A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment
March 19, 2008
3. Watersheds
DELTA ISSUES:
Groups threaten to sue over decline of San Francisco Bay-Delta - Associated Press
Environmental groups to sue over California Delta's deterioration - Central valley Business Times
INVASIVE SPECIES:
Guest Column: Everyone needs to work together on invasive species - California Farm Bureau Federation
DELTA ISSUES:
Groups threaten to sue over decline of San Francisco Bay-Delta
Associated Press – 3/18/08
The California Water Impact Network and the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance filed the complaint against the State Water Resources Board on Tuesday.
The groups accuse the board of allowing the state and federal government to pump too much water from the delta to farms and water users in the
William Rukeyser, a spokesman for the water board, said the state already has been taking steps to restore the waterway.
"Just as there are multiple historic causes for the problems of the Delta, restoring it will take multiple actions and we are already doing our part," he said. #
http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_8616777
Environmental groups to sue over
Two environmental groups say they are preparing to haul officials of the State Water Resources Control Board into court for failing to protect the San Joaquin-Sacramento Delta.
As a prelude to the probable lawsuit, the California Water Impact Network and the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance on Tuesday filed a public trust, waste and unreasonable use of water and method of diversion petition with the State Water Resources Control Board.
It says the board has failed to halt the continuing ecological collapse of the estuary by permitting excessive amounts of water to be pumped to western
There was no immediate comment from the Water Board.
The California Water Impact Network (C-WIN) and the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (CSPA) contend the Water Board has allowed the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau) to pump so much water each year from the beleaguered Delta that
The draining of the Delta has pushed many fish species to the brink of extinction and forced citizen groups to turn to the courts instead of the Water Board, which has primary authority for protecting the state's surface water supplies, the two groups contend.
"The Water Board has served as a handmaiden for decades to special interest groups instead of doing its job as a regulatory agency," says Carolee Krieger, chairwoman of the California Water Impact Network board of directors. "Dying fish populations and degraded drinking water are the result of this shocking dereliction of duty.”
Bill Jennings, executive director of CSPA, says that because of the ongoing failure of the Water Board to do its job, a federal judge in
"The stall-and-delay tactics of the Water Board as the
"Watching fisheries that God nurtured over tens of thousands of years being virtually destroyed in less than two decades while DWR, the Bureau and the State Board continue their embrace of denial is surely one of the most wretched and despicable spectacles we have ever witnessed," he says.
The two groups say that if the Water Board does not take decisive action to begin reversing the decline of the Delta within the next 60 days they will take the matter into state court.
Water Board action demanded by the two groups includes:
• Modification of existing water rights to improve the fishery;
• Mandatory daily flow requirements;
• Mandatory pulse flows during salmon migration;
• Functional fish passage facilities on all dams;
• State-of-the-art fish screens on all diversion points to prevent young fish from being ground up in the Delta pumps or sucked down irrigation ditches;
• Requiring the California Department of Water Resources and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to begin actually complying with all water and fishery protection laws; and.
• Establishing minimum pool and temperature requirements on all water storage reservoirs to protect fish.
The petition requests the board to begin holding evidentiary hearings including testimony under oath, cross-examination and rebuttal on the issues raised as soon as possible. #
http://www.centralvalleybusinesstimes.com/stories/001/?ID=8160
INVASIVE SPECIES:
Guest Column: Everyone needs to work together on invasive species
By Doug Johnson, executive director of the nonprofit
Those working in agriculture are no strangers to the impacts of invasive species. Non-native weeds, plant diseases and insect pests have challenged producers for millennia. In
Only in recent years have those working in another field, that of natural resource protection and habitat restoration, begun to recognize the full extent to which invasive species impact their work as well. Invasive species are now acknowledged as a top threat to biodiversity, second only to outright habitat destruction. For lands that have been protected from development, invasives are the No. 1 threat.
At least half of the species federally listed as threatened or endangered are significantly impacted by invasive species, and invasives are implicated as primary stressors for 415 special status species in
More than ever, agricultural and environmental stakeholders are seizing the opportunity to work together on conservation issues. Successful collaborations like the Rangeland Conservation Coalition or the California Roundtable on Agriculture and the Environment show the great potential for joint efforts to address long-standing challenges. When diverse stakeholders build the trust necessary to work together, a synergy develops that benefits all participants. Nowhere is this approach more essential than in the invasive species arena.
When it comes to controlling invasive plants on the ground, weed workers recognize that "invasive plants ignore fences." Removing weeds on your property does not do much good if they move back in from a neighbor's land. To address this need for coordination,
These collaborative groups bring together public agencies, private land managers, and conservation organizations to coordinate top-priority weed control projects. A project could, for instance, have Caltrans, the U.S. Forest Service, a land trust and a rancher all working together to address a mutual weed infestation that could not be effectively addressed by any one of the partners alone. With a small amount of state funding for seed grants, WMAs leverage diverse resources for on-the-ground to weed control, while keeping an eye out for new plants that might be spreading.
This same sort of coordination is critical at the state level as well. At least 20 state and federal agencies work on invasive species in
Doug Johnson is executive director of the nonprofit California Invasive Plant Council, a membership organization for land managers, researchers, volunteers and concerned citizens. Visit www.cal-ipc.org for more information on invasive plants in
http://www.cfbf.com/agalert/AgAlertStory.cfm?ID=1007&ck=D7322ED717DEDF1EB4E6E52A37EA7BCD
####
No comments:
Post a Comment