This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 9/24/07

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER SUPPLY ISSUES:

Unlike its neighbor, L.A. goes with the flow; As Long Beach enacts restrictions on water use in advance of a potential crisis, the DWP takes a wait-and-see approach - Los Angeles Times

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

September 24, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

Temecula-area farmers brace for water cuts - Riverside Press Enterprise

 

Water agency warns supply in jeopardy; officials say Hi-Desert OK for now - Hi-Desert Star

 

Fallbrook alert puts limits on water use; Voluntary, mandatory restrictions in place - San Diego Union Tribune

 

Sanders, Aguirre push water conservation policies - San Diego Union Tribune

 

STATEWIDE WATER CONSERVATION:

Editorial: Drips and drops; State mustn't forget about conservation - Vacaville Reporter

 

NAPA AREA CREEKS:

Column: Water gait - Napa Valley Register

 

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER SUPPLY ISSUES:

Unlike its neighbor, L.A. goes with the flow; As Long Beach enacts restrictions on water use in advance of a potential crisis, the DWP takes a wait-and-see approach

Los Angeles Times – 9/24/07

By Steve Hymon, staff writer

 

Long Beach has a population of almost half a million, making it the second largest city in the county of Los Angeles and the fifth most populous in the state.

As you may have read, water officials there recently looked at the prospect of tightening water supplies and decided the outlook was bleak enough to impose restrictions.

The new rules are hardly draconian, but they do have some bite. Lawn watering is now allowed only three days per week, the time that sprinkler systems are allowed to run has been limited and daytime watering has been prohibited.

Long Beach's decision is intriguing, in part, because the largest city in the county, Los Angeles, has not imposed such rules. Instead, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa asked residents this summer to voluntarily cut their usage by 10%.

Long Beach residents already use less water on average than L.A. residents -- 121 gallons per day versus 141 in 2006. Which leads to the question. . .

Is Long Beach jumping the gun, or is Los Angeles sticking its head in the sand?

This is hard to say without the ability to predict the weather. In the winter of 2004-05, for example, the city of Los Angeles had its second-wettest year on record. Last winter was its driest. This year: Who knows? Despite the rainy weekend, forecasters are saying it could be a drier-than-normal year in the Southwest.

In Long Beach, officials insist they're simply trying to prepare residents for a time when water resources grow more scarce and thus more expensive. Besides the ongoing drought, they also point to projections of a diminishing snowpack in California and the West, courtesy of global warming.

There is also the prospect that the amount of water pumped into the California Aqueduct from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta could be curtailed to protect the endangered delta smelt.

"We are preparing our customers for a water supply emergency," said Ryan Alsop, spokesman for the Long Beach Water Department. "It may happen, it may not happen. But we think it's likely, and we wanted our community to be the absolute best-prepared community in Southern California to deal with it."

Alsop added, "We should be doing these things year-round. Water is a finite resource as it is. . . . We're owning up to the fact that we're wasting water."

Although the city can issue citations to violators, it is not planning to do that, nor is it known if the new rules will become permanent. Alsop said the goal, for now, is to educate residents. He also said he doesn't believe the watering restrictions will send anyone's landscaping off to the gallows.

The city is encouraging residents to report those who are wasting water. The Long Beach Water Department has even produced two YouTube videos. One of them shows a man leisurely hosing down a sidewalk -- a no-no under the new water restrictions -- and provides a phone number ([562] 570-2455) residents can call to rat each other out. A complete list of restrictions is at www.lbwater.org.

And what are Los Angeles officials saying?

"I think there are a number of factors on the horizon and they will come to a head very quickly," said David Nahai, president of the Department of Water and Power board. "At that point we'll be able to make a decision. If all of a sudden we get mounds of snow in the Sierra or we get a great deal of rainfall, imposing an additional, onerous burden will be uncalled for.

"And what will we do next time? Will we be taken seriously?"

