This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 11/5/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

November 5, 2007

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People

 

WATER PROJECTS LEGISLATION:

Water bill override expected; Legislation essential for area, Herger says - Marysville Appeal Democrat

 

Bush's water bill veto blasted; House, Senate leaders vow to override choice - Desert Sun

 

COLORADO RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN:

Plan manages Colorado River in drought; SLC hydrologist says the arrangement means 'everyone shares the pain' - Salt Lake Tribune

 

Guidelines proposed for river use - Mohave Daily News

 

LAKE MEAD LEVELS:

Out West, a Falling Lake Lowers All Boats - New York Times

 

DELTA LEVEES:

Expert: Delta due for a quake - Brentwood Press

 

SOLANO IRRIGATION DISTRICT CAMPAIGN:

SID board campaign a race redux - Vacaville Reporter

 

GM RESIGNS AT EL DORADO IRRIGATION DISTRICT:

General manager resigns - Sacramento Bee

 

 

WATER PROJECTS LEGISLATION:

Water bill override expected; Legislation essential for area, Herger says

Marysville Appeal Democrat – 11/3/07

By John Dickey, staff writer

 

President Bush vetoed legislation Friday that offers more than $20 billion for flood control and other water projects across the country, including funding to repair Marysville’s levees.

Congress promptly scheduled votes next week that are expected to override his action.

When the House votes as early as Tuesday, Rep. Wally Herger, R-Chico, will be among those expected to vote again for the Water Resources Development Act of 2007.

Herger said that while he supports the president’s attempts to hold down spending, the legislation is very important for his district’s safety.

The act authorizes as much as $107 million for one project alone, the Yuba River Basin project, which would provide money to repair Marysville’s levees.

“An issue that affects health and safety like this water bill is something that I will override,” said Herger.

The legislation includes more than $1.3 billion in authorizations for 54 flood control, ecosystem restoration and other water projects in California, according to Sen. Barbara Boxer’s office.

Herger’s district, which covers the Mid-Valley, is among the places that could benefit from the legislation if Congress overrides the president’s veto.

Other Herger district projects that could see money from the authorization bill include the Hamilton City J Levee flood protection project to build a new levee in the Glenn County community. The existing levee is so shaky that Hamilton City has been evacuated six times. A $500,000 authorization would continue preconstruction and design activities, according to a Herger press release.

There is also as much as $23 million in funding authorized to fix erosion sites along the Sacramento River that threaten a fish screen and irrigation pumps in Glenn and Colusa counties.

The legislation is an authorization bill with actual appropriation amounts to be set in a separate piece of legislation.

Both the House and Senate passed the act with substantial majorities sufficient to override the president’s veto if they hold. The House voted 381-40 for the legislation, while the Senate voted 81-12.

Boxer, chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, said work has already begun across party lines to override what she called an “ill-advised veto.”

“We haven’t had a WRDA bill in almost seven years, leaving many of California’s and our nation’s water infrastructure needs unmet,” said Boxer in a statement. “This WRDA bill provides critical flood protection for California, including authorizing necessary modifications at Folsom Dam to protect hundreds of thousands of people in the Sacramento area. It also authorizes critical environmental restoration projects, including projects at the Los Angeles River and the Salton Sea.” #

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/news/legislation_56098___article.html/water_herger.html

 

 

Bush's water bill veto blasted; House, Senate leaders vow to override choice

Desert Sun – 11/3/07

By Diana Marrero and Maria Lee, staff writers

 

A bill that would authorize $23 billion for more than 900 water projects across the country was vetoed by President Bush on Friday.

 

Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., criticized Bush, saying his veto "breaks his commitment to America's communities to make them economically strong and protect them from flooding."

 

Here are some questions and answers about what the bill would do and what the veto means:

 

QUESTION: What would the bill do?

