This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 4/14/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

April 14, 2008

 

2. Supply

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA:

Water supply threats worsen - North County Times

 

NESTLE WATER BOTTLING:

Water worries put cap on bottling - Associated Press

 

WATER SUPPLY POLICY:

Guest Column: We can solve the water ‘crisis’ in three easy steps - Eureka Reporter

 

WATER CONSERVATION:

A season for conservation – Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

AG ISSUES:

Free workshop will cover farm irrigation systems - Redding Record Searchlight

 

WATER RIGHTS ISSUES:

Yolo and Lake counties at stand-still over water rights - Lake County Record Bee

 

NEVADA WATER ISSUES:

Water story makes big splash; Doomsday predictions for Lake Mead, Las Vegas get world's attention - Las Vegas Review Journal

 

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA:

Water supply threats worsen

North County Times – 4/12/08

By Bradley J. Fikes, staff writer

 

San Diego County has long had to worry about drought. It imports nearly all of its water from sources hundreds of miles away. Now it’s struggling with what has been called a “man-made drought,” a cut of up to 30 percent from Northern California rivers.

Local water agencies have created numerous programs to encourage saving water. For example, the region’s water wholesaler, the San Diego County Water Authority, is promoting a “20 Gallon Challenge” to cut household water use by 20 gallons a day. And the authority recently adopted a model drought conservation plan for its member agencies, who directly provide water to customers.

However, other water-deprived areas outside of California have done even more to conserve water. One of the most notable examples is the Las Vegas area, renowned for its creative management of a water supply that’s far more limited than San Diego County’s.

Las Vegas has managed to produce an economic boom despite drought, and even decreased its water use in the bargain. This has been done mostly through conservation. By contrast, most of San Diego County’s efforts have focused on getting more water, particularly its landmark water transfer deal with the Imperial Irrigation District.

That supply, however, is contingent upon there being enough water to transfer, and Mother Nature has shown herself to be a fickle provider. Conservation and reclamation of already used water doesn’t rely on the vagaries of the weather. So the Las Vegas area, a desert like San Diego County, provides an example for what can be done locally.

Total water consumption in the Las Vegas area dropped by 13 billion gallons from 2002 to 2007, said Doug Bennett, conservation manager for the Southern Nevada Water Authority, the water wholesaler for the region. During the same period, the area’s population has increased by 400,000.

Desert success

Las Vegas has had no choice but to become more efficient in conserving and reusing water. The landlocked area doesn’t even have the desalination option available to coastal San Diego County.

Las Vegas’ major water source is Lake Mead, filled by the Colorado River. The state’s annual allocation of 300,000 acre-feet from the Colorado River was reached decades ago. But the Las Vegas area, consumer of nearly all the water in the state, uses much more than that, thanks to reclamation. Water reclaimed and released into Lake Mead doesn’t count against the area’s allocation. That reclaimed water re-enters the Colorado River water supply, where it is used by farmers and by business and urban customers, including those in San Diego.

In San Diego County, reclaimed water can be used for irrigation or manufacturing, but not for drinking, due to public squeamishness over what’s called “toilet to tap.” So unused reclaimed water is dumped into the ocean.

About six years ago, the Las Vegas region had to crank up the volume on conservation even more than usual. An extraordinary drought in the Colorado River basin reduced supplies throughout much of the Western states.

So the Las Vegas-area water agencies unleashed a torrent of new incentives, including discount coupons for carwashes. That’s water-saving, Bennett said, because carwashes recycle their water, while water used to hose down cars in driveways is lost to evaporation.

There are also rebates for buying water-saving devices, a program that has just arrived to San Diego County. In March, the city of San Diego and the county Water Authority announced rebates of up to $175 to homes or businesses for buying water-conserving appliances such as clothes washers.

Most notably, Las Vegas homeowners are paid to replace turf grass lawns with less-thirsty landscaping. (The city of Poway recently adopted an ordinance to pay homeowners for replacing natural turf with the artificial kind.)