Nahai said he believes the call for voluntary conservation in L.A. is analogous to what Long Beach is doing, since Long Beach is not fining violators. Nahai said too that the supply situation is different for Los Angeles.

Both cities rely on groundwater wells and water purchased from the Metropolitan Water District, which imports water from Northern California and the Colorado River. But Los Angeles also owns a pair of aqueducts to import water from the Eastern Sierra.

Most provocatively, Nahai said that he's open in the future to using higher water rates as a way to "encourage" people to stop wasting water. That's not something you hear often from high-ranking water officials.

As for imposing restrictions, he said that is something the DWP board would do only after consulting with the mayor, who appoints its members.

Attentive readers may recall that when The Times earlier this summer asked Villaraigosa about his big water bills at his Mount Washington home in 2006, the mayor invoked the Caddyshack Doctrine and said that gophers chewed into the sprinkler system and caused leaks.

How bad is the water situation at the moment?

Generally speaking, many of the largest reservoirs in the state are at levels below where they usually are at the end of summer.

Let's take a look at some numbers: Lake Shasta in Northern California, the state's largest reservoir, was only 43% filled as of Wednesday -- about 72% of its average capacity this time of year.

Oroville and San Luis reservoirs -- which serve Southern California via the California Aqueduct -- were at 46% and 28% of capacity, respectively, and are both well under their averages for this date. On the Colorado River, Lake Mead and Lake Powell were about half-filled, thanks to eight years of drought in the Rocky Mountains.

The DWP's Crowley Lake in the Eastern Sierra was at 57% capacity through August, about 81% of its average for that date. On the other hand, the MWD's massive Diamond Valley Lake was almost at 90% of its capacity.

Still, one reason that the region isn't in deeper water trouble is, since there are so many reservoirs, the state and region have effectively built a multiyear buffer against drought. Equally important, it also has helped Los Angeles that conservation has taken hold in recent years.

As the accompanying chart illustrates, in 1980 the average Angeleno used 178 gallons of water each day. After rising in the 1980s, that number has fallen and was 141 in 2006, thanks to water-saving technology such as low-flow toilets, officials say. That's a number that compares favorably with many other cities in the state -- residents in the San Diego area used 173 gallons a day last year.

But here's the problem: Per capita use may be down in L.A., but because of population growth, overall water use is up -- from 192.7 billion gallons in 1980 to 193.6 billion in 2005 and 200.7 billion in 2006. If the population is going to keep growing -- and if history is an indicator, it will -- then per capita usage has to keep falling for total demand to stay flat.

If demand doesn't, cities will either have to build more dams -- ignoring the environmental consequences and that most of the best sites have been taken -- or pray that the predictions about global warming are wrong and the snowpack actually increases in the 21st century.

Or, elected officials can draw a line in the sand and say, once and for all, that in a semi-arid climate, wasteful practices simply will not be tolerated. #

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-localgovtqa24sep24,1,4540719,full.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-california

 

 

Temecula-area farmers brace for water cuts

Riverside Press Enterprise – 9/21/07

By Jeff Horseman, staff writer

 

TEMECULA - Farmers who get water from the Rancho California Water District may have to scale back their irrigation plans as the district deals with an expected cut from one of its top suppliers.

 

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California will likely ask Rancho California to reduce the amount of water it uses for agriculture, officials with both agencies said Friday. By Jan. 1, Rancho California will likely have to cut the amount of water it imports for crops and livestock by 30 percent, said Timothy Barr, a resource planner for the Temecula-based district.

 

Based in Los Angeles, Metropolitan is a consortium supplying drinking water to nearly 18 million people in six counties, including Riverside and San Bernardino.

 

Rancho California, which serves more than 120,000 people in southwest Riverside County, including Temecula and nearby unincorporated areas, is one of 26 agencies served by Metropolitan.

