A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment
June 6, 2007
2. Supply
State changes course on S.J.'s bid for Mokelumne water rights
By Alex Breitler, staff writer
State water officials have reversed an earlier decision canceling the county's request to take and store some of the Mokelumne's flows during wet years.
There's a long way to go before a proposed off-stream reservoir in the rangelands northeast of
"It's huge," said Mel Lytle, water resources coordinator for the county. "We can't afford to lose a single drop of this water we're fighting to preserve."
The deficit is roughly enough water to supply 150,000 families for one year.
Most of the county's other rivers are tapped. While
The Bay Area gets most of the Mokelumne's bounty, but in wet years, some of the water simply dumps into the ocean.
To capture those flows,
The county protested, saying it needed more time for a regional analysis of future water supplies. The state board changed its stance in a letter last week, saying the county is making "substantial progress" and should be given more time to build the facilities needed to use the water.
"Everyone was smiling when they heard. It's really positive news," said Kevin Kauffman, general manager of the Stockton East Water District. His district is helping seek a solution to the region's groundwater woes.
Already more than $1 million has been spent on Mokelumne studies, with $2 million more allocated next year. The federal government has kicked in $3.3 million.
Some money and guidance has come from the California Department of Water Resources, a sister agency to the state board.
The county has been doing what the state told it to do all along, said Ed Steffani, general manager of the North San Joaquin Water Conservation District.
"I think that was the clincher" in the board's reversal, he said.
Mokelumne battles are far from over. Steffani's
http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070606/A_NEWS/706060322
####
No comments:
Post a Comment