This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 6/25/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

June 25, 2007

 

2. Supply -

 

Officials: Desert thirsty for change -

The Desert Sun

 

State's share of a coal plant is assailed

Critics say Nevada facility contradicts goal to cut share of greenhouse gases. -

Sacramento Bee

 

To keep water flowing, cut usage by 15% -

Antelope Valley Press

 

_________________________________________

 

Officials: Desert thirsty for change

The Desert Sun – 6/24/07

By Keith Matheny

 

Ongoing drought forcing new look at landscaping habits

Celeste Cantú recalled feeling heartened when she saw a model home in a new development landscaped with water-conserving, native California vegetation.

Then she drove through the development, and saw none of the homeowners had followed the model's example.

 

"Everyone had the Iowa look - green grass and water-sucking plants," said Cantú, the general manager of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, at Thursday's Riverside County Water Symposium in Cabazon.

 

The lush, green Coachella Valley many have come to know may soon be forced to change, due to an increasingly dire water reality in the West.

 

Ongoing drought with no let-up in sight. Global warming. Court battles with environmentalists and levee problems in the Sacramento-San Joaquin river delta that supplies much of California with water; coupled with diminishing supplies of Colorado River water that supplies most of the rest. An ever-increasing water demand from a growing population. The factors have all come together to create what Cantú called "the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse."

 

But the alarms many Western water experts are sounding haven't yet resonated in most desert neighborhoods.

 

Nancy Speer with Speer Business Services in Palm Desert manages five homeowner associations in the region. Four are in the Coachella Valley.

While desert landscaping is utilized in most of the local associations, some, such as Aliso La Quinta, require homeowners to have at least 20 percent of their lawns in grass.

 

"The rest can be desert plants, but people just haven't chosen to do that," she said.

"It comes from where they came from. If they relocated from Orange County to the desert, the first thing they want is what they're used to."

Most homes use well more than half their water on their lawns and outdoor landscaping.

 

That has many worried.

 

"We need to stop pretending we live in someplace else," said Palm Desert resident Buford Crites, vice president of Friends of the Desert Mountains, a land conservation group."We don't live someplace with a bunch of water," he said.

 

Changing long-held perceptions of what the desert should look like has proven a difficult task, Coachella Valley Water District general manager Steve Robbins said.

"For many years, people came out here and the symbol was building something green in the desert," he said.

 

Changing minds has included educating that desert landscaping doesn't have to mean "a gravel front yard with one spindly cactus in it," he said.

He noted such areas as Bighorn in Palm Desert as "the best examples of what lush and efficient desert landscaping can be."

 

Crackdown coming?

The county board of supervisors earlier this year adopted a water-efficient landscape requirements ordinance. The Coachella Valley Water District has a similar ordinance, as do at least six of the valley's nine cities.

 

Most of the tough requirements, however, are for newly developed or redeveloped public areas, large businesses or multi-family homes. Cracking down on lush-lawned, single-family homes is now viewed as a last resort, not a first step, said Randy Record, chairman of the Riverside County Water Task Force.

 

"If we can't set the right example in the public landscaping, we have no business telling people what they can do in their back yard or front yard," he said.

 

The valley water agencies are getting together to "give a unified message" on water conservation, said Bob Edwards, environmental compliance coordinator for the Indio Water Authority.

 

The effort is about "trying to do something most people can go along with and accept - trying to make it easy to follow; not complicated," said Dave Luker, general manager of the Desert Water Agency.

 

Rather than focusing on limiting grass, the Coachella Valley Water District's ordinance sets parameters for annual water use at a development.

"We're trying to build in flexibility," Robbins said. "We're saying to the developers, 'Here's the amount of water you have to use. You be creative and you can do that however you want in your development.'"

 

Using water wisely

If aesthetics can't prod desert-dwellers to give the sprinklers more off-time, other options that could eventually be implemented might, such as tiered pricing, charging customers higher rates based on higher water use.

 

"In that way, those who think it's truly a priority to have a green lawn, make them pay for it," said Mark Buehler, assistant general manager of the Coachella Valley Water District.

 

Bringing landscaping ordinances in line with the desert's water realities is only a part of what must happen, Robbins said. Determining how to follow up at developments and deal with noncompliance is required as well in order to effectively reduce water consumption, he said.

 

"We've had cases where developers submit a landscape plan and on paper everything looks great; then you go out into the field three months later and they didn't build anything close to what's in the plan," he said.

 

"You've got to put the restrictions in the plans and check the plans. But you've also got to be able to go out and make sure they actually installed what's in the plan," Robbins said.

 

"And put in some kind of incentive through (water) pricing to make sure they keep it that way five years down the road."#

http://www.desertsunonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?aid=/20070624/news01/706240315/1006/news01&GID=xOXPnpGQ53hN1LDUoXnusXAsoTuLg776N7pHrrNxF+g%3D

 

State's share of a coal plant is assailed

Critics say Nevada facility contradicts goal to cut share of greenhouse gases.

Sacramento Bee – 6/23/07

By Judy Lin - Bee Capitol Bureau

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger once proudly proclaimed that California has stopped buying coal-generated power due to its harmful side effects on the environment. He urged the rest of the nation to follow his lead.

 

But the state not only buys power from a Nevada coal-fired power plant, it owns a piece of it.

 

The state Department of Water Resources confirms that it has a majority stake in one of four generating units at the Reid Gardner coal-fired plant 50 miles northeast of Las Vegas. The department receives up to 275 megawatts -- enough to power a small city -- from Reid Gardner to help run pumps that deliver water throughout the state as part of the State Water Project.

 

"It reflects the department's business-as-usual attitude toward global warming and that's not good enough," said V. John White, executive director of the Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technology. "They have an undistinguished history and they ought to be looking at alternatives, such as solar panels."

 

Schwarzenegger spokesman Bill Maile said the state is tied to a long-term contract that was signed years ago. He said the state will not renew the Reid Gardner contract when it expires in 2013.

 

"The governor wants to clean up polluting coal-powered electricity generators as soon as possible and he is leading the charge to protect California's environment," Maile said.

 

Carl Torgersen, chief of operations and maintenance for the State Water Project, said the department is responding by installing more efficient equipment. Department officials say no decision has been made to sell the state's share of the plant.

 

Recently the Reid Gardner plant came under environmental scrutiny. In April, the plant's main owner, Nevada Power Co., was ordered to pay $90 million in a settlement with the federal government and in fines for alleged air pollution violations.

 

Although the state is not a party to the settlement, Nevada Power spokeswoman Andrea Smith said California may be asked to help pay for equipment upgrades to reduce emissions of nitrous oxide, a major source of greenhouse gas. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the utility will need to spend $85 million on cleaner technology at the plant.

 

Coal pollution concerns come at a time when California has challenged itself to cut overall greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by 2020, putting pressure on government, industry and consumers to conserve power and find alternative energy sources. Advocates for renewable energy say it's not enough for the administration to talk green. They say the state has to act.

 

If California wants to maintain its green reputation, said Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, D-Oakland, the state should stop buying power from Reid Gardner as soon as possible. If the state's contract cannot be broken, Perata said he will introduce legislation requiring the state to divest its stake in the coal plant.

"Do as we do, not as we say," he said Friday.

 

Unless the department decides to end its contract early, White said, "it means this brown energy source is going to continue to move water through California and show the governor and DWR are not acting on their word."

 

According to state documents, California acquired partial ownership in the unit in 1979 as a way to diversify power sources. Today, coal power from the Nevada plant makes up 12 percent of the department's overall energy profile. Much of the rest comes from hydroelectric plants.

 

For the past year, Schwarzenegger has been on a whirlwind tour promoting the greening of California.

 

"We don't buy any more electricity from anyone that gets it from coal," Schwarzenegger declared April 11 at an environmental conference at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. "We have changed that, so we have sent a very clear signal to the rest of the country."

 

That same day, Perata sent a letter to Department of Water Resources Director Lester Snow, asking what steps the department is taking to replace Reid Gardner with cleaner electricity. He noted that water-related energy use accounts for 19 percent of the state's electricity consumption.

 

Perata noted in the letter that the Schwarzenegger administration is implementing greenhouse gas reduction laws and the state is moving ahead with water storage and conveyance paid by infrastructure bonds. He said that presents "an opportunity to review the department's current activities with an eye toward reducing energy consumption and dependence on fossil fuels to help meet state climate goals."

 

Schwarzenegger last year signed legislation to prohibit public and private utilities from buying new electric power unless they comply with state emissions performance standards. Perata said, "Our best policies in state government are those we first practice ourselves."

 

Snow responded in an April 13 letter that said the department is "exploring alternative power options" for Reid Gardner. He noted that the State Water Project contributes less than 1 percent of the state's greenhouse gases, compared with transportation, which accounts for over 40 percent of the state's emissions.

 

Torgersen said the water project is improving energy efficiency by replacing 60-megawatt water pumps at the Edmonston pumping plant at the southern tip of the San Joaquin Valley, which will improve efficiency by up to 5 percent.

 

"For a pump that large, it's a considerable increase," Torgersen said.

The department also has installed the first of four new turbine generators at the Hyatt power plant at Lake Oroville. The project is expected to increase efficiency by up to 7 percent.#

http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/237795.html

 

 

To keep water flowing, cut usage by 15%

Antelope Valley Press – 6/24/07

By Titus Gee, staff writer

 

PALMDALE - Only conservation will get us through the summer, Palmdale Water District officials told residents Saturday at an open house.

Every household must cut 15% out of their water usage in order to keep the faucets from running dry, they said.

 

"If we get that, we can make it through the year without water rationing or other measures," said Greg Dluzak , production manager for the district.

 

If residents cannot cut back voluntarily, mandatory rationing will have to be instituted with fines as high as $1,000 for breaking regulations, officials said.

 

The water district lured residents with free drought-resistant plants, low-flow shower heads and other water-saving giveaways.

 

Households that successfully conserve 15% during the summer months may receive free plants and could win trees or a new toilet in a district raffle, they said.

The open house also featured demonstrations and displays about water-efficient landscaping and plumbing tips to keep water from escaping.

 

"We always want people to use (water) wisely; then we'll have enough for everyone," said Claudette Roberts , the district's water conservation manager.

 

"I think we won't have a problem" getting people to comply, she said. "It's easy enough to do. … Just a little bit of help goes a long way."

 

Roberts suggested turning the watering time on automatic sprinklers down by a minute or two, taking fewer or shorter showers and choosing to decorate with desertworthy plants.

 

"Plant irises," she said. "They're good flowers. They are low-water tolerant and everybody loves them."

 

Bill and Patricia Van Gorder did just that. The pair do not live within the Palmdale Water District, but they attended the open house because they care about water conservation, Patricia Van Gorder said.

 

"It's something I think everybody needs to be concerned about," she said. "Where does the aquifer go? Under all of us, so it's a good idea for all of us to conserve it.

The Van Gorders planted more than 100 irises in their yard, and they use a meter to check moisture levels before watering. The flowers often go a week without needing more water, they said.

 

This summer's water crisis rises from an unusually dry winter that left the reservoir in Littlerock almost completely dry, Dluzak said. The district usually pulls about 4,000 acre feet of water from behind the Littlerock Dam, a pool that is supplied entirely by local runoff, he said - runoff that never materialized this year.

 

Between July 2006 and the end of February, local weather watchers recorded only 1.41 inches of rain in Palmdale and 1.45 inches in Antelope Acres.

 

"I think we're really going to be into something this summer," watcher John Baylor said in February, and that is exactly what happened.

 

The 4,000 acre-feet that cannot come from Littlerock equals about 15% of the estimated demand for the summer, Dluzak said.

 

Adding to the problem, a conflict between the Department of Water Resources and a sport-fishing group shut down one of the major pumps that supplies the state aqueduct, he said.

 

The Department of Water Resources turned off the pumps at the Harvey O. Banks Pumping Plant, near Stockton, for 10 days in early June as a voluntary effort to protect the delta smelt, an indigenous species of fish. That move pre-empted the order of an Alameda County superior court judge to shut down June 18 and save the smelt. Pumps reportedly are operating again but at less than 20% of normal capacity.

 

The pump could be shut down again and stay shut for up to 18 months, "which would put us in a world of hurt," Dluzak said.

 

Due to supply controls based on state estimates of water supply, the district will receive about 60% of its water allotment for the year, he said.

 

The manager urged residents not to assume that seeing water in Palmdale Lake or flowing in the aqueduct indicates an abundance of water.

"They don't realize that (water supply) really is a complicated animal," he said.#

http://avpress.com/n/24/0624_s3.hts

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive