This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 6/8/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

June 8, 2007

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People

 

FUNDING FOR LOCAL PROJECTS:

County to hire lobbyists to fatten flood control purse - Napa Valley Register

 

Proposal to raise SLO water rates prompts protest; About 10,000 postcards are mailed to residents to request opposition - San Luis Obispo Tribune

 

 

FUNDING FOR LOCAL PROJECTS:

County to hire lobbyists to fatten flood control purse

Napa Valley Register – 6/8/07

By Kevin Courtney, staff writer

 

Maintaining that you have to spend money to get money, the Napa County Flood Control District will pay lobbyists $258,000 next year to sway lawmakers in Sacramento and Washington.

Spending a quarter of a million dollars for access to state and federal governments may seem high, but the district doesn’t have any choice if it wants to keep the Napa flood project moving, said Heather Stanton, local project manager.

“There isn’t another major project that doesn’t employ a lobbyist. We have to be there,” Stanton said.

The district voted this week to renew contracts with The Gualco Group in Sacramento for $98,000 and the Carmen Group in Washington for $160,000.

 

Much greater sums of money are at stake to keep the flood project from falling further behind schedule, Stanton said.

The Gualco Group will help the district obtain nearly $24 million in state reimbursement for local flood expenses, she said. The Carmen Group will be trying to pry millions more from Congress and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to build flood defenses in and around downtown, she said.

In Washington and in Sacramento, Napa is having to compete against much larger cities for flood funding, Stanton said. There isn’t enough money to go around, so a lobbyist becomes essential, she said.

“These folks have the ability to wind through all the machinations in Sacramento and Washington,” Stanton said.

Although federal funding has lagged, Napa got $14 million for construction this year. This is $5 million more than President Bush had proposed, she said.

The Corps of Engineers will need even larger appropriations in coming years if the flood project is to wrap up by its new target date, 2015, Stanton said. That schedule assumes annual federal allocations averaging $15 million.

In Sacramento, Napa lobbies the Legislature and the governor to pay the state’s share of local flood costs. Thanks in part to Gualco, the local project got $30.8 million this year, Stanton said. Another $23.9 million is in the pipeline for next year.

Napa Mayor Jill Techel, who chairs the flood board, said lobbyists set up meetings with key legislators, staff members and administration officials when locals make lobbying trips.

Without lobbyists, “you are risking your project not getting the money it needs,” Techel said.

Techel agreed that $258,000 is a lot of money. “It’s a chunk of money, but it brings back millions and millions for this project,” she said.

“They know staffers, they know the process, they know other funding sources,” Techel said of lobbyists.

While federal funding is always an uncertainty, the local half-cent flood control tax, which pays for right of way acquisition, will be adequate next year, Stanton said. “We’re in very good shape,” she said.

The flood tax is expected to bring in $13.2 million. #

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2007/06/08/news/local/doc4668f68677b68791936948.txt

 

 

Proposal to raise SLO water rates prompts protest; About 10,000 postcards are mailed to residents to request opposition

San Luis Obispo Tribune – 6/8/07

By Sally Connell, staff writer

 

One man’s protest against San Luis Obispo’s plan to get water from Nacimiento Lake is the reason about 10,000 city residents are receiving postcards in the mail this week asking for support in fighting double-digit water rate increases.

 

The mailing by truck driver and unsuccessful City Council candidate Terry Mohan states his opposition to the rate increases and asks voters in San Luis Obispo to sign the attached postcard and send it back to City Hall.

 

Under state law, if 50 percent plus one of the city’s 14,400 or so water ratepayers protest, they could halt the increases and force the City Council to take another action.

 

The council is to adopt the 13 percent increase that will raise water rates for an average household in the city to $42 a month from $37. A majority of the council is expected to approve that increase June 19, and it could go into effect July 1.

 

Most city officials hope Mohan’s protest will not gain traction and the rate increases will go forward. City Utilities Director John Moss anticipates another 13 percent increase in water rates next year, and rates are expected to almost double between now and 2012 and then level off.

 

The biggest portion of the rate increases is in anticipation of paying for the city’s share of the 45-mile-long Nacimiento Lake pipeline project.

 

The project is out to bid. Officials are hoping that it does not exceed the $180 million to $190 million estimates for construction. Five agencies are taking part: San Luis Obispo, Paso Robles, Templeton Community Services District, Atascadero Mutual Water Co., and County Service Area 10a, serving Cayucos.

 

The city of San Luis Obispo expects to get 3,300 acre-feet of water from the project, enough water to supply 9,900 households on the formula that the city uses, officials report.

 

Mohan believes there is enough water for current San Luis Obispo residents and that Nacimiento water would contribute to unbridled growth.

 

“The only people who need this water is new development,” Mohan said. “They are the ones who should be paying for it. I don’t care if they build the pipeline; I don’t think the people here should pay for it.”

 

He said he has no issue with reasonable rate increases to serve the current water plant and other infrastructure.

 

But city officials say the Nacimiento project is a key to the city’s future water supply. And Moss said Mohan is mistaken in his belief that there is enough water now for the city of 44,000.

 

The city has two primary sources of water, the Salinas Reservoir and Whale Rock Reservoir near Cayucos. Whale Rock Reservoir was finished in 1962.

 

“I will be disappointed if it gets overturned,” Moss said. “We can’t stop looking for more water.”

 

City Councilman Allen Settle said he remembers the long drought that led to the city’s water rationing in the 1980s. The city has added no new sources of water since then beyond a recent project to use recycled water for landscaping.

 

“I prefer to have managed growth with reliable resources,” he said, “to a crisis management situation where we have to tell the voters, ‘You are going to be restricted on water consumption.’ ”

 

Settle worries that Mohan’s campaign will appeal to some people for the wrong reasons.

 

“Nobody wants to pay more for anything right now —gas, utilities; I can understand that,” Settle said. “I would urge the people here to recognize the last thing you want to run out of is water.”

 

City Attorney Jonathan Lowell determined that returning the signed card with a utility bill number would serve as a legal, official protest.

 

Under guidelines allowed in California Proposition 218, if 50 percent plus one of those who pay a fee or rate oppose an increase, it cannot be approved as planned. The issue could then go to a larger vote, or the city could revise its proposal and hold a new public hearing similar to the one it held May 31. #

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

No comments:

Blog Archive