This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 3/3/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

March 3, 2008

 

3. Watersheds

 

DELTA ISSUES:

Conflict seen in smelt rules; As water contractors join the rule-making on Delta pumping, group says 'fox is guarding the henhouse.' - Sacramento Bee

 

Editorial: Working together for the delta; The latest in a Times editorial series on water and water policy - Los Angeles Times

 

Column: Canal at heart of state water talks; Second Thoughts: Rash action is worse than no action. And a peripheral canal is no exception - Tracy Press

 

SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RESTORATION:

A view too far; As the San Joaquin River Parkway hits a milestone, questions loom about its future and accessibility - Fresno Bee

 

QUAGGA MUSSELS:

New unit sniffs trouble, secures state's waters - Contra Costa Times

 

Invasive aquatic species makes its way to Southern California - Desert Sun

 

Vote to close Lake Casitas for one year set; Protection from invasive mussels hoped - Ventura County Star

 

WETLANDS RESTORATION:

Prado wetlands reborn through hard work - Riverside Press Enterprise

 

SALMON ISSUES:

Officials consider salmon-fishing ban; Data shows Sacramento fall run at its lowest level in 37 years - Redding Record Searchlight

 

Sacramento Salmon Forecast at All-Time Low - YubaNet.com

 

 

DELTA ISSUES:

Conflict seen in smelt rules; As water contractors join the rule-making on Delta pumping, group says 'fox is guarding the henhouse.'

Sacramento Bee – 3/3/08

By Matt Weiser, staff writer

 

Water users who benefit most from tapping the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta have been given an unprecedented role in drafting new rules to manage water diversions.

 

Critics call it a "fox in the henhouse" situation that may further imperil the Delta, where experts believe water diversions have already contributed to a broad ecosystem collapse.

 

The new draft rules, called a biological assessment, are being prepared in response to a court order last year. Federal Judge Oliver Wanger in Fresno declared existing rules inadequate to protect the threatened Delta smelt. He set a Sept. 12 deadline to rewrite the rules.

 

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, which operates one of two Delta water systems, is a defendant in the case. The bureau allowed water contractors to help write new diversion rules. Wanger, in his ruling, didn't specify who should rewrite the rules.

 

The decision also applies to its co-defendant, the state Department of Water Resources, which operates the other diversion system, and its contractors.

 

"It indicates to me the agencies are still continuing to view the Delta as a big faucet, and their main concern is simply water supply," said Kate Poole, an attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council, one of the environmental groups suing the agencies. "They should be opening the door to many more interested parties, not just the ones who have a financial interest in harming the smelt."

 

Water contractors are urban and agricultural agencies that sell Delta water to farms and cities from San Jose to San Diego. They include small-scale diverters and big players such as the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and Westlands Water District.

 

The water agencies said their participation is legal and appropriate under the Endangered Species Act, which governs the process. They said they offer unique expertise because they know the pumping systems well.

 

They also note that the diverters have a limited role. For instance, they cannot consult directly with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which must approve the new rules to ensure smelt won't be harmed.

 

"There's a place at the table for these folks, and they're allowed to be there," said bureau spokesman Jeff McCracken. "So far, they've been involved in a very broad area looking at everything."

 

Fishing and environmental groups asked to participate and were denied, McCracken said, because there isn't time for more players to be involved.

 

"It calls into question whether or not this report is going to be unbiased," said Sen. Mike Machado, D-Linden, a frequent critic of water operations and chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Delta Resources.

 

The 740,000-acre Delta is the largest estuary on North America's Pacific Coast. It is a vast mixing zone for fresh and salt water that was once among the world's most productive fisheries.

 

A century of dam building, development and diversions caused a gradual decline that worsened in the last five years.

Nine Delta fish species are in steep decline, and toxic algae blooms have become more common. The latest victims are fall-run chinook salmon.

 

Biologists haven't pinpointed the cause but believe several factors are involved, including ocean conditions, foreign species, poor water quality and excessive water diversions.

 

Delta water diversions serve 25 million people and 2 million acres of farms.

 

This is partly why water diverters believe their role in the rule-making is appropriate: They understand the broad benefits provided by the Delta.

 

"We are trying to make sure the information that Reclamation and DWR put together is not too narrow, that it is a full vetting of the picture that's out there," said Curtis Creel, water resources manager at the Kern County Water Agency, who represents state water contractors in the rule-drafting process.

 

The new rules amount to a proposal for operating Delta pumps to satisfy the Endangered Species Act and the court.

 

The Fish and Wildlife Service will review and modify the proposal to ensure water exports do not jeopardize smelt.

 

Alex Pitts, Fish and Wildlife Service spokeswoman, said the agency is not worried about the diverters' role.

 

"We're more focused on good information, not necessarily who has it," she said. "It's not something just handed over in a package saying 'You have to view this as truth.' There's a process there for reviewing this information."

 

Developing the proposal is complex. It requires key decisions early on about how the smelt behave and what environmental factors matter. The review also must go beyond the pumps and consider upstream reservoirs that determine how much water flows through the Delta.

 

Many of the decisions will help computer models draft operating rules.

 

"One of the things we have been trying to do is assist the agencies with describing the project," said Creel. "In other words, what are the various parts of it and what would be the types of assumptions used in the modeling analyses."

 

Poole, the environmental lawyer, said modeling can obscure initial decision-making and skew the results. The process is not public, so there is no opportunity for others to examine choices made.

 

She said Wanger's ruling rejected an approach to pumping that had favored water diverters at the expense of fish. "I don't think it bodes well," she said, that those diverters are now helping draft new rules to protect fish. #

http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/754898.html

 

 

Editorial: Working together for the delta; The latest in a Times editorial series on water and water policy

Los Angeles Times – 3/3/08

 

Early last week, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's water plans looked to be headed down the path of universal healthcare. A Feb. 21 meeting with Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) raised hopes that a bipartisan water bond might surface in Sacramento. But then rumors that the governor would begin work on a peripheral canal in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta sent Northern Californians into fits. Radio ads warned ominously of a "water giveaway" to "a few wealthy Southern California corporations." Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata (D-Oakland) and two colleagues said they were "shocked" and found it "difficult to negotiate seriously ... in view of this."

Responding, Schwarzenegger did outline plans to study "conveyance" options for the delta. But he also vowed to continue environmental repairs and proposed cutting per capita water use in the state 20% by 2020. The senators seemed mollified. "You cannot declare an end to the water wars," one veteran marveled, "but [they are] more civilized than they were 24 hours ago."

In California water politics, things don't get much better than that. Especially when it comes to the peripheral canal, the very name of which unsettles old-time Northern Californians.

The fragile Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta is home to more than 700 native species, half a million people and 1,100 miles of levees. California transports water to 25 million people through the delta, pumping it through the region's waterways and into the California Aqueduct. This has been devastating to the local ecosystem. Last year, a judge shut down the pumps when the population of the delta smelt crashed.

Because disruptions in the delta mean diminished water supplies -- it has been estimated that the smelt shutdown will cut exports from the region by a third -- engineers during the 1960s proposed building a canal to connect the Sacramento River directly to pumps at the southern end of the delta. The idea was to separate flows from threats such as earthquakes, floods and environmental edicts. The peripheral canal, as it became known, has been a lightning rod ever since. Widely viewed as a Southern California water grab, it was defeated in a 1982 initiative campaign by a 3-to-2 margin.

Today, thanks to new research, we know that building a canal might not be a bad thing for the delta's ecosystem -- especially if it's accompanied by statewide conservation and mitigation efforts. A peripheral canal might stabilize the delta and help restore its fragile environment, while also protecting a reasonable volume of exports to Southern California and the other parts of the state that rely on delta water.

For that to work, Northern California must abandon its reflexive opposition to the canal. Maintaining the status quo -- a strategy the governor says he will also evaluate -- probably is not a realistic option. If climate change or a natural disaster were to level the delta and contaminate the water supply, a less-optimal, slapdash fix might worsen the situation.

Here in Southern California, our responsibility is to learn why the delta matters to us and to provide assurance that we won't squander its bounty. We must make wiser decisions about development. And we must conserve. All users of delta water, from the residents of Silicon Valley to farmers in the Central Valley, must heed these hard truths.

Last week's events suggest that Schwarzenegger and the Legislature can still move this conversation forward, evaluate options honestly and lead North and South through the tough choices that we all must make to save California's environment and its water supply. This glass of water might be half full after all. V#

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-ed-delta3mar03,0,6280356.story

 

 

Column: Canal at heart of state water talks; Second Thoughts: Rash action is worse than no action. And a peripheral canal is no exception

Tracy Press – 2/29/08

By Jon Mendelson

 

Just two weeks ago, I wrote about why folks in Tracy — removed from threat of flooding though they might be — should care about the fate of the Delta and a peripheral canal that would alter it forever. After several reports from Sacramento this week, that concern has grown.

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is starting the ball rolling on said canal — in addition to exploring other options for fixing California's water conundrum — without the approval of the state Legislature.

 

A budget adjustment — to the tune of $1.4 million in a cash-strapped season — would pay for eight staff members to begin the environmental review process for the "alternative conveyance system" that would shuttle water around the heart of the Delta directly to Tracy-area pumps, which send the water southbound.

 

While San Joaquin County officials and many environmental activists have come down solidly against a plan that includes a peripheral canal — they say it's the surest way to turn our part of the Delta into a saltwater pond — that apparently isn't the biggest priority of the governor, who wants to make sure vast swaths of California don't have their vital imported water supply threatened by a catastrophic levee break.

 

Schwarzenegger fancies himself a man of action and has little patience for the politics of the capital. Let the girlie men in the Legislature worry about things like compromise and consensus — he wants movement. So he's kick-starting a long review process to get his project off the ground.

 

The Legislature often needs a solid kick in rump, but its members are less than thrilled about being left out of the loop.

 

At least the folks on Capitol Hill can take comfort that, while the governor is entitled to start the review process as a solo act, actually trying to build a canal without their consent would risk a civil war among Sacramento politicians.

 

So the powers that be have time to consider if the peripheral canal is truly the best way forward. Those powers, especially Schwarzenegger, should take another look at the most comprehensive plan available for protecting both the Delta and the state's water supply.

 

Schwarzenegger's Blue Ribbon Delta Task Force cautioned in its December report that "The Delta cannot be 'fixed' by any single action. No matter what policy choices are made, we Californians are compelled to change the ways we behave toward the environment and water.

 

"… For those who rush to discuss Delta water conveyance as if no other issue is of importance, we caution that decisions about storage and conveyance flow from all 12 recommendations in our vision, and cannot be decided by themselves."

 

That's a shot at do-first-ask-questions-later proponents of the peripheral canal, which wouldn't reduce the amount of water we use or help us store more water.

 

The peripheral canal's big benefit is that it would allow water exports to continue if an earthquake or flood leveled valley levees. But perhaps the route to true water security (without sacrificing the Delta in the process) is to not rely so heavily on the Delta in the first place, a thought that fits nicely with the task force's vision.

 

Schwarzenegger later in the week announced he wants to cut state water consumption by 20 percent — a step in the right direction. But the canal is still very much on the radar, and its specter will likely haunt the dreams of those in the Delta's heartland until it's officially axed.

 

Despite the need to fix the state's water crunch sooner rather than later, rash action is worse than no action. And the canal is no exception.

 

If built without other projects to complement it or without thought to its impact on the Delta, the canal is doomed to be a one-trick pony, offering an incomplete and counterproductive "fix" to the state's many water problems.

 

And if you want a healthy, vibrant Delta, that trick just might be on you. #

http://tracypress.com/content/view/13762/2244/

 

 

SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RESTORATION:

A view too far; As the San Joaquin River Parkway hits a milestone, questions loom about its future and accessibility

Fresno Bee – 3/1/08

By Mark Grossi, staff writer

 

Piece by piece, a park has been forming for two decades along 22 miles of the San Joaquin River at Fresno's doorstep, offering what city folk crave -- prime canoe-launching spots, fishing holes and wildlife havens.

 

It's the San Joaquin River Parkway, a natural treasure with a major public relations problem: People can't see much of it.

 

Preservationists who fought to save riverfront property from development are still finding money to buy more land and complete the parkway. They just don't have enough cash to open all of it to the public.

 

Public access has never been the first order of business for the parkway. Preservationists remain true to their original fight in the mid-1980s against developers who planned to slab over the riverbanks with houses and concrete.

 

The fight spawned the San Joaquin River Parkway and Conservation Trust, a persistent advocate for river preservation. It was born on March 15, 1988.

 

The subdivisions never happened. Instead, preservationists have acquired two-thirds of the land they need to protect a ribbon of nature from Friant Dam to Highway 99.

 

"You can build houses in other places," said Mary Savala, one of the original parkway activists and a director on the trust's first board. "The river has to be saved."

 

But the public wants in. Even though almost 3,800 acres are in public ownership, people still can't get to many parts of the river.

 

Access questions include: When will people get full access to this parkway? Who will police rowdy visitors? Who will pick up the garbage, maintain the parks and fix trails? And who pays for all this?

 

Richard Sloan, a member of RiverTree Volunteers, a nonprofit group dedicated to cleaning up and restoring the San Joaquin, said he would like to see more progress.

 

"The land can't be just opened to the public unless there's some kind of management for it," he said. "I support the parkway. But why isn't more happening to open it up to the public?"

 

There are many ways to fund and manage parks, hiking trails and other amenities, the simplest of which would be to have the state take over. But that idea might be hard to sell, given the state's budget crunch.

 

As for access, parkway trust officials said there already are some places for boating, fishing, walking, picnicking and horseback riding. There also are eight projects to open up more of the parkway in the next five years.

 

Full access will come with time, trust officials said. More importantly, vast sections of this region's natural heritage have been protected from development.

 

Cities need these kinds of amenities to grow economically, said Hal Tokmakian, another parkway supporter from the 1980s.

 

"Without a doubt, the parkway is a terribly important asset for our quality of life and our ability to compete with other areas for jobs," said Tokmakian, who also was a 1960s Fresno County planning director and later taught planning at California State University, Fresno.

 

Tokmakian's view is an example of how the thinking about the river had begun to shift in the 1980s.

 

The San Joaquin had mainly been a supply of water for crops.

 

It has been dammed since the 1940s, seasonally drying up many miles downstream from the parkway.

 

By December 1988, that too was changing.

 

The Natural Resources Defense Council filed suit in federal court over farm water contracts. The case would evolve 18 years later into a settlement requiring the restoration of water and salmon runs that were destroyed when Friant Dam was built.

 

Unlike environmentalists and their fight for salmon, parkway supporters knew there would be no turning back if developers paved over the riverbanks. They needed to get riverside property off the market permanently.

 

Supporters formed the nonprofit trust to plan a parkway, find willing sellers among riverside landowners, raise funds, educate the public and work on restoration projects. They understood that the public would have to be on board.

 

"We needed to get more people to understand what the river is," said Coke Hallowell, another of the original board members on the parkway trust. "It's amazing how many people were not even aware that it was there."

 

By the early 1990s, the state Legislature approved an umbrella state agency to receive state funding to buy land and manage the parkway. The agency is called the San Joaquin River Conservancy.

 

More than $70 million has now been invested in the parkway, trust officials say. Another $45 million is still available from state bonds.

 

The bonds have underwritten much of the effort, though there also has been nearly $19 million in separate grants from many sources, such as the federal Central Valley Project Improvement Act.

 

Observers say the campaign has made remarkable progress, considering the conflicting interests on the river. Aside from private landowners, farmers and gravel mining operators, thereare the city of Fresno, Madera County, state land authorities and federal agencies.

 

Trust and conservancy officials have found willing partners in most agencies, businesses and landowners. Now they must provide more ways to let people explore the parkway.

 

The eight current projects range from improvements at Sycamore Island to a riverbottom park and trail by the city of Fresno.

 

One of the more visible changes in the next five years will be the extension of the Lewis Eaton Trail beyond Woodward Park, west of Highway 41, into about a two-mile section of the river. The extension is called River West Open Space Area.

 

Fresno is interested in managing the south side of the extension, which will include recreation areas, restrooms and boat launches. On the Madera County side, options are under discussion, including the possibility of a tax assessment district for future development.

 

The city manages perhaps the best-known river access for walkers and joggers. It is the Jensen River Ranch, which can be reached through Woodward Park.

 

The trust works with partners, such as Fresno, because the organization does not have the authority to manage the property on its own, said Dave Koehler, executive director of the parkway trust.

 

"We're an agent of change," he said. "We can help channel this need and energy for river access to community leaders."

 

North of the river in Madera County, there is no large city to help pay for running the parkway.

 

Jim Cobb, president of the Madera County Taxpayers Association, has suggested a special district to raise tax money from developments built near the parkway.

 

"I'm looking at 100 years from now," said Cobb. "The people who benefit the most from the parkway should pay for it. Does Madera County have the resources to pay for it? No."

 

Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, said he has a good idea for funding. A parkway supporter for many years, Costa was the Assembly member who wrote state legislation in the 1990s to form the river conservancy.

 

Costa said he has always thought Millerton Lake State Recreation Area should be extended to Highway 99 to contain the parkway. The state could then operate and maintain the parkway on both sides of the river.

 

Costa said he thinks the state owes the Valley some help. For decades, state funding for parks has gone largely to coastal communities and large metropolitan areas, bypassing the Valley, he said. #

http://www.fresnobee.com/263/story/434693.html

 

 

QUAGGA MUSSELS:

New unit sniffs trouble, secures state's waters

Contra Costa Times – 3/1/08

By Denis Cuff, staff writer

 

A hound dog named Cooper swiveled his head and furiously sniffed a boat in search of a new California public enemy: the quagga mussel.

 

"Come on, boy," called out his handler, Roxanne Bowers, a state fish and game warden.

 

The 62-pound, 2-year-old German shorthair suddenly stopped, sat and froze. He stared hard to point out a boat part with a sample of the non-native shellfish that California wants to keep out of its rivers and lakes.

 

Cooper had passed a test on the final day of police academy last month near Willitts for the California Department of Fish and Game's new canine unit.

 

The first seven dogs began patrols last week, giving California a new line of defense to protect fish, wildlife and the environment.

 

These natural resources face threats from poachers, sturgeon black marketers, illegal hunters and fishers, and non-native fish and shellfish that can disrupt the ecosystem.

 

"The dogs can greatly increase the efficiency of our wardens," said Nancy Foley, the Fish and Game department's chief of enforcement, "whether they're trying to find quagga, abalone, bear parts, gun casings, criminal suspects or missing persons."

 

With fewer than 200 wardens statewide, the same number as in the 1960s, the department needs the help, Foley said. It can cost $6,500 to $12,000 to acquire and train one dog, plus extra for required refresher training, amounting to several hours a month.

 

Fine noses make the dogs top detectives.

 

The dogs can detect abalone, bear gall bladders, fish and weapons -- restricted items that lawbreakers have been known to stash in hidden car compartments, trunks, spare tires, clothes, sports bags, lunch chests and other places.

 

The dogs also will be called on this year to sniff out tiny quagga mussels that might be clinging to boats before they are allowed to enter lakes or rivers.

 

The non-native mussels -- which spread by hitchhiking rides on boats -- threaten to harm California lake and river environments, and clog water pipes and pumps.

 

One dog can check a boat in one to three minutes, whereas an expert human would take 15 minutes or more, and not do as well.

 

"That's a huge time difference that ought to save a lot of time and frustration by the public ... especially if there is a line of boating waiting up to get into a reservoir," said Lynette Shimek, coordinator of the department's new canine unit and owner of a German shepherd on the team.

 

The dogs also may be used to walk lake shorelines to detect quagga in waters suspected of infestations.

 

Inspections will step up when the boat season arrives this spring.

 

In their other duties, the dogs sometimes can make fish and game violators give up hidden items before they are searched.

 

"I've had cases where someone had hidden illegally taken fish or animals," Shimek said. "Once he saw my dog, he pulled out the items, and said, 'Here it is. I confess.'"

 

Sixteen other states have some form of canine unit in their fish and game departments, Shimek said.

 

California Fish and Game proposes to expand the canine unit to 24 dogs if enough wardens volunteer to live with and work with a dog.

 

Bowers, who patrols parts of Alameda and Contra Costa counties, rescued her dog Cooper as a puppy from an Oakland animal shelter.

 

She sought out a dog who is active, sociable and excited about finding things -- qualities suited for working long hours in rough terrain and sometimes in close contact with people.

 

Most of the dogs are black Labradors, also a hunting dog.

 

During a patrol in West Contra Costa County on Wednesday, Bowers walked Cooper on a leash as she checked fishing licenses on a pier in Carquinez Regional Shoreline near Crockett.

 

She wore a revolver on her hip, and she carried a plastic bag for dog poop in her pocket.

 

Bowers let some children on the pier to pet Cooper as she talked about fishing limit sizes and best angling locations.

 

"I'd say 90 percent of the time, the dog puts people at ease," she said.

 

One pier fisher, Pedro Goncalves of San Francisco, said he likes the idea of dogs helping wardens.

 

"The wardens need all the help they can get," he said. "I see people keeping undersized fish, and taking fish they shouldn't. It bothers me."

 

Later that afternoon in Rodeo, Bowers found two men fishing off the shoreline without a fishing license, as required.

 

"Did you catch any fish?" she asked.

 

"No, ma'am," one angler replied.

 

Bowers spotted a striped bass in the water hooked to a line nearby.

 

"Is this yours?"

 

"Yes ma'am," he replied.

 

"Why didn't you tell me the truth?" she asked.

 

"I didn't want to get in trouble," the man said.

 

Bowers ticketed the two men who said they didn't know a license was required to fish there as Cooper watched ,.

The men accepted the tickets and drove off.

 

Later, Bowers said having a dog makes her feel safer in a job that often calls for patrolling isolated areas at odd hours, and confronting hunters or other people with weapons.

 

"Having Cooper there affords me greater security," Bowers said. "The other thing is companionship. It's nice having a warm beating heart next to you at 3 a.m. in the morning when it's cold in the truck and you're tired, hungry and thirsty. It's nice knowing something is there." #

http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_8418837?nclick_check=1

 

 

Invasive aquatic species makes its way to Southern California

Desert Sun – 3/1/08

By Denise Goolsby, staff writer

 

Quagga mussels, an invasive, ecosystem-killing aquatic species first discovered in California waters in January, 2007, are on move.

Originally from the Ukraine and Russia, Quagga mussels found their way into the U.S. in about 1989, first appearing in the Great Lakes region.

The prolific, thumb-sized mollusk can wreak havoc on irrigation systems by clogging water delivery pipes and damaging pumping machinery.

They pile on top of each other and eventually choke the flow of water. They are virtually impossible to eradicate.

First spotted in Lake Havasu on the Colorado River in early 2007, the quick-multiplying mussels were discovered at Miramar Reservoir in San Diego in December.

In February, quaggas were discovered in a desilting basin at Imperial Dam near Yuma, Ariz. by an Imperial Irrigation District employee.

Colorado River water flows into Imperial Dam and is transported to the Coachella Valley via the All American and Coachella canals.

The Coachella Valley Water District uses Colorado River water to irrigate golf courses and about 70,000 acres of Coachella Valley farmland.

The Coachella Valley Water District has not discovered any quaggas in its water delivery system so far, said Mark Johnson, CVWD director of engineering.

Johnson said there are 11 monitoring locations within the canal and distribution systems.

"So far, we have not seen signs of the veligers (the initial, pre-shell stage of the quaggas)," said Johnson.

The district monitors four locations in its irrigation distribution system, Johnson said. Water samples are taken from these sites and are sent to the Bureau of Reclamation for visual analysis and DNA testing.

"All those results have been negative," he said. #

http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080301/NEWS01/80301003/1263/update

 

 

Vote to close Lake Casitas for one year set; Protection from invasive mussels hoped

Ventura County Star – 3/3/08

By Zeke Barlow, staff writer

 

The decision of whether to temporarily close Lake Casitas to outside boats to protect it from invasive mussels is scheduled to be decided Tuesday amid heated debate.

 

Fishermen who love the lake for its trophy bass hope to convince the board of the Casitas Municipal Water District that the lake should remain open. Others say it should be closed to protect the water resource.

 

The tiny critter causing all the commotion is the quagga mussel, which has been found in waterways along the Colorado River.

 

Officials fear that if a mussel attached to a boat gets into Lake Casitas, it could cause millions of dollars in damage by clogging pipes and other infrastructure as well as destroy the fishery there. Casitas provides water to more than 60,000 people in western Ventura County.

 

The board is expected to vote on whether to close the lake to outside personal boats for one year but still allow fishing and continue boat rentals. Board members would use the time to figure out how to keep the mussels at bay.

 

Fishermen who love Casitas for its prized bass have been organizing in the hopes of persuading the board to keep the lake open.

 

"We are hoping that if they see that all of us are doing everything we can to save the lake that they will recognize that and support us," said Scott Sweet, vice president of the California Bass Federation.

 

Board member Russ Baggerly said the board doesn't relish the thought of having to close the lake, though it could be necessary.

 

"The protection of this water resource is essential to this area," he said.

 

Casitas General Manager Steve Wickstrum is calculating how much a closure would cost versus the price of a mussel infestation.

 

The mussels could cost the district as much as $600,000 annually on top of $300,000 in capital costs, preliminary estimates show.

 

The effect of the loss of fishing is harder to measure, Wickstrum said.

 

The district would lose at least $220,000 in entry fees with untold economic effects on the surrounding community, he said.

 

The meeting is scheduled at 5:30 p.m. Tuesday at Nordhoff High School cafeteria, 1401 Maricopa Highway, Ojai. #

http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2008/mar/03/vote-to-close-lake-casitas-for-one-year-set/

 

 

WETLANDS RESTORATION:

Prado wetlands reborn through hard work

Riverside Press Enterprise – 3/2/08

By Paige Austin, staff writer

 

CORONA - South Dakota has Mount Rushmore. Cawker City, Kan. has a really big ball of twine.

 

And Corona has Southern California's largest man-made wetlands.

 

However, Corona's unique 465-acre landmark is a somewhat of a secret. The complex of more than 50 man-made ponds behind the Prado Dam is for the birds. Humans can visit by appointment only.

 

The wetlands were shielded from the public eye for more than two years after the rain-swollen Santa Ana River washed them out in the 2004-05 rainy season.

 

After $4 million in repairs, the restored Prado wetlands are open to duck hunters, school field trips, researchers and bird-watchers by appointment, said Craig Miller, assisting general manager for the wetlands.

 

"The construction is finished, and now it's up to Mother Nature to bring it back to its prior state," Miller said.

 

Natural Filter

 

Sunk into a flood basin surrounded by dairies, the Prado Dam and highways 71 and 91, the wetlands look like a large, silver lake from a distance. Up close, a series of square ponds emerges.

 

The ponds, a few feet deep and separated by mud levees, serve the Orange County Water District as a natural water purifier. When operating at full capacity, about half the water from the Santa Ana River is diverted into the ponds, which naturally filter out about 20 tons of nitrates each month before channeling the water back to the river behind the Prado Dam.

 

Heavy and constant rainfall during the 2004-05 season devastated the wetlands. The usually docile Santa Ana River raged, but as debris flowed downriver, it clogged the flow of water, causing the river to alter its course directly through the wetlands. The levees were washed out, and the wetlands destroyed, said Bonnie Nash, the wetlands' habitat manager for the Orange County Water District, which oversees the land.

 

"It just wiped out the whole system," Nash said. "It just blew through and brought six to eight feet of sediment."

 

Levees Repaired

 

The levees have been repaired, and engineers are waiting for a sufficient break between storms to build a temporary sand levee in the river that will divert half the water to the wetlands, which have only a fraction of the water they can hold.

 

Driving her pickup along the narrow levees, Nash watches for the local wildlife. She spots red-tailed hawks, great egrets, ducks, and turkey vultures long before the rumble of her truck drives them to flight.

 

The wetlands also are home to bobcats, raccoons, snakes and frogs -- all of which will slowly return to the wetlands this spring now that it is fully restored, Nash said.

 

"The circle of life out here is obviously tremendous," said Nash. "This is a great wildlife resource for the region."

 

Biologists and wetlands staffers are preparing for the March 15 to Sept. 15 mating season of the native but threatened least Bell's vireo, a little bird that is making a big comeback in the region. Wetlands staff plant vegetation for the bird's nests and rid the area of nonnative cow birds, which trick the vireos into protecting their eggs at the expense of the vireo's own eggs.

 

The students love it, said Autumn DeWoody, who escorted a class of Corona High School seniors to the wetlands Wednesday. DeWoody is the project manager for Inland Empire Waterkeeper, which sponsored field trips for high school science classes this year.

 

The students help plant vegetation, watch birds, and collect and test water samples for contaminants, said DeWoody.

"It really blows their minds," she said.

 

"I think they get from it the concept of watershed and wetlands and the usefulness of wetlands as opposed to treatment plants."  #

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_cwetlands02.4262fb7.html

 

 

SALMON ISSUES:

Officials consider salmon-fishing ban; Data shows Sacramento fall run at its lowest level in 37 years

Redding Record Searchlight – 3/1/08

By R-S staff, news services

 

SACRAMENTO -- Officials warn that a total closure of commercial and recreational salmon fishing may be needed this year to protect dwindling Sacramento River fall-run chinook populations.

 

In a preseason report, the Pacific Fishery Management Council offered data showing the 2007 Sacramento fall run reached its lowest level in 37 years of record-keeping. The report largely confirms data leaked to the media last month.

 

But various officials went further, warning that all salmon fishing may have to be closed in 2008 to protect the Sacramento fall-run chinook. The normally abundant run underpins a coastal fishery with an average annual economic value of $103 million.

 

"This is very bad news for West Coast salmon fisheries," council chairman Don Hansen said in a statement. "The world disaster' comes immediately to mind, and I mean a disaster much worse than the Klamath fishery disaster of 2006."

 

"This is just really nerve-racking for us," said Lisa Manies of Redding, who with her husband, Gary, runs Strictly Fishin' guide service and tackle shop. "It's scary."

 

Manies said the couple collect two-thirds of their income from salmon fishing.

 

Officials with the Department of Fish and Game will host their annual meeting from 1 to 5 p.m. Wednesday in Santa Rosa to update the public -- and collect comments -- on the status of California salmon populations and the outlook for ocean and river fisheries in 2008.

 

"We're organizing a group to carpool to Santa Rosa, pound on the table. At least we'll feel good about it," said Salmon King Lodge owner and guide Bill Divens of Red Bluff. "We're telling people right know to hold off on deposits and we're going after the fly guys, the trout guys.

 

"But my gut feeling ... boy we'd like to have at least one fish per angler."

 

Wednesday's meeting will be staffed by the DFG, the Pacific Fisheries Management Council and the National Marine Fisheries Service and will be held at the Sonoma County Water Agency offices at 404 Aviation Blvd. in Santa Rosa.

 

The cause of the run's decline is not known, but probably is related to both ocean and in-stream problems. The council has developed a list of 46 possible causes.

 

A full closure of salmon fishing is one option the council will consider when it meets next Saturday to March 14 in Sacramento.

 

A full closure would not only affect guides, commercial fishermen, party boat operators and tackle shops, but businesses such as hotels, gas stations, grocery stores and restaurants. Tourism officials estimate that each salmon caught during the recreational sportfishing season on the Sacramento -- a season that normally starts July 16 each year from San Francisco Bay to 150 feet below the Sycamore Boat Ramp in Red Bluff -- is worth about $700 to the local economy.

 

"You have to understand that the fishermen coming in toward the fall, after the summer season, is good for the hotels, the restaurants," said Redding tourism officer Bob Warren. "It's like gravy. (Fishing) is a huge boon to the local economy; a tremendous amount of money gets spent in the local economy."

 

A closure would be felt throughout the north state.

 

"At that rate, it would be an impact on us," he said.

 

A final decision is expected in April. To read the council's full press release, download it at www.pcouncil.org/newsreleases/Feb_2008_Sacramento_News_Release.pdf. #

http://www.redding.com/news/2008/mar/01/officials-consider-salmon-fishing-ban/

 

 

Sacramento Salmon Forecast at All-Time Low

YubaNet.com – 2/29/08

By Pacific Fishery Management Council

 

Feb. 28,2008 - The Pacific Fishery Management Council has released a report indicating that Sacramento fall Chinook salmon abundance will fall to an all-time low in 2008. While the report does not yet forecast an exact number of Sacramento River fall Chinook, the information infers total abundance to be near the low end of the spawning goal range in 2008, even if all ocean and freshwater fisheries are closed. (The spawning goal of 122,000 to 180,000 is the optimal number of adult fish returning to hatcheries and natural spawning areas or the long term productivity of the stock.) "This is very bad news for West Coast salmon fisheries," said Pacific Council Chairman Don Hansen. "The word 'disaster' comes immediately to mind, and I mean a disaster much worse than the Klamath fishery disaster of 2006."

 

The Pacific Council will begin the process of setting 2008 ocean salmon seasons at its meeting March 9 - 14 in Sacramento, California, where it will develop up to three options for public review. Final Council action on 2008 ocean salmon commercial and recreational seasons will occur at its April 7 - 12 meeting in Seattle, Washington.

 

Biological Information

 

Sacramento River salmon are primarily caught off California and Oregon, but are also found off Washington and as far north as British Columbia.

 

They are typically one of the healthiest and most abundant stocks on the west coast, and are the dominant contributor to both commercial and recreational fisheries off California and most of Oregon. Sacramento River fall Chinook are not listed under the Endangered Species Act, like Sacramento Winter Run Chinook and some other California stocks.

 

The graph below provides some historical context for the decline in abundance, showing an abundance index of ocean salmon catch and freshwater salmon returns composed primarily of Sacramento River stocks.

 

It shows the forecast for 2008 at about 22% of the long term average, and about two thirds of last year's poor showing. The report containing abundance forecasts, Preseason Report I: Stock Abundance Analysis for

2008 Ocean Salmon Fisheries, was prepared by the Council's Salmon Technical Team in February. It is available online.2

 

The forecast of very low abundance is based on the return of "jack" salmon in the fall of 2007. Jack salmon are young male fish that return to the rivers as two year olds, unlike adult fish which return at age three or older. Jack salmon are currently the best statistical indicator of returning adult population the following year. Only about 2,000 Sacramento River fall Chinook jacks returned in 2007, by far a new record low count. This compares to a long-term average of about 40,000 and the previous record low of about 10,000, which occurred in 2006.

 

"The biological situation for Sacramento River fall Chinook salmon is unprecedented in our experience," said Pacific Council Executive Director Dr. Donald McIsaac. "We are looking at back-to-back record low brood year production, even though the parent spawning levels exceeded the spawning goal."

 

It is also notable that the return of adult fall Chinook salmon to the Sacramento River in 2007 was less than the spawning escaement goal for the first time in 15 years (88,000, compared to the goal of 122,000-180,000). This low return of adult salmon followed the then-record low return of 10,000 jacks in 2006. Adult returns of this stock to spawning areas have averaged 416,000 over the previous ten years, including a high of 755,000 in 20053.

 

Economic Impact

 

The economic implications of the low abundance of Sacramento River fall Chinook salmon could be substantial for commercial, recreational, marine and freshwater fisheries. In California and Oregon south of Cape Falcon (in northern Oregon), where Sacramento fish stocks have the biggest impact, the commercial and recreational salmon fishery had an average economic value of $103 million per year between 1979 and 20004. From

2001 to 2005, average economic impact to communities was $61 million ($40 million in the commercial fishery and $21 million in the recreational fishery).

 

Lack of fishing in 2008 to protect Sacramento fall Chinook salmon will come as bad news to beleaguered salmon fleets on the west coast.

 

California and Oregon ocean salmon fisheries are still recovering from a disastrous fishing season in 2006, when Klamath River fall Chinook returns were below their spawning escapement goal for the third consecutive year. The catch of salmon in 2007 in these areas was also well below average.

 

Causes for the decline

 

The reason for the decline is unclear, but both hatchery and naturally-produced fish are similarly affected. At its upcoming meeting in Sacramento, the Council will review a list of 46 possible factors that may be contributing to the decline5. In the past, ocean conditions have been a major determinant of Sacramento stock productivity, and may have played an important role in this decline. Freshwater conditions also play an important role in brood year strength. Other possible causes include abnormal interactions with prey species (such as krill) and predators (such as sea lions), as well as human-caused effects such as pollution, water diversions, construction, habitat loss, or changes in hatchery operations. Unfortunately, no quick answers to the question of what caused the decline are expected in the short term. "We need to thoroughly research what has gone wrong for these two broods of Sacramento fall Chinook," said Marija Vojkovich, the California Department of Fish and Game representative for the Pacific Council. "But the first step is to identify where to focus the research."

 

Management Process

 

At its March 8-14 meeting in Sacramento, California, the Council will develop a range of three fishery management options for public review.

 

Salmon management discussions begin on Tuesday, March 11, when the Council will review 2007 salmon fisheries and discuss stock abundance estimates. The Council's Scientific and Statistical Committee will provide a peer review of the 2008 forecast elements for Sacramento fal Chinook salmon. Later on Tuesday, the Council will tentatively adopt salmon management measures for analysis by Council technical teams and scientists. Discussions will continue on Wednesday and Thursday afternoon. Friday, the Council is scheduled to formally adopt the fishery management options for public review. "Regarding fishing seasons affecting Sacramento fall run Chinook, I won't be surprised to see the Council look at the ‘totally closed' option as one option, that is, closed to both sport and commercial fisheries," said Council Vice-Chairman Dave Ortmann. "This is a very important and valuable stock of fish, particularly to the regional salmon fisheries off California and Oregon."

 

Public hearings to receive input on the options are scheduled for March

31 in Westport, Washington and Coos Bay, Oregon, and for April 1 in Eureka, California.

 

At its April 7 -12 meeting in Seattle, Washington, the Council will consult with its scientific and fishery stakeholder advisory bodies, hear public comment, and choose a final option for ocean commercial and recreational salmon fishing. The California Fish and Game Commission will set freshwater seasons affecting Sacramento fall Chinook salmon later in 2008.

 

All Council meetings are open to the public. Based on previous experience with contentious salmon fishery issues, the Council expects there to be a large public turnout at both the March and April meetings and the public hearings.

 

The Pacific Fishery Management Council is one of eight regional fishery management councils established by the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 for the purpose of managing fisheries 3-200 miles offshore of the United States of America coastline. The Pacific Council recommends management measures for fisheries off the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington.

http://yubanet.com/california/Sacramento-Salmon-Forecast-at-All-Time-Low.php

####

No comments:

Blog Archive