 

By Nov. 1, Metropolitan is expected to issue a 60-day warning about the cut for agricultural customers enrolled in a special program that allows them to get water at a reduced rate, Barr said. In exchange, their water supply is first on the chopping block for reductions in times of shortage, he said.

 

The discussion comes in response to the region's chronic water supply problems.

 

A lack of local water, plus an eight-year drought along the Colorado River and a recent federal court decision affecting Northern California's water supply, contribute to the shortage, Metropolitan spokesman Bob Muir said.

 

One customer bracing for the possible change is Ben Drake, who sits on the Rancho California board. Drake oversees about 400 acres of vineyards and 1,000 acres of avocados.

 

Drake said the cut would have a bigger effect on farmers of permanent crops, such as avocados. In the face of global competition, smaller crops are at a competitive disadvantage, he added.

 

Rancho California officials already are taking steps to deal with the looming cut, which would affect about 1,700 customers farming everything from strawberries to avocados.

 

Barr said not all farmers should expect drastic cuts to their water. The district will work with customers on a case-by-case basis to make their water delivery systems more efficient, he said.

 

By doing so, Barr said Rancho California could comply with Metropolitan's mandate without cutting every farmer's water supply by 30 percent.

 

"We're trying to create a plan that is fair and balanced," Barr said.

 

In another potential move to save drinking water, Rancho California also is considering a policy requiring large-scale users, such as golf courses, to use recycled or untreated water for landscaping. A vote could come next month. #

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_C_water22.3a332c1.html

 

 

Water agency warns supply in jeopardy; officials say Hi-Desert OK for now

Hi-Desert Star – 9/22/07

By Jimmy Biggerstaff, staff writer

 

APPLE VALLEYCalifornia’s State Water Project is mired in a crisis that threatens water deliveries throughout the state, including the Hi-Desert, the Mojave Water Agency warned this week as the Association of California Water Agencies launched launched a media campaign including TV ads and news releases throughout the state.

The record dry year in 2007 would be enough to threaten deliveries, Mojave Water Agency general manager Kirby Brill warned during a recent presentation to the Hi-Desert Water District directors.

Supporters of the ACWA campaign say the impending crisis is exacerbated by a federal court decision last month that cuts water supplies from the state’s two largest delivery systems by up to one-third to protect the endangered delta smelt.

The small fish is an indicator species whose demise, conservation experts caution, could herald the death of the Sacramento delta region.

“As if the drought and reduction in deliveries weren’t enough,” Brill warned, “there’s the specter of global warming, which is reducing mountain snow pack, and the earthquake threat.”

The aging Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Delta, through which water is delivered to 25 million Californians, is at risk of a natural disaster that could cripple water deliveries for an extended period of time, according to Brill.

 

 

“Water users are going to have to pay more attention to how we use and manage our water resources,” said Jim Ventura, Mojave Water Agency board president.

While water rationing hasn’t entered the lexicon of water agencies, conservation has taken on an added urgency. Ventura emphasized that we can’t conserve our way out of this crisis.

“I don’t want to minimize the importance or effectiveness of conservation; we all should do whatever we can to save water,” Ventura continued. “But we also need to explore a number of options to meet our demands.”

As the wholesale water purveyor to the Hi-Desert, Mojave Water Agency is pursuing several ways to meet water demands during times of drought or reduced deliveries from the State Water Project.

 

 

 

Options include:

·  Buying supplemental water,

·  A banking program and

·  A conservation program.

Statewide, water reserves are extremely low. However, because the Morongo Basin relies on groundwater that can be stored in a vast underground reservoir, water users are in much better shape in the short term.

The Mojave Water Agency has been preparing for a serious shortage by purchasing more than 100,000 acre-feet of supplemental water that has been delivered from the State Water Project and “banked” in the underground reservoirs, according to a news release provided by the agency.

“We haven’t had to tap into those reserves yet,” Brill said, “and we should be OK for several years, barring a complete shutdown of the State Water Project.”

In October, the Mojave Water Agency will start its regional Water Conservation Incentive Program to induce more public participation in conservation efforts. The program will provide vouchers and rebates valued up to $165 per device for conservation products, as well as a turf buy-back program that pays up to $3,000 to homeowners who remove their grass and replace it with less water-needy landscaping. Commercial customers are eligible for up to $10,000.

The Association of California Water Agencies is a 450-member coalition that includes the Mojave Water Agency. Its press material expresses concern that the public at large is unaware of critical water problems facing California today and its potential impact on our economy, environment and quality of life.

In response, ACWA has launched a statewide program to heighten public awareness about the problems the state faces, urging residents to be water-wise.

“If our water supply and infrastructure systems fail, the impacts would be felt in homes and businesses across the state. Such a failure could trigger widespread water shortages and mandatory rationing, with serious impacts on our quality of life, environment, agricultural production and general economy,” Brill added.

Brill credits the adoption of the Regional Water Management Plan in 2005 with providing the agency the vision to plan for the future. The plan proposed projects and management actions over 20 years to help meet present and future water demands.

Not all the state’s water agencies are buying into the ACWA campaign. The Stockton Record newspaper reports two water districts in San Joaquin Valley are opposing the campaign, fearing it is intended at least in part to win support for a Sacramento River canal that the water agencies say will hurt the area. #

http://www.hidesertstar.com/articles/2007/09/22/news/news1.txt

 

 

Fallbrook alert puts limits on water use; Voluntary, mandatory restrictions in place

San Diego Union Tribune – 9/22/07

By Matthew T. Hall and Mike Lee, staff writers

 

The Fallbrook Public Utility District yesterday became the first water supplier in the county to announce a Stage II water alert, which combines restrictions with voluntary measures. The new rules will immediately affect everyone from restaurant patrons to residents with yards.

 

Earlier in the day, San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders and City Attorney Michael Aguirre renewed their calls for water conservation in the face of reduced supply and record-low rainfall.

 

Water managers across the region are watching how the compulsory and optional efforts play out as they plan their own strategies. Opinions are split about whether it's premature to start putting mandates in place, as they were during the last major drought in the early 1990s.

 

“Once you start the panic ... it's going to be very emotional,” said Bill Rucker, general manager of the Vallecitos Water District in San Marcos. “You are going to impact people's businesses ... and livelihoods.”

 

The San Diego County Water Authority has been promoting voluntary conservation measures all summer because of drought conditions on the Colorado River and limited supplies from Northern California.

 

Keith Lewinger, manager of the Fallbrook district, said it's time to take stronger steps based on the expected impact of a federal court ruling issued in August that will probably reduce Southern California's water supply drastically next year.

 

Several water officials in the county are holding off on announcing emergency conservation measures because specifics of the judge's order won't be known for weeks. But Lewinger said his district's rules force him to get more aggressive now.

 

“I just cannot see how we are going to meet all our water demands without all our customers conserving at least 10 percent,” he said.

 

Fallbrook's declaration means that district customers can water their lawns only between 5 p.m. and 9 a.m. and that ornamental fountains can be run only under certain conditions.

 

The district won't consider annexations of land outside its current service area. In addition, restaurants have been told not to serve water unless patrons request it.

 

District officials won't be checking water bills to enforce the rule, but Lewinger said restrictions could become more severe if water supplies don't improve.

 

Each agency has slightly different rules and response plans for water emergencies.

 

In San Diego, Aguirre called a news conference to assert that the city's lakes and reservoirs have been drawn to “unsafe levels.”

 

 He said San Diego ought to emulate last week's declaration of an imminent water supply shortage by the Long Beach Board of Water Commissioners.

 

Under that announcement, people are barred from washing driveways, sidewalks and parking lots with garden hoses. They also can't irrigate landscapes more than three days a week.

 

Emergency status means that “people will take it a lot more seriously,” Aguirre said.

 

At his own news conference, Sanders said San Diego may need to declare a formal water emergency – but not yet.

 

“I think the best approach is a measured and thoughtful approach that neither overreacts nor misjudges the potential of the problem,” he said.

 

Officials for the county water authority will present a report about supply levels to the San Diego City Council on Oct. 8, Council President Scott Peters said. He said he hopes the city will have a short-term water strategy by month's end.

 

“All San Diegans are going to be called on to pay close attention to their own water habits,” Peters said. “What form that takes, I think it's too early to say.”

 

San Diego is required by council policy to maintain more than a seven-month supply of water for use at any given time, said Jim Barrett, director of the city's water department.

 

It currently has 153,000 acre-feet – 20,000 more than what's mandated, he said. An acre-foot is enough to meet the needs of two typical households for a year. #

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20070922-9999-2m22water.html

 

 

Sanders, Aguirre push water conservation policies

San Diego Union Tribune – 9/21/07

By Matthew T. Hall, staff writer

 

San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders and City Attorney Michael Aguirre renewed recent calls for voluntary water conservation Friday in the face of reduced supply and historically low rainfall.

 

But in dueling news conferences separated by half an hour, Sanders said it was premature to declare an emergency to make conservation mandatory as Aguirre suggested.

 

Aguirre called their difference “a matter of degree” but said San Diegans would use less water if the City Council declared an emergency and required conservation than if people were simply asked to conserve.

 

A spokeswoman for City Council President Scott Peters said he was preparing a response for release later in the day.

 

The two news conferences continued an escalating war of words over water issues between Sanders and Aguirre. Aguirre began making public comments about water policy in recent weeks after a legal decision last month that could limit the city's access to water out of the Sacramento Delta.

 

About 90 percent of San Diego's water is imported.

 

Jim Barrett, director of the city water department, said yesterday that San Diego is required by council policy to maintain more than a seven-month supply of water for use at any given time. It currently has 153,000 acre-feet, 20,000 more than that requirement, he said.

 

Sanders said the city may eventually need to declare a formal water emergency but added, “I think the best approach is a measured and thoughtful approach that neither overreacts nor misjudges the potential of the problem.”

 

Aguirre said by declaring an emergency, “People will take it a lot more seriously.”  #

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20070921-1328-bn21water.html

 

 

STATEWIDE WATER CONSERVATION:

Editorial: Drips and drops; State mustn't forget about conservation

Vacaville Reporter – 9/21/07

 

The governor and lawmakers, engaged in a special legislative session, are attempting a Herculean task: to craft a solution to California's water woes.

 

Their focus so far has been on multibillion-dollar bond proposals that would pay for dams, reservoirs, canals and other expensive water works. While such massive initiatives surely will be part of the solution, if a solution is devised, they are not the only path to take.

 

Solano County is a most interested partner in this Capitol debate. The water projects that affect the Delta affect an important source of our supply. Pumping from the Sacramento River enables our farmers and our cities to sustain their existence.

 

In addition to the big projects and the debate over the next iteration of the old Peripheral Canal proposal, there should be another topic of equal importance being debated in Sacramento: Requiring more conservation and efficient water use. Reducing wasteful water use offers the most cost-effective way of ensuring California's fragile water supply.

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and lawmakers need to make sure that water agencies, consumers, businesses and farmers have the proper system of mandates, incentives and pricing in place so that California can continue making strides in efficient water use.

 

Efficiency gains already have been significant. California's total water use is down sharply from a peak in 1980, even as the state's economy and population have grown sharply. The state's per capita consumption of water has stayed at roughly 1,100 gallons a day over the past decade, down about 40 percent from 1970, estimates the Pacific Research Institute.

 

But more needs to be done.

 

The greatest potential for additional efficiencies is among California's urban residents. More homeowners need to install low-flow shower heads and toilets, efficient washing machines, and drought-tolerant landscaping. Businesses need to speed up adoption of newer water-efficient practices and recycling. And policy-makers need to put in place appropriate pricing and incentives that promote conservation.

 

Agriculture, which uses 80 percent of the state's water, also needs to accelerate changes. Farmers should speed up the installation of drip systems, sprinklers, sensors and other technologies. Today, only about 35 percent of the state's farmland uses drip irrigation. With about 50 percent of the land still on wasteful flood irrigation systems, there's a lot of room for improvement.

 

Farmers, whose water often comes at cheap, subsidized prices, also need to continue shifting away from water-intensive crops, such as cotton and alfalfa, and move toward more water-efficient, higher-value fruits and vegetables.

 

Improving the management of groundwater and increased use of recycled water also should be encouraged.

 

Conservation and more efficient water use will not entirely solve the problem. But Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, D-Oakland, are working primarily on bond proposals for 2008 - $9 billion and $5.4 billion, respectively - that call for building more storage and delivery systems.

 

That might be needed, but policy-makers should first look to using some of the $10 billion in water-related bonds voters already passed last year.

 

Both the governor and lawmakers should resist the urge to simply throw a lot of concrete at the water problem, with taxpayers picking up the tab. Building infrastructure will always look like a bolder solution when compared with conservation and efficiency. But sensible, achievable and less expensive strategies should not be shortchanged. #

http://www.thereporter.com/specials/ci_6958966

 

 

NAPA AREA CREEKS:

Column: Water gait

Napa Valley Register – 9/23/07

By Bill Kisliuk, columnist

 

The hound and I walked up the center of Redwood Creek recently, without getting a paw or a shoelace wet.

The creek has been bone-dry for months for where it passes near Alston Park, one indicator of the extremely dry season we’ve had this year — last week’s drizzle aside.

It hasn’t been a dry period for water-related news stories, though, as St. Helena is scaling back water usage, other cities around the North Bay are doing the same, and Napa’s supply of State Water Project flows likely will be limited because pumps in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta are endangering the Delta smelt.

Water news in California is nothing new, but it feels as though the scarcity is finally beginning to capture the imagination of the public and public servants.

 

One of the first long news articles I wrote, and therefore one of the first long news articles my editors just about completely rewrote, was about water, specifically the increased intrusion of salt water in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. With fresh water diverted to Central Valley farms and Southern California cities, salt water has made it further and further up the delta and altered the ecosystem there.

The granddaddy of all California water stories — captured among other places in the, ahem, watershed piece of non-fiction “Cadillac Desert” — was the tale of how William Mulholland engineered the delivery (did someone say theft?) of water from the Owens River in the Eastern Sierra to Los Angeles. “Cadillac Desert,” by Marc Reisner, also details the marvel of how engineers made water run uphill to top the pass into the Los Angeles basin.

I think of this every time my wife, her hound and I leave Los Angeles on Highway 5, where at the northern edge of the San Fernando Valley a giant man-made waterfall spills thousands of gallons a second into the thirsty city.

I’m a Southern California native, and I think it is fair to say that there is almost zero public perception there that California is perennially on the edge of a water crisis —ironic because that city relies entirely on imported water and the mighty-sounding Los Angeles River is just a sad, dry little desert wash encased in concrete.

But water awareness is growing. Local officials have talked for years about getting recycled water to Coombsville and Carneros, for example, which will ease the burden on falling water tables in those areas. As Kevin Courtney reported earlier this month, Coombsville property owners might be voting on an assessment to pay for a reclaimed water pipeline in 2009.

A reclaimed water pipeline to Carneros is more problematic for several reasons, ranging from the secrecy private property owners like to maintain about the strength of their wells to the obstacles of getting recycled water from treatment plants on the east side of the Napa River to Carneros properties on the west side.

Meanwhile, a dog can walk a long way on the rocky floor of Redwood Creek these days without finding anything to slurp. #

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2007/09/23/columnists/bill_kisliuk/doc46f5e62979f57411007189.txt

####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive