmers may be forced to leave productive land fallow, which would decimate the valley economy and make a depressed area even more impoverished. Or the state government could take a lead role in building new reservoirs and maybe even a peripheral canal, which has never been a popular idea in the northern end of the state.

 

What will happen is anybody's guess. But if the state prison system is an example, nothing will happen. The courts threatened to take over the prison system, then the state promised massive reforms. Nothing has changed.

 

Will the state's water crisis follow the same path?

 

None of this is our problem here in the north. We have water.

 

But when big cities and big farms in the south want water, the pressure on us mounts. Local farmers will sell the water they usually get if some metropolitan water district offers a boatload of money. Then our fields go fallow and our economy goes south, so to speak.

 

So where's that silver lining mentioned in the first paragraph? Let's see. Perhaps the court's forced cutbacks will force the politicians' hand. Maybe they'll finally have to quit ignoring the warning signs and face up to the problem. Maybe they'll spend money on delta restoration. Maybe they'll force cities and farmers to do more in the way of recycling water and conserving water. Maybe they'll start studying groundwater. Maybe they'll offer incentives for businesses and cities to try experimental things like desalination plants. Maybe they'll figure out a canal around the delta that actually works. Maybe they'll realize they need to build dams, large and small. Maybe they'll realize there's not a single massive solution, but many little solutions. Maybe this is just what they need to finally do something. ...

 

Nah. #
http://www.chicoer.com//ci_6824437?IADID=Search-www.chicoer.com-www.chicoer.com

 

 

Editorial: Limits on growth; Threat of water rationing is a wake-up call

LA Daily News – 9/7/07

 

DON'T blame the smelt. A district judge cited the danger of wiping out the tiny Sacramento Delta fish when he imposed tough restrictions that threaten Southern California's water supply. But if it hadn't been the smelt, it would have been something else.

 

Eventually, something was going to arise to make the state face the fact that its water demands can't keep going up indefinitely while the water supply keeps shrinking.

 

The preciousness of water in this semidesert state is something that has escaped the attention of California's politicians. That's because all they can see is how growth replenishes public treasuries and provides more money to squander every year.

 

State and local politicians routinely rubber-stamp new developments with little thought to environmental preservation or the strain on water supply.

 

Something had to give.

 

The expected result of the ruling last week is the threat of water rationing that would hit many Southern California communities hard. For most of us, it means adopting a perpetual-drought mind-set and conserving at every level. For agriculture, it will mean a hard economic punch. And for politicians, it ought to mean a serious rethinking of land-use policy.

 

Some will dismiss this an overreaction to the possible extinction of a little-known fish. But concentrating on the water rights of smelt vs. humans misses the entire point: We don't have unlimited amounts of water.

 

If there isn't enough water for smelt or people, how can we continue to allow major construction developments that bring in more people who need more water and force more rationing on current residents?

 

The answer is we can't.

 

The largest user of delta water, the Metropolitan Water District, has already made plans for rationing water to its 18 million users. No doubt every agency affected will do the same.

 

The past of California has been one of opportunity and open horizons and the dream for millions of new and potential residents.

 

This ruling makes it clear the future must be different for the state to continue to prosper.

 

Water can be used more wisely, stronger conservation measures can be introduced, and future developments need to meet stringent land-use planning rules and pay a hefty premium for that most basic of all necessities, water.  #

http://www.dailynews.com/search/ci_6822177?IADID=Search-www.dailynews.com-www.dailynews.com

 

 

Editorial: Water woes; They're going to get worse this winter

Vacaville Reporter – 9/7/07

 

There's only one thing completely clear about a federal judge's week-old order telling California water agencies to protect an endangered fish: Those of us who rely on Delta water - and that is nearly every Californian - are going to have to make do with less of it for at least the next year.

 

Just how much less will depend on the weather and the fish themselves.

 

At this point, experts are estimating that cuts in the amount of water being sent through the giant California Aqueduct pumps near Tracy will equal a 15 percent to 35 percent reduction in water allocations up and down the state. A worst-case scenario being floated claims that 2 million acre feet next year - enough water for more than 1 million acres of farmland or 8 million households - could be withheld.

 

Domestic users in Solano County, whose water also comes from wells and Lake Berryessa, will feel a pinch, but it won't be nearly as tight as that endured by residents across the Carquinez Strait, where some cities rely on the Delta for up to 80 percent of their water supply.

 

Hardest hit will be agricultural users who rely completely on water from the Delta or the state Water Project, which will impose cuts systemwide.

 

The reductions were ordered last Friday by U.S. District Court Judge Oliver Wanger, whose decision reflects the middle ground between environmentalists, who wanted even more water left behind to protect the Delta smelt, and water agencies that want to continue supplying water to 25 million Californians and 3 million acres of agriculture.

 

The cuts are to be enacted from late December, when the smelt begin to spawn, through June, when they are large enough to swim on their own, making them less vulnerable to being sucked into the pumps. A wet winter could help the problem considerably, so praying for rain could be helpful.

 

Certainly that is a more useful suggestion than the one Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger came up with this week.

 

His administration officials called a press conference on Wednesday to push his earlier, failed proposal to build two reservoirs and revive the Peripheral Canal plan.

 

While developing more water storage and new ways to deliver it may yet prove to be valuable long-term solutions, neither will help the short-term crisis the state is currently facing.

 

Besides, the governor is putting the cart before the horse. His Delta Vision Blue-Ribbon Task Force is working feverishly to pull together by the end of this year a coherent and comprehensive plan for the Delta, one that will address water, flood and environmental issues in the long run. Taxpayers should be allowed to hear that report before being asked to commit already scarce resources.

 

But if the governor wants to do something, he might start prodding his own department of Fish and Game, as well as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to complete a biological report showing the effects of pumping on the fast-dwindling Delta smelt.

 

That report, which is nearly a year overdue now, is the reason a federal judge had to step into the state's water picture to begin with.

 

The governor might also want to start ratcheting up conservation efforts right now. Californians are generally water conscious, but we can do better. And we're going to have to, if we expect to get through the coming winter and spring.  #

http://www.thereporter.com/opinion/ci_6826932

 

 

AG WATER SUPPLY ISSUES:

Farmers make emergency water request

Stockton Record – 9/7/07

By Alex Breitler, staff writer

 

FARMINGTON - About 20 farms in this area could go dry as soon as next week unless the federal government grants a request for emergency water, the Stockton East Water District said this week.

 

Fruit, nut and grape fields may be damaged, and tomato, pepper and other row crops may not be harvested, perhaps costing the farmers millions of dollars, district General Manager Kevin Kauffman wrote in a letter to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. A total of 2,000 acres might be affected.

 

"You are essentially these farmers' last hope," Kauffman wrote.

 

Kauffman this week said that a combination of factors prompted the shortage.

 

The lack of rain and snow last winter means that the district has received only about 30 percent of the water it normally is allocated by the federal government. That water, from New Melones Lake on the Stanislaus River, is shipped to farms and the city of Stockton via a series of canals and pipelines.

 

The district this year also didn't receive all of the water it normally buys from a pair of other water districts on the Stanislaus. And the federal government is more strictly enforcing the terms of its contract with Stockton East, taking away flexibility that in the past benefited the district, Kauffman said.

 

Stockton East gets its water from two major above-ground sources: the Stanislaus and Calaveras rivers. But the farmers affected by the shortage can get water only from the Stanislaus.

 

Other farmers have been asked to cut back on water use, Kauffman said, and the city of Stockton is pumping more water from its wells to save river water.

 

The district asked the government for 8,000 acre-feet of water, enough water to supply 8,000 typical households for one year. Bureau officials could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

 

While supplies are tight, the district believes it has enough water stored in New Hogan Lake to make it through next year even if the winter is dry, said Mel Panizza, who heads the Stockton East board.

 

But, he added, "We've called farmers and told them to be prepared, to start thinking of water conservation methods."

 

The district is also participating in drought prepared-ness workshops hosted by the state.

 

"We think we'll get through the year," Kauffman said. "But we've got 20 farmers on the edge." #

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070907/A_NEWS/709070313

 

 

DROUGHT CONDITIONS:

Expert: Calif. 'Perfect Drought' Could Span 100 Years; In 2007, Parts of Southland Got Less Rain than Death Valley

KABC ABC Channel 7 (Los Angeles) – 9/6/07

By Dallas Raines

 

Sept. 6, 2007 (KABC-TV) - Southern California is now in its eighth year of an extended drought. But what would happen if that drought lasted for decades, or even a century? Some experts say the pieces are falling into place for a so-called "perfect drought," and it could have devastating consequences for California.

 

Higher temperatures, less water, and more wildfires -- the effects of global climate change can already be seen here in Southern California. And when you combine climate change with drought conditions, the consequences can be severe. Some say we're in the middle of a historic drought.

 

2007 will go down on the books as Southern California's driest year in recorded history. Fires raged out of control. Millions of dollars were lost as California crops shrivel in the searing sun. And the Eastern Sierras, where L.A. gets most of its water, marked its second lowest snowpack on record.

 

It's a recipe for disaster, or as one expert calls it -- the perfect drought.

 

"The idea of a perfect drought plays off the idea of a perfect storm," said Glen MacDonald with the Department of Geography at UCLA. "It's a convergence of natural or man-made effects that lead to a somewhat unexpected, but catastrophic result."

 

A so-called perfect drought would last not one or two years, but a decade or more. Scientists studying ancient tree rings have found evidence of epic droughts in Southern California, with some lasting as long as 100 years.

 

"You can't say with 100-percent probability, but we are putting into place the pieces for a perfect drought," said MacDonald.

 

This year, parts of Southern California got less rainfall than Death Valley.

 

"We didn't plant this time for the first time in 85 years," said Betty Bouris of Bouris Ranches.

 

The Bouris family has been farming in Riverside County since 1922. This year, the lack of rain forced them to lay off long-time employees and auction off their farming equipment.

 

"I think it hit home to me when I walked into the parts room that was absolutely stocked, and I went in there and all the shelves are empty because all the parts were sold," said Bouris.

 

It's a growing crisis across the American Southwest as a whole. The region is now in its eighth year of an extended drought.

Lake Mead, the nation's largest man-made reservoir, stands at less than half its normal levels. California's predicted population explosion will further strain already scarce water resources.

 

"California could have 50 million people by 30- or 40-years from now," said Dan Cayan, a climate researcher for the Scripps Institute and the USGS.

 

Water conservation in L.A. -- now voluntary -- could turn into mandatory water rationing in the not too distant future.

 

"If this continues for another year or two like this, we'll have a full-fledged drought and we'll need to take more drastic steps," said David Nahai, president of Department Water and Power (DWP).

 

Drastic steps, such as a return of the drought busters who roamed the streets of L.A. issuing citations during our last major drought from '87 to '92.

 

Drought conditions promote wildfires, like the one in Lake Tahoe that destroyed more than 200 homes; or the Zaca fire in Ventura County, which is now the second largest in California history.

 

The San Bernardino forest is tinder dry -- a million dead trees killed by bark beetles and the drought. Thousand Oaks hillsides are still scorched from a fire in January.

 

"If you look around you, the Chapparal, the coastal sage, it's absolutely tinder dry," said MacDonald. "It takes nothing to ignite this."

 

The deepening drought led Governor Schwarzenegger to declare a state of emergency in Riverside County. Extreme measures for an extreme dry spell -- but still too late for the Bouris family.

 

"It's just in your blood to farm," said Bouris. "It's kind of sad, to see a family tradition end like that."

 

Government forecasters with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have announced they believe another La Nina is on the way. That weather phenomenon is a periodic cooling of surface temperatures in the Pacific that's expected to bring drier-than-normal conditions this fall to an already drought-stricken Southern California. #

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=weather&id=5642723

####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive