This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 9/13/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

September 13, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

AG WATER ISSUES:

Water crisis squeezes California's economy; A recent federal ruling to reduce the amount of water that flows through the delta is likely to boost food prices and trim jobs in agriculture - Christian Science Monitor

 

Editorial: Water rulings hurt state's agriculture - Fremont Argus

 

SSJID suspends '08 water charge - Manteca Bulletin

 

Editorial: Court order will dry up water supply; Southern California’s woes no cause to party up north - Marysville Appeal Democrat

 

CRYSTAL GEYSER PROJECT:

Crystal Geyser loses bid to pump mineral water from Napa - Napa Valley Register

 

WATER SUPPLY PLANNING:

Dos Rios Water Project would be costly - Ukiah Daily Journal

 

WATER TRANSFER:

Cement plant to provide water for Shadow Cliffs; PLEASANTON: Park district is preparing infrastructure to deliver the flow after making a deal with CEMEX - Contra Costa Times

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUPPLY CONDITIONS:

Editorial: Coping with drought; As Southern California gets drier, we're all going to have to swallow tougher water measures - Los Angeles Times

 

Editorial: Don't be a drip; Adopt stricter water conservation rules on your own - Long Beach Press Telegram

 

 

AG WATER ISSUES:

Water crisis squeezes California's economy; A recent federal ruling to reduce the amount of water that flows through the delta is likely to boost food prices and trim jobs in agriculture

Christian Science Monitor – 9/12/07

By Daniel B. Wood, staff writer

 

Los Angeles - California farmers, who produce half the nation's fruits and vegetables, say they will idle fields and cut back on planting lettuce, cotton, rice, and more.

 

Silicon Valley computer-chip makers and other industrial/commercial users say they will rethink manufacturing processes that use water, or dramatically raise the price of products they sell.

 

Cities from Sacramento to San Diego say drought-era practices of rationed water – low-use toilets and washers, designated water days for lawns and cars – are back, including stiff fines for those who don't follow the rules.

 

After 35 years of hemming and hawing over how to fix the largest estuary in the Western Hemisphere – the sprawl of canals, levees, and flood plains that join the Golden State's two river systems – the state has been told by a federal judge that business-as-usual is now illegal.

 

A new ruling to stop pumping up to 37 percent of the water that flows through the delta to protect endangered fish species has sent shock waves of concern into the three main sectors that have long competed for it: cities, farms, environment.

 

The estuary provides water to 23 million Californians and about 5 million acres of farmland. Overused and under maintained for years, the delta and its water are at the heart of the state's economic vitality, its wildlife habitat, shipping, transportation, drinking water, and recreation.

 

"In the water business we are facing the biggest challenges here in over half a century … there is no way any knowledgeable person could contest that," says Tim Quinn, executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies, which represents more than 450 of the state's water agencies that provide water to 95 percent of the state's farms and cities. "The state has had some success in better managing this problem for the last decade, but we have hid ourselves from the biggest issue … and Mother Nature is telling us there is no more hiding."

 

The biggest issue, say Mr. Quinn and others, is the clash between the environment, the California economy, and the population, which is pouring in at more than 600,000 per year.

 

In recent years, the use of water in the delta has been crippled as a result of drought as well as age, with deteriorating levees that are vulnerable to flood, earthquake, and subsidence. It was environmental groups who most recently challenged water use. The ruling by US District Court Judge Oliver Wanger in Fresno Aug. 31 came after a suit against state and federal water officials by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and three other environmental groups.

 

The agricultural community in the Central Valley appears to be the most worried about the consequences of the judge's action.

Stephen Patricio, chairman of the board of directors for the Western Growers Association and a 30-year farmer of 2,000 acres of cantaloupe near Firebaugh, Calif., says the impact of a 30 percent or more reduction of water to his region will have a domino effect on other jobs.

 

He expects his $6 million payroll, employing about 600 people during the harvest, will drop to about $1.5 million this year and force him to cut 400 jobs. Those losses will contribute to another 2,400 layoffs in related industries: truck drivers, tractor operators, seed operations, warehousing, repair, and fuel, he says.

 

The announcement is already having an effect on the loans farmers receive to operate their farms during 2008.

 

"Ninety percent of these farms need to be financed, and lenders have made it very clear that without a water plan, there is no money for 2008 crops," Mr. Patricio says.

 

Eighty percent of the water in California moves from above the delta to farms and communities in the south of it via pumps. The environmental groups said that current use of water pumping through the delta endangered several species of fish, including two kinds of smelt (long fin and delta), steel head, green sturgeon, winter and spring salmon, and split tail.

 

"This ruling was essentially an agreement that we need to protect habitat in the delta more than we have been, and what state and federal agencies have been doing is likely to drive the smelt to extinction," says Barry Nelson of the NRDC. "For all the serious concern about how the state is now going to meet its water needs, no one is saying that the court got it wrong. Everyone has known for a long time that this was coming."

 

Water agencies, farmers, and scientists agree, saying the ruling will force a much-needed opportunity to fine-tune the use of water to avoid waste.

 

"This alarm as been sounding about the delta for 30 years, and we've been pushing the snooze alarm," says Peter Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute, a nonprofit think tank in Oakland, Calif. "This may lead to some of the first discussions ever on how we manage growth in the state, how people live, how much we waste, and what crops we farm."

 

He notes that farming just three common crops – rice, cotton, and alfalfa – as well as irrigated pastures for cows use about half of the agricultural sector's allotment but earn a fraction of agricultural income. "We can continue to have a healthy economy with less water, but there has been no demand to do that yet," he says. "This ruling may drive us to do things we ought to be doing anyway."

 

Anticipating the reduced water spigot from the delta as of January 2008, water agencies north of it are telling their clients to cut back on water use. They are already spending money in new ad campaigns to remind users to cut back or face the possibility of mandatory laws with fines.

 

"We are spending millions to get the conservation message out that we need to conserve as if we are in a crunch," says Jeff Kightlinger, of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which serves agencies and 18 million residents in six counties. He says the new rationing will affect 2 of every 3 Californians.

 

"Farmers across the state know this will be very tough and not pleasant," says Dave Kranz, spokesman for the California Farm Bureau Federation. "To the extent that you take farmland out of production for whatever reason, it increases another problem, which is providing enough American-grown food to serve the US population as well as demand from other countries."

 

Solutions are now in the works. A commission appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is planning to make recommendations next month, including ideas for dams and more storage capacity.

 

State Senate President pro tem Don Perata (D) is pushing two measures. One provides $200 million for immediate safeguards of freshwater flows from north to south. The second is a $5 billion bond that includes $2 billion to fix the water supply, improve flood protection, and boost fisheries in the delta, and $2 billion for water storage projects such as dams.  #

http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0912/p02s01-ussc.html?page=1

 

 

Editorial: Water rulings hurt state's agriculture

Fremont Argus – 9/12/07

 

AFEDERAL JUDGE'S decision to severely cut back water pumping from the Delta presents a historic choice for California. Either the state builds large new reservoirs or it loses a significant portion of its agriculture.

 

Federal environmental law forced U.S. District Judge Oliver Wanger to order a reduction of about 1 million acre-feet of water being pumped from the Delta to save smelt from extinction.

 

That's enough water to supply 2 million households.

 

The water cutbacks come after a May decision by Wanger that the federal projects that supply water to farms and 25million Californians were violating the Endangered Species Act.

 

A month earlier, a California judge ruled that the state Department of Water Resources had failed to get a state permit required by the state's endangered species law.

 

As a result of the cutbacks, which could be as many as 2million acre-feet under some conditions, San Joaquin Valley farms will be forced to idle hundreds of thousands of acres of productive land, probably in the next growing season.

 

Also hit hard will be the Zone 7 Water Agency, which supplies water to 200,000 people in Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton. Much of the district's water comes from the state water project, which pumps supplies out of the Delta.

 

Other urban water districts from the Bay Area to San Diego will have to use other sources, drought supplies or simply use less water, which could lead to hardships next year.

 

The biggest loser in California will be agriculture, and the impact is likely to be felt within a year.

 

Some environmentalists wanted even steeper reductions in water pumping to protect the endangered Delta ecosystem.

 

Several species of fish are declining in the Delta, and the situation could get worse without sufficient flows of fresh water.

 

There is room for better agricultural water use by eliminating certain crops, such as cotton, in arid regions. Greater use of drip irrigation also would help.

 

However, the kind of water cutbacks ordered by Wanger would still cause a significant loss to farms that use water wisely.

 

What is becoming increasingly clear is that the only practical way to ensure enough fresh water for the Delta environment, farms and urban users is to store much larger supplies of water during the wet months so there is enough to deliver to all users year-round.

 

California has not built a large reservoir other than Los Vaqueros for decades.

 

With the pumping cutbacks, time is running out for decisive action on increasing the state's ability to supply water in an environmentally responsible manner.

 

That means building at least a couple of major new reservoirs, or significantly enlarging older ones, and an updated delivery system.

 

That alternative to inaction is a devastating blow to one of the state's largest industries. #

http://www.insidebayarea.com/argus/oped/ci_6869980

 

 

SSJID suspends '08 water charge

Manteca Bulletin – 9/13/07

 

South San Joaquin Irrigation District is waving 2008 water charges for farmers.

But there's one slight detail. If they're not current on this year's bill by Nov. 1, they will have to pay for 2008 water.

The board Tuesday directed staff to waive the charges for one year. The move will provide district farmers a collective relief of roughly $1.3 million.

District leaders stressed this isn't being done because the district has excess water. It is based on farmers being frugal and participating in efforts to keep costs down over the years that has led to the district's strong financial position.

It is also an early "payback" on the Tri-Dam benefits that the board intends to use to lower electric bills for rural and urban users within the district as soon as possible. That, however, requires obtaining the PG&E distribution system first.

The board last month also wanted the City of Manteca to share in the savings. Details of that as well as possible conservation program will be addressed at a future meeting.

The issue of farmer charges had to be settled to meet legal deadlines on establishing rates.

As of July 31, the district had $46.6 million in various accounts. It's annual operating budget is $12 million. #

http://mantecabulletin.com/main.asp?FromHome=1&TypeID=1&ArticleID=54304&SectionID=28&SubSectionID=58

 

 

Editorial: Court order will dry up water supply; Southern California’s woes no cause to party up north

Marysville Appeal Democrat – 9/13/07

 

When one hears about food shortages, droughts and other disasters in Third World countries, a closer look almost always reveals that such problems are man-made, usually the result of asinine government land-use or economic policies.

Even in wealthy California, government-imposed restrictions can create shortages of necessary natural resources.

While natural cycles – a heat wave and long drought – are also sipping away at the state’s water supplies, a massive new shortage of water resources could result from a strange decision by a federal judge in a lawsuit brought by environmental activists.

As the Environment News Service reported, “U.S. District Judge Oliver Wanger on Aug. 31 ordered the State Water Project and federal Central Valley Project to reduce pumping in the (Sacramento River) Delta to protect the small silvery Delta smelt that has been declining year by year.”

The little fish has trouble swimming fast enough to escape the pull of the pumps. Unfortunately, the fish’s problem will soon become Southern California’s problem – water officials will have until December to replace water sources. The reduced pumping will go on for six months at least, so this is no short-term problem.

“We’re already pinched on Colorado River water,” said Brett Barbre, a Municipal Water District of Orange County board member. “This will be a court-induced regulatory drought. So many environmental groups are trying to stop all progress.”

California has 36 million residents, and that number is expected to rise to 60 million by midcentury. The state already imposes Draconian restrictions on land use, which makes it quite difficult to build the houses and infrastructure needed to deal with the coming residents. Curtailing water supply will further make it difficult to meet the state’s growth needs.

Northern Californians, who long have chafed at Southern California’s thirst for “their” water, should not celebrate the South’s problems as just desserts. If water transfers through the Delta are held hostage to court orders, that only adds momentum to renewed calls for a Peripheral Canal-styled ditch that bypasses the Delta entirely. The immense cost of such a project, and the litigation that would surely result, would drain water purveyors on both sides of the Delta.

The Schwarzenegger administration is pushing for a $5.9 billion plan to assure continued supplies from the Delta, according to published reports, and is warning about a coming crisis. So no matter what, the likely result will be forced conservation, more bond debt and higher prices for water consumers. Once again, government will have been the main obstacle to progress. #

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/articles/water_53931___article.html/delta_california.html

 

 

CRYSTAL GEYSER PROJECT:

Crystal Geyser loses bid to pump mineral water from Napa

Napa Valley Register – 9/13/07

By Kevin Courtney, staff writer

 

Saying they are concerned about global warming and millions of plastic water bottles, Napa City Councilmembers won’t let Crystal Geyser tap into a city aquifer for mineral water.

Crystal Geyser’s well application was rejected on a 3-2 vote Tuesday, with Councilman Mark van Gorder saying that bottled water companies were contributing to global warming by putting their product in billions of plastic containers.

 

Crystal Geyser’s proposal to dig a well beneath Napa Valley Corporate Park was “one of the worst projects that’s been proposed while I’ve been on the Planning Commission or the City Council,” van Gorder said.

Plastic water bottles have become a lightning rod for criticism by environmentalists who want consumers to reduce use of goods whose production creates greenhouse gases.

Napa Mayor Jill Techel based her opposition on her desire to protect Napa’s underground water supply. “We shouldn’t be mining it and shipping it out of our jurisdiction,” she said.

Crystal Geyser, based in Calistoga, produced multiple reports from hydrologists who said extracting 100 acre feet annually would have no impact on the area’s underground supply. One hundred acre feet is about the quantity consumed by 300 homes in a year.

Far greater quantities have been extracted from the area for industrial use in the early 20th century without any impact, they said. The aquifer under Napa Valley Corporate Park is rich in water, unlike the water-deprived Coombsville area, which sits atop another water formation, hydrologist James Strandberg said.

The company submitted plans to monitor the water table weekly. If it showed signs of dropping or if Napa were hit with a multi-year drought, the company agreed to cut back production.

Responding to council concerns about traffic, Crystal Geyser submitted a plan to keep its double-tanker trucks off the road during morning and afternoon rush hours.

The bottler planned 20 truck visits to 920 Anselmo Court daily. Trucks would haul 126,000 gallons daily to the company’s bottling plant in Calistoga.

“It’s in our interest to protect this resource,” said Peter Gordon, a founding partner at Crystal Geyser.

Council members Juliana Inman and Peter Mott supported Crystal Geyser’s proposal, saying that environmental and operational concerns had been mitigated.

“Regardless of how I may not like it, I think they’re within their rights to draw that water out,” Mott said.

Van Gorder countered that the project’s environmental analysis didn’t take into account the impact of the plastics industry on global warming. As a petroleum-based product, plastic generates a lot of greenhouse gasses during its production, he said.

Councilman Jim Krider voted against the project, saying bottled water contributed to environmental degradation while generating no jobs or taxes for Napa. Crystal Geyser, which had applied for a well permit as Triton Naturals, had volunteered to pay $36,000 annually to the city for road maintenance.

The Planning Commission had rejected Crystal Geyser’s application, calling water extraction an incompatible use for a light industrial park.

Owners of office condominiums at an adjacent property, Napa Valley Venture Commerce, protested the water operation. It would generate noisy truck traffic next to high-end office and hotel uses, they said.

The city attorney will come back at a future meeting with a motion detailing the various environmental and land use considerations that make Crystal Geyser’s well at bad fit for Napa Valley Corporate Park.

Crystal Geyser had offered to change its mineral water label to credit Napa for its water. The company’s 18-ounce plastic bottles would have said, “From our natural mineral water sources in Napa and Northern California.”

“It’s nice to have Napa mentioned,” Techel said before voting against the project. #

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2007/09/13/news/local/doc46e83c719b00e967614573.txt

 

 

WATER SUPPLY PLANNING:

Dos Rios Water Project would be costly

Ukiah Daily Journal – 9/13/07

By Rob Burgess, staff writer

 

If the proposed Dos Rios Water Extraction Project is approved, relief for the area's water crisis may be in sight--but some say not without substantial cost.

 

At Tuesday's Mendocino County Board of Supervisors meeting, the board sat as the Mendocino County Water Agency for the afternoon session.

 

During the meeting, it heard a presentation from Water Agency General Manager Roland Sanford regarding the proposal.

 

He said the feasibility of the pipeline, which would begin with a diversion from alluvial gravel deposits adjacent to the river channel and run from Dos Rios to Redwood Valley, was dependent on several factors.

 

"This is very expensive," he said. "We have to figure out if there is enough demand to spread the cost among the potential users.

 

The distance between the potential water source and potential water users is pretty far as well."

 

The proposed path of the pipeline was supposed to follow the defunct Northern Pacific railroad tracks between the two towns, which would present its own problems.

 

"The cost of maintaining right-of-way would be one concern," he said. "Also we'd be pumping the water uphill almost 1,000 feet in elevation. It's not cheap to pump water uphill."

 

Sanford said any water that was extracted by the project would have limited uses by law.

 

"The definition of domestic water use' allows for the use of the Eel River water by municipal water purveyors, but not agricultural operations," he said. "That is very clear."

 

Sanford said a 2002 legal opinion by county counsel stated that a "water diversion facility can be constructed at Dos Rios if the Secretary of the State Resources Agency determined that the water diversion facility is needed to supply domestic water to the residents of Mendocino County and that the water diversion will not adversely affect the river's free-flowing condition and natural character."

 

Sanford recommended in part that the board conduct a detailed analysis of existing and future water needs in the proposed project area and evaluate the feasibility of diverting water upstream of the currently proposed point-of-diversion at Dos Rios.

 

Any decision on the proposed project was delayed until the next board meeting by 5th District Supervisor J. David Colfax, who invoked Rule 22.

 

"Any motion which by its terms calls for an appropriation or expenditure of money shall, upon request and without further action, be continued to the next regularly scheduled Board meeting," states Rule 22 of the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors Rules of procedure.

 

The next board meeting will take place Sept. 18 at the Fort Bragg Town Hall at 363 N. Main St. #

http://www.ukiahdailyjournal.com/ci_6882674

 

 

WATER TRANSFER:

Cement plant to provide water for Shadow Cliffs; PLEASANTON: Park district is preparing infrastructure to deliver the flow after making a deal with CEMEX

Contra Costa Times – 9/13/07

By Meera Pal, staff writer

 

Providing a much-needed backup source for replenishing the 80-acre lake at Shadow Cliffs Regional Recreation Area, the East Bay Regional Park District has announced a deal to receive additional water from a local cement plant.

 

A popular swimming, boating and fishing spot in Pleasanton, the Shadow Cliffs lake was created in an abandoned gravel quarry pit. Water is lost through seepage and evaporation, especially in the summer.

 

The park district usually siphons groundwater from the nearby Arroyo del Valle to fill up the lake. But that access is limited, as the arroyo also serves the Zone 7 Water Agency and its customers in Pleasanton, Livermore, Dublin and the Dougherty Valley.

 

Through a recent agreement, CEMEX -- one of the largest cement and ready-mix companies in the country -- will provide fresh water from its holding ponds to the park district.

 

"When we quarry, we keep our water on-site and we sometimes have some in reserve," said Syl LaMacchia, manager of the CEMEX Eliot Plant on Stanley Boulevard. "The water remains on site and is recycled on site."

 

The water is used to wash sand and gravel -- the aggregates -- and is available for other uses after it undergoes a several-stage settling process. CEMEX tests the water to meet state standards before releasing the water to streams.

 

"There is nothing that we do except wash sand and gravel with it," LaMacchia said.

 

In addition to CEMEX's testing, park district officials will also monitor the water.

 

According to spokeswoman Shelly Lewis, the park district is currently adding the infrastructure needed to "pipe the water from the holding ponds to the lake."

 

LaMacchia estimated the distance between the lake and the ponds to be about 2,000 feet. The plant borders the east side of Shadow Cliffs in Alameda County.

 

Ultimately, this arrangement could save the park district and taxpayers thousands of dollars annually in potential water usage fees, and in construction costs for alternatives such as pumping water from other quarries.

 

The 266-acre Shadow Cliffs Recreation Area was donated to the park district by Kaiser Industries. A $250,000 matching grant from the U.S. Bureau of Outdoor Recreation was used to develop the park lands, lake and a four-flume waterslide, parking and picnic grounds.

 

The popular swim area is open on weekends in spring and fall and daily in the summer.

 

Quarry companies have long added water to the Arroyo del Valle, keeping its flow through Pleasanton going, usually even through the driest summers. In 2000, some of that water was diverted to Shadow Cliffs; that, along a deactivated quarry pump, resulted in the creek drying up through Pleasanton.

 

In summer 2006, Zone 7's board adopted a stream management plan. A key component of the plan is the formation of the "chain of lakes."

 

These lakes -- Shadow Cliffs among them -- would form a crescent from northeast Pleasanton to southwest Livermore. It is outlined in the Livermore-Amador Valley Quarry Area Reclamation Plan adopted by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors in 1981.

 

The stored water would be released downstream only after storms pass through the area, allowing arroyos to maintain a more natural state. Also as part of the management plan, 10 projects would remove or modify fish-passage barriers in Arroyo Mocho, Arroyo del Valle and Arroyo de la Laguna waterways. #

http://www.contracostatimes.com/search/ci_6881128?IADID=Search-www.contracostatimes.com-www.contracostatimes.com&nclick_check=1

 

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUPPLY CONDITIONS:

Editorial: Coping with drought; As Southern California gets drier, we're all going to have to swallow tougher water measures

Los Angeles Times - 9/13/07

 

In the late summer of a bone-dry 2007, 2008 is already looking like another bad year for water supplies in Southern California. It's past time for Los Angeles to start paying attention.

Two weeks ago, a federal judge ruled that state and federal water projects must limit the pumping operations that move fresh water through the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and into the southern part of the state -- all to protect the delta smelt, an endangered fish considered a bellwether for that region's fragile ecosystem. That may sound arcane, but it has serious everyday consequences. The water that flows through the delta serves 25 million people, providing more than a third of Southern California's supply. Officials estimate that the judge's ruling could cut off more than 30% of delta deliveries for at least a year.

Water districts from Silicon Valley to San Diego said they'd be squeezed next year, but most, like the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, said they hadn't yet decided to impose mandatory restrictions on water use. The Metropolitan Water District, Southern California's water wholesaler, will determine later this year how much water the DWP, which got 70% of its water from the MWD this year, will receive in 2008. Officials at the DWP, in turn, will wait until this allocation is made before calling for mandatory restrictions, which might include tiered pricing (with households exceeding a certain level of use paying higher rates, on a sliding scale) and enforcement of existing conservation rules.

It's great that Los Angeles has kept usage steady over the last 20 years; that the DWP is investing in local ground-, storm- and wastewater reclamation; that water agencies across the state are ramping up education campaigns; and that the MWD has done such a good job of building up reserves for non-rainy days. But given the profound uncertainties facing the state's water system, the choice to wait on mandatory restrictions is puzzling. As Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa reminded Angelenos in June when he called for (as yet unrealized) voluntary 10% reductions in water use, low local rainfall, diminished Sierra snowpacks and prolonged drought conditions on the Colorado River have combined to make this year L.A.'s driest ever. The effects of global warming on future water supplies are still unknown. And endangered species aren't the only threat to delta pumping: A breach in the region's unstable levees could shut down operations at any moment.

A more inspiring and productive response would capitalize on the sense of urgency and call on Los Angeles to do its part to address wider water woes now. Careful consideration of proposals to re-engineer the delta should be one part of the effort; serious dedication to conservation, another. Planners across the state should think twice before they allow development of lush suburbs or vast farmlands in hydrologically-challenged regions. All Californians will have to work for a water system that works for everyone. #

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-water13sep13,0,7170217.story?coll=la-news-comment-editorials

 

 

Editorial: Don't be a drip; Adopt stricter water conservation rules on your own

Long Beach Press Telegram – 9/13/07

 

Even without the impending reduction in water supply from Northern California, Long Beach should do more to conserve. Soon residents may not have a choice. And that may not be a bad thing.

 

The water board plans to meet today to consider declaring a water-supply shortage and strict regulations on how residents and business use water. We support the recommendations by Water Department administrators and urge the board to pass them.

 

It will not be a picnic. We remember the rationing of the 1980s and 1990s, but it's time for residents to get in the habit of treating water for what it is, a precious commodity, rather than something they can spray all over the driveways whenever they choose.

 

Long Beach water officials are anticipating a 10 percent reduction in the water supply following a federal judge's ruling in favor of the National Resources Defense Council, which sought to protect an endangered smelt from pumps along the San Joaquin-Sacramento River delta. Though the ruling is under appeal, it would squeeze the water supply from December to June and could harm the already-teetering economy.

 

The Water Department has not declared a water shortage in 16 years, so the potential move today is not without significance.

 

The board plans to consider eight rules to reduce water use that would restrict outdoor watering to three days a week and force restaurants to serve drinking water only on request.

 

Those who do not comply with the new rules face penalties, higher rates and - for serious offenders - a shutdown in service.

 

Fortunately the penalties are preventable for those willing to adopt a few smart conservation techniques, such as watering yards before 8 a.m., adjusting sprinkler settings to avoid overspray, sweeping driveways, repairing leaking sprinkler heads and faucets, tearing out lawns and installing drought-resistant plants, taking three-minute showers and washing only full loads of dishes and clothes.

 

Though change is hard for those used to watering their lawns until they look like fairways, there is an upside to all of this: lower bills for those who comply.  #

http://www.presstelegram.com/opinions/ci_6876112

####

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive