This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 4/14/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

April 14, 2008

 

3. Watersheds

 

INVASIVE SPECIES:

Bill to keep mussels out of lakes - Contra Costa Times

 

Invasive species prevention; Anti-mussel emergency at two lakes; Boats will be pressure-washed at Lopez and Santa Margarita this weekend to keep pests out - San Luis Obispo Tribune

 

Editorial: Casitas to let boats back in; Stringent rules put in place - Ventura County Star

 

SALMON ISSUES:

End of coast's 150-year-old fishery looms - San Francisco Chronicle

 

Commercial Fleet; Local salmon fishermen hoping feds will dispense disaster aid; Some say they can’t survive without help if the season is canceled as a panel suggests - San Luis Obispo Tribune

 

Bodega festival finds fishermen pondering future; Surviving a year without salmon has boat owners searching for ways to replace lost income - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

State panel to vote on drastic California salmon fishing cutback - Sacramento Bee (This article also appeared in the Modesto Bee)

 

Salmon fishermen cast their 'Plan B'; Many commercial boats will pursue halibut and whatever Dungeness crabs remain - San Jose Mercury News

 

Bay Area left reeling after ban on fishing; Businesses brace for slow summer after officials put end to salmon season - Vallejo Times Herald

 

Editorial: Federal agency oblivious to the decline of salmon - Modesto Bee

 

Editorial: Save the salmon - Sacramento Bee

 

Guest Column: What it will take to restore salmon - Eureka Times Standard

 

DRY WATERSHEDS:

Decades later, Taft's 'navigable waterway' disappears - Bakersfield Californian

 

 

INVASIVE SPECIES:

Bill to keep mussels out of lakes

Contra Costa Times – 4/11/08

By Denis Cuff, staff writer

 

California, where water and recreation often mix, is struggling to devise a plan to defend its lakes and rivers from invasions by tiny quagga and zebra mussels, which threaten to wreak havoc on the environment and water delivery systems.

 

An East Bay lawmaker has introduced a bill that would require lake and reservoir operators to develop plans to prevent boaters from inadvertently infecting new water bodies in California with nonnative mussels. The invasive mollusks can stow away in boats hauled from one reservoir to another. In a little more than a year, the mussels have infested the Colorado River and 17 reservoirs and aqueducts, mostly in Southern California but one in San Benito County.

 

Drinking water agencies and others that run private or public recreational lakes would be required to set up consumer education and boating inspection programs, under the bill introduced by Assemblywoman Loni Hancock, D-Berkeley.

 

"We want to make sure we're doing what we can to prevent the spread of these very destructive non-native mussels," Hancock, said. "It takes only one water management system not doing what it should to infect all our waters. Our water systems in California are highly connected."

 

Her bill sailed through the Assembly Water Parks and Wildlife Committee last week on an 11-0 vote with two abstentions.

 

Water suppliers have qualms about the cost of implementing inspection programs, a sign of potential friction ahead as lawmakers grapple with how best to combat the new problem.

 

"Our board is very concerned about the cost of a new state mandate placed on us without any guarantee of getting reimbursement," said Deanne Kloepfer, a spokeswoman for the El Dorado Irrigation District, which has water reservoirs with boating.

 

Water and wildlife managers in California worry that the fast-multiplying non-native mussels will clog water pipes and pumps, devour massive amounts of nutrients in the aquatic food chain and starve native species. They can also ruin boat motors and force public officials to close reservoirs to boating.

 

The El Dorado Irrigation District could face significantly higher costs if it has to inspect boats before they're allowed in its reservoirs, Kloepfer said. The El Dorado District, which supplies tap water to 100,000 people, opposes the Hancock bill unless it's amended to reflect its concerns about unfunded mandates.

 

Elsewhere, an association for 450 water agencies in California water has taken a cautious approach to the bill, offering support for it, but only with as-yet unspecified amendments.

 

"The quagga and zebra are an emerging problem. Every month, we get a new report of another invasion in another water body," said Jennifer Persike, a spokeswoman for the Association of California Water Agencies.

 

"We really want to take a hard look at what our guidance should be on the issue."

 

Hancock said California needs to move swiftly to contain the mussels.

 

San Justo Lake in San Benito County, where the zebra mussel was first detected in California in January, is the farthest north the mussels have been found. Wildlife officials caution that they are likely to rapidly colonize water bodies in northern California if steps aren't taken to halt their spread.

 

"We can't wait. We have to get everyone involved," Hancock said. "Once the mussels get established in an area, it will be much more expensive to contain them."

 

The State Water Project, a network of canals and reservoirs, already spends $40 million a year to control the quagga, she said.

 

Hancock's bill, AB2605, leaves it up to local reservoir operators to determine their own boat inspection program to monitor for vessels that might carry non-native mussels attached to a hull or hiding in pooled water.

 

"We think the locals know best about their reservoirs," she said. #

http://www.contracostatimes.com/bayandstate/ci_8897290?nclick_check=1

 

 

Invasive species prevention; Anti-mussel emergency at two lakes; Boats will be pressure-washed at Lopez and Santa Margarita this weekend to keep pests out

San Luis Obispo Tribune – 4/12/08

By Bill Morem, staff writer

 

The threat of tiny quagga and zebra mussels invading county reservoirs and harming water supplies has prompted county officials to enact emergency measures at Santa Margarita and Lopez lakes starting this weekend.

 

In addition to inspecting boats to spot the mollusks and quizzing owners where their rigs have been, boats will be pressure-washed with 140- degree water. That will mean lake users can expect longer waits than usual to launch, said county Parks Manager Pete Jenny, who oversees recreation at both lakes.

 

“The danger of mussels coming here has hit the fan,” he said. “We’re getting an ‘Oh my God, what are we going to do now?’ reaction.”

 

The emergency measures come as Santa Margarita Lake will host bass tournaments this weekend and the next two. These events can attract fishermen with mussel-infected boats from around the state.

 

With the zebra mussel capable of spawning anywhere from 30,000 to 100,000 offspring a year—and the quagga up to a million a year—an infestation could cripple a water system by choking lake screens on intake pipes and getting inside the main pipes.

 

Impetus for county action increased dramatically when municipal water boards closed Lake Casitas in Ventura County and Lake Cachuma in Santa Barbara County to outside boats last month because of mussel-contamination fears.

 

Although the Casitas boat ban was lifted this week, stringent decontamination restrictions are still in place.

 

San Luis Obispo City Councilwoman Christine Mulholland called the threat of mussel invasion in the city’s drinking water supply from Santa Margarita Lake scary.

 

In addition to her council duties, Mulholland serves as the city’s liaison on the county Water Resources Advisory Committee, which was briefed on the mussels April 2.

 

Santa Margarita Lake “is our drinking water source,” she said. “It can very easily be compromised in a way that will cost us huge amounts of money to maintain that drinking water source.”

 

She added that the scheduled bass tournaments at Margarita spurred the water committee to unanimously ask the Board of Supervisors to hold an emergency hearing. For its part, the San Luis Obispo City Council will hear an update on the mussels Tuesday.

 

Quaggas can spawn up to a million microscopic larvae a year. They arrived in the Great Lakes region in the mid-1980s in freighter bilge water, probably from Ukraine. Since then, the mussels have cost billions of dollars in ruined infrastructure by clogging water delivery systems, fouling drinking sources and killing vast quantities of wildlife.

 

They’re now found in the Colorado River water system that feeds into various reservoirs in Southern California. Those reservoirs are now plagued by the organisms.

 

Nacimiento worries

 

It’s not only an infestation at Margarita that worries Mulholland. San Luis Obispo—along with Paso Robles, Atascadero, Templeton and the county — is spending millions on a project to pipe water from Nacimiento Lake. Yet there are many access roads to that lake, she said, “which means numerous launch sites and no way to control access.”

 

That’s a prospect that worries John Hollenbeck, project engineer for the $173 million Nacimiento Water Project.

 

“If we got them in Nacimiento, we couldn’t get them out,” he told The Tribune last month. “They can completely cripple any water system.”

 

That bothers Mike Winn, president of the Water Resources Advisory Committee.

 

“Let’s get ahead of the curve and stop boats from coming into the lakes,” he said. “If we could hold (mussel infestation) off for 50 years, we could save millions of dollars; every pump, main and lateral wouldn’t have to be replaced.”

 

Mulholland said local officials can’t drag their feet, because once the mussels are in, “they’re in. They could contaminate the whole Salinas watershed corridor.”

 

John Moss is a bass fisherman; he keeps his boat parked in his garage when he’s not on one of the county’s lakes. He is also the public utilities director for San Luis Obispo. As such, part of his job is making sure drinking water flows from Margarita to the city.

 

The report he compiled for Tuesday’s City Council meeting asks the county to adopt similar action that was taken at Lake Cachuma:

 

• Immediately start inspection and decontamination programs;

 

• Close Margarita to all boats not stored at the lake until inspection and contamination programs are in place; and

 

• Close Margarita to all boats not stored there until infestation prevention can be assured or eradication and control programs are developed.

 

The county is pursuing all those options, Jenny said.

 

Moss said the recommendations are similar to Cachuma’s.

 

“It’s adequate,” he acknowledged, “but is it 100 percent effective? No.”

 

Balancing priorities

 

Although Moss believes long-term closure of a reservoir isn’t realistic, he is well aware of the stakes involved.

 

“We have 17 miles of pipeline from the Salinas dam to the city. The costs for replacing pipe at one time were a million dollars a mile — it’s probably more now.”

 

His report to the council notes that the impact of the mussel finding its way into state and federal water systems in California would be staggering. And the impact would be the same on local reservoirs.

 

“That said,” he wrote, “the recreation, boating and tourism industries associated with the recreational use of state and local waters are also very significant and important to state and local economies.”

 

Jenny will debrief the City Council on Tuesday on the county’s efforts; he agrees with Moss’ assessment.

 

“What we’re doing is putting protocols in place for the water purveyors; recreation is secondary,” Jenny said.

 

“But we’ll also see a loss of about a half-million dollars in revenue if the lakes are closed, and that would result in a loss close to $2 million to $3 million for mom-and-pop businesses associated with lake recreation.”

 

Yet decontamination carries its own costs. The county has purchased two mobile high-pressure washers for $3,000 apiece; two more are order. More permanent models would cost in the six-figure range to install.

Then there’s the question of building a station so the wash water can be recycled and kept from the lake.

 

Finally, there’s the question of manpower. Rangers will have to be pulled off their regular duties to oversee inspections and decontaminations. And because a county hiring freeze is in place, the use of existing manpower within his department is a zero sum game.

 

“We’ll have restrooms that won’t get cleaned regularly,” Jenny said, “and lawns that won’t get mowed as often to get this program up and running.”

 

Today and into the foreseeable future, bass fishermen and other lake enthusiasts will have their patience tried as their craft are decontaminated.

 

“But,” Jenny said, “it will be a minor inconvenience compared to seeing our lakes closed.”

 

Will the extra measures at Santa Margarita and Lopez lakes keep you from visiting? #

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/story/330512.html

 

 

Editorial: Casitas to let boats back in; Stringent rules put in place

Ventura County Star – 4/13/08

 

Break out the fishing gear and the bait. Officials at the Casitas Municipal Water District have come up with a plan to allow boats back onto popular Lake Casitas — but under very stringent rules.

 

The lake has been closed to outside boaters since early in March. The action had been taken because water district officials feared an infestation of the quagga mussel, a tiny aquatic menace. If it found its way into the reservoir, it could create millions of dollars worth of problems and, even, make the lake barren of fish, including the plump bass preferred by anglers.

 

The ban did not sit well with fisherman or with those whose livelihoods depend on the estimated 30,000 boat launches a month into the lake. But the first priority of Lake Casitas is as a reservoir to supply 60,000-plus Ventura and Ojai residents their water needs. Fishermen must always come second to the protection of this important water source.

 

The water district could have just put the ban in place and left it at that. Instead, it created an ad hoc committee to seek ways to protect the lake and to open it to fishermen. Wednesday, only five weeks after the ban took effect, the water district passed a proposal that will allow outside boats back on the lake.

 

However, fishermen, always known for their patience, must exhibit more. The process of allowing them back will be rigorous and take some time:

 

— Every boat will be inspected to make sure fish wells, bait wells and plumbing are completely dry.

 

— Once boats are deemed clean and dry, a tamper-proof ID tag will be affixed to the boat and trailer.

 

— Boats will then be quarantined for 10 days, either at the lake or elsewhere.

 

— At the end of the quarantine period, the ID tag will be removed and a fisherman can launch his boat.

 

— When the fishing day is done, a new ID tag will be affixed.

 

Some procedures remain up in the air. The method for determining if a boat's plumbing is dry hasn't yet been decided and officials are still considering what to do about kayaks, which generally do not have trailers for an ID tag.

 

The inspection process will take a few weeks to begin, but once under way, fishermen will soon be able to get their boats back on the lake. As long as a fisherman keeps his boat at the lake, he will be able to launch his boat as often as he likes.

 

However, taking the boat to another lake or removing the ID tags for any reason will require another inspection and quarantine period before the boat can be used in Lake Casitas again. Tampering with the ID tags earns a one-year ban. Using a boat in a lake that is infested with the quagga mussel will require a 28-day quarantine before being allowed back into Lake Casitas.

 

We commend Casitas Municipal Water District for doing an excellent job of trying to accommodate the wishes of fishermen even as it seeks to protect the lake from the destructive quagga mussel.

 

But fishermen must understand they are being given a privilege to fish on the lake. The importance of Lake Casitas remains as a reservoir. If the efforts taken so far to protect the lake fall short, fishermen will have no choice but to cut bait because the safety of that water supply must always come first. About that, there can be no debate.

 

Waiting list

 

Once the protocol for inspecting boats has been established, the lake will call boaters on an exiting list of people wanting to store their boats at the lake. To get on the list, which has at least 240 people on it now, call 649-2233, ext. 7. #

http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2008/apr/13/casitas-to-let-boats-back-in/

 

 

SALMON ISSUES:

End of coast's 150-year-old fishery looms

San Francisco Chronicle – 3/12/08

By Carl Nolte, staff writer

 

The ban on all commercial and sport fishing for chinook salmon in California and most of Oregon this year could be the beginning of the end for a whole way of life.

 

Commercial fishing is an industry that is deep in the heart of life along California's 1,000-mile coast, where fishing ports from Crescent City to Morro Bay have supported generations of fishing families.

 

Now, for the first time since commercial fishing began on the West Coast more than 150 years ago during the Gold Rush era, no boats will be permitted to put to sea to fish for chinook, the fabled king salmon that is the mainstay of the commercial fishery.

 

The ban is only for one year, but it could be a death blow to an industry that has been in decline for years. As recently as 15 years ago, 4,000 small boats fished off the California coast for salmon; now the salmon fleet numbers only 400.

 

"We're looking at the end of it right now," said Hedley Prince, harbormaster at San Francisco's Fisherman's Wharf. Once, there were hundreds of boats based in San Francisco; they supported whole families and a whole immigrant community, mostly Italians based in North Beach. Joe DiMaggio came from a fishing family. So did ex-Mayor Joe Alioto.

 

Now only a handful actually are fishing. "It could be more like a museum than a fishing port," Prince says.

 

"We are going to lose all the fishing fleet if we don't get federal help," said Larry Collins, who ranges the whole coast in his boat out of San Francisco. "We need federal disaster relief. Is this a disaster? Hell, yes."

 

"I have been fishing all my working life," said Duncan MacLean, whose boat, the 43-foot-long Barbara Faye - named for his daughter - is based at Half Moon Bay. "I've got a lot of talent," he said, "but I don't have a lot of marketable skills.

 

"You know, it's a grim-looking picture."

 

The money is in the salmon fishing

 

The trouble is that skippers like MacLean count on salmon for 70 percent of their fishing income. There are other fisheries on the coast - crab, rockfish, herring - but the money to make the business pay is in the salmon.

 

Wild salmon, caught on hook-and-line rigs on small boats, is "the king of fish," according to David Montgomery, a professor at the University of Washington who has written a book on the fish. California and Oregon fishermen have been able to market wild salmon as a niche product, as distinct from farmed fish.

 

The difference, they point out, is that salmon swim free in the ocean; farm fish live in pens or ponds. Fresh wild salmon has commanded a premium price; fishermen swear the wild product is a superior fish, the way grass-fed beef is better than beef from a feedlot.

 

"Farm fish live in pens," said Rich Fitzpatrick, who works out of Fisherman's Wharf in San Francisco. "They feed in their own poop."

 

The ban on fishing, even for one year, "will damage the whole marketing infrastructure for an entire industry we've built up," MacLean says.

 

Crab fishing is costly, needs a lot of gear

 

Why don't fishermen go for other fish? Fishing for crab is expensive. It requires a lot of gear, like crab pots. The season is at its peak right at the opening, in mid-November, and then declines rapidly. At the end of the season, not many crab are left.

 

A few salmon boats could fish in Alaska, but a permit is needed for that fishery. MacLean says a permit would cost $60,000 - too much for small-boat fishermen.

 

Then there are rockfish, just off the California coast. Rockfish are endangered, too, and fishermen say the rockfish fishery is bound by regulations as to the amount of catch. Herring, which spawn in San Francisco and Tomales bays in December and January, require special boats and nets.

 

Herring roe have a good market in Japan, where it is regarded as a delicacy. But for some reason, the bottom has dropped out of the herring market.

 

The herring have disappeared, too. No one knows why. Prince said the herring that did come to San Francisco Bay to spawn were mixed up with sardines.

 

"Last season we had only 12 herring boats," said Prince, the San Francisco harbormaster. "A dozen years ago, there were so many herring boats you could walk across the harbor on them and never touch water."

 

It's tourists who feed Cannery Row now

 

The coming and going of fish is a bit of a mystery. John Steinbeck wrote about sardines and life in the Monterey canneries in "Cannery Row." The fish disappeared over a couple of years, and Cannery Row is now a tourist attraction, where restaurants offer "catch of the day," mostly farmed or frozen fish.

 

There seems to be no great mystery about the collapse of the salmon fishery.

 

"Salmon are trapped between human population growth, economic development, degradation of environmental quality and the politics of public policy," Montgomery wrote.

 

There are a lot of reasons the population of salmon returning to their spawning grounds on the Sacramento River and its tributaries dropped from 800,000 six years ago to 68,000 last year.

 

Some say the food chain in the ocean has changed; some say global warming has made the ocean too warm for the fish, and you can find fishermen who think the fishery has been mismanaged. Maybe it was overfishing. Maybe, as Fitzpatrick thinks, the fry from fish hatcheries were dumped in the bay from pipes, and, stunned, were eaten by predators.

 

Then there are the dams. Over the last 60 or 70 years, California has diverted most of the flow of its water from the Central Valley to farms and Southern California.

 

The rivers that drain the Sierra used to flow through the valleys and into the ocean; millions and millions of gallons poured through the Golden Gate.

 

First Shasta Dam diverted water from the Sacramento; then the Friant Dam was built to take water from the San Joaquin River. All these rivers and their tributaries were prime salmon runs.

 

"You know there was a million fish run on the San Joaquin River before the water was diverted?" says Collins. "You know that at Los Banos, they caught 800,000 fish?" Los Banos is near what is now Interstate 5. The San Joaquin River near there is now almost dry; no fish could survive in it.

 

Then the state built the California Water Project, diverting the flows of the Sacramento and Feather rivers. One result was the collapse of the delta smelt, a small fish that is thought to be the bellwether of the health of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

 

All the salmon, returning to spawn or swimming downstream to the ocean, must pass through the delta.

 

"The delta," said Collins, "is just a sewer now."

 

"Without water, the fish can't live," he said. "We sacrificed the fish for farms and to water lawns."

 

Whatever the reason, the salmon and the fishermen are in big trouble.

 

"I always wanted to be a fisherman since I was a kid," said Fitzpatrick. "I worked on other boats, on Frank Damato's boat, until I could get my own boat.

 

"He taught me what I know. He's been a mentor. He's like a father to me.

 

"It took me a long time to get accepted on the wharf," he said. "The old guys were all Italian, and I was only half Italian. But when I got accepted, we were all like family.

 

"Now I'm one of the old guys." He's 48 and has been self- employed since he was 18.

 

His boat is called Josephine and is 40 feet long, built of wood by the long-vanished Pasquanucci Boat Works in Sausalito. "I never had a job on land. I'm not educated, though I know how to handle boats and men. What will I do now? Be a doctor?"

 

"It was good for us," said Damato. "For 50 years. Until now."

 

Al Baccari, who wrote a book on Fisherman's Wharf, said: "It's a tragedy." #

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/12/MNAB104836.DTL

 

 

Commercial Fleet; Local salmon fishermen hoping feds will dispense disaster aid; Some say they can’t survive without help if the season is canceled as a panel suggests

San Luis Obispo Tribune – 4/12/08

By David Sneed, staff writer

 

Morro Bay salmon and albacore fisherman Craig Barbre said disaster assistance will be needed to prevent some local fishermen from going out of business, following a recommendation by a federal panel that the West Coast salmon season be canceled this year.

 

“The fleet is just hoping that Congress will come through with another disaster package,” he said. “If we go away for a couple of years, we won’t come back.”

 

Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara, and other lawmakers with fishing constituencies are calling for a fishery failure disaster declaration that would allow direct financial assistance.

 

After a similar collapse of the salmon fishery in 2006, the federal government allocated $60 million in aid to keep fishing families and communities afloat.

 

Although San Luis Obispo County is toward the southern end of the West Coast salmon fishery, more than half the local boats have salmon fishing permits. Some use them only if salmon migrate to local waters.

 

Others, like Barbre and his wife, Marlyse Battistella, who fish aboard the Preamble, go as far as Alaska to pursue the fish. The couple did that last year and expects to do it again this year as a way to get by in the face of the closure of the fishery off California waters.

 

Salmon are also popular with recreational fishermen. The closure affects both commercial and recreational fishing.

 

In addition to disaster relief, several other steps can be taken to keep the salmon fishery intact until it can recover, Barbre said.

 

One is to raise local salmon stocks in rearing pens and hatcheries. Such approaches are not ideal but are better than allowing the fishery to collapse, Barbre said.

 

“We just won’t have salmon if we rely solely on natural runs,” he said.

 

Another step is to develop ways to genetically identify from which river system salmon originate, in order to allow fishermen to target fish from healthier ecosystems. The Sacramento delta fishery is considered much healthier than the Klamath River fishery.

 

On Friday, the governors of California, Oregon and Washington pledged to help financially strapped fishermen and fishing communities.

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a state of emergency in California, directing state agencies to offer grants and loans to fishermen and businesses af fected by the fishery closure.

 

He also sent a letter to President Bush seeking federal disaster assistance, saying the state is projected to lose more than 2,200 jobs and about $255 million from the fishery closure.

 

“The salmon situation is very unfortunate,” Schwarzenegger said at a news conference Friday in San Francisco. “This is a big hit to our economy.”

 

Also on Friday, the governor signed legislation to spend $5.4 million to help restore habitat for coastal salmon and steelhead.

 

Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski set aside $500,000 in strategic reserve funds and declared a state of emergency, which his administration said would free up money for job retraining, unemployment benefits and re-employment opportunities for affected communities.

 

Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire did not declare a state of emergency or offer immediate financial aid to fishing communities Friday, but said those options were on the table. She praised regulators for taking the drastic steps needed to help restore West Coast salmon runs.

 

“While the action is dramatic, they are doing it believing that they must do everything they can to make sure that we can get this fishery restored,” Gregoire said.

 

She said states only can provide limited assistance, and what’s really needed is help from Congress and the Bush administration.

 

This year’s West Coast salmon season was projected to be one of the worst ever after surveys found a near-record low number of chinook, also known as king salmon, returning to spawn in California’s Sacramento River and its tributaries last fall.

 

Scientists are studying a long list of possible causes of the Sacramento River collapse.

 

Many researchers point to unusual weather patterns that have disrupted the marine food chain along the Pacific Coast in recent years and left salmon without the tiny shrimp and fish they need to survive.

 

Fishermen and environmentalists say too much water is being diverted from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, which juvenile salmon must swim through on their way to the ocean.  #

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/story/330507.html

 

 

Bodega festival finds fishermen pondering future; Surviving a year without salmon has boat owners searching for ways to replace lost income

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 4/12/08

By Robert Digitale, staff writer

 

BODEGA BAY -- Stan Carpenter unfolded his Fishermen's Festival T-shirt and gazed silently at the historic photo imprinted on it, an image of his grandfather on deck hoisting a crab pot six decades ago.

Carpenter, almost 55, a commercial fishermen like his father and grandfather, stood Friday in the same harbor on the deck of his own vessel, the Sandy B, preparing it for Sunday's blessing of the fleet in a year when no one will be blessed with landing a single salmon.

As a result of federal efforts to protect Sacramento River chinook salmon, this will be the first year in history when Carpenter and other commercial trollers can't fish for salmon off the California coast. Carpenter isn't sure what he will do this summer, but he stands in better shape than those who entered the industry in recent years.

"If you have boat payments, you're not going to make it, not big boat payments," Carpenter said.

The impact of a summer without salmon will be felt by fish wholesalers like Carpenter's nephew Toby Carpenter, and by charter boat operators like Rick Powers, who won't be able to take out recreational anglers for salmon fishing.

Nonetheless, members of some longtime fishing families said they have weathered harsh restrictions before and the fishing industry here will survive to see better times and the return of abundant salmon runs.

"Every year it's a slap in the face, and we just tighten our belts and move on," said Bev Burton, whose husband, John, has been a commercial fisherman for more than 40 years. "We will do what we have to do."

This weekend's Fishermen's Festival honors the community's fishing families and the tenacity that has allowed them to ply Pacific Ocean waters for more than 60 years. The festival begins today and on Sunday features the traditional boat parade and blessing of the fleet.

The festival takes place in the wake of federal action to ban all sport and commercial fishing off California this season. On Thursday, the federal Pacific Fisheries Management Council, meeting in Seattle, recommended the ban and proposed only a token fishery for coho salmon off Oregon.

The proposed rules, the most restrictive in history, are likely to be adopted next month by the U.S. Commerce Department.

Federal officials and many fishermen said the closure was needed to help restore Sacramento River chinook salmon, which are expected to return in record low numbers to Central Valley streams this fall.

On a day when Bodega Bay basked in sunshine, Carpenter and crew were at Spud Point Marina washing down the Sandy B, a 45-foot vessel that he will take out for Sunday's parade. Bev Burton, on hand to help her husband get their boat ready, stopped by and handed Carpenter the festival T-shirt. The shirt contains the festival's iconic image of Carpenter's grandfather, Harold Ames Sr.

The shirt was too small, so Carpenter gave it to his cousin and deckhand, Dean Carpenter, 57. With the season closed here, Dean Carpenter plans to fish salmon in southeast Alaska this summer, a trip that from Eureka will take two weeks by sea.

The fishermen, whose numbers have been declining for three decades, will try to cope this year by continuing to catch crab through June, a time when they normally would have switched their vessels over to troll for salmon. Other possible fisheries, including rock fish, won't offset the losses from the salmon ban, they said.

On the other side of the harbor at Lucas Wharf, nephew Toby Carpenter, 29, said he spends lots of time considering how to keep open his two-year-old wholesale and retail business. Crab and salmon fishing don't look very promising for perhaps two years, and those two fisheries make up more than 90 percent of his business.

"Unfortunately, I got into this at the worst time," said Toby Carpenter, shortly before he was visited by his pregnant wife, Jessica, and their 19-month-old daughter, Emma.

He could try to bring in wild salmon from the Pacific Northwest. But in this economy, he asked skeptically, "do people want to pay 25 bucks a pound for a wild Canadian fish?"

Without a salmon season, charter boat skipper Rick Powers will run whale-watching excursions, rock and ling cod fishing trips and tours to the Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary, where the public can view an "outstanding" variety of marine life.

Powers acknowledged those efforts won't equal the revenue he would make from fishing trips. Still, he supported the effort of the federal fishery council to bring back the Sacramento salmon.

"They made an excellent decision," Powers said, "and we're going to have to endure some hard times." #

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20080412/NEWS/804120349/1033/NEWS&template=kart

 

 

State panel to vote on drastic California salmon fishing cutback

Sacramento Bee (This article also appeared in the Modesto Bee) – 4/12/08

By Matt Weiser, staff writer

 

Central Valley residents next week may lose the opportunity, for the first time in history, to catch a mighty king salmon in their local rivers.

 

The state Fish and Game Commission is scheduled to vote Tuesday on drastic cutbacks in recreational fishing for fall-run king salmon, also known as chinook, in response to a steep decline in the species last year. It is also likely to close recreational fishing on the ocean.

 

A record-low spawning run of 58,200 fish is expected this year in the Sacramento River and its tributaries, down from more than 775,000 fish in 2002.

 

The closures could send hundreds of fishing guides and charter boat captains scrambling to find other work. It may also mean many of California's 1.2 million licensed anglers won't bring home any fresh-caught salmon this year.

 

"If they close the rivers, I can't tell you how bad it will hurt," said Dave Jacobs, a Redding guide who offers salmon fishing trips on the Sacramento River. "I just hope I can survive. I would really hate to throw away my whole dream and my livelihood for my family."

 

On Thursday, the Pacific Fishery Management Council voted to close all commercial and recreational salmon fishing in federal waters off California. The state commission is likely to follow with closures in near-shore waters and Central Valley rivers, including the Sacramento, the American and the Feather.

 

Catch-and-release fishing may still be allowed in the rivers.

 

"It's going to affect us dearly," said Terry Horst of Sacramento, a recreational angler who catches about 15 salmon a year in area rivers. "I just bought a boat a couple years ago and one of the main reasons I bought it is to go salmon fishing. I enjoy eating them as well as catching them."

 

Much of the attention has focused on commercial fishing. But recreational salmon fishing is actually a bigger economic engine.

 

The Department of Fish and Game estimated this week the closures may cost California $255 million this year and 2,263 jobs. Nearly two-thirds of that impact, or about $187 million, will be felt in the recreational fishery.

 

"We won't sell any salmon lures, so we're giving up that part of the store to make room for other stuff," said Alan Fong, manager of Fisherman's Warehouse in Sacramento. The store, billed as Northern California's largest tackle shop, gets at least 25 percent of its business from salmon fishermen.

 

"People don't realize it, but it screws up the whole fishing industry when you cut the salmon off," Fong said. "It's a chain reaction."

 

That's because guides must still make their boat and mortgage payments, and they still have to put food on the table. Many will offer customers other fish to catch, such as tuna and rock cod in the ocean, and striped bass and sturgeon in the rivers.

 

Many coastal fishermen have also begun to offer whale-watching excursions, which will probably increase as well.

 

"I got everything I own in this business, so I gotta do whatever I can to survive," said Pete Bruno, owner of Randy's Fishing Trips in Monterey. He has canceled at least a dozen salmon charters this month and will soon call regular customers to cancel trips planned this summer.

 

Because many guides will adopt a similar strategy, the competition for customers could increase as well as the pressure on other fish species.

 

"I don't think they'll come as often as they did for salmon fishing, because that's the glory fish," said Roger Thomas, a charter boat captain based in Sausalito and president of the Golden Gate Fisherman's Association. "It's going to hurt the tackle businesses, the bait sales businesses. It'll hurt the fuel docks, the restaurants and motels. The ripple effects are huge."

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Thursday declared a state of emergency because of the salmon closures and wrote to President Bush in hopes of expediting federal assistance.

 

The governor also directed the state Department of Finance to make $2.7 million available to refund 2008 commercial salmon fishing permits, and called on state agencies to tap into all forms of assistance for the industry, whether state or federal.

 

Many in the fishing business reluctantly admit they'll probably need this kind of aid to survive.

 

"We're going to the government crying," said Bruno. "The whole thing is just sour." #

http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/856334.html

 

 

Salmon fishermen cast their 'Plan B'; Many commercial boats will pursue halibut and whatever Dungeness crabs remain

San Jose Mercury News – 4/12/08

By Julia Scott, staff writer

 

PRINCETON-BY-THE-SEA — Fishermen heading out of Pillar Point Harbor on Friday showed no surprise at the unprecedented, total loss of their chinook salmon season, announced Thursday afternoon by regional fisheries regulators in Seattle.

 

Many commercial fishermen's boats had already left the harbor, pursuing a haphazard "Plan B" that included fishing for halibut and whatever remaining Dungeness crabs remained in the outer ocean environs of San Francisco Bay.

 

Some even agreed with the conclusions reached by the Pacific Fishery Management Council, which concluded that to allow any commercial or sport fishing for chinook salmon south of Cape Falcon in northern Oregon would be too risky in the face of historically low salmon returns from the Sacramento River, the main breeding ground for salmon off the California and Oregon coasts.

 

Most working fishermen in Pillar Point depend on salmon for half their annual income, charter boats included, and count on crabs for the rest.

 

Frank Inferreira is no exception. The Santa Cruz-based skipper has been fishing out of Pillar Point since the 1990s and on Friday, he didn't miss a beat as he loaded up his boat, the Ann R., with bait for an extended crabbing tour. In June, he plans to travel all the way up to Alaska to catch salmon and stay there for two months.

 

"I'd rather not go, honestly," said Inferreira. "I seen it coming. We haven't had it rosy the last couple of years anyway."

 

In 2006, the salmon season was severely restricted to protect dwindling stocks in the Klamath River, which runs from southern Oregon to northern California. Congress granted disaster relief totaling $62 million for fishermen in the two states.

 

The Dungeness crab season also was a disappointment this year, getting a late start because of the Cosco Busan oil spill last November.

 

The canceled season will be more than just a problem for fishermen and an inconvenience for Bay Area consumers, who will have to dine instead on farmed salmon or wild sockeye from Alaska. It's a $255 million industry that supports 2,263 California jobs, including bait shops, ice vendors, fish processors and wholesalers.

 

The San Mateo County Harbor District, which depends on tourists as much as fishermen's berth fees, also will take a hit.

 

"It's going to hurt everyone from our launch ramp to our visitors who come here to buy fish," said Deputy Harbormaster Cary Smith, adding that Pillar Point Harbor's occupancy rate already was lower than normal for this time of year.

 

"We don't have half the number of boats that we normally get in transit during the salmon season," he said.

 

Larry Fortado has been running Three Captains Sea Products since 1981. It's one of two seafood processors that buy fishermen's salmon catch at Pillar Point Harbor. He has eight full-time employees to support this year and only a limited crab fishery to employ them.

 

"We'll see if we can find something to keep us going," said Fortado, who also owns a drag boat. "Last couple of years I've been going into debt. I can't do that anymore."

 

Scientists are studying a long list of possible causes of the Sacramento River collapse. Many researchers point to unusual weather patterns that have disrupted the marine food chain along the Pacific Coast in recent years and left salmon without the tiny shrimp and fish they need to survive.

 

Fishermen and environmentalists say too much water is being diverted from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, through which juvenile salmon must swim on their way to the ocean. They say the dams along the Sacramento River are preventing fish from spawning upstream.

 

California fishermen glimpsed a thin ray of hope on Friday when word spread that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger had issued a proclamation declaring a state of emergency and sent a letter to President Bush asking for his help in providing federal disaster assistance to fishermen. Schwarzenegger committed up to $2.7 million to refund commercial salmon permits for the 2008 season. He also said he would sign a bill by state Sen. Pat Wiggins, D-Santa Rosa, that commits $5.3 million to coastal salmon and steelhead restoration projects.

 

Last week, a delegation of Bay Area fishermen traveled to Washington, D.C., to ask Congress to declare a state of disaster that would release strings-free financial aid to fishermen throughout the state. They also asked for a special investigation into how the Columbia, Klamath and Sacramento rivers are administered in light of evidence that so many of the problems there are man-made. #

http://www.mercurynews.com//ci_8902390?IADID=Search-www.mercurynews.com-www.mercurynews.com

 

 

Bay Area left reeling after ban on fishing; Businesses brace for slow summer after officials put end to salmon season

Vallejo Times Herald – 4/14/08

By Sara Stroud, staff writer

 

Local businesses that rely heavily on the summer salmon boom are readying for a lean season after fishery officials voted to ban salmon fishing this year.

 

But, they said, the move is necessary to revive the precariously dwindling salmon population.

 

"This basically shuts down our summer," Benicia Bait and Tackle proprietor Curtis Hayes said.

 

Salmon fisherman comprise most of the shop's business between mid-July and November, Hayes said, from bait sales to thousands of dollars worth of salmon lures, some of which are made in the shop.

 

The Pacific Fishery Management Council's decision to shut down the season stemmed from an extremely low number of salmon reported, especially in the Sacramento River. The council's recommendation to close salmon fisheries in Oregon and California will be forwarded to the National Marine Fisheries Service for approval by May 1.

 

Scientists are studying a long list of possible causes of the Sacramento River collapse. Many researchers point to unusual weather patterns in recent years that have disrupted the marine food chain along the Pacific Coast.

 

Others, including Kevin Yost who runs Lucky Strike Charters, blame mismanagement of the water system that has resulted in a lack of fresh water for the migrating fish. Fishermen and environmentalists say too much water is being diverted from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, which juvenile salmon must swim through on their way to the ocean.

 

Mike Andrews, who runs a fishing charter service and teaches at California Maritime Academy, said he's seen almost universal support from anglers for the temporary ban.

 

"This will cost me about 25 to 30 percent of my business. Unfortunately, I do think it's necessary," Yost said of the fishing ban.

 

Fisherman are looking to other species, such as rockfish and halibut, to partially make up for the lost salmon. But, Hayes said, increased fishing for other types of fish will put added pressure on those populations.

 

"The competition is intense," Andrews said.

 

Those who prefer their salmon already caught will be affected as well. It will be tough for consumers to find chinook salmon at stores and restaurants, but they still will be able to buy farm-raised salmon, as well as wild sockeye from Alaska.

 

"It's one of our more popular dishes. People have been calling with concerns," said Tony LoForte, owner of Zio Fraedo's restaurant in Vallejo. For now the eatery is shifting to other fish, he said.

 

Last week, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill providing more than $5 million in emergency relief for fishery restoration projects. The bill went into effect immediately.

 

"We're hoping for big salmon return," Hayes said.

 

• Bay City News contributed to this story.  #

http://www.timesheraldonline.com//ci_8919037?IADID=Search-www.timesheraldonline.com-www.timesheraldonline.com

 

 

Editorial: Federal agency oblivious to the decline of salmon

Modesto Bee – 4/13/08

 

Perhaps the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission managers didn't get the word about the disastrous decline of chinook salmon across the West Coast, and especially on the Tuolumne River. Why else would FERC inexplicably decide that nothing more needs be done to bring the river's salmon back from the edge of extinction?

 

In an April 3 order, FERC ignored the recommendations of its own staff, turned a blind eye to steps the Tuolumne River's irrigation districts agreed last year to take and told officials that current measures were sufficient -- at least for now.

 

Clearly, that's not the case.

 

"It's a disaster," said Patrick Koepele, the Tuolumne River Trust biologist who has overseen the Big Bend habitat restoration project. "I can't believe this; the whole thing is really shocking."

 

He isn't alone. Federal and state agency staffers have been huddling to consider requesting a "rehearing" of FERC's order by the May 3 deadline. What's to consider? A rehearing is necessary, as are changes to the order.

 

The order follows the completion of 10 years of studies and restoration efforts that have been taking place on the Tuolumne as part of a 1995 environmental settlement. FERC oversaw the settlement because it grants a license to operate electric generation facilities at Don Pedro Dam. The review began in 2005, but FERC needed until April 3 to finish it.

 

The Turlock Irrigation District manages releases from Don Pedro Dam and restoration projects for its partners, the Modesto Irrigation District and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. The TID has overseen several promising projects, most of which are still too new to show significant results. Even Tim Ford, the TID's careful and well-respected biologist, admits this year's salmon numbers were awful and that the overall trend is falling, not rising.

 

The same is true elsewhere. The salmon collapse prompted the National Marine Fisheries Service and other agencies Thursday to ban salmon fishing from California to Washington this year. Even commercial fishers supported the ban in hopes the populations can be revived.

 

Salmon are anadromous, meaning they start their lives in cold, freshwater rivers, migrate to the ocean to feed and grow, then return to the same rivers to spawn. Thousands of spawners used to swim up the San Joaquin River and its tributaries in November and December, then millions of their offspring would try to swim out by May.

 

The decline in ocean salmon mirrors a decline on all of California's rivers -- but none more so than the Tuolumne. Several agencies do counts, so numbers vary. But the highest anyone claims this year is 211;

others say only 150, 135 or 115 salmon returned. Numbers also crashed on the Merced (497) and Stanislaus (315) rivers.

 

Ocean conditions were a big factor. But in the face of such a dire situation, this is no time to make it more difficult for salmon to recover. And that is exactly what the FERC order would do.

 

Signed by J. Mark Robinson, director of energy projects, the order did not require any additional measures or studies, and it even provided an opportunity to abandon some measures now in place. In its summary, FERC requires the districts to report the number of salmon each year, but higher in the order, it says that current counting methods such as trapping, snorkel surveys and seine counts (with a mesh net) should be continued "if adequate funding sources are available."

 

What if they're not? The districts already are in a dispute with CalFed for the $600,000 they have spent over the past three years.

 

Such equivocation flies in the face of FERC's field staff, which had extracted greater commitments from the TID and MID to improve salmon conditions. In March 2007, the districts agreed to FERC staff requirements for six additional measures -- including more tracking studies, enhanced egg- and fry-survival studies and a look at the effects of higher water flows.

 

It was clear from these remedies that FERC staff had charted a middle course between the desires of the districts and the demands of environmentalists and oversight agencies. But none of these measures was required in the final order. Instead, FERC said such studies should be rolled into the relicensing process, which won't be finished until 2016.

 

"FERC callously refuses to address the catastrophic decline of the Tuolumne River salmon because some of the problems may occur in the delta and the ocean," said Chris Shutes of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance. "FERC needs to address the problems in the river that it does control. The best available science says those problems are inadequate flows for juvenile salmon, rearing and outmigration, and inadequate summer flows to provide coldwater habitat."

 

Koepele of the Tuolumne River Trust appeared dumbfounded: "Why did they ignore the district plan on chinook restoration? ... For FERC to completely reverse itself and not to do anything doesn't make any sense."

 

The Tuolumne River once teemed with salmon, but no longer. The FERC order does not require any additional efforts from the Turlock and Modesto irrigation districts to help remedy the situation. But that doesn't mean the districts should stop trying. They must commit to maintaining studies and continuing restoration projects and then more, when they figure out what should be done next.

 

It's not a question of what FERC wants, it's what those who live in the districts require. Clearly, we would prefer a river with salmon. #

http://www.modbee.com/opinion/story/267980.html

 

 

Editorial: Save the salmon

Sacramento Bee – 4/13/08

 

Whether you like your chinook grilled or poached, or even if you have no taste for salmon, last week's vote to ban salmon fishing off the California and Oregon coasts is the exclamation point on an unmitigated disaster.

 

In one fell swoop, thousands of fishermen, fish processors and charter boats will see their livelihoods wiped out, at least for a year.

 

Consumers will see prices rise for whatever salmon is left – the farm-raised stuff and wild sockeye from Alaska.

 

Recall when cod fishing was banned off of New England in the 1990s? A vast coastal region was hammered. Now another one will be.

 

"For the entire West Coast, this is the worst in history," said Don McIsaac, executive director of the Pacific Fishery Management Council. On Thursday, the federal council, as expected, approved a one-year ban on commercial and recreational fishing for chinook salmon from California to northern Oregon.

 

Regulators had little choice. Surveys this year have shown a record-low number of chinook returning to one of the West Coast's fish factories – the Sacramento River and its tributaries, including the American River.

 

Total numbers of spawning fish in the Sacramento Valley have dropped from 800,000 six years ago to 68,000 last year. If ocean fishing were to continue, it could prompt a further collapse of the fishery.

 

Many fishermen blame this crisis on past water diversions from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, which may have directly killed young salmon or made them more vulnerable to predators.

 

While water diversions and pollution are surely a piece of this puzzle, the Delta alone can't explain the full scope of this year's salmon collapse.

 

Off of Washington and Oregon, the number of coho and chinook salmon are also down. Those numbers reflect the struggles fish face in the Klamath and Columbia rivers. But they also suggest that changes in the ocean could be affecting the larger fishery.

 

In recent years, biologists have noticed a reduction in "upwelling" of nutrient-rich waters off the West Coast. Fish tend to thrive with this upwelling, which feeds crill and other species that salmon need to survive.

 

Scientists now face two crucial questions: Is this change in the ocean temporary? Or is it a harbinger of a more permanent transition caused by climate change?

 

Regardless of the answer, there's little policymakers can do to alter these ocean conditions. What they can do is restore habitat for salmon. That means a multistate effort to restore tributaries, provide cool water for salmon, remove unneeded dams, retrofit unscreened diversions of water and reduce pollution.

 

Year-to-year management of ocean catches is a backstop. What's needed now is a proactive effort to save the salmon of the West Coast. #

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/856129.html

 

 

Guest Column: What it will take to restore salmon

Eureka Times Standard – 4/12/08

By Pat Wiggins, (D-Santa Rosa) represents California's 2nd Senate District, which includes portions or all of six counties, including Humboldt. She also chairs the Legislature's Joint Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture. On Thursday, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed her salmon restoration bill

 

There is a paradox about salmon: We love them, but we are part of their problem.

 

We love them as an important food, as the base of fishing economies, for sport recreation, and as symbols of fresh water and renewal. But we harvest them, dam, pave and pump their streams, pollute their water and mix their gene pool with hatchery fish.

 

Then there's global warming and changing ocean currents.

 

When we look at Central Valley Spring Run salmon decline, we look back to the 1990s and realize, shocked, that the populations have crashed by over 90 percent. Estimates may make that 95 percent or worse.

 

But that only looks at a few years. We don't like to acknowledge that less than two centuries ago, the fish were so plentiful that they supported cultures. They were so abundant, in fact, that they could be harvested with pitchforks. The run of fish supported animals, the soil and plants, and were a significant wild ocean resource as well.

 

Now the runs are on the ropes, and wild salmon will be disappearing from our plates, as well as our rivers, for the next couple of years ... at least.

 

The problems that salmon, as a group of species, have encountered are epic. They include loss of habitat, fishing in the ocean, changing ocean and inland conditions, less water, more pollution and predation from other marine life. In addition, we have introduced hatcheries into the life cycle of the fish.

 

Our runs are hatchery-dominated, with survival and pathogen issues plaguing the raised fingerlings. The hatcheries stand with the dams, the mitigations for cutting off spawning habitat, adding up to hundreds of miles of major rivers and thousands of miles of tributaries, the small streams where fish reproduce.

 

Ocean-farmed fish are not a solution. There are so many problems of disease, escapement and pollution that California doesn't allow factory salmon farms in state waters.

 

The problem of salmon collapse is not restricted to the Central Valley. We have lost significant salmon and steelhead runs in the Russian, the Eel and the Klamath rivers as well, creating economic disasters for fishermen and the sport-fishing industry. Emergency relief funding will only last so long, and we cannot support the fishing community on handouts from the government (nor do they wish to be supported in this way).

 

On April 1, the Senate passed my bill (SB 562) to support salmon monitoring and restoration with nearly $5.3 million. This money, which may enable our state to secure up to $20 million in federal matching funds, will go to basic science and the repair of specific problems on creeks and rivers. It is an investment in this resource.

 

But we will need more than simple patience and investment to get salmon back to respectable runs. We will need cooperation from fishermen, farmers, water users, the tribes, power companies, the governor's office and the Legislature to find an effective path to recovery.

 

We also need help from every citizen to “think at the sink” and “use your brain at the drain,” and not introduce oil, detergents and chemicals into our waters.

 

No less than recovery is necessary for our fishing and sport-fishing economy, for our responsibility to the species, and to have great tasting, healthy wild salmon as part of a continuing California tradition.  #

http://www.times-standard.com//ci_8901613?IADID=Search-www.times-standard.com-www.times-standard.com

 

 

DRY WATERSHEDS:

Decades later, Taft's 'navigable waterway' disappears

Bakersfield Californian – 4/14/08

By Stacey Shepard, staff writer

 

Sandy Creek in Taft is exactly what it sounds like: a dusty, dry creek bed that was bone dry just days after a recent 25-year rainfall.

 

Yet it’s taken three years, numerous scientific studies, four government agencies and three state lawmakers to finally determine that a ship or even toy sailboat won’t sail down this wash anytime soon.

 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Thursday corrected a longtime mistake and declassified the creek as a navigable waterway, a term for rivers and lakes and connecting bodies of water the federal government deems to have interstate or foreign commerce value.

 

The repeal is expected to lift expensive environmental hurdles for developers and facilitate growth in a community that until recently was landlocked by properties owned by oil companies.

 

“This is excellent, not only for us but for Taft and the surrounding community,” said Bob Hampton, chairman of Westside Economic Development Co., LLC, which bought more than 1,700 acres of land in the city from ChevronTexaco in 2004.

 

Since purchasing the land, Westside has sold the majority to homebuilders who plan to build more than 450 homes and a golf course. But the federal designation of Sandy Creek as a commercially viable waterway has hindered plans because it requires expensive environmental studies to ensure that run-off water from new developments won’t adversely impact the waterway.

 

City officials have long maintained that run-off into the creek causes no harm because it eventually drains into an area known to have brackish groundwater.

 

The effort to convince bureaucrats of the creek’s true hydrology was no easy feat.

 

“It would almost have been easier to navigate a commercial vessel up a dry creek than navigate this process,” Taft City Councilman Dave Noerr joked Friday.

 

Sandy Creek became Noerr’s pet project when the city council was told a few years ago that new rules for federal waters would require an expensive upgrade for a city waste water treatment plant that drains into the creek.

 

After looking into the issue, Noerr learned that the creek had been incorrectly classified decades ago in a federal government surveying process that relied on outdated topographical maps.

 

He urged fellow councilmembers to instead convince state and federal officials that Sandy Creek isn’t a navigable waterway. “Somebody has got to say the king is naked and I'm not afraid to do it,” said Noerr.

 

Noerr enlisted the help of then-Assemblyman Kevin McCarthy, state Sen. Roy Ashburn and more recently, Assemblywoman Jean Fuller.

 

Then last year, the Supreme Court clarified the meaning of federal waters to exclude bodies like Sandy Creek. Noerr immediately arranged for water officials to come out and officially declare Sandy Creek exempt from federal regulation.

 

The federal government’s acknowledgment that the creek no longer falls under its jurisdiction is “a big step forward,” Noerr said.

 

The only obstacle to development now is a similar determination by the state. State water regulators currently consider Sandy Creek suitable habitat for warm water fish and ideal for water sports.

 

“We'll give them 24 hours and then we'll start making our phone calls,” Noerr said. #

http://www.bakersfield.com/102/story/414576.html

####

No comments:

Blog Archive