 

ANSWER: The bill, known as the Water Resources Development Act, doesn't include any money. Instead, it sets spending limits for specific U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects for shipping, flood control and environmental restoration projects, as well as local drinking water and wastewater treatment plants. Money for the projects, which isn't a sure thing, would be part of an appropriations bills to be considered next year.

 

What would the bill do for California?

 

The water bill authorizes more than $1 billion in water projects in California, including:

 

$40 million to establish a statewide program for critical water quality projects in California.

 

$30 million for restoration of the Salton Sea, which is shrinking, creating air quality problems in the Coachella Valleys.

 

Construction of a wastewater system for the Mission Springs Water District, which serves Desert Hot Springs and the surrounding areas.

 

A flood study in Yucca Valley to examine whether to construct detention basins and other facilities in the West Burnt Mountain basin.

 

A study to determine flood control measures in the Pinto Basin area of Twentynine Palms.

 

Why did President Bush veto the water projects bill?

 

He questions why local water treatment plans are included since they aren't part of the Army Corps of Engineers mission. He says the legislation would add to the Corps' backlog of pending work and there wouldn't be enough money for all the projects.

"American taxpayers should not be asked to support a pork-barrel system of federal authorization and funding where a project's merit is an afterthought," Bush said in a statement.

 

What happens next?

 

The water projects bill passed the House 381-40 and the Senate 81-12. A veto override attempt is expected next week.

 

When would projects begin?

 

Getting a project listed in the authorization bill doesn't guarantee funding. Funding decisions will come next year. If a project receives funding in 2008, the actual work might not begin until 2009. Complications could mean an even longer wait, an Army Corps of Engineers spokesman said. #

http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007711030317

 

 

COLORADO RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN:

Plan manages Colorado River in drought; SLC hydrologist says the arrangement means 'everyone shares the pain'

Salt Lake Tribune – 11/3/07

By Patty Henetz, staff writer

 

The Law of the River has gotten another adjustment with a federal plan to manage the Colorado River during dry years.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation on Friday released a final environmental impact study that could be a way to avoid renegotiating an 85-year-old agreement based on inflated notions of how much water really is in the river.

Or, according to river advocates, the plan that will govern use and allocation through 2026 could be a way to ensure none of the seven Western states that share the river ever has enough water.

The study's conclusions drew from a consensus decision by the seven Western states that depend on the Colorado River on what to do during low-water years, officials said.

"This is an arrangement for operating the river where everyone shares the pain when you're going through a drought time," said Tom Ryan, a Bureau of Reclamation hydrologist in Salt Lake City.

The Bureau of Reclamation began the environmental study in 1999. Since then, the river basin has experienced the worst drought in 100 years of recorded history, and its two largest reservoirs - Lake Powell and Lake Mead - have gone from being nearly full to just over half-full.

The report, expected to be final in December, plans how the upper basin states - Utah, Colorado, Wyoming and New Mexico - will respond to demand from California, Arizona and Nevada, the lower basin states, which have more people and older water rights.

While the Bureau of Reclamation implicitly acknowledges that the 1922 Colorado River Compact is based on estimates from unusually wet years and its report assumes ongoing shortages, it doesn't suggest any changes to the agreement.

"Nobody wants to renegotiate the compact. The feeling is the compact provides an adequate framework for managing the river," Ryan said.

But to John Weisheit, conservation director for the non-profit organization Living Rivers, the bureau's solution entrenches wastefulness and refuses to acknowledge ways to store water more effectively.

"We're extremely disappointed," he said. "Now we're playing this balancing act between two reservoirs that climate change is going to keep empty."

Living Rivers has long campaigned to decommission the Glen Canyon dam and rely on Lake Mead for surface water storage.

 

The organization also believes using aquifers in Arizona and California to store water underground would be a better solution.

 

But the main problem with the bureau's solution is there's not enough water, which speeds destruction of the river ecosystem, Weisheit said. #

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_7358233

 

 

Guidelines proposed for river use

Mohave Daily News – 11/4/07

 

BOULDER CITY, Nev. - Commissioner of Reclamation Robert Johnson has announced that the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation issued a final Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed adoption of specific Colorado River Lower Basin shortage guidelines and coordinated reservoir management strategies aimed at the operation of Lake Powell and Lake Mead under low reservoir conditions.

 

“These proposed operational guidelines will provide Colorado River water users and managers in the U.S. a greater degree of certainty about how the two large reservoirs on the Colorado River will be operated under low water conditions, and when - and by how much - water deliveries will be reduced in the Lower Basin in drought or other low reservoir conditions,” Johnson said in a press release issued Friday.

The Final EIS presents six alternatives, including a no action alternative and a preferred Alternative. The preferred alternative proposes that:

 

- Specific water levels in Lake Mead be used to determine when a shortage condition - the availability of less than 7.5 million acre-feet - would be declared in the lower Colorado River Basin, and how that shortage would be shared by the three Lower Division states - Arizona, California and Nevada;

- Specific reservoir conditions at lakes Powell and Mead be used to determine the annual operation of the reservoirs, in a manner that would minimize shortages in the lower basin and avoid the risk of water delivery curtailments in the upper basin;

- A mechanism be implemented to encourage and account for augmentation and conservation of water supplies in Lake Mead to minimize the likelihood and severity of potential future shortages and to provide additional flexibility to meet water use needs, particularly under low reservoir conditions; and

- The Interim Surplus Guidelines established in 2001 be modified and extended through 2026.

“The Preferred Alternative was developed by Reclamation after extensive collaborative efforts with the Colorado River Basin States, environmental organizations and other stakeholders,” Johnson said in the press release. “It was designed to allow the river to be managed to meet the demands being placed on it today and into the future. I commend the states and all the other stakeholders who worked so long and hard to develop these guidelines and management strategies - this truly is an historic accomplishment.”

Development of the guidelines was spurred by the current drought in the Colorado River Basin, which began in the fall of 1999.

In the eight years since then, the Basin has experienced the worst drought conditions in 100 years of recorded history, and storage in Colorado River reservoirs has dropped from nearly full to about 54 percent of capacity.

Because there are currently no specific guidelines for determining shortage conditions in the lower basin, or the coordinated operation of Lake Powell and Lake Mead during drought and low reservoir conditions, a public process was initiated in September 2005 to develop them. They are expected to be adopted in December, and take effect in January. They would then be used each year through 2026 to develop the annual operating plan for Colorado River reservoirs.

The Final EIS is available for viewing and copying at Reclamation's project Web site, www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/strategies.html. Alternatively, a compact disc or hard copy is available upon written request to: Regional Director, Lower Colorado Region, Bureau of Reclamation, Attention: BCOO-1005, P.O. Box 61470, Boulder City, Nevada 89006-1470; fax at 702-293-8156; or e-mail at strategies@lc.usbr.gov. #

http://www.mohavedailynews.com/articles/2007/11/05/news/top_story/top1.txt

 

 

LAKE MEAD LEVELS:

Out West, a Falling Lake Lowers All Boats

New York Times – 11/4/07

By Dan Barry, staff writer

 

All aboard the Desert Princess for the 2 o’clock tour of historic Lake Mead, and please smile for your souvenir photograph, available for purchase at the end of this excursion. What a beautiful afternoon, with the sky an endless ocean of blue. Not a rain cloud in sight.

 

Loaded now with its camera-wielding cargo, the paddle-wheeling Desert Princess begins a lake loop that will include a reverent pause before the majestic Hoover Dam. Kick back in the enclosed bar, or grab one of the plastic seats on the open top deck, and drink it all in:

 

The glassy surface waters of the lake. The looming desert hills, now umber, now chocolate. The chalky whiteness that covers the lake-side faces of those hills; a wall of white, really, rising dozens of feet in the air and prompting one’s inner naturalist to wonder, What the heck is that?

 

As the boat churns along, a recorded narration discusses everything from the dinosaurs that once roamed to the gradual filling of what is now Lake Mead, after the dam’s completion in 1935. But the disembodied narrator never mentions those prominent hills of white defining the view from port and starboard, bow and stern.

 

Explanation, then, is left to a sun-baked, window-washing deckhand. He lowers his squeegee and, with the inflection of someone struggling to be patient with the slow-witted, says: “We’re in a nine-year drought.”

 

That whiteness covering the desert hillsides is a sort of bathtub ring, measuring through calcium and other mineral deposits how much the water level has dropped in Lake Mead over the years, but especially within the last decade. And if you squint and look way, way up, you can see signs at the very tops of some of those hills that, in effect, say the open air is closed to water skiing.

 

The melting snow on the western slopes of the Rockies feeds into the Colorado River to flow west and south, across parts of Colorado, Utah and Arizona, and, since the construction of the dam, into Lake Mead, some 30 miles east of that study in population explosion, Las Vegas. The lake’s water level has risen and fallen, like a sleeping man’s chest, but never has the drop been quite like this.

 

Lake Mead is at 49 percent of capacity,” says Scott Huntley, spokesman for the Southern Nevada Water Authority. In other words: half empty.

 

True, the lake’s water level was this low 45 years ago, though Mr. Huntley attributes much of that to the filling of Lake Powell, 490 miles upriver in Utah. And true, the water level fluctuates naturally; that is why the Desert Princess’s onboard narration never utters the word “drought,” a spokeswoman explains.

 

But the lake was lapping at the top of Hoover Dam just two decades ago, making this drought all the more unnerving. For years its “normal” elevation ranged between 1,180 and 1,220 feet above sea level; today it is at 1,111 feet, and predicted to drop below 1,100 feet within two years.

 

Now there are tense meetings among several states that rely on the Colorado for drinking water, power production and crop irrigation. Now the head of the water authority here attributes the drought’s length and severity to climate change. Now the operative word is “conserve.”

 

Roxanne Dey, a National Park Service spokeswoman for the Lake Mead National Recreation Area, says that believe it or not, the drought has had at least one positive impact: “It reminds people here that we live in a desert.”

 

The Desert Princess, which is available for romantic evening cruises, class reunions and Christmas parties, turns to face the Hoover Dam, a stunning gray wall of concrete 726 feet high and 1,244 feet across. Here in the wildness of the Black Canyon, it seems almost unreal, like a mirage.

 

The paddle-wheeler begins its grind back to shore. The bar is selling Lake Mead postcards taken when the water level was much higher, judging by the relative shortness of the white on the walls in the background. (Three years ago? Four?) The sound system is playing oldies music, lending a slight dance-band-on-the-Titanic effect to the journey.

 

The Desert Princess returns to its dock, the one it began using four years ago after the waters around its original dock became too shallow. But nothing is certain here; its owners continue to join the park service in moving operations to meet the receding shoreline. They call this expensive endeavor “chasing the water.”

 

What the Desert Princess narration leaves unmentioned, a fishing guide named Mark Edison lives. You can sometimes see his 24-footer skipping past the paddle-wheeler, carrying clients who seek virtue in fishing for striped bass after a smoky night of gambling. He is 48, with graying hair set off by tanned skin. Years ago he gave up his job as a corporate chef to ply waters now diminishing.

 

An hour after the Desert Princess docks in one marina, Mr. Edison launches his boat from another a few miles north, one that will move in a few months because its harbor is nearly unnavigable. “We used to launch way up there,” he says, pointing to a spot a few hundred yards up the dusty horizon.

 

His pointing continues: at a lone dock on a hill; at a camp in the dry distance that was once at waterside; at a squat water tank on Boulder Island that 75 years ago was instrumental in the Hoover Dam’s construction. Not long ago, only divers could see the tank; not long ago, Boulder Island was called the Boulder Islands.

 

There is still a lot of water in Lake Mead; at one point the sonar device on Mr. Edison’s boat indicates 400 feet of water beneath. Still, as he skims across this lake of human design, this lake made even more precious by uncertainty, he keeps watch for shoals not there yesterday. #

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/us/04land.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&ref=us&adxnnlx=1194279165-UQL/5ndzeh4VONWF2atu+Q

 

 

DELTA LEVEES:

Expert: Delta due for a quake

Brentwood Press – 11/2/07

By Dave Roberts, staff writer

 

The strongest earthquake to hit the Bay Area in 18 years on Tuesday night was a reminder that the ground can move at any time, especially in California. And if it moves in the area of the Delta, it could lead to massive levee failures with the resulting death and destruction as well as disruption to the state water supply, costing as much as $60 billion in economic losses.

“In the 1800s there was a lot of earthquake activity in the Delta. But after 1906 there’s been a lull,” said Les Harder, deputy director, California Department of Water Resources. “It’s fairly well agreed upon that the Delta has enjoyed a quiet seismic period, and that’s not going to last. Tectonic movements continue in the Bay Area. The faults are due to break again. We’ll expect to see larger earthquakes.”

Five days after Harder spoke those words, a 5.6-magnitude quake hit near San Jose. Harder was speaking at the Oct. 25 meeting of the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force, which is preparing recommendations for saving the Delta to be presented to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger later this year.

There is a 62-percent probability of a 6.2-magnitude or larger earthquake in the next 25 years in the Bay Area, said Harder. There’s a 28-percent chance that the levees on 30 or more Delta islands will fail simultaneously in that same time period due to a large quake. The west side of the Delta (the portion nearest East County) is expected to be hit harder than the eastern portion.

“The levees are relatively fragile for earthquake shaking,” said Harder. “They are not designed for this. (Economic losses) could be as much as $60 billion for a catastrophic event.”

Delta Task Force member Raymond Seed, who is a professor of civil engineering, said that unlike the isolated break in a levee that has been seen in the past, an earthquake would cause massive levee failures.

“Some of the seismic scenarios would require us to construct tens of miles, if not hundreds of miles, of levees,” said Seed. “It would be like starting over. Putting a few rocks in place is not going to stop the channels. We may need dredges where we can literally rebuild levees almost from scratch. It’s a task we should set for ourselves. It’s not a simple issue.”

It will cost anywhere from $25-52 million per mile of levee to make them seismically safer, so the tab could be enormous. As a result, choices may have to be made on which islands are most worth saving.

“The Delta is a place that has a value in itself and should be protected as the jewel that it is,” said Harder. “(But) we don’t have the funds to protect every single thing. (The emphasis will be on) some of the towns that are there, populations that are there and other points of value – which islands have people, habitat, and are critical for infrastructure. There’s a fair amount that we want to retain. It’s probably very much in the billions of dollars.”

Currently nowhere near that amount of money is available. Proposition 1E, the $4 billion Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond approved by voters last year, may provide at least $500 million for Delta levee protection, with another $300 million available from other sources. Reclamation districts can tap into those funds, receiving 75-percent reimbursement for levee repairs. About $57 million is being spent this year on levee repairs in California.

A proposal has been made to spend up to $74 million to stockpile rock and make other preparations to more quickly shore up levees in case of an earthquake.

Ron Baldwin of the San Joaquin County Office of Emergency Services told the task force that it’s important to put together a regional agency that will be in charge of the Delta when an earthquake occurs.

“Regional is a buzzword that everyone supports until you try to implement it,” said Baldwin. “We need a regional response system where we’re integrated and have a single organization responding. The prime directive is to hold the levees. If we hold the levee, we prevent a lot of tragedy. The real vision is: how do we get there? How do we overcome those barriers of turf?”

Linda Fiatt from the Delta Protection Commission said a group is forming to discuss how to transport people and animals off of the islands in case of levee failures.

“I was watching the media about the fires (in Southern California) and seeing the kids in the stadium with their goats and pets. If you ask people to leave their animals (behind in an emergency), they won’t do it. We’re going to talk about what currently exists out there and where the gaps are.”

To publicize and personalize the situation, Baldwin suggested creating a contest in which schoolchildren provide names for the levees.

Phil Isenberg, a former state assemblyman who once represented far East County and now chairs the Delta Task Force, jokingly suggested these two names: “Death and Destruction Levee” and “About to Fail Levee.” #

http://www.brentwoodpress.com/article.cfm?articleID=18050

 

 

SOLANO IRRIGATION DISTRICT CAMPAIGN:

SID board campaign a race redux

Vacaville Reporter – 11/4/07

By Robin Miller, City Editor

 

The quiet race for Solano Irrigation District's one contested seat is a repeat of the 2003 election.

 

Incumbent Bob Bishop of Vacaville is once again facing a challenge from local resident Terry Riddle.

 

Back in 2003, the race was low-key and Bishop, a Pleasants Valley Farmer garnered 67 percent of the vote.

 

This time around, the race has also been quiet with both candidates touting their backgrounds and experience as necessary for the growing challenges that face the SID.

 

Bishop, 72, has served eight years on the board and is a farmer in the area. He said he can "strike a balance between agricultural, municipal and industrial water needs," in his official campaign ballot statement.

 

"During my tenure on the board, I have consistently voted to maintain moderate water rates and not raise taxes," he noted.

 

"My in-depth understanding of the water distribution network and established working relationships with local and regional agencies will ensure that vital infrastructure needed for reliable, cost-effective, and equitable water distribution is maintained while meeting federal and state quality standards."

 

For his part, Riddle, 65, says his qualifications include his background as a rancher and his 18 years in the area.

 

"I am retired from a national agency with over 38 years of experience," he noted in his ballot statment. "I bring with me the following qualifications: Senior Administrator and Operations Officer with responsibilities including agency performance, financial accountability, budget planning, and oversight for 38 managers and over 2,000 employees."

 

He is also a volunteer associate director for the Solano Resource Conservation District and a trustee for the Solano County Wildlife Committee.

 

He also serves as a parks commissioner for the Solano County Parks and Recreation Commission, is a member of the Solano County Water Agency's Flood Control Advisory Committee and recently completed a two-year appointment on the Solano County grand jury.

 

"Water is one of Solano County's most important assets," he said. "The county is growing and changing, and Solano Irrigation District faces many challenges to successfully meet the water needs of its customers."

 

The Solano Irrigation District is in charge of water delivery to the county's vast agricultural areas, delivering water from Lake Berryessa, a federal water project.  #

http://www.thereporter.com//ci_7369495?IADID=Search-www.thereporter.com-www.thereporter.com

 

 

GM RESIGNS AT EL DORADO IRRIGATION DISTRICT:

General manager resigns

Sacramento Bee – 11/1/07

By Cathy Locke, staff writer

 

Ane Deister, general manager of the El Dorado Irrigation District for the past six years, announced last week that she will resign, effective Dec. 31.

 

She will join the engineering firm of Brown and Caldwell as an officer and vice president, according to a district news release.

 

She also will serve as restoration administrator for the federally sanctioned settlement agreement between the Friant Water Users Authority and the Natural Resources Defense Council to restore the San Joaquin River and salmon fisheries.

 

Bill George, district board president, said in the news release that while "we will miss her and appreciate the progress we have accomplished together, we also congratulate Ane and send her our best wishes in her career move."

 

George said the board has begun its search for a new general manager and has established a recruitment subcommittee consisting of directors George Osborne and George Wheeldon.

 

Deister said in the news release that she was especially proud of the district's progress over the past several years in improving customer service, securing water rights to ensure a reliable water supply, and in achieving a more solid financial footing. #

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost1.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

No comments:

Blog Archive