Department of Water Resources
A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment
June 27, 2007
1. Top Item
Hetch Hetchy study a no-go; House panel rejects Bush proposal for funds to look at draining the reservoir
Sacramento Bee (Same article appeared in today’s Fresno Bee and today’s Modesto Bee) – 6/27/07
By Michael Doyle, staff writer
But in truth, the idea was dead on arrival several months ago.
In a multibillion-dollar Interior Department funding bill, lawmakers Tuesday pointedly declined to include money needed to study the Hetch Hetchy proposal. Bush had sought $7 million to begin studying the idea of draining the reservoir and restoring the once-famous valley in
Forget it, lawmakers said.
"This highly controversial proposal, with a potential cost of as much as $10 billion, was not well justified in the budget materials," the House Appropriations Committee noted.
The Senate Appropriations Committee has likewise omitted Hetch Hetchy funding in its own version of the fiscal 2008 spending bill, approved by the Senate panel last week. Although the House and Senate have yet to negotiate their final spending bill, there is no chance the Hetch Hetchy money will be included.
"We felt from the very beginning that this didn't have a huge chance of getting funded,"
Yosemite officials admitted being caught by surprise when the Bush administration included the Hetch Hetchy study funding in the proposed fiscal 2008 budget in February. The $7 million would have helped evaluate the environmental and economic consequences of removing O'Shaughnessy Dam.
Authorized by Congress in 1913, the 312-foot-high dam stores water coveted by
A state study last summer concluded that valley restoration would be technically feasible but also cost somewhere between $3 billion and $10 billion. State officials added that further federal studies would be needed.
Even with this background, though, there were no discernible political fingerprints on the Bush budget proposal this year.
Neither the National Park Service nor the White House's Office of Management and Budget admitted to having anything to do with the Hetchy Hetchy spending request.
"We tried a couple of different ways to find out how that money got in there," said Spencer Pederson, spokesman for Rep. George Radanovich, R-Mariposa, "and we just kept running into a dead end."
A Republican administration last publicly discussed restoring Hetch Hetchy in the late 1980s, when skeptics dismissed the notion as a bit of political judo. By defending the existing reservoir with its 360,000 acre-feet of water, liberal San Francisco-area politicians clash with their customary allies in the environmental groups that favor the valley restoration idea.
The Office of Management and Budget already has threatened a presidential veto of the House's Interior Department spending bill, contending it includes "an irresponsible and excessive level of spending."
The White House's official policy statement, though, made no reference to the omission of funding for the Hetch Hetchy study, and Radanovich noted the administration seemed to drop the idea quickly.
"There really wasn't that much of an effort behind it," Radanovich said.
Overall, the $27.6 billion House bill includes myriad other
The official committee report accompanying the House bill "strongly encourages" the Environmental Protection Agency to grant
http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/243989.html
####
No comments:
Post a Comment