The water conservation system is now largely self-enforced, Bennett said. Price incentives, rebates and education have made the population water-aware.

Water hogs still exist in the Las Vegas area, Bennett said, but they pay a heavy price in higher water bills. Large water users pay hefty surcharges and fines for practices deemed to be water-wasting. By contrast, diligent water-savers get a big reward in lower water bills.

“Our incentive programs are enormous. We spend over $90 million (annually) paying people to do things that conserve water,” Bennett said. “All of our conservation programs are financed by new growth. So when somebody moves into this valley and develops a piece of property, they pay pretty large connection fees. A portion of those monies goes to funding conservation efforts.”

Bennett said that gives him a nice answer for longtime residents who feel imposed upon because their conservation is making more growth possible.

“That new person, who you’re helping provide water for, is paying the bill for these (conservation) programs,” Bennett said.

Getting the word out

Water conservation depends on public support, Bennett says. People have to be constantly told of the need to save water and what they can do to help

People may think they’re saving water by not running the tap while they’re brushing their teeth, Bennett said. But most of the water savings comes from reducing outdoor water use. Water from indoor use can be reclaimed, while water wasted outside evaporates in the hot desert sun.

Bennett said the district uses a combination of public education, water rates that penalize high water use, regulations and incentive programs.

“They really all play off each other,” Bennett said, calling outreach “a critical component.”

“We’ll spend millions of dollars on messaging, publicity and so forth,” Bennett said. “Most of those messages are intended to drive people to other resources, to let them know about a product or service, to let them know about a behavior we want them to implement.

“One of the key principles behind our success is actively engaging the community in not only (explaining) what the issues are and what the choices are, but making it very clear exactly what they can do about it,” Bennett said.

Some of the messages are surprising: While turf grass lawns are discouraged because they use so much water, just about any other greenery will produce substantial water savings.

“They can have a very lush-looking landscape,” Bennett said. “They can have a tropical landscape with flowers and trees, shrubs and plants. They can have a rose garden. All we care is that it’s not spray-irrigated turf grass anymore.”

On average, the water savings from converting from lawns to other vegetation is about 75 percent, Bennett said.

Short to long term

Water conservation needs to proceed on two tracks: short-term responses to emergencies and long-term changes in behavior, said Chris Brown, executive director of the California Urban Water Conservation Council.

“In an immediate threat to water supplies, restrictions on outdoor water use have been shown to work around the country,” Brown said. For example, watering lawns and gardens could be prohibited during middays, limited to certain days of the week or entirely banned.

The model drought conservation plan endorsed last month by the San Diego County Water Authority aims for a unified response to drought among its 24 member agencies that sell water directly to customers. The plan is intended to make it easier to get a single message out to the public in San Diego County about what they should do during a drought.

The plan, which must be adopted by the member agencies to go into effect, establishes four levels of drought warnings.

Level One, Drought Watch, calls for a 10 percent voluntary reduction in consumer water use. The remaining three ---- Drought Alert, Drought Critical and Drought Emergency ---- call for mandatory reductions of up to 20 percent, 40 percent and more than 40 percent, respectively.

These levels come with specified conservation measures that curb practices regarded as nonessential, such as outdoor irrigation. This ensures that people who are already conserving water are not penalized.

These drought warnings, however, are short-term measures.

For the longer term, the goal is to get people to use a series of so-called “best management practices” that have been proven to permanently reduce per-capita water use, Brown said. These include more efficient irrigation timers, changing landscape to drought-tolerant species, or using a broom instead of washing down driveways.

Sometimes, short-term restrictions can lead to long-term changes in behavior, Brown said.

“A lot of customers learn that their lawns don’t go dead when they’re not watered every day,” Brown said. “It’s a very educational experience. These have been learning opportunities as well as challenges.” #

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/04/13/business/733c9432b08b0dba88257420007050f7.txt

 

 

NESTLE WATER BOTTLING:

Water worries put cap on bottling

Associated Press – 4/13/08

By Samantha Young, staff writer

 

McCLOUD – The lumber mill closed five years ago, and so many families moved out that the town can no longer even field a high school football team.

 

But McCloud is hoping to turn things around by exploiting the other natural resource in abundance along the icy flanks of Mount Shasta — water.

 

The town of 1,300 people in far Northern California struck a deal with Nestle in 2003 under which the Swiss company would build the nation’s largest water bottling plant to tap three of the many springs on the mountainside and bottle up to 521 million gallons of water a year.

 

The project is still awaiting an environmental review from the county and could be several years away from approval, having run into opposition from scientists, fishermen, conservationists and some members of the community.

 

But others in town are growing frustrated by the delays and want to see something, anything, to replace the lumber mill that was driven out of business by the logging restrictions that have hurt the timber industry across the Pacific Northwest.

 

“When they had the mill, this town was jumping,” said homeowner Paula Kleinhans. “As soon as the mill closed down, people moved, they lost their jobs, and now there are no children here. It really needs industry here.”

 

Similar disputes are playing out elsewhere around the country as water becomes an increasingly precious commodity — and a major source of legal and political controversy — because of drought, booming population and the popularity of bottled water.

 

From California to New Hampshire and Florida, corporate giants such as Nestle, Coca-Cola and Crystal Geyser are looking for new sources of water and running into resistance.

 

Supporters of bottling plants see them as a vital source of jobs and revenue. Others fear that pumping large amounts of water from the ground will drain wells, creeks and streams.

 

“It’s no longer this limitless resource,” said Elaine Renich, a commissioner in Lake County, Fla., where California-based Niagara Bottling LLC wants to pump water from the region’s shrinking aquifer. “It’s beyond me how you can expect people to conserve water and you turn around and say a water bottling plant is OK.”

 

In New Hampshire, residents are trying to block New Hampshire-based USA Springs from pumping more than 300,000 gallons a day from 100 acres it bought.

 

“They are people who want to bully their way in and take our water,” said Barrington, N.H., resident Denise Hart.

 

Opposition in Wisconsin forced Nestle to abandon plans by its Perrier subsidiary to build a $100 million bottling plant near Wisconsin Dells. In Michigan, about 200 miles northwest of Detroit, residents are engaged in a similar legal dispute against Nestle.

 

Last September, Napa rejected Crystal Geyser’s application to tap into the city’s aquifer to bottle mineral water.

 

Bottled water is a $10.8 billion-a-year industry in the U.S., with demand growing 8 percent a year. California is home to an estimated 40 percent of the nation’s 300 water bottling operations.

 

McCloud sits in the shadow of 14,162-foot Mount Shasta in a forested region crisscrossed with trout streams.

 

The dozens of springs breaking through the crust of Mount Shasta’s lower reaches are so pure that residents drink directly from them, filling bottles to take back home. Coca-Cola and Crystal Geyser already run bottling operations nearby.

 

Under the agreement negotiated by McCloud’s sole governing body, an elected board that oversees water, roads and sewers, Nestle is promising 240 jobs and payments of as much as $390,000 a year, depending on how much water is removed.

 

The company and the board say the town will still have more than enough water for itself. And preliminary reviews have shown that the pumping plant would have minimal environmental effect.

 

“We’re all working to the same goal: sustainability and protection of the environment,” said Nestle’s Northern California natural resource manager, David Palais. “We’re not going to come in and invest money and deplete the resource.”

 

Opponents say not enough study has been done. Among other things, they say, it is not clear what the pumping would do to the streams. Some could become slower or warmer, perhaps harming the trout, scientists say.

 

“These are small streams. Individually, they don’t count for much, but it’s always the cumulative effect you worry about,” said Peter Moyle, a biologist with the University of California at Davis.

 

In town, some residents and community leaders believe the project could bring some energy back to McCloud, which had 2,000 people before the lumber mill closed.

 

Nowadays, the McCloud Soda Shoppe & I, the bookstore and the general store close by 5:30 p.m., and the only place to get a meal on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday nights is the bar at the Veterans of Foreign Wars hall.

 

Randy Prinz, 52, said he might support the bottling operation if the town renegotiated to get more money. His grandparents settled in McCloud at the height of the timber industry, and he watched it go from boom to bust.

“Now all you have is your memories and your house,” he said. “And no job.” #

http://www.chicoer.com/advertise/ci_8907177?IADID=Search-www.chicoer.com-www.chicoer.com

 

 

WATER SUPPLY POLICY:

Guest Column: We can solve the water ‘crisis’ in three easy steps

Eureka Reporter – 4/13/08

By Tony Bogar, works with Friends of the River, California’s statewide river conservation group

 

California has enough water. Surprised?

 

We hear endlessly about the “water crisis.” Politicians are pushing to build more dams, at a cost of several billion dollars each. Even the Peripheral Canal has resurfaced as a solution to our crisis. Yet do we really need to pile on to the state’s debt and wait decades for these “solutions” to be built? Isn’t there a quicker, cheaper, smarter answer to our problems?

 

Let’s be clear. California certainly faces major water challenges such as global warming and increased demand.

 

So, some people are rushing to build dams — expensive 19th century solutions to 21st century problems. We don’t need solutions that are expensive, destructive and useless. A little common sense shows us that the real answers to our problems are easy, efficient and smart.

 

Why dams don’t work: Dams are expensive. Dams today are the most expensive option for water, costing billions of dollars each to build and maintain. Taxpayers could end up paying a bill that’s almost 50 times — yes, 50 times! — the cost of smarter solutions.

 

Dams are destructive. California already has lost 90 percent of its river environment. We have lost 95 percent of our salmon and steelhead habitat. Our commercial fisheries — and the communities they once supported — are barely hanging on as it is. Building more dams will only destroy more rivers and more fisheries.

 

Dams are useless. California already has 1,400 dams on its rivers. As a practical matter, there is very little water to collect behind new dams anymore. According to the state, new dams would provide even less reliable water than cloud seeding!

 

Why common sense does work: Saving water is easy. Conservation really does work. California has cut its per capita water use by 50 percent over the past 40 years, even as the state has boomed. Simply using the tools we already have — such as new appliances and drip irrigation — we can easily cut our water use another 20 percent and still support a growing population and even bigger economy.

 

Recycling water is efficient. Why spray clean, clear drinking water on our golf courses and median strips? We can use the rainwater that runs into our storm drains and recycle our wastewater. Through reclamation and recycling we can save enough drinking water each year for 1.5 million households — roughly all of Los Angeles.

 

Storing water is smart. Every year enough water for almost 3 million households — one-quarter of all the households in California — disappears into thin air behind our existing dams. It’s much smarter to store our water underground, by allowing it to seep into the water table. In fact, we already store enough water underground to fill Hetch Hetchy 15 times over — and there’s room for much, much more.

These three easy steps easily beat billion-dollar dams and canals. #

http://eurekareporter.com/article/080413-we-can-solve-the-water-crisis-in-three-easy-steps

 

 

WATER CONSERVATION:

A season for conservation

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 4/12/08

By Bob Norberg, staff writer

 

Gene Berman was shocked by his March water usage.

The first month of irrigating the ¾-acre of landscaping at his Rincon Valley home caused his water use to shoot from 3,000 gallons to 29,000.

“I don’t like wasting anything,” said Berman, who moved into the home 18 months ago. “This is lush landscaping. It’s beautiful, but we may start to think about drought-resistant plants.”

Using as much water as Berman did is not unusual, said Randall Barron, a city of Santa Rosa water conservation technician.

During a two-hour water audit Friday, what Barron found also was typical – sprinkler heads that were old, leaking, blocked by shrubbery, aimed the wrong way and inefficient; drip irrigation where there no longer were plants; and faucets and a shower head that needed restrictors.

“By replacing sprinkler heads and going to drip in some areas where you now have overhead sprinklers, you can easily save half of that water,” Barron said.

The weather is heating up, with temperatures in the 70s and 80s the next few days. That means yard irrigation is expected to move into high gear.

Yet the Sonoma County Water Agency already is warning that without more rainfall to increase the level of water in Lake Mendocino near Ukiah, there probably will be some form of water conservation again this year.

“We don’t have at this point a specific target that we are aiming for. However, that is partly because we don’t know what the water supply will be,” said Pam Jeane, the Water Agency’s deputy director of operations. “The message at this point is that less is more – using less water means more water for the environment and recreation.”

The agency last year was under a mandatory state order to limit the water it took from the Russian River so that more could be stored in Lake Mendocino for release during the fall spawning run of hinook salmon.

It in turn passed the conservation order to its contractors, including Santa Rosa, its largest customer.

“Now is the time when people are starting to turn irrigation systems on. It is a good time for everyone to check out to make sure it is operating correctly, that there are no leaks or breaks or blockages,” said Jennifer Burke, a senior water resources manager with the city.

Santa Rosa has an extensive water conservation program that includes free water inspections, such as those by Barron.

Barron downloaded a satellite image of Berman’s house and landscaping and then spent two hours checking every faucet, shower, toilet and the sprinkler and drip irrigation systems.

He even set up 18 catch-cans on a 380-square-foot lawn to determine how much water the sprinklers emitted and how it was distributed.

“Not well,” said Barron, summarizing his findings. “I will have to take it back and put it into a spreadsheet to crunch the numbers, but it’s very uneven.”

The city will give homeowners as much as $350 toward repairing irrigation systems and $250 for removing lawns.

The city also gives out free self-testing kits that include water bags to measure shower and faucet flow, dye tablets to check for toilet leaks and a list of what to look for with irrigation systems.

Barron recommends replacing sprinkler heads with multi-stream rotor heads, which can be adjusted to control spread and throw, and which also throw out heavy drops of water that aren’t affected by wind.

Berman said he appreciated the city’s program.

“I like to save money, but it isn’t the issue. To conserve water is the issue, because it’ll run out,” he said. “This is extremely valuable.” #

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20080412/NEWS/804120328/1033/NEWS&template=kart

 

 

AG ISSUES:

Free workshop will cover farm irrigation systems

Redding Record Searchlight – 4/13/08

 

The Tehama County Resource Conservation District is offering a free workshop to teach farmers, ranchers and others how to make the most of their irrigation systems.

 

The April 25 workshop will demonstrate the district's Mobile Irrigation Lab and free irrigation evaluation services.

 

The workshop will be held at the Chico State University farm from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m., starting in the Crops 2 classroom and moving into the field for a demonstration and discussion of other irrigation management methods.

 

The district advises that proper water use increases water and energy savings, improves crop yields and increases profits. An evaluation by the MIL provides information on how evenly your system distributes irrigation water, assistance with irrigation scheduling and a confidential report on the system's performance.

 

A map and directions to the workshop are available on the district's Web site, www.tehamacountyrcd.org.

Bring your own lunch, or you can order one at the site. R.S.V.P. by calling the Tehama County RCD at 527-3013, Ext. 3. #

http://www.redding.com/news/2008/apr/13/free-workshop-will-cover-farm-irrigation-systems/

 

 

WATER RIGHTS ISSUES:

Yolo and Lake counties at stand-still over water rights

Lake County Record Bee – 4/7/08

By Tiffany Revelle, staff writer

 

LAKE COUNTY -- Negotiations over long-standing water rights to Lake County's centerpiece lake are at a standstill between officials in Lake and Yolo counties.

 

Lake County supervisors Anthony Farrington and Ed Robey are the representatives for Lake County Sanitation District in ongoing talks with Yolo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, which currently has the legal right to use approximately 314,000 acre feet of Clear Lake annually.

 

In May 2007, the Lake County district approved an amendment to a current agreement with Yolo that allows the Lake district to inject 7,950 acre feet of Clear Lake water into the pipeline that carries Lake County's sewer water to the Geysers.

 

If the amendment was agreed upon by both entities, it would make that 7,950 acre feet available for beneficial use including for drinking anywhere in the county. The board approved the suggested amendment on the premise that less and less of it is needed to fill the pipe going to the Geysers as treated sewage increases with population growth.

 

"We haven't had any meetings lately, but we will meet this spring. I don't know when yet," Robey said. He and Farrington met informally with two directors from the Yolo district group to discuss both counties' water needs.

 

According to the Yolo district's general manager Tim O'Halloran, the meetings stopped after Yolo received the proposed amendment almost a year ago. "We were surprised by their approach of sending us a document out of blue," O'Halloran said.

 

"Our sense was that rather than just on one side say, this is what we want,' we should work collaboratively to develop an arrangement that makes sense for both parties. The term is interest-based collaboration, where we identify each other's needs and work toward mutually acceptable solutions," O'Halloran said.

 

He continued, "We don't feel it was developed in that manner. Frankly, we didn't quite understand where they were coming from or what they were suggesting."

 

The Lake board of directors also approved a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Yolo district, which Robey said was put before the Yolo group along with the suggested amendment. According to Lake County records, the purpose of the MOU was to "facilitate mutual support for water supply, water quality and flood control projects."

 

O'Halloran said he was not aware of an MOU.

 

Yolo Water and Power Co., which later became the Yolo water district, applied May 28, 1912 for the right to use water flowing through Cache Creek, naming all the streams and flowing into the lake, according to the Lake County Recorder's office. As it prepared to construct the present dam on Cache Creek, Yolo Water and Power Company had asked the board of supervisors at the time if Lake County was interested in the lake water. According to a brief history from the Lake County Water Resources Department, the answer was no.  #

http://www.record-bee.com//ci_8846248?IADID=Search-www.record-bee.com-www.record-bee.com

 

 

NEVADA WATER ISSUES:

Water story makes big splash; Doomsday predictions for Lake Mead, Las Vegas get world's attention

Las Vegas Review Journal – 4/14/08

By Henry Brean, staff writer

 

The story has everything, from the lights of Las Vegas to the end of the world. No wonder it's drawing so much attention from media worldwide.

 

Over the past year, the Southern Nevada Water Authority has fielded a barrage of interview requests from media outlets from across the country and around the globe.

 

They all want to talk about the same thing: doomsday predictions for climate change, drought on the Colorado River and Las Vegas' water future.

 

Authority officials have been interviewed more than 30 times by some of the world's most recognized publications and broadcast outlets, from Good Morning America to the BBC, Time magazine and the French newspaper Le Monde.

 

These aren't the usual freelance journalists parachuting in from Los Angeles or New York, either. The world's most widely circulated newspaper, Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun, sent a staffer from Tokyo. The reporter from Le Monde came over from Paris.

 

The requests really started to pour in two months ago after the Scripps Institution of Oceanography released a report predicting a 50-50 chance that Lake Mead could run dry by 2021.

 

Within a week, water authority Public Information Manager Scott Huntley had fielded 18 media inquiries.

"It was really a made-for-headline, made-for-TV kind of study," he said.

 

The onslaught continues.

 

Earlier this month, water authority General Manager Pat Mulroy taped an interview for CBS News Sunday Morning. On Tuesday, she sat down with the Weather Channel and the English-language branch of the Arabic news network Al Jazeera.

 

"That was about as exotic a request I've gotten in my career," Huntley said, and he wasn't talking about the Weather Channel.

 

For Mulroy, who has done the lion's share of the interviews, the surge in interest is proof of just how serious the drought got last year. The Scripps study simply brought the matter into sharper focus, she said.

 

Huntley said the tone of recent interviews has changed somewhat when it comes to the study.

 

"We're starting to get into the longer-term follow mode instead of the initial-frenzy mode," he said.

 

Scripps researchers trace Lake Mead's fall to climate change and overuse of water from the Colorado River.

 

 According to the study, there is also a 50 percent chance that the reservoir's level will fall low enough to shut down power generation at Hoover Dam by 2017, and a 10 percent chance the lake could empty by 2014.

 

Water managers have questioned the study's methodology, but Mulroy said its conclusions about Lake Mead cannot be dismissed out of hand.

 

"Can I say it is impossible? No, I can't say it's impossible."

 

International interest in the study, and the Colorado River as a whole, comes as no surprise to Mulroy.

 

"From a media perspective, it's a sexy story for them. You've got Las Vegas. You've got the Grand Canyon.

 

You've got Los Angeles," she said.

 

"And climate change is an enormous issue in Europe. It's much bigger there than it is here. They're not arguing about whether it's real or not anymore."

 

Mulroy got a bizarre, firsthand taste of Europe's fascination with the issue a few weeks ago, when she traveled to Zurich, Switzerland, for a speaking engagement before an environmental think tank, which paid for the trip.

 

Mulroy said she turned on the television in her hotel room, and a familiar face appeared on the screen: hers. It was video, freshly dubbed in German, from an interview she gave months before in Las Vegas.

 

"I thought, 'Oh my God, I can't get away from it,' " she said. "It was truly hilarious."

 

Huntley said the story might not get quite so much traction overseas if it were happening in Portland, Ore.; Sacramento, Calif.; or San Antonio.

 

"I think Las Vegas has an effect, yes. They can focus on a name they've all heard of. Everybody's heard of Las Vegas."

 

In February, Yomiuri Shimbun, with its circulation of more than 10 million, published a four-part series on water issues worldwide. Part three was dedicated solely to shrinking Lake Mead and the water authority's turf rebate program.

 

"There is a real heightened level of attention," Mulroy said.

 

Reporters aren't the only ones taking notes, either.

 

Mulroy recently returned from an international water conference hosted by investment house Goldman Sachs in New York City. Both the Scripps study and current conditions on the Colorado River came up at the conference.

 

Mulroy said it is clear that "Wall Street is watching" the water situation in Las Vegas, something that could impact private investment in, and bond ratings for, projects in the region.

 

So what did Southern Nevada's water czar say to calm the jangled nerves of the nation's largest investment firms?

 

"As dire as it looks on television, Las Vegas has a plan," Mulroy said she told them. "Never underestimate Las Vegas' ability to adapt."

 

The community's plan is to lessen its dependence on the drought-stricken Colorado River by building a pipeline to tap groundwater across eastern Nevada.

 

The project is expected to stretch 250 miles, as far north as Great Basin National Park, and cost between $2 billion and $3.5 billion.

 

Even at peak capacity, however, the pipeline would supply fewer than 400,000 homes, far less than what the Colorado River provides. The Las Vegas Valley gets 90 percent of its water from the river by way of Lake Mead.

 

The Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada is one of several groups that have objected publicly to the pipeline project, declaring it a threat to the environment and the livelihoods of rural residents.

 

PLAN's executive director, Bob Fulkerson, said he welcomes all the media attention, even if it gives water authority officials a larger forum to tout the virtues of their pipeline.

 

"The spin can work both ways. All eyes are on Las Vegas, and the reporters we have talked to are pretty much aghast that Las Vegas wants to go through with this project." #

http://www.lvrj.com/news/17654274.html

####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive