This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS -6/22/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

June 22, 2009

 

3. Watersheds –

 

 

Environmentalists baffled by Obama's strategy

L.A. Times

 

Bonding money funds Lake Tahoe improvements

Mercury News

 

Creekside residents in Novato desperate for solution to erosion as storm season wipes out property

Marin Independent Journal

 

'Rivers of a Lost Coast' coming soon

Eureka Times-Standard

 

 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

Environmentalists baffled by Obama's strategy

L.A. Times-6/21/09

By Jim Tankersley

 

As a candidate for president, Barack Obama wooed environmentalists with a promise to "support and defend" pristine national forest land from road building and other development that had been pushed by the George W. Bush administration.

 

But five months into Obama's presidency, the new administration is actively opposing those protections on about 60 million acres of federal woodlands in a case being considered by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

The roadless issue is one of several instances of the administration defending in court environmental policies that it once vowed to end.

 

Its position has been a disappointment to environmentalists who had hoped for decisive action in rolling back Bush-era policies.

 

Administration officials say that in some cases, they are defending the policies to prevent the courts from settling the issues -- a prospect that would restrict the government's ability to set the environmental agenda. They say the task of setting policy is better left to government agencies and legislators.

 

 

"We have set out on a very clear path toward improving our nation's environmental laws and policies so they balance America's need for a strong, sustainable economy and a healthy environment," said Christine Glunz, spokeswoman for the White House Council on Environmental Quality. "That means taking short- and sometimes longer-term action."

 

Still, the strategy has puzzled some environmentalists because the administration has used the courts to backpedal from Bush policies in some areas, including spotted owl protection, energy efficiency standards and hazardous-waste burning.

 

Most prominently, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson dropped an appeal to the Supreme Court in a case that struck down Bush-era limits on mercury pollution from coal power plants, which environmentalists called too lax.

 

Whatever the overall strategy, the result has been a series of cases in which President Obama appears to be taking positions in court that run counter to his stated goals.

 

The Interior Department this spring, for example, defended a Bush plan to lease western Colorado's picturesque Roan Plateau for oil and gas drilling.

 

When the Bush administration announced the plan in 2008, then-Sen. Ken Salazar of Colorado called it "the unsound product of an administration that has lost sight of the balance" between developing and conserving public lands.

 

But today, Interior Secretary Salazar is opposing a court challenge from environmentalists to block the leases.

 

A Interior spokesman declined to comment on the department's position, but other officials noted that negotiations are underway on a possible out-of-court settlement, and the government's hand in these negotiations may be stronger if it continues to fight in court.

 

Administration lawyers have also fought environmentalists in court over a coal mining technique known as mountaintop removal.

 

The administration successfully argued this year that the court should reject the environmentalists' suit, in part because officials were already developing new standards for mountaintop mining projects.

 

They announced the standards last week, though many environmentalists criticized them for doing too little to protect against water pollution and other effects of mountaintop mining.

 

In the road-building case, the governor and the attorney general of Oregon urged the federal government in a letter last week to drop its opposition to a court ruling that tossed out Bush's roadless policy and reinstated Clinton-era protections.

 

"Obviously, we'd love for the Obama administration to withdraw the appeal," Oregon Atty. Gen. John Kroger said in a telephone interview, "or otherwise help us to get the right rule."

 

Administration officials say they are committed to protecting roadless areas but have decided to pursue the goal through policymaking rather than in the courts. As part of that effort, the Agriculture Department last month announced a de facto one-year moratorium on development in most roadless areas.

 

In broad terms, administration officials say relying on court cases to deal with such issues entails greater delays and uncertainties.

 

"Our judgment is, we're going to have these court cases for a long time to come, and therefore we'd have uncertainty for a long time to come," said Robert Bonnie, a senior advisor in the Agriculture Department, which is responsible for a large proportion of federal forest lands.

 

Some environmental groups warn, however, that there is a risk to the strategy of opposing an issue to ultimately support it.

 

If the courts agree with the government and allow the building of more roads in wilderness areas, the administration could face enormous difficulties in achieving its ultimate goal of keeping the roads out.#

 

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/environment/la-na-obama-enviro21-2009jun21,0,2983783.story?track=rss

 

 

Bonding money funds Lake Tahoe improvements

Mercury News-6/19/09

By Rachelle Gines

 

The 2009 Nevada Legislature and Gov. Jim Gibbons approved a new law that requires issuance of up to $100 million in general-obligation bonds to pay for environmental improvement projects at Lake Tahoe over the next 10 years.

 

Lake Tahoe's famed clarity has been declining and the bonds issued under AB18 will pay for projects to help stop that trend, said Allen Biaggi, director of the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.

 

The bonds also will help water quality, forest management, air quality, transportation, recreation and maintenance projects.

