This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] FW: 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 6/08/09

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

June 4, 2009

 

2. Supply –

 

 

 

Rancho California Water District seeking federal dollars

The Press-Enterprise

 

 

Desalination facilities planned for the county

The Union-Tribune

 

 

Ag and Water: Making Do with Less

KQED

 

El Nino brewing, raising O.C.’s chance for wet winter

Orange County Register

 

Summer water picture brings '70s flashback

Marysville Appeal-Democrat

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

 

Rancho California Water District seeking federal dollars

The Press-Enterprise-6/06/09

By Jeff Horseman

 

 

The Rancho California Water District is seeking up to $20 million in federal stimulus money for a long-range project to boost the use of recycled water while reducing dependence on costly imported water.

 

The Temecula-based district applied for the money earlier this year; $20 million is the most the district can get, said MWD Director of Planning Perry Louck.

He said the district hopes to hear whether it will get any stimulus dollars later this month.

 

The money would help construct the district's water reclamation project, a three-phase, $141 million plan officials say will meet local water needs through 2050.

 

Rancho Water District serves more than 130,000 people in a 150-square-mile region consisting of Temecula, parts of Murrieta and nearby unincorporated areas.

 

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California supplies more than half the district's water. Faced with a long-term drought and water supply problems, MWD this spring announced 10 percent supply cutbacks to its clients, a move that forced Rancho Water to consider mandatory water restrictions and supply cuts to agricultural customers.

 

The first phase of the reclamation plant calls for building a 48-inch pipeline to transport raw water from the MWD's aqueduct system to Vail Lake east of Temecula.

 

The $28 million pipeline would store an additional 10,000 acre-feet annually of untreated water during the low-demand winter months.

 

One acre-foot equals the amount of water needed to supply two families for a year.

 

Louck said the district is waiting the completion of a federal environmental study before sending the project out to bid. Construction is expected to take two years, he said.

 

Phase two would convert the water system in Temecula Valley Wine Country to use untreated water for crops and vineyards instead of potable water.

 

The $57 million conversion would allow less-expense nonpotable water to be used for irrigation.

 

The third phase involves building a $56 million desalination plant to lower the salt content of recycled water from Eastern Municipal Water District.

 

Rancho Water cannot use this water because its salt content exceeds state standards.

 

About 16,000 acre-feet a year of recycled water is expected to be made usable through the plant.

 

Phases two and three are dependent upon the Rancho Water securing recycled water from Eastern Municipal Water District in Perris.

 

Those discussions are ongoing, Louck said.

 

The plant could bring other side benefits.

 

A brine disposal system would be needed for the plant, and an established system could lure businesses seeking to get rid of their brine, Louck said.

 

And by retaining more local water, Rancho Water can cut back on its emissions from pumping activities, he added.#

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_swater07.4a2c816.html

 

 

Desalination facilities planned for the county

Projects set to tap the ocean for water

The Union-Tribune-6/07/09

By Michael Burge

 

With a large-scale desalination plant approved for the Carlsbad coast and others possibly on tap nearby, San Diego County is positioned to become a global leader in turning ocean water into drinking water.

 

If planned desalination facilities go forward, nearly one out of every five gallons of the region's tap water will come from the ocean by 2020.

 

Besides Poseidon Resources' envisioned plant in Carlsbad, which is scheduled to churn out 50 million gallons of purified ocean water each day starting in 2012, the San Diego County Water Authority has just completed a feasibility study on a potential 150 million-gallon-a-day operation at Camp Pendleton.

 

The second project would take a decade and nearly $2 billion to complete. It would likely begin as a smaller complex and gradually expand.

 

“If they go ahead with (the full-sized version), it will be the biggest seawater desalination plant in the world,” said Tom Pankratz, editor of the Water Desalination Report and an industry consultant.

 

The largest saltwater desalination complex under development is a site in Algeria that would generate 132 million gallons per day starting in 2011.

 

While desert nations in the Middle East and elsewhere have long depended on desalinated seawater, U.S. demand has emerged only during the past decade.

 

In California, about 20 projects have been proposed from San Diego to Marin counties.

 

Aside from analyzing the Camp Pendleton prospect, the county water authority has teamed up with the International Boundary and Water Commission to explore the idea of building a plant in Rosarito Beach, about 15 miles south of the U.S.-Mexico border.

 

San Diego has always stood at the forefront of the desalination business because the industry was born here, Pankratz said.

 

“It probably has the biggest concentration of desalination experts in the United States,” he said.

 

The first desalination plant to successfully demonstrate the reverse-osmosis technology in wide use today was installed in 1969 at the Stardust golf course in Mission Valley (now called Riverwalk Golf Course). It demineralized brackish groundwater, Richard Sudak said.

 

Sudak was the reverse-osmosis engineering manager at the time for San Diego-based General Atomics, which pioneered the field of reverse osmosis. In general, the method involves using specialized membranes to filter salt, impurities or other substances out of water.

 

“A number of other companies started membrane manufacturing as a result of” General Atomics' advances, said Gerry Filteau, president of Separation Processes of Carlsbad, a company that Sudak founded in 1980.

 

Local membrane manufacturers include Hydranautics in Oceanside, Toray in Poway and Koch Membrane Systems in San Diego. Desalination-related chemical companies include Professional Water Technologies in Vista, King Lee Technologies in San Diego and Avista Technologies in San Marcos.

 

But it's only coincidence that San Diego County was both an early center of the desalination industry and the likely future home to some of the world's major desalination projects.

 

The region gets nearly 90 percent of its water from Northern California and the Colorado River.

 

Those supply lines are crimped by ongoing drought in California and restraints on transferring water from Northern California to Southern California through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

 

“It's significant because it shows you've run out of alternatives,” Pankratz said.

Seawater desalination is a logical step for the San Diego area because of its geographic constraints, said Ken Weinberg, the county water authority's director of water resources.

 

“The fact that there's no large groundwater basin limits our opportunities,” he said. “We have very limited sources – you have recycling, you have conservation and you've got the ocean.”

 

While ocean-water desalination has the biggest potential, two local water agencies – Oceanside and the Sweetwater Authority in South Bay – have been desalinating brackish groundwater for years.

 

Oceanside's 2 million-gallon-a-day output is expected to triple to 6 million gallons on Tuesday.

 

Sweetwater desalinates 3.8 million gallons a day and has teamed up with the Otay Water District to explore boosting that amount.

 

The city of San Diego is considering desalination of groundwater wells in places such as the San Pasqual and San Diego River valleys.

 

“Ideally, you want to find those locations where there's the highest water quality that you can bring up and utilize,” said Marsi Steirer, deputy director of water resources and planning for San Diego.

 

The county water authority projects that at least 89,600 acre-feet of the region's supply – 10 percent of total demand – will come from the ocean by 2020.

 

If the Camp Pendleton plant produces 100 million gallons a day, the region would get 168,000 acre-feet – or about 19 percent of its supply – from the ocean.

 

The water authority began looking at the base as a potential site for a desalination facility after a possible marriage with the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station fell through. San Onofre was attractive because it has an existing system for drawing in and expelling ocean water.

 

Camp Pendleton has enough land at two prospective sites – 26 to 30 acres – to build a desalination complex.

 

Bob Yamada, the authority's water resources manager, said a desalination plant offers the base several benefits, “one of which would be a core water supply or emergency water supply.” Camp Pendleton currently depends on groundwater.

 

Yamada said his agency would build an outfall to discharge salty water from the desalination facility, and that base officials could use the same pipe to discharge wastewater.

 

Camp Pendleton's leaders have no official position on the proposal but are discussing it with the San Diego County Water Authority, said base spokesman Lt. Riley Whaling.

 

A major issue would be the seawater intake system, which is also the most controversial aspect of Poseidon Resources' project in Carlsbad. An open intake can crush small organisms and pin fish and other marine animals against filter screens, killing them.

 

Yamada said the county water authority is considering subsurface intakes for the proposed complex at Camp Pendleton.

 

The method, which uses pipes or wells buried beneath the ocean, avoids sucking in marine life because seawater is filtered through sand and rock on the ocean floor. The sand also acts as a natural pretreatment agent for the desalination process by preventing large particles from entering the pipes or wells.

 

If the county water authority decides to go with the open-intake option, Yamada said, it would use the latest technology to reduce environmental harm.

 

Mexico's Rosarito proposal is being studied by the county water authority, the Metropolitan Water District, Southern Nevada Water Authority and Central Arizona Water Conservation District.

 

The agencies are working under the umbrella of the International Boundary and Water Commission, which addresses border issues. They are hoping to take pressure off the Colorado River, which supplies water to seven states and Mexico.

 

Issues such as how large the project would be, who would pay for it and how the water would be distributed have yet to be worked out, said David Fogerson, a senior engineer for the county water authority.#

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jun/07/1n7desal225241-projects-set-tap-ocean-water/?northcounty&zIndex=112304

 

Ag and Water: Making Do with Less

KQED-6/06/09

By Sasha Khokha

.

Does climate change spell doomsday for California agriculture?

 

That’s what Nobel-prize winning physicist Steven Chu told the Los Angeles Times in an interview, soon after President Obama appointed him Secretary of Energy.

 

“I don’t think the American public has gripped in its gut what could happen,” he told the Times in February. “We’re looking at a scenario where there’s no more agriculture in California.”

 

For another perspective, I called UC Davis ag economist Richard Howitt, who focuses on water and California agriculture, to ask him what he thought.

 

“That’s a highly inaccurate statement,” Howitt said. “Steven got carried away. Brilliant man, but he doesn’t know anything about California water.”

 

Howitt’s models show climate change will likely lead to a 25% reduction in the state’s water supply over the next 50 years. He says that will likely mean some rough times ahead for farmers, but certainly not the end of California’s role as an agricultural powerhouse.

 

In fact, Howitt says if California farmers can continue to grow more drought-tolerant crops and cut back on flood irrigation, they’re likely to thrive in the marketplace over the long term:

“As income increases, people eat more California fruit, nuts, and vegetables,” he says. “They don’t care about cotton; they don’t care about corn. We are on the right side of the agricultural business in terms of future growth.”

 

Of course, that means if you were to fly over the Central Valley in 50 years, you’d probably see fewer emerald-green islands of crops like rice, alfalfa, and cotton–and more fields of wheat and flexible crops like canning tomatoes, which can be planted seasonally and according to demand.

 

“This will, of course mean that we have less slack in the system than we do now,”  says Howitt.  “We’re going to have to be much better at applying water, look a little more like Israel and a little less like Northern California.”

 

Engineers who specialize in irrigation technology have long looked to drought-stricken countries for models. The folks who developed the Pure Sense software I discuss in my radio story have collaborated extensively with farmers in Australia.

 

Howitt also says no matter how efficiently farmers apply water, they have to figure out how to more efficiently move it around the state. Rather than just fighting over smelt, salmon, and pumping in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, Howitt thinks farmers could be more efficient if we plumb water east to west (currently the two major water systems in California are primarily north-south oriented).

 

Howitt says that would create incentives for farmers in relatively water-rich areas, like the east side of the San Joaquin Valley, to sell water to farms with good soil but less water–like the west side of the San Joaquin Valley, home to the some of the largest and wealthiest farms in the world.

 

Tricking plants into yielding more with less

 

Meanwhile, the idea of "dry farming," like what the folks at Sonoma County's Flatland Farm are doing with their apples, is getting popular in coastal areas. Dry-farmed tomatoes, like these from Santa Cruz, are increasingly popular at farmer’s markets.

 

Some researchers are taking this concept to places where it doesn’t rain so much. The idea is to control irrigation to stress the plants to the point where they think they’re starting to die, which triggers the plant's genetic imperative to produce more fruit.

 

David Goldhamer, who advises Central Valley farmers through the UC Cooperative extension, has demonstrated that farmers who cut back on watering of navel oranges and pistachios, may actually produce higher-quality fruit and generate more income.

 

A sprinkling of history

 

I also visited David Zoldoske, at the Center for Irrigation Technology at Fresno State. They have an amazing collection of historical sprinkler systems and a virtual irrigation museum online. Zoldoske has been studying irrigation and water efficiency for decades. Here’s what he told me about how agriculture is going to have to adapt to warming temperatures:

I think the thing to remember here is there is no silver bullet. There is no reservoir or canal or any other technology or engineering feat that’s going to solve this problem. We’re going to have to use every tool in the toolbox. It’s going  to take multiple feats of engineering elegance so we can solve this problem. And it’s still possible that we’ll fail. And I don’t want to be saying that we will fail. We need to be very focused on this. It’s going to be a long journey. We won’t solve it over night.”#

 

http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/06/06/ag-and-water-making-do-with-less/

 

 

 

El Nino brewing, raising O.C.’s chance for wet winter

Orange County Register-6/08/09

by Gary Robbins

 

 

After three straight years of below average rainfall, there may finally be some good news ahead. News of the soggy kind.

 

The U.S. Climate Prediction Center says  in a new advisory that an El Nino of undetermined size appears to be forming in the equatorial Pacific.

 

The natural, periodic climate change usually produces wet winters in California, where drought-related water restrictions are currently going into effect statewide.

 

Past El Ninos also have led to flooding, mudslides and strengthened some storms to the point where they generated huge waves that damaged the Orange County coastline, especially local piers.

 

“Conditions are favorable for a transition for ENSO-neutral to El Nino conditions during June-August 2009,” the advisory says.

 

In simplest terms, sea surface temperatures become unusually warm in the eastern equatorial Pacific during El Nino, a phenomenon that can vary greatly in intensity.

 

This warming sets off oceanographic and atmospheric chain reaction that can make winter storms stronger, especially when the northern jet stream dips south.

 

Forecasters should have a better idea by mid-summer whether the El Nino now brewing along the equator is going to become big.#

http://sciencedude.freedomblogging.com/2009/06/08/el-nino-brewing-raising-ocs-chance-for-wet-winter/35459/

 

Summer water picture brings '70s flashback

Marysville Appeal-Democrat-6/07/09

By Thomas D. Elias

 

We are starting to see the summer water picture for California -- and it's looking a lot like the late 1970s. Or, to put it another way, it's beginning to look a lot like Bolinas almost did.

 

That's right, chances are much of the rest of California will soon be following the plan put in place and later rescinded by Bolinas, the funky town not too far north of San Francisco in coastal Marin County. Best known for its populace of aging hippies, artists, lawyers and others seeking refuge from crowded urban life, Bolinas was rescued by an unexpected late-March storm that suddenly refilled its key reservoir.

 

Bolinas isn't often first with anything. But because it has no access to supplies from the state Water Project, the federal Central Valley Project or the San Francisco-owned Hetch Hetchy reservoir system and aqueduct, Bolinas uses only local supplies.

 

Before the unexpected late-season rains, the key Bolinas reservoir was at risk of running dry before the next rainy season, likely to start in November or December.

 

So Bolinas adopted California's toughest water rules: Residents were to use no more than 150 gallons per day, 4,500 per month. That amounted to about a 25 percent cutback from normal usage of about 208 gallons per day per water hookup. Violate the rule once or twice and nothing much would happen to residents. But supplies could be cut off on a third violation.

 

The Bolinas rules are now in abeyance, but they were only a little bit tougher than what many other places might soon be seeing, despite a few late rains.

 

In the Central Valley, cities like Folsom and Roseville are weighing water use cutbacks. Farmers are fallowing fields because allocations from the state Water Project and the federal Central Valley Project remain low. The East Bay Municipal Utility District, covering much of Alameda and Contra Costa counties, has now raised prices because water use there has been cut back so much. That's right: Use less and pay more.

 

But the most visible water-use reductions might be coming soon in Los Angeles, which has its own aqueduct running from the Owens Valley on the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada mountains.

 

Despite heavier than usual rains in February and March, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has not backed off proposed water use restrictions involving a tiered pricing system punishing consumers and businesses that fail to conserve even beyond today's levels, which see average use down almost 15 percent from the levels of the 1960s.

 

"The level of severity of this drought is still severe," he said. "We have to move quickly."

 

No one can be sure whether Villaraigosa's plan is not at least partially motivated by politics. Just reelected to a new four-year term as mayor, he may run for governor next year. If so, he'll be the only Southern Californian in a crowded field running for an office that's been held exclusively by Southern California politicians since the 1960s days of Edmund G. (Pat) Brown. Southern Californians in the office have included Ronald Reagan, Brown's son Jerry, George Deukmejian, Pete Wilson, Grey Davis and today's occupant, Arnold Schwarzenegger.

 

Among today's likely candidates, even ex-Angeleno Jerry Brown, the current attorney general, is now a confirmed Northern California resident based in Oakland, where he served two terms as mayor.

 

No Los Angeles mayor, not even the long-serving Sam Yorty or Tom Bradley, has ever been elected governor. That's been partly because of regional animosity stemming from a Northern California sense that water from that region has been "stolen" by Central Valley farmers and Southern California cities.

 

A vigorous approach to water rationing by Villaraigosa can only help him in the north, where Southern California is viewed as a profligate water waster - even by people who use unlimited water during droughts because their homes don't feature water meters.

 

Vigorous is surely an accurate term for what Villaraigosa has instituted: sprinkler use limited to twice a week, with a likely cut to once; no hosing of sidewalks or parking areas; water use in decorative fountains and ponds only if they feature a recirculating system; no washing cars with hoses without a self-closing shut-off device; no watering lawns between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., and fines for allowing excess water to flow onto sidewalks, driveways, streets or gutters. If things get worse, there would be no refilling of swimming pools and spas.

 

All this implies imposing a "water cop" system like that employed in the '70s, when water department or water district inspectors roved widely looking for violations.

 

The ultimate penalty for repeated offenders would be a water supply cutoff.

 

That's the immediate water future for much of California. Not a pretty sight, but it worked in the 1970s and there's no reason to believe it can't work again - unless the rest of the state gets the same kind of reprieve Bolinas did.#

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/articles/water-78337-use-california.html

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive