This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 3/12/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

March 12, 2008

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People

 

FLOOD ISSUES:

QUARTZ HILL - Residents of this community are no strangers to flooding when rain soaks the high desert; Basin accused of causing floods; Residents put blame on new housing - Antelope Valley Press

 

WATER POLICY:

Editorial: Sacramento needs to get serious about state water policy - Desert Sun

 

Editorial: Bond proposal offers fresh start for water fix - San Jose Mercury News

 

Happy together? - San Diego Union Tribune blog

 

IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT ISSUES:

Editorial: Board must share in the blame - Imperial Irrigation District

 

ST. FRANCIS DAM DISASTER:

Editorial: Dam disaster: 80 years later; The story is still being told - Ventura County Star

 

NEW APPOINTMENT:

Water board member to head L.A. public works - Santa Clarita Signal

 

 

FLOOD ISSUES:

QUARTZ HILL - Residents of this community are no strangers to flooding when rain soaks the high desert.

Basin accused of causing floods; Residents put blame on new housing

Antelope Valley Press – 3/11/08

By James Rufus Koren, staff writer

 

But Joe and Becky Barreras said water that flooded their backyard and swimming pool last month didn't fall from the sky - it came from a nearby retention basin.

 

"The damage here was from water being released," Joe Barreras said Monday. "The water isn't being managed very well."

 

The flooding of the Barreras' Quartz Hill Road property is just the latest episode in a long-running spat between Quartz Hill residents and officials of Palmdale, Lancaster and Los Angeles County. Quartz Hill residents blame local government officials for allowing new housing tracts they say send more storm runoff onto their streets and yards.

 

The Barreras' backyard is just about 50 feet from a culvert that empties a retention basin behind the Portafino Estates development - part of Lancaster. Water runs into the retention basin down Avenue N from tracts inside Palmdale city limits.

 

When the basin fills to a certain level, it drains by spilling over into the culvert. Water then goes past the Barreras' home and other residences along a natural drainage ditch.

 

Joe Barreras, who moved into the Quartz Hill Road home six years ago, said his backyard didn't flood until after Portafino and the retention basin were built, but Randy Williams, Lancaster's public works director, said that might not be true.

 

"The property owners down through there seem to have a different memory of that," he said. The retention basin is more than large enough to accommodate runoff from Portofino, he said.

 

The problem seems to be that once water from the basin leaves the culvert, it goes into a small, dirt creek bed that easily can overflow its shallow banks.

 

Adding to the problem, Williams said, is that with water from tract house lawn runoff flowing through the creek year-round - not just during the rainy season - vegetation has started to grow, making it more difficult for water to flow through.

 

"That has the force and effect of retaining and pooling that water," he said.

 

Ideally, said Mark Caddick, north county engineer for the county public works department, the creek bed would be developed into a permanent drainage canal or storm drain.

 

But neither the city or county are willing to pay for it.

 

"Both Palmdale and Lancaster feel we have spent millions each trying to correct this problem," Williams said. "I hate to sound unkind, but we haven't seen similar contributions from the county for those purposes. For Lancaster citizens to be paying to build something in the county area is just not good public policy."

 

The county, Williams said, won't make improvements because Quartz Hill voters haven't approved tax hikes to pay for them.

 

"The county's big issue is they don't want to maintain anything built through Quartz Hill unless residents join an assessment district," Williams said.

 

Caddick said county officials inspected the area around the Barreras' home last week to see if anything could be done to improve water flow in the existing creek. Officials will study their data and make recommendations.

 

He added that the county has been looking for a solution to residential flooding along that corridor, but money has been a stumbling block.

 

"Several proposals have gone forth, and each has been rejected," he said. "The ultimate solution is something that can be achievable and that would involved a drainage system that would be continuous through the Quartz Hill area. That, honestly, is the long-term solution."

 

Quartz Hill resident have voted down various measures that would have levied new taxes to build and maintain a storm drain system. Critics said they shouldn't have to pay to correct something that wasn't their fault.

 

In the meantime, Joe and Becky Barreras said they will take legal action if neither the county or city take some kind of responsibility for what they say is more than $20,000 in flood damage to their backyard.

 

"If they don't do anything, I'll get an attorney," Becky Barreras said. "That's my next step."  #

http://www.avpress.com/n/11/0311_s1.hts

 

 

WATER POLICY:

Editorial: Sacramento needs to get serious about state water policy

Desert Sun – 3/12/08

 

Sen. Dianne Feinstein is right to be concerned about the future of California's water and to call on her fellow Democrats to come to the table and discuss a new long-term water policy.

 

It is a shame that state Democratic leaders are holding off meeting with the governor on water, prompting a well-deserved rebuke from our senior senator.

 

We realize that California is a place where a Republican governor and Democratic lawmakers can thoughtfully set aside differences and reach agreement on many things. But we feel issues concerning water are so critical to the state right now that that spirit of cooperation is critical in focusing on a bond to upgrade California's declining water system.

 

What's more, the California Chamber of Commerce is considering placement of an initiative on the November ballot that would create nearly $12 billion for water projects throughout the state.

 

A good number of Democrats are against the initiative because it would expand water storage that could flood areas and negatively impact the environment. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger favors increasing reservoirs and canals.

 

Feinstein also tends to favor more water storage. Democrats, in general, would like to see more conservation, instead of storage. Lawmakers must come together and find a workable plan. Schwarzenegger called on Feinstein to help get Democrats to the table because he feels California voters will approve a measure crafted by Democrats and Republicans.

 

The governor is likely right, and Feinstein acted appropriately in a letter last week to Democratic leaders, in which she criticized them for not acting in the spirit of moving issues forward. She had said she was disappointed to learn her party's leadership has refused to negotiate with Schwarzenegger and legislative Republicans.

 

Lawmakers had been scheduled to meet several times over a two-week period and cancelled. One meeting that was held on March 4 was not attended by any Senate Democrat.

 

This is outrageous. While we certainly can understand that our representatives are busy people and occasionally have scheduling conflicts, we also believe that when future water policy is on the agenda, elected officials should make the time.

 

The one Democrat who attended the March 4 meeting was Assemblywoman Lois Wolk, D-Davis, who has expertise on water issues. But Feinstein complained that Wolk did not have authority to negotiate.

 

Wolk was sent to the meeting by Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez, D-Los Angeles. Nuñez' spokeswoman told the Associated Press that the fact that Wolk attended the meeting shows Nuñez is serious about reaching an agreement on water policy, but we're scratching our heads over this one. If you're serious, why do you send someone who can't negotiate?

 

And this is after the governor had his staff send an e-mail to Nuñez and Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, D-Oakland, alerting them to send representatives to negotiate a water bond.

 

Time is of the essence. California's old system is inadequate to meet the need of our growing population. As climate change reduces snowpack, the state's water crises are increasingly becoming more urgent.

 

Voters elect their representatives to be present and find solutions. To do that, they have to attend meetings and move important issues forward. #

http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080312/OPINION01/803120310/1026/news12

 

 

Editorial: Bond proposal offers fresh start for water fix

San Jose Mercury News – 3/12/08

 

California's water woes have defied solution for decades, most recently during last year's failed special legislative session.

 

So it's good to see Sen. Mike Machado, D-Stockton, trying to rekindle interest by offering a $6.8 billion bond proposal. Although sketchy, the bill represents a fresh starting point for bipartisan discussion on how to meet long-term needs.

 

California can't give up on this.

 

Machado is a key lawmaker on water because his district includes much of the ecologically troubled Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, which supplies water to 25 million Californians. Sen. Dave Cogdill, R-Fresno, the leader-elect of Senate Republicans, has pledged to work with him. Cogdill's district includes Central Valley farms, and he has been closely allied with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on water issues.

 

The challenge is bridging a longstanding partisan divide: Republicans favor building dams and other major infrastructure, while Democrats focus on conservation and environmental safeguards. Machado includes ideas from both sides, including stepped-up delta protections, new water storage and the governor's new goal of reducing per capita water use 20 percent by 2020.

 

Water solutions will be tough to tackle in the midst of a huge budget deficit. But it's good policy-makers are at least trying to restart the dialogue. #

http://www.mercurynews.com//ci_8542736?IADID=Search-www.mercurynews.com-www.mercurynews.com

 

 

Happy together?

San Diego Union Tribune blog – 3/11/08

Posted by Michael Gardner, staff writer

 

SACRAMENTO - What a difference two weeks -- and a sweeping clarification -- makes.

 

A Senate committee review of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's clarified water goals produced signs of progress Tuesday, with even the farm giant Westlands Water District and environmentalists agreeing that it offers a fresh path.

 

The concise, four-page outline proposes reducing water use by 20 percent by 2020 -- certainly an appetizer for environmentalists who have said for years that conservation should be a statewide priority. They are disappointed, however, that the governor's plan singles out urban use and appears to give farmers a pass.

 

Large water agencies also have embraced the governor's directive that state water officials finish the environmental studies for potential new reservoirs and a north-to-south water conveyance by 2010. The governor's agenda does not identify a favorite dam or type of canal.

 

The outcome is of consequence to the San Diego region, which receives about a third of its annual water supplies from the deteriorating Sacramento delta.

 

The civil and welcoming tone of the Senate panel was a sharp turn from a hearing before the same committee late last month when Democrats, particularly, grew testy over revelations that the governor was considering an end run around the Legislature by issuing an executive order to push ahead with a canal, even though voters in 1982 had rejected one such proposal and it remains somewhat of a wedge issue even today. #

http://weblog.signonsandiego.com/news/breaking/ut_polblog/index.html

 

 

IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT ISSUES:

Editorial: Board must share in the blame

Imperial Irrigation District – 3/12/08

 

Bonnie Garcia’s recent interest in the Imperial Irrigation District should be a lesson to the Board of Directors. We hope now it will pay attention to how it is perceived. What other people think does matter.

Garcia had shown little concern with the IID during her tenure in the state Assembly. That changed when the IID board became a divided, bickering panel that could not get anything much accomplished. And when directors do get things accomplished, it is usually with a split vote that comes after much divisive debate.

So now that Garcia is in effect calling the board dysfunctional and wants the Coachella Valley to have a greater say in energy issues, the board must accept some of the blame. When you lift your head up, it is likely that someone will take a political shot at it. That’s what Garcia is doing.

We have often cited board infighting and micromanagement as a problem, and it is apparent we are not the only one’s paying attention. >From the hedging fiasco to the highly questionable process followed for hiring a still-officially unnamed energy manager, the IID board has made quite a target for ridicule out of itself.

There is a greater danger in doing that than the local newspaper calling you out. There is the danger that state officials will notice and start to take interest in your actions. We all know the value of water in our region and state, so it should come as no surprise to anyone that state officials care about who is protecting that water and how they are doing that all important job.

It is apparent to us that Garcia does not understand the intricacies of local power or water issues. And that is what makes her sudden interest — near the end of her tenure in the Assembly — not only perplexing but also dangerous. The Imperial Valley does not need Garcia meddling with the Water Code. It certainly doesn’t need the state government looking at changes to the code. In this political climate, we are sure our Valley would be on the losing end of any changes that would be made.

So the IID board needs to put a stop to the ongoing sniping and find some common ground. This issue has apparently brought the directors together, and we believe they must stay a united front in the face of any external assault. There has been no clearer signal in recent memory that the district needs to gets its operation running smoothly than this move by Garcia. #
http://www.ivpressonline.com/articles/2008/03/12/our_opinion/ed02_03-12-08.txt

 

 

ST. FRANCIS DAM DISASTER:

Editorial: Dam disaster: 80 years later; The story is still being told

Ventura County Star – 3/12/08

 

Today marks the 80th year since the 200-foot-high St. Francis Dam collapsed at 11:57 p.m., unleashing 12.5 billion gallons of water, killing hundreds in its path, and wiping out 1,200 homes and 10 bridges in its 54-mile rush to the sea.

 

Amazingly, eight decades later, we are still learning about the second-most-lethal disaster in California history, next to the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Although virtually any Californian could tell you about the quake, not many know the horror visited upon Ventura County March 12, 1928, from the dam collapse. Death toll estimates range from 450 to 600, although the precise number can never be known.

 

Many of those who died literally did not know what hit them, as the dam was built quickly, with little public notice, in the remote San Francisquito Canyon, about five miles northeast of the Magic Mountain theme park. Studies and preliminary designs were completed in 1923 and the dam was completed in 1926.

 

As the disaster is commemorated, seemingly at five-year intervals, more are learning about it. Interest is always high, as evidenced by the sold-out tour of the site Sunday, given by disaster historian Frank Rock, through the Santa Clarita Historical Society.

 

Several books have been published on the disaster and Santa Paula's California Oil Museum is opening a dam exhibit Sunday.

 

John Nichols, of Santa Paula, curator of the exhibit and author of "St. Francis Dam Disaster," said this year, he is focusing on the Los Angeles Aqueduct angle of the story. "It's just amazing what comes up constantly," he said. "You think it would be a subject past its prime. But it is perennially interesting and endlessly fascinating."

 

This interest has spurred memorials, which help to correct the historical oversight of this important event in our state history. Ten years ago, the Santa Paula Historical Society commissioned a forged steel sculpture from Santa Paula artist Eric Richards at the Railroad Plaza at 10th and Santa Barbara streets. "The Warning," unveiled in 2003, depicts two motorcycle policemen roaring through town with sirens blaring to urge residents to move to higher ground.

 

The following year, the Santa Paula Historical Society dedicated a boulder monument at Santa Paula Cemetery, in memory of 14 unknown victims of the dam break buried there.

 

The society's St. Francis Dam Memorial Project encourages other communities that were in the path of the water to commemorate the event.

 

We hope this latest anniversary spurs more memorials and exhibits. With each anniversary, there are fewer survivors who can give their firsthand accounts. This renewed attention is an opportunity for more of their amazing stories to be captured and added to the historical record.

 

This region grew from the spoils of the California Water Wars that began at the turn of the 20th century. William Mulholland, chief engineer of the Bureau of Water Works and Supply, directed the building of the 233-mile-long Los Angeles Aqueduct, from 1905 to 1913, and wanted the St. Francis Dam to be built to provide a reserve supply of water for thirsty Los Angeles.

 

How the dam was built with inferior concrete on an ancient landslide is still being investigated and Mr. Mulholland's culpability in the collapse is still debated.

 

Beyond debate is the scope of the tragedy, the heroism exhibited and the importance of remembering the disaster.

Museum exhibit

 

The St. Francis Dam Disaster exhibit will open Sunday, from 1 to 3 p.m., at Santa Paula's California Oil Museum, 1001 E. Main St., at 10th and Main streets. It will run through July 27. The museum is open Wednesday through Sunday, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. For more information about the dam disaster, log on to curator John Nichols' Web site, http://www.damdisaster.com. #

http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2008/mar/12/dam-disaster-80-years-later/

 

 

NEW APPOINTMENT:

Water board member to head L.A. public works

Santa Clarita Signal – 3/12/08

By Jim Holt, staff writer

 

Castaic Lake Water Agency board member Dean F. Efstathiou has been appointed Acting Director of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works.

Efstathiou, who is often the lone critical voice on water issues raised by the agency, received the unanimous endorsement of supervisors at Tuesday's regular meeting of the county Board of Supervisors.
Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich made the announcement Tuesday.

"With a proven track record and 37 years of public service, Dean is a knowledgeable and capable leader, who will work effectively with our communities," Antonovich said in a statement. "In October 2007, at my request, Dean oversaw the fast-tracked reconstruction of the Vasquez Canyon Bridge - a major thoroughfare in the Santa Clarita Valley destroyed by the Buckweed Fire. As a result of his leadership and the hard work of our county work crews, the bridge reopened two days ahead of schedule and helped prevent the disruption of day-to-day activities for the thousands of residents who rely on the bridge."

Efstathiou, a resident of Pasadena, replaces outgoing Public Works Director Donald L. Wolfe, who retired last month.

As Acting Director of Public Works, Efstathiou also wears the hats of Acting Road Commissioner, Acting County Surveyor and Acting Chief Engineer of the Flood Control District.

"That's a prestigious position," said Dan Masnada, general manager of the Castaic Lake Water Agency. "We're lucky to have him on the board representing the county."

With water agency meetings scheduled for three nights this week, including a general meeting Wednesday, Efstathiou's schedule is a tireless one. His term as an agency board member expires in 2011.

Those attending tonight's meeting are expected to hear reports from Masnada, as well as a president's report and director's report. #

http://newmedia.the-signal.com/news/article/763/

####

No comments:

Blog Archive