 

"In general terms, the focus of the money and the projects is Lake Tahoe's water quality," Biaggi said. "The reason Lake Tahoe is so special is because of its water clarity and how far down you can see into it."

 

Biaggi said recent projects have slowed the decline in Tahoe's clarity, which currently averages about 70 feet, and the goal is to increase that to 80 feet by 2028. Tahoe has lost an average of one foot of clarity per year since the 1960s.

 

"The loss of clarity is slowing because water quality projects are working and making a difference," Biaggi said, adding that the eventual goal is to increase clarity to 100 feet.

 

The clarity is hurt by sediments from urban areas and nutrients from fertilizers in gardens and lawns, which appear in runoff to the lake. Sediments deflect light on Tahoe's surface, causing the water to appear muddy, and nutrients can

cause algae overbloom.

The environmental projects also will focus on forest health of the Lake Tahoe Basin. Biaggi called forest health important, adding that the June 2007 Angora fire showed that Tahoe Basin forests are in bad shape.

 

Lake Tahoe forests are overgrown because of fire suppression efforts, Biaggi said. Project money will be used to lower the occurrence and intensity of fires by removing brush and thinning trees.

 

The $100 million in bonding money funds Nevada's involvement in Tahoe's Environmental Improvement Program over the next decade. President Clinton launched the program in 1997.

 

Nevada and California state and local agencies participate in the program, along with federal agencies, homeowners and businesses. Over half a billion dollars have been spent on water quality and environment improvement projects so far.

 

Besides the bonding money, lawmakers approved Gibbons' cuts to Nevada's share of funding for the bistate Tahoe Regional Planning agency. That cuts this state's nearly $3.8 million share of TRPA costs over the next two fiscal years by about $1.1 million.

 

TRPA has already completed budget cuts, Biaggi said, adding, "Nevada has pretty much always met its obligation and there have been times when California hasn't, so this is not unprecedented."#

 

http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_12650365

 

 

Creekside residents in Novato desperate for solution to erosion as storm season wipes out property

Marin Independent Journal-6/21/09

Brent Ainsworth

 

During the rainy season, Novato Creek has a voracious appetite, taking Volkswagen-sized bites out of people's backyards in the swirling aftermath of each storm.

 

Gerry and Glenna Godwin have lost one-third of their backyard, including a 13.2-ton bay tree, to the creek off Marion Court. Cracks in their patio - ominous signs of further erosion - creep within four feet of their house.

 

A mile away, Mary Page's backyard near Miwok Park is hanging precariously over the now-calm creek waters. In the winter, it's like a punching bag for a chocolate-brown heavyweight champion that could be called the Novato River, complete with whitecaps.

 

Who is responsible for preventing such erosion? In some cases, it's Marin County and its flood control district. In others, it is the city's public works department. But most of the time, in a legal sense, it's the property owners fending for themselves.

 

"I'm at a standstill because financially I can't afford to do anything," Page said. "It has grown to be a much bigger project than it was originally. I'm fed up."

 

Obtaining environmental impact reports and permits to make creekbed improvements and save eroding property can costs hundreds of thousands of dollars as well as approval from several agencies. Rock reinforcement called rip-rap works in some cases, but bio-engineered solutions are required in other places.

 

There is no easy answer to coordinated flood control, but a proposed Novato Creek Watershed Stewardship Program could result in progress if the city approves it.

 

The Novato City Council last week showed support for the concept during a community workshop but did not have majority support to spend $210,000 on it now to help pay for technical studies, program management and a final work plan. The issue is expected to reappear on a future agenda.

 

Councilwoman Pat Eklund said there's no question properties along Novato's creeks need attention, but she said she sees it as the responsibility of the county flood control district. And having the city chip in for a stewardship program now is going to be tough.

 

"The question is how can the planning effort be paid for when the city has a $3 million budget deficit, the state is asking us for $1 million and we're laying off and furloughing city staff," she said.

 

Bad timing or not, Farhad Mansourian, the county's director of public works who lives in Novato, would like the city to approve the program sometime soon so it can incorporate much of what has been learned in the Ross Valley over the past few years.

 

In Novato, some creekside residents hoping to make progress during the dry season are disappointed. That's nothing new for Page. She said it's not only an issue of losing more property to erosion, but trees next to Miwok Park threaten to crash down onto a children's playground across from her backyard.

 

Page, who has lived on Novato Boulevard for 30 years, contends that drainage improvements made along nearby Eucalyptus Avenue three years ago were so effective that creek water shoots at her yard with much more force than in the past, providing a penetrating firehose effect.

 

"They won't fess up to that," Page said of city brass. "It hits my bank directly. I used to have 50 feet (of yard) across and now it's about 30 feet."

 

Dietrich Stroeh, a Novato resident and civil engineer with CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group, got so frustrated when he tried to help Page solve her problem that he threw up his arms in disgust during a tour of the site with civic and government officials, Page said.

 

"We had a plan together design-wise to fix that issue, but the city didn't have any money to work on their side at Miwok Park, so nothing got done," Stroeh said. "Nobody wants to fund anything anymore. ... It is mired in bureaucracy, right, wrong or indifferent."

 

Page spent $77,000 to start the bio-engineered method, which involves huge logs and eucalyptus roots rather than rip-rap. The project started but then stopped abruptly because the firm handling the job didn't obtain all the required permits. Massive logs still sit in Page's yard as well as a neighbor's yard.

 

"That's $77,000 of her own money that was wasted," Gerry Godwin said. "That poor lady."

 

The Godwins live a few yards north of the bridge where Novato Creek runs under Grant Avenue. Through the years, they have lost a chunk of land roughly 30 feet out from their yard into the creekbed, 70 feet wide and 15 feet deep. Gerry Godwin, a disabled and retired engineer, has documented all his letters of appeal for help to various government entities.

 

"We live here because it's beautiful. The creek is beautiful and we see a lot of wildlife," he said. "But this is wiping us out. If I wanted to sell my home, I don't think I could get anything for it. We don't have half a million dollars to get all the studies done to move forward. We're retired."

 

In the Godwins' view, the creek should be the responsibility of the city public works department because residents have been paying flood control taxes for decades. They see it as an emergency situation because trees 60 or 70 feet high are being undermined by creekwater erosion and are about to topple onto homes, fences, backyard sheds and other structures.

 

A major deterrent to property owners solving their own erosion issues privately are the federal mandates in place to protect wild salmon and steelhead trout. When asked how many government agencies have to coordinate efforts for effective flood control, Mansourian said, "several million."

 

On the list of agencies that have a stake in flood control are the county flood control district, cities, community development agencies, state fish and game, regional water quality control, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife and the National Marin Fisheries Service.

 

"That's why there is a watershed process," Mansourian said. "Floods do not discriminate, just like fire. They don't care who owns what or who is responsible for what.

 

"The watershed process does not say we're going to take over the world. It says, regardless of who you are, let's study this and work toward a solution to our flooding problems. Let's coordinate the efforts."

 

There have been so many years of problems and inactivity, 77-year-old Gerry Godwin is pessimistic about a coordinated solution any time soon. He predicts it would take at least five years of bureaucratic paperwork to get anything started.

 

"I'll be long gone by then," he said.

 

Novato is not alone in its fight to solve flooding and erosion problems along creeks.

 

The Southern Marin Watershed Stewardship Program was launched last week with guidance from the Marin County Flood Control District. Next on the list are programs in Stinson Beach and the Miller Creek area of Marinwood.

 

The Marin County Flood Control District hopes to establish a countywide watershed management program so that teamwork can lead to progress fighting flooding and erosion.

 

Farhad Mansourian, the county's public works boss, said chances of nailing down state and federal funding for improvement projects are greatly enhanced if it is seen as a combined effort by many municipalities.

 

In Novato, the total cost of the plan is expected to be $680,000, with $340,000 being provided by the county. The North Marin Water District and Novato Sanitary District have combined to cover $130,000 of the balance.

 

Mansourian is asking the Novato City Council to commit $210,000 to launch the stewardship effort and help pay for program management, technical studies, engineering, final workplans and a public election preparation campaign to gain voter support to create an assessment district.#

 

http://www.marinij.com/marinnews/ci_12661723?IADID=Search-www.marinij.com-www.marinij.com

 

 

'Rivers of a Lost Coast' coming soon

Eureka Times-Standard-6/20/09

 

Nelson Rossig, a 100-year-old Eureka native, first started fishing the Eel River in 1915.

 

Rossig is the star of a new documentary, “Rivers of a Lost Coast,” which will be in Humboldt County next week.

 

The film uses first-hand accounts of legendary fly fishermen to re-live the Golden Era of angling along Northern California rivers such as the Eel, Smith and Russian.

 

The film also takes aim at decades of unregulated logging and water withdrawals that aided in the demise of the North Coast's fisheries.

 

”Rivers of a Lost Coast,” partially filmed in Humboldt County in 2006, has played to large crowds from San Diego to Seattle. The film recently received special commendations from the Wild Steelhead Coalition in Seattle, and the Placer County Board of Supervisors.

 

Next week's Arcata and Fortuna screenings are the only scheduled Humboldt County dates.

 

”Rivers of a Lost Coast” will play at the Arcata Minor Theater on Monday at 5:15 and 7:30 p.m., and Tuesday at 5:15 p.m. The film will also play Tuesday at 7 p.m. at the Fortuna 6 theater.#

 

http://www.times-standard.com/ci_12654531?IADID=Search-www.times-standard.com-www.times-standard.com

 

 

